RESUMEN
Objective: Osteoarthritis of the knee (knee OA) is a serious joint disease leading to pain and reduced quality of life. Pharmacological treatments include anti-inflammatories, analgesics, intraarticular hyaluronic acid, and intraarticular corticosteroids while for severe knee OA, knee replacement is an option. This study examined the incidence, prevalence, patient characteristics, and uptake of medical and surgical treatments in knee OA patients in Germany. Design: A non-interventional, retrospective health claims data analysis with anonymized data from the InGef database was performed. Patients ≥18 years were analyzed cross-sectionally for each year 2015-2020. Newly diagnosed patients in 2015 were also longitudinally analyzed until end of 2020. Results: Annual knee OA prevalence increased from 7.07 â% in 2015 to 7.39 â% in 2020. Annual incidence proportions ranged from 1.71 â% in 2015 to 1.46 â% in 2020. Knee replacement was the most common surgery, with rising patient numbers (e.g., 7918 patients in 2015 and 8975 patients in 2019). Approximately 62 â% of patients newly diagnosed in 2015 received prescription pharmacological pain treatment during follow-up. Most (96.95 â%) received non-opioid analgesics, followed by weak opioids (8.14 â%) and strong opioids (3.00 â%) as first-line treatment (combinations possible). Knee surgery was performed in 16.6 â% of patients during follow-up. Median time from first diagnosis until surgery was 346 days for any knee surgery and 564 days for knee replacement. Conclusions: The number of patients with knee OA in Germany is steadily rising, along with an increasing number of surgical interventions, especially knee replacement. Time until first surgery and knee replacement is relatively short, even for newly diagnosed patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IAHA) products are often used in the treatment of adults with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The International Symposium on Intra-Articular Treatment (ISIAT) convened a multidisciplinary technical expert panel to define characteristics for an innovative IAHA product that should answer unmet needs in the clinical management of adults with mild-to-moderate KOA. METHODS: An initial set of evidence-based statements was developed based on data extracted from articles identified through a comprehensive literature search. A Delphi panel comprising 19 experts in KOA voted in 3 rounds to rate their degree of agreement with accepted statements. RESULTS: The final set of 13 accepted statements focus on the effect of an innovative IAHA across 5 key domains of nociceptive pain, joint function, quality of life, joint structure and integrity, and adverse effects. The statements set thresholds for clinically meaningful improvements that exceed those generally achievable by currently available IAHA products. CONCLUSION: The characteristics described by these statements from the ISIAT set new standards for what should be expected from an innovative IAHA. These statements should serve as a framework for driving the development of innovative IAHA products that will surpass the actual outcomes achieved by current viscosupplements in patients with mild-to-moderate KOA.
RESUMEN
Background: Early stage of osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized by joint stiffness and pain as well as by subclinical structural changes that may affect cartilage, synovium, and bone. At the moment, the lack of a validated definition of early osteoarthritis (EOA) does not allow to make an early diagnosis and adopt a therapeutic strategy to slow disease progression. Also, no questionnaires are available to evaluate the early stage, and therefore this remains an unmet need. Objective: Therefore, the purpose of the technical experts panel (TEP) of 'International Symposium of intra-articular treatment' (ISIAT) was to create a specific questionnaire to evaluate and monitor the follow-up and clinical progress of patients affected by early knee OA. Design: The items for the Early Osteoarthritis Questionnaire (EOAQ) were identified according to the following steps: items generation, items reduction, and pre-test submission. Methods: During the first step, literature has been reviewed and a comprehensive list of items about pain and function in knee EOA was drafted. Then, during the ISIAT (5th edition 2019), the draft has been discussed by the board, which reformulated, deleted, or subdivided some of the items. After the ISIAT symposium, the draft was submitted to 24 subjects affected by knee OA. A score based on the importance and the frequency was created and the items with a score ⩾0.75 were selected. After intermediate evaluation made by a sample of patients, the second and final version of the questionnaire EOAQ was submitted to the whole board for final analysis and acceptance in a second meeting (29 January 2021). Results: After an exhaustive elaboration, the final version of the questionnaire contains two domains (Clinical Features and Patients Reported Outcome) with respectively 2 and 9 questions, for a total of 11 questions. Questions mainly explored the fields of early symptoms and patients reported outcomes. Marginally, the need of the symptoms treatment and the use of painkillers were investigated. Conclusions: Adoption of diagnostic criteria of early OA is strongly encouraged and a specific questionnaire for the whole management of the clinical features and patients' outcome might really improve the evolution of OA in the early stages of the disease, when the treatment is expected to be more effective.
