Contrasting pediatric specialty provider opinion between contextualized and structured radiology reports.

BACKGROUND: Structured reporting (SR) replaced narrative (free text) reporting and utilizes templated headings and subheadings with findings typically based on the anatomy included in the examination. Its use has been widely advocated by radiology and non-radiology organizations as the new reporting standard. There are, however, shortcomings to SR, such as templated text not addressing a specific clinical indication. Contextual reporting (CR) fills this gap. CR is a type of SR which is tailored to a narrow clinical indication by including pertinent positive and negative findings for that specific clinical entity. OBJECTIVE: This study assesses provider preferences for CR as compared to SR in the pediatric practice environment using a survey methodology. METHODS & MATERIALS: Surveys with examples of SR and CR reports were sent electronically to two groups. One group was focused on neurological diseases and included pediatric specialists in neurosurgery, neurology, ENT, ED, and ophthalmology (190 people), referred to as the pediatric neuroimaging group. The pediatric neuroimaging group survey contained examples of CR and SR reports of an orbital CT for orbital cellulitis and a head CT for stroke. The other group was focused on gastrointestinal diseases, and included pediatric specialists in gastroenterology, general surgery, and the ED (159 people), referred to as the pediatric gastrointestinal (GI) imaging group. The pediatric GI imaging group survey contained example reports of an abdominal CT for appendicitis and an MRI enterography for Crohn's disease. Surveys utilizing a 5-point Likert scale were analyzed via Fischer's exact test with a p-value deemed statistically significant at less than 0.05. RESULTS: 349 individuals were contacted to participate in the survey. There were 81 (23 %, 81/349) survey respondents; 41 (22 %, 41/190) from the neuro group, and 40 (25 %, 40/159) from the GI group. 56 % (45/81) of all respondents preferred CR reports over traditional SR reports, while 29 % (23/81) did not. Most respondents (59 %, 48/81) indicated that CR reports are easier to interpret than traditional SR reports. Respondents from the pediatric neuroimaging group favored CR reports to a lesser degree (44 %, 36/81) compared to respondents from the pediatric GI imaging group (68 %, 55/81). CONCLUSIONS: We learned from this survey that it would be beneficial to be very intentional about selecting clinical indications where CR would be most valued rather than trying to develop CR for any specific clinical indication. The study results indicate it is reasonable to continue further efforts at exploring the utility of contextualized reports.

Incorporating Cardiovascular Risk Assessment into Adolescent Reproductive Health and Primary Care Visits.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the usability and feasibility of incorporating a cardiovascular risk assessment tool into adolescent reproductive health and primary care visits. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 60 young women ages 13-21 years to complete the HerHeart web-tool in 2 adolescent clinics in Atlanta, GA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants rated the tool's usability via the Website Analysis and Measurement Inventory (WAMMI, range 0-95) and their perceived 10-year and lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) on a visual analog scale (range 0-10). Participants' perceived risk, blood pressure, and body mass index were measured at baseline and 3 months after enrollment. Health care providers (HCP, n = 5) completed the WAMMI to determine the usability and feasibility of incorporating the HerHeart tool into clinical practice. RESULTS: Adolescent participants and HCPs rated the tool's usability highly on the WAMMI with a median of 79 (interquartile range [IQR] 65, 84) and 76 (IQR 71, 84). At the baseline visit, participants' median perceived 10-year risk of a heart attack was 1 (IQR 0, 3), and perceived lifetime risk was 2 (IQR 0, 4). Immediately after engaging with the tool, participants' median perceived 10-year risk was 2 (IQR 1, 4.3), and perceived lifetime risk was 3 (IQR 1.8, 6). Thirty-one participants chose to set a behavior change goal, and 12 participants returned for follow-up. Clinical metrics were similar at the baseline and follow-up visits. CONCLUSION: HerHeart is acceptable to young women and demonstrates potential for changing risk perception and improving health habits to reduce risk of CVD. Future research should focus on improving retention in studies to promote cardiovascular health within reproductive health clinics.

