Simulated LC-MS Data Set for Assessing the Metabolomics Data Processing Pipeline Implemented into MVAPACK.

Metabolomics commonly relies on using one-dimensional (1D) 1H NMR spectroscopy or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) to derive scientific insights from large collections of biological samples. NMR and MS approaches to metabolomics require, among other issues, a data processing pipeline. Quantitative assessment of the performance of these software platforms is challenged by a lack of standardized data sets with "known" outcomes. To resolve this issue, we created a novel simulated LC-MS data set with known peak locations and intensities, defined metabolite differences between groups (i.e., fold change > 2, coefficient of variation ≤ 25%), and different amounts of added Gaussian noise (0, 5, or 10%) and missing features (0, 10, or 20%). This data set was developed to improve benchmarking of existing LC-MS metabolomics software and to validate the updated version of our MVAPACK software, which added gas chromatography-MS and LC-MS functionality to its existing 1D and two-dimensional NMR data processing capabilities. We also included two experimental LC-MS data sets acquired from a standard mixture andMycobacterium smegmatiscell lysates since a simulated data set alone may not capture all the unique characteristics and variability of real spectra needed to assess software performance properly. Our simulated and experimental LC-MS data sets were processed with the MS-DIAL and XCMSOnline software packages and our MVAPACK toolkit to showcase the utility of our data sets to benchmark MVAPACK against community standards. Our results demonstrate the enhanced objectivity and clarity of software assessment that can be achieved when both simulated and experimental data are employed since distinctly different software performances were observed with the simulated and experimental LC-MS data sets. We also demonstrate that the performance of MVAPACK is equivalent to or exceeds existing LC-MS software programs while providing a single platform for processing and analyzing both NMR and MS data sets.

Multiplatform untargeted metabolomics.

Metabolomics samples like human urine or serum contain upwards of a few thousand metabolites, but individual analytical techniques can only characterize a few hundred metabolites at best. The uncertainty in metabolite identification commonly encountered in untargeted metabolomics adds to this low coverage problem. A multiplatform (multiple analytical techniques) approach can improve upon the number of metabolites reliably detected and correctly assigned. This can be further improved by applying synergistic sample preparation along with the use of combinatorial or sequential non-destructive and destructive techniques. Similarly, peak detection and metabolite identification strategies that employ multiple probabilistic approaches have led to better annotation decisions. Applying these techniques also addresses the issues of reproducibility found in single platform methods. Nevertheless, the analysis of large data sets from disparate analytical techniques presents unique challenges. While the general data processing workflow is similar across multiple platforms, many software packages are only fully capable of processing data types from a single analytical instrument. Traditional statistical methods such as principal component analysis were not designed to handle multiple, distinct data sets. Instead, multivariate analysis requires multiblock or other model types for understanding the contribution from multiple instruments. This review summarizes the advantages, limitations, and recent achievements of a multiplatform approach to untargeted metabolomics.