RESUMEN
RATIONALE: Viscosupplementation (VS) with hyaluronic acid is widely used in the management of knee osteoarthritis. There is no clear recommendation on the decision-making to achieve VS. DESIGN: Based on extensive research of the literature and expert opinion, the members of the EUROVISCO (European Viscosupplementation Consensus Group) task force were asked to give their degree of agreement with 60 issues, using a Delphi method. RESULTS: The expert panel achieved unanimous agreement in favor of the following statements: It is recommended to assess pain on a visual or 10-point numeric scale before considering VS. VS can be considered for patients with pain scores between 3 and 8. A standard x-ray must be obtained before the decision of VS. If the x-ray is normal, osteoarthritis must be confirmed by MRI or computed tomography (CT) arthrogram before considering VS. The aims of VS are relieving pain, improving function, and reducing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) consumption. The use of VS must not be considered for treating an osteoarthritis flare. VS can be envisaged as a first-line pharmacological treatment in patients having a contra-indication to NSAIDs or analgesics. VS can be considered in patients with contra-indications to arthroplasty. In the case of severe comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, gastrointestinal disorders, renal failure), VS can avoid the use of potentially dangerous treatments. VS can be considered in patients receiving antiplatelet agents, vitamin K antagonists, and direct factor Xa or thrombin inhibitors. Five other statements obtained a high level of consensus. CONCLUSION: These recommendations, illustrated in a decision algorithm, have been established to help practitioners in the decision-making of knee VS.
Asunto(s)
Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Viscosuplementación , Humanos , Viscosuplementación/métodos , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Hialurónico/uso terapéutico , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
The aim of the present work is an overview of current concepts in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures, risk factors, clinical presentation and conservative and operative management. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are a widespread problem, affecting between 700,000 and 1.5 million adults annually in the USA alone. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures can cause severe physical impairment, including back pain, dysfunction, and progressive thoracic kyphosis. Mortality after osteoporotic vertebral fractures is still increased compared to age-matched controls. In the reality of care, advocates of purely conservative therapy as well as advocates of surgical treatment can be found all over the world. In summary, understanding the risk factors, appropriate clinical evaluation and treatment strategies are crucial. When surgery is indicated, balloon kyphoplasty shows significantly better pain reduction and lower mortality compared to nonsurgical treatment.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas por Compresión , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fracturas por Compresión/diagnóstico , Fracturas por Compresión/terapia , Fracturas por Compresión/etiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/diagnóstico , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/terapia , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Columna VertebralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In microbiological diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) there is no consensus regarding the most suitable and optimal number of specimens to be cultured or the most effective technique of tissue processing. This comparative study analysed the accuracy of two semi-automated homogenization methods with special focus on the volume and exact origin of each sample. METHODS: We investigated a total of 722 periprosthetic tissue samples. PJI was defined according to the new scoring system for preoperative and intraoperative criteria. We compared the performance of our routinely used single tissue processing by disposable high-frequency disperser with the bead milling method. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included. Among forty classified PJIs, 34 patients yielded positive culture results. In 23 cases (68%) exact concordant results were generated with both techniques. However, in seven cases (20%) processing by the disperser and in four cases (12%) by bead milling provided additional positive samples, but without significant difference since the major definition criteria were met in all cases. The percentage of positive results was influenced by the volume and origin of the tissue samples. Results for small tissue samples tended to be better using the bead milling method. This might lead to improved preoperative arthroscopic diagnosis, as the volume of biopsies is generally limited. Six patients had negative results due to previous antimicrobial therapy. Forty other patients were classified as aseptic failures. Neither procedure resulted in any contamination. CONCLUSION: Both methods enable reliable processing of tissue samples for diagnosis of PJI and are suitable for routine use.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Artritis Infecciosa/microbiología , Biopsia , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