Distinguishing Clinical Features of Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome and Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical characteristics that distinguish cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) from cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS), 2 conditions marked by episodes of nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted to a large children's health care system from 2015 through 2022. Patients with CHS and CVS were identified by the electronic medical record using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision codes. RESULTS: Of 201 patients screened, 125 were included. Patients with CHS were older than those with CVS (mean [SD] 18.06 [1.41] vs 14.50 [2.91] years, P < .001). There were no significant differences in sex, race, ethnicity, or hospital length of stay between groups. Patients with CHS were more likely to have a positive urine drug screen (86% vs 2.9%, P < .001), lower mean (SD) serum potassium (3.62 [0.77] vs 3.88 [0.49], P < .001), and greater mean (SD) serum creatinine (0.83 (0.41) vs 0.63 (0.17), P < .001). The average (SD) systolic blood pressure was significantly greater in patients with CHS (systolic blood pressure 124.46 [10.66] vs 118.55 [10.99], P = .032) compared with children of comparable age range with CVS. Imaging was obtained in 36% of all patients, and only 2.4% had abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical features including older age, greater systolic blood pressure, positive urine drug screen, and select electrolyte findings might distinguish CHS from CVS. Abdominal imaging in both conditions is of low yield. These findings may allow for early recognition and appropriate therapy in CHS patients.

Assessment of Disaster Preparedness at the Household Level in a Pediatric Cardiology Clinic Population.

Natural and human-provoked disasters pose serious health risks to children, particularly children and youth with special healthcare needs, including many cardiology patients. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) provides preparedness recommendations for families, but little is known about recommendation adherence. Caregivers of children seen in a pediatric cardiology clinic network were recruited to complete an electronic survey. Participants self-reported child medical history and their household's implementation of AAP recommended disaster preparedness items. Families received a link to AAP resources and a child ID card. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. 320 caregivers participated in the study, of whom 124 (38.8%) indicated that their child has a diagnosed cardiac condition, and 150 (46.9%) indicated that their child had special healthcare needs. The average preparedness item completion rate was 70.7% for household preparedness, 40.1% for reunification preparedness, and 26.3% for community preparedness. Households of children with medical needs had similar rates of preparedness compared to overall rates. Of all respondents, 27.8% previously received disaster preparedness resources, 67.7% would like resources on discussing disaster preparedness, and 93.0% intend to talk with their household about disaster preparedness after completing the survey. These results demonstrate a gap between AAP recommendations and household-level disaster preparedness, including patients with cardiac conditions and those with special healthcare needs. Families expressed that they were interested in getting resources for disaster preparedness. Pediatric cardiologists may consider asking about disaster preparedness and providing disaster preparedness resources tailored to the needs of their patients.

A Mixed-methods Examination of Culturally Responsive Adaptation to an Evidence-based Parent-mediated Intervention Implemented for Autistic Children.

Parent-mediated interventions (PMIs) are considered an evidence-based practice for fostering social communication skills in young autistic children and for promoting parent responsivity and empowerment, yet barriers to caregiver engagement are evident when PMIs are implemented within historically underserved community settings. Issues of caregiver engagement can reflect a lack of fit between PMIs and the needs of diverse families. We used a mixed methods approach to examine barriers to participating in an evidence-based PMI, Project ImPACT (Ingersoll & Dvortcsak, 2019), within an outpatient setting, as well as strategies that clinicians reported using to deliver and adapt Project ImPACT for minoritized families. Participants included 134 caregivers of a child 13 to 48 months with autism or other social communication differences and six clinicians delivering Project ImPACT. Findings suggest that caregivers experience barriers to participating in Project ImPACT and that these barriers are associated with caregivers' ability to complete the program. Although quantitative findings indicate that adaptation to Project ImPACT did not differ by caregiver and child background, qualitative findings highlighted that clinicians attempt to deliver Project ImPACT to respond to the needs of families from minoritized backgrounds by actively considering the family's culture, psychosocial experiences, goals, and specific barriers. Further, both qualitative and quantitative findings suggest that culturally responsive care and adaptations may support caregiver engagement, including rapport, trust, buy-in, and attendance. Approaches to center cultural alongside contextual/psychosocial considerations within family-centered care in the implementation of PMIs are also highlighted.

