Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 8(9): e3169, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25233346

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: India is home to 60% of the total global visceral leishmaniasis (VL) population. Use of long-term oral (e.g. miltefosine) and parenteral drugs, considered the mainstay for treatment of VL, is now faced with increased resistance, decreased efficacy, low compliance and safety issues. The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of an alternate treatment option, i.e. single infusion of preformed amphotericin B (AmB) lipid emulsion (ABLE) in comparison with that of liposomal formulation (LAmB). METHODS: In this multicentric, open-label study, 500 patients with VL were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive 15 mg/kg single infusion of either ABLE (N = 376) or LAmB (N = 124). Initial cure (Day 30/45), clinical improvement (Day 30) and long term definitive cure (Day 180) were assessed. FINDINGS: A total of 326 (86.7%) patients in the ABLE group and 122 (98.4%) patients in the LAmB group completed the study. Initial cure was achieved by 95.9% of patients in the ABLE group compared to 100% in the LAmB group (p = 0.028; 95% CI: -0.0663, -0.0150). Clinical improvement was comparable between treatments (ABLE: 98.9% vs. LAmB: 98.4%). Definitive cure was achieved in 85.9% with ABLE compared to 98.4% with LAmB. Infusion-related pyrexia (37.2% vs. 32.3%) and chills (18.4% vs. 18.5%) were comparable between ABLE and LAmB, respectively. Treatment-related serious adverse events were fewer in ABLE (0.3%) compared to LAmB (1.6%). Two deaths occurred in the ABLE group, of which one was probably related to the study drug. Nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity was not observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: ABLE 15 mg/kg single infusion had favorable efficacy and was well tolerated. Considering the demographic profile of the population in this region, a single dose treatment offers advantages in terms of compliance, cost and applicability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00876824.


Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Antiprotozoarios/uso terapéutico , Leishmaniasis Visceral/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anfotericina B/administración & dosificación , Anfotericina B/efectos adversos , Animales , Antiprotozoarios/administración & dosificación , Antiprotozoarios/efectos adversos , Emulsiones , Femenino , Fiebre/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Leishmaniasis Visceral/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ovinos , Adulto Joven
2.
J Infect Dis ; 196(4): 591-8, 2007 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17624846

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a major public health problem in Bihar, accounting for 90% of all cases in India. Development of high levels of resistance to various existing drugs necessitated the search for alternative orally administered drugs. Hospital-based studies have shown that oral miltefosine is a highly effective treatment for VL both in adults and in children. METHODS: An open, single-arm trial was designed to investigate the feasibility of treatment of VL patients with miltefosine in field conditions in 13 centers in Bihar. RESULTS: The phase 4 study was conducted among 1132 adult and pediatric VL patients. Compliance was good, with 1084 (95.5%) patients completing the full 28-day treatment course. Nine hundred and seventy-one (85.8%) patients returned for the final cure assessment at 6 months after treatment. The final cure rate was 82% by intention to treat analysis and 95% by per protocol analysis (similar to the 94% cure rate in hospitalized patients). Treatment-related adverse events of common toxicity criteria grade 3 occurred in ~3% of patients, including gastrointestinal toxicity and rise in aspertate amino transferase, alanine amino transferase, or serum creatinine levels, similar to previous clinical experience. CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of miltefosine in an outpatient setting in an area where VL is endemic.


Asunto(s)
Antiprotozoarios/uso terapéutico , Leishmaniasis Visceral/tratamiento farmacológico , Fosforilcolina/análogos & derivados , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Antiprotozoarios/administración & dosificación , Antiprotozoarios/efectos adversos , Aspartato Aminotransferasas/sangre , Cápsulas/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas , Niño , Preescolar , Creatinina/sangre , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/inducido químicamente , Humanos , India , Hepatopatías/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente , Fosforilcolina/administración & dosificación , Fosforilcolina/efectos adversos , Fosforilcolina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...