The inverse total shoulder prosthesis is a standard treatment for cuff arthropathy. The number of implanted inverse total shoulder prostheses in Germany is significantly higher than that of the anatomical total shoulder prosthesis. Kaplan-Meier analyses show a 10-year result of inverse total shoulder prostheses after cuff arthropathy of 90%. The extent of the scapular notching correlates with the functional clinical outcome. The humeral anchoring principles of inverse total shoulder prosthesis differ considerably (from purely epiphyseal to diaphyseal). Inverse total shoulder prostheses show significant differences in humeral and glenoid offset as well as in shaft-neck angles. The large number of systems available differ considerably concerning anatomical and biomechanical parameters - the surgeons must be trained accordingly. Still, most shoulder replacements are implanted by surgeons who rarely perform this procedure.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Artropatías , Prótesis Articulares , Articulación del Hombro , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/métodos , Humanos , Artropatías/cirugía , Diseño de Prótesis , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Stemless humeral components for shoulder arthroplasty represent the fourth generation of modern prosthetic shoulder implants. Because of their metaphyseal fixation, the implantation technique is rather straightforward and preserves the humeral canal from violation. Substantial benefits have been highlighted with such a design, including less perioperative morbidity, independence from the proximal humeral anatomy, preservation of bone stock, ease of potential revision surgeries, and limited risk of complex periprosthetic fractures. Initially conceived to better re-create the center of rotation of the humeral head in anatomic arthroplasties, their use has been successfully extended to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Provided that contraindications are respected (eg, poor proximal humeral bone quality, proximal humerus fractures, patients who are elderly and/or overweight), short-term and midterm functional outcomes as well as postoperative complications appear to be similar to those of traditional stemmed implants, without increased risk of loosening of the humeral component.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Articulación del Hombro , Prótesis de Hombro , Anciano , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/efectos adversos , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/métodos , Humanos , Cabeza Humeral/cirugía , Húmero/anatomía & histología , Húmero/cirugía , Diseño de Prótesis , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Prótesis de Hombro/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
In this article the causes of arthritis in the region of the ankle are introduced and the conservative treatment options are described and discussed more extensively. The risks of treatment with nonopioid analgesics (NOPA) are presented in detail. The topical use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) should always be considered in the clinical routine. If contraindications for oral NSAIDs are present, intra-articular treatment is a meaningful option. The best evidence is currently available for viscosupplementation but the study situation for the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is still not sufficiently comprehensive and there are only a few case reports on the use of mesenchymal stem cells..
Asunto(s)
Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Tobillo , Tratamiento Conservador , Humanos , Ácido Hialurónico/uso terapéutico , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This work studied if and how current clinical practice agrees with European Viscosupplementation Consensus Group (EUROVISCO) recommendations and how this agreement might be different according to physician's specialization. In addition, this work aimed to identify key decision factors that practitioners consider in their decision to retreat or not a patient with hyaluronic acid viscosupplementation. METHODS: Practitioners have been invited by e-mail to participate in an online exercise on viscosupplementation retreatment. They received a fictional patient case at random among a set of predefined fictional cases. The platform asked the practitioner if he/she would retreat the patient with viscosupplementation or not. To take a decision, the practitioner could select questions among a list of predefined questions. Among them, some were related to criteria used in the EUROVISCO decision tree and others served as confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 506 practitioners participated to the exercise, of which 399 gave their decision about the case assigned to them by the platform. The observed agreement between practitioner decisions and EUROVISCO recommendations was 58.89 ± 4.95% (95% confidence interval [CI]). Overall, the decision to retreat was taken in 47.87% of the cases, while the EUROVISCO guidelines follow-up would have led to 55.89% retreatment for the same cases (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In current practice, physicians tended to reinject their patients less than recommended, although EUROVISCO guidelines for viscosupplementation retreatment consider decision criteria that clearly correspond to those of practitioners in real life. These include the patients' willingness to be treated or the patients' perception of the effectiveness of the treatment.