Trends in sedation-analgesia practices in pediatric liver transplant patients admitted postoperatively to the pediatric intensive care unit: An analysis of data from the pediatric health information system (PHIS) database.

BACKGROUND: Children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), after liver transplantation, frequently require analgesia and sedation in the immediate postoperative period. Our objective was to assess trends and variations in sedation and analgesia used in this cohort. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System from 2012 to 2022. RESULTS: During the study period, 3963 patients with liver transplantation were admitted to the PICU from 32 US children's hospitals with a median age of 2 years [IQR: 0.00, 10.00]. 54 percent of patients received mechanical ventilation (MV). Compared with patients without MV, those with MV were more likely to receive morphine (57% vs 49%, p < .001), fentanyl (57% vs 44%), midazolam (45% vs 31%), lorazepam (39% vs. 24%), dexmedetomidine (38% vs 30%), and ketamine (25% vs 12%), all p < .001. Vasopressor usage was also higher in MV patients (22% vs. 35%, p < .001). During the study period, there was an increasing trend in the utilization of dexmedetomidine and ketamine, but the use of benzodiazepine decreased (p < .001). CONCLUSION: About 50% of patients who undergo liver transplant are placed on MV in the PICU postoperatively and receive a greater amount of benzodiazepines in comparison with those without MV. The overall utilization of dexmedetomidine and ketamine was more frequent, whereas the administration of benzodiazepines was less during the study period. Pediatric intensivists have a distinctive opportunity to collaborate with the liver transplant team to develop comprehensive guidelines for sedation and analgesia, aimed at enhancing the quality of care provided to these patients.

Feasibility of recruiting adolescents into a prospective cohort study of the effects of social isolation during COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Social connection and loneliness in adolescence are increasingly understood as critical influences on adult mental and physical health. The unique impact of the social isolation imposed by the COVID-19 lockdown on emerging adults is therefore expected to be especially profound. We sought to investigate the feasibility of using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and wearable accelerometers to characterize the effects of social isolation and/or loneliness experienced by adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We recruited 19 participants aged 13-18 from an Adolescent Medicine practice in Atlanta, GA. Participants completed surveys at baseline and throughout a 2-week study period using EMA regarding their degree of social isolation, loneliness, family functioning, school climate, social media use, and COVID-19 experiences surrounding their physical, mental, and social domains. Six participants agreed to wear an activity tracker and heart rate measurement device for 14 days to monitor their emotional state and physical health. Participant feedback was collected via open-ended exit interviews. Feasibility of recruitment/retention, adherence, and outcome measures were investigated. Implementation was also assessed by evaluating the barriers and facilitators to study delivery. Associations between the social isolation and loneliness variables and all other variables were performed with univariate linear regression analysis with significance set at p < 0.05. The progression criteria were a recruitment rate of > 30% and a retention rate of > 80%. RESULTS: Progression criteria were met for recruitment (76%) of participants, but not retention (38%). Adherence to EMA survey completion was highly variable with only 54% completing ≥ 1 survey a day, and accelerometry use was not feasible. Social isolation was significantly correlated with lower school climate, higher COVID-19 experiences, higher depression scores, and lower sleep quality. Loneliness also showed a significant correlation with all these factors except COVID-19 experiences. CONCLUSIONS: EMA and wearable accelerometer use was not feasible in this longitudinal study of adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should further investigate barriers to conducting long-term research with adolescents and the potential effects of the pandemic on subject recruitment and retention.