Asunto(s)
Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Viscosuplementación , Consenso , Femenino , Humanos , Ácido Hialurónico/uso terapéutico , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/tratamiento farmacológico , Retratamiento , Viscosuplementos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Viscosupplementation (VS) is a symptomatic treatment for knee and other joint osteoarthritis (OA). Despite a long history of use, conflicting opinions remain on the best clinical indications and the most appropriate patients to be treated with intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IA-HA), the optimal dosing regimen and the modalities of retreatment. A multidisciplinary committee of European experts on OA (EUROVISCO) was constituted to formulate recommendations, aimed at helping physicians in the decision-making and the optimal achievement of VS. Before each session members were tasked to collate an exhaustive literature review. Level of evidence and strength of recommendation were based on the level of agreement for each item according to the Delphi method. In 2015, a consensus position was proposed for 24 statements. Among those that obtained a consensual agreement, the working group stressed that VS is effective in mild/moderate knee OA but is not an alternative to surgery in advanced OA, and that dosing regimen must be supported by controlled trials. In 2018, two decision algorithms for the retreatment with IA-HA in knee OA were published. Among the key recommendations, the experts recommended to re-treat every year patients with high risk of OA progression, even if not symptomatic. In 2020, EUROVISCO published two sets of recommendations for the design of clinical trials on the disease-modifying effect of VS and for optimizing the results of VS. The working group underlined that an accurate analysis of radiological features and symptoms and a careful clinical examination may improve the chances of success of VS, as well as good technique of injection and the use of imaging guidance. Based on the exhaustive analysis of the literature and their own clinical experience, the EUROVISCO experts offer a wide range of recommendations intended to help practitioners, particularly in certain cases where the specific characteristics of the patients make the therapeutic decision difficult.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to primarily assess the clinical and functional outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of the symptomatic iliopectineal cyst at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Our secondary objective was to document the technical nuances of our arthroscopic technique. METHODS: A retrospective review of chart data was performed for 30 patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment of a symptomatic iliopectineal cyst in the period between 1999 and 2015. The mean age of our patients was 57 (33-78) years. All patients completed a minimum follow-up period of 5 years. Our clinical outcomes were assessed by 100 mm VAS for pain, recurrence rate and complications. Functional outcome was evaluated by the modified Harris hip score (mHHS). Patients were asked their level of satisfaction with surgery on a scale of 0-10. RESULTS: In all patients, the valve mechanism of the iliopectineal cyst could be released arthroscopically and the cyst could be completely evacuated. The preoperative symptoms disappeared within 3-6 weeks after the arthroscopic intervention. Patients showed significant improvement in VAS and mHHS 6 months postoperatively and at final follow-up. The average patient satisfaction was 9.2 at 6 months postoperative and 7.9 at final follow-up. None of our patients experienced any complications. At the final follow-up, there was neither clinical nor radiological evidence of cyst recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic treatment of the iliopectineal cyst is a feasible and safe alternative to open surgery resulting in significant improvement of clinical and functional outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Quistes , Pinzamiento Femoroacetabular , Anciano , Artroscopía , Quistes/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Articulación de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing coracoclavicular (CC) ligament repair by two suture anchors and acromioclavicular (AC) joint (ACJ) fixation using heavy nonabsorbable sutures for the treatment of types III-V ACJ injuries with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. METHODS: The clinical and radiographic outcomes of 36 consecutive patients (26 men and 10 women) who underwent anatomic reduction for acute ACJ dislocation using two suture anchors for CC ligament reconstruction and two strands of non-absorbable stitches for ACJ fixation between December 2013 and December 2018 were reviewed. Two 3.5 mm suture anchors with double-loaded sutures were separately inserted into the anterolateral and posteromedial portions of the coracoid process. The suture strands were passed through the hole created in the clavicle using 2.0 mm drill and tied over the clavicle. Additional ACJ augmentation using two strands of non-absorbable heavy sutures was performed in all patients. At 3, 6, and 12 months and last follow-up visit, the scores on the visual analog scale (VAS), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score, and simple shoulder test (SST) questionnaires were used to provide a final evaluation of shoulder function. Comparison between baseline and treatment results was performed. Radiographic analysis included vertical displacement and horizontal shift. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (20 men and nine women) were included in the study. A total of seven, six, and 16 patients had Rockwood type III, type IV, and type V ACJ dislocations, respectively. The mean patient age was 42.8 ± 13.5 years, with a mean follow-up of 28 months (range, 12-56 months). At the 12-month follow-up, the mean ASES score was 92.1 ± 3.5, with a mean pain score of 0.5 ± 0.7 on the VAS and mean Constant-Murley score of 93.0 ± 2.4. The new number of positive answers on the SST was 11.5 ± 0.6. Compared with the baseline, the clinical results improved significantly (P < 0.05). No significant difference could be found between the 6- and 12-month follow-up evaluations (P > 0.05). Radiographs showed two partial loss of reduction, whereas no horizontal displacement was found in all patients. One patient developed a superficial wound infection 3 weeks postoperation. The wound healed after routine wound care. No neurovascular complications were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: CC ligament reconstruction using two suture anchors and ACJ augmentation using two strands of non-absorbable heavy sutures on high-grade AC dislocation is a reliable technique for restoring stability to the ACJ and can obtain good to excellent clinical results.
Asunto(s)
Articulación Acromioclavicular/lesiones , Articulación Acromioclavicular/cirugía , Luxaciones Articulares/cirugía , Ligamentos Articulares/lesiones , Ligamentos Articulares/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Anclas para Sutura , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del DolorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In microbiological diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) there is much controversial discussion about culture media and incubation time, especially if anaerobic bacteria are the causative agents. This retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the results obtained by inoculation of sonicate fluid from prosthetic components into BD Bactec blood culture bottles with those obtained by our culture method using sensitive supplemented growth media. METHODS: Twenty-eight cases were included in this study. For definition of PJI, the criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) were considered. The quantity and time to positivity of anaerobes detected in sonicate fluid were monitored both from inoculated supplemented liver thioglycollate broth and anaerobic blood culture bottles. Furthermore, phenotypic testing was performed on the antimicrobial activity within the sonicate fluid. RESULTS: The most frequently isolated microbes were Cutibacterium species, followed by Finegoldia magna, Parvimonas micra, Robinsoniella peoriensis, Clostridium species, Peptoniphilus harei and Slackia exigua. In 24 cases, the microorganisms became detectable within five days (median time 3.2 days) when sonicate fluid was incubated in supplemented liver thioglycollate broth, regardless of whether the patients had taken antimicrobial agents prior to surgery. However, when sonicate fluid was inoculated into anaerobic Bactec bottles, the median time to positivity was 7.4 days and only 12 cases (43%) were correctly identified. Sixteen cases remained negative after 14 days of incubation. CONCLUSION: Depending on the pathogen, incubation of sonicate fluid using blood culture bottles can support diagnosis of PJI but compared with our culture medium it is less efficient if anaerobes are the suspected cause of infection. Microbiological expertise is therefore indispensable to ensure reliable detection of these microorganisms in PJI until a gold standard for laboratory handling of anaerobes has been established.
Asunto(s)
Bacterias Anaerobias , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacterias Anaerobias/aislamiento & purificación , Cultivo de Sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Técnicas Microbiológicas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , SonicaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The 3 aims of the work were to identify population subgroups that can benefit the most from viscosupplementation (VS), to provide recommendations on injection techniques, and to discuss VS appropriateness in clinical situations that are commonplace in daily practice. METHODS: The task force members voted on their degree of agreement on 27 statements, 36 recommendations, and 22 clinical scenarios using a 9-point scale. The strength of agreement/appropriateness/recommendation (SOA/SOR) was classified as strong if the median agreement score was ≥8. The level of consensus (LOC) was also obtained. RESULTS: Among the assumed predictors for VS failure, obesity, radiographic severity, large synovial fluid effusion, severe patellofemoral involvement, major malalignment, and gross joint instability received a large majority of agreements. The lateral mid-patellar approach was recommended for knee injection. Imaging guidance was unanimously recommended for hip and ankle. Agreement was achieved to strictly respect the dosing regimen proven by controlled trials. There was agreement for treating with VS patients with mild to moderate knee and hip OA, with normal weight or moderate overweight, insufficiently improved by first-line therapies, or who do not wish get oral treatment or who have contraindications to pain killers. The group considered the patient's wishes as a key element in therapeutic decision making. CONCLUSION: Based on literature data and clinical experience, the EUROVISCO group proposed a set of recommendations for optimizing the results of VS, aimed to help practitioners, especially in some cases in which the patients' specificities make the therapeutic decision difficult.
Asunto(s)
Ácido Hialurónico/administración & dosificación , Osteoartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Viscosuplementación/normas , Viscosuplementos/administración & dosificación , Comités Consultivos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Consenso , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Viscosuplementación/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Hyaluronic acid viscosupplementation is a commonly used intra-articular treatment for osteoarthritis (OA). Some recent preclinical and clinical trials have demonstrated a potential for its disease-modifying effects. The goal of this expert opinion, consensus-driven exercise is to provide guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials assessing the disease-modifying effect of viscosupplementation in the knee. METHODS: The EUROVISCO group constitutes 10 members who had expertise in clinical research methodology in the field of OA and viscosupplementation. They initially drafted issues through an iterative process and had to vote on their degree of agreement on these recommendations. The scores were pooled to generate a median agreement score for each recommendation. RESULTS: The document includes 31 recommendations regarding study population, imaging, clinical and biological assessment of disease-modifying effects of viscosupplementation. Agreements were reached on some recommendations. In particular, the experts reached unanimous agreement on double-blind study design, imaging primary outcomes, time interval between 2 radiographs, x-ray procedure standardization, and the combined use of imaging and biological markers. The group did not recommend the use of ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT) scan and CT arthrography as a tool for OA diagnosis or to assess progression over time. CONCLUSION: In summary, the working group identified 31 recommendations that represent the current best practices regarding clinical trials that target the assessment of viscosupplementation disease-modifying effects in patients with knee OA. These recommendations integrate new imaging technologies and soluble biomarkers.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Ácido Hialurónico/administración & dosificación , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/tratamiento farmacológico , Viscosuplementación/métodos , Viscosuplementos/administración & dosificación , Comités Consultivos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/análisis , Femenino , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The present paper gives an overview of the different types of short stem total hip replacements. There is a pronounced inhomogeneity of the nomenclature in clinical practice as well as in regard to the scientific literature. Examples include neck preserving implants, meta-, epi- or metadiaphyseal fixed implants, microimplants, ultrashort implants, partial neck preserving implants, trochanteric sparing implants, implants with extra- and/or intramedullar fixation, implants without primary fixation, etc. Biomechanically, the short stems vary from very short, completely neck retaining versions up to implants which are just a shorter version of a standard implant. A frequently cited classification recommends the osteotomy level as a discriminating factor. This classification categorizes into a neck preserving, partial neck preserving and neck resecting short stems.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/instrumentación , Fémur/cirugía , Prótesis de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Fémur/fisiopatología , Cuello Femoral/fisiopatología , Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Prótesis de Cadera/clasificación , Humanos , Osteotomía , Diseño de Prótesis , RotaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In this work, we aimed to establish a clinical target in the management of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and to propose good clinical practice (GCP) statements for carrying out a treat-to-target strategy. METHODS: A steering committee of seven experts had formulated a provisional set of recommendations that were exposed for discussion and modification to a technical expert panel (TEP) of 25 multidisciplinary experts from Europe, North America, South America and Asia. The level of evidence and strength of each recommendation was discussed. The TEP formulated overarching principles and GCP statements based on the level of agreement for each item with a vote using a 10-point numerical scale. RESULTS: Two overarching principles and 10 GCP statements were formulated by the TEP. These GCP statements suggest: treatment should achieve clinical improvement bringing the patient to the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS); pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment should begin as early as possible, with an early diagnosis of symptomatic KOA; the patient should be evaluated every 3-6 months; risk factors of KOA progression should be identified and managed with patients at the beginning of the treatment and monitored regularly; treatment should be adapted according to patient phenotype and disease severity; healthy lifestyle must be promoted and monitored. The level of agreement average ranged from 8.7 to 9.6 on scale. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed overarching principles and GCP statements have the aim of involving patients, general practitioners and multidisciplinary specialists in sharing a therapeutic treat-to-target strategy for KOA management based on the best evidence and expert opinions.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In microbiological diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) culture media and incubation time are controversially discussed, especially if anaerobic bacteria are the causative agent. This study was conducted to demonstrate the influence of sensitive supplemented growth media on the duration of culturing anaerobes. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive cases were included in this retrospective study. For definition of PJI, the criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) were considered. Histopathological analysis was interpreted according to the classification by Krenn et al. The quantity and time to positivity of detected anaerobes were monitored. Furthermore, antimicrobial activity within the tissue and sonicate fluid was phenotypically tested. RESULTS: In all cases, even if the patients had received antibiotics before recovery, culture of anaerobes (Propionibacterium species, Finegoldia magna, Parvimonas micra and Robinsoniella peoriensis), both from tissue samples and prosthetic components, first became detectable in supplemented liver thioglycollate broth within six days (median: four days). CONCLUSION: Recommendations for prolonged cultivation for up to 14 days mostly aim at detection of anaerobes. Here we present a laboratory procedure that can shorten cultivation time considerably.
Asunto(s)
Bacterias Anaerobias , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artritis Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Artritis Infecciosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Infecciosa/microbiología , Bacterias Anaerobias/clasificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/sangre , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Biomarcadores , Biopsia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Radiografía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The pharmacological treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a purely symptomatic therapy, which often ensures that the mobility of the patient is successfully retained. This article refers to the recommendations and opinions regarding the pharmacotherapy of knee OA contained in the new guideline of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), highlighting several important aspects and describing the considerations underlying the decision-making process. With this article it is hoped that therapeutic effectiveness can be realistically estimated, that any risks of medication errors and avoidable side effects can be reduced, and that further helpful measures can be taken into consideration.