Dynamic effect of three locking plates fixated to humeral fracture based on multibody musculoskeletal model.

OBJECTIVE: This study attempts to analyse the biomechanical effect of internal fixation (plated in parallel or plated vertically) on the basis of distal humeral fractures on musculoskeletal multibody dynamics using AnyBody in Finite Element Method. METHOD: Humeral 3D models were reconstructed by MIMICS after volunteers' CT image input in *.dicom format, and processed by Geomagic Studio for surfaces, while locking plates and screws were then designed by Pro-E. A humeral model of T-type fracture was created and assembled in Hypermesh, to integrate fixtures (e.g., MPL/PML/ML), to grid the mesh and then assign materials. A musculoskeletal model of the upper limb was established by AnyBody to simulate elbow flexion and extension. They were finally imported to Abaqus for boundary conditions and dynamic analysis. RESULT: In terms of Von Mises stress, its maximum increased and then decreased gradually during the joint motion, but p > 0.05 in SPSS suggests no significant difference for all three fixtures. In terms of displacement, when the elbow was at 90°, each motional pattern reached its peak as follows: ML180° = 0.28 mm, MPL90° = 0.49 mm & PML90° = 0.54 mm during flexion; ML180° = 0.073 mm, MPL90° = 0.10 mm & PML90° = 0.12 mm during extension. p < 0.05 suggests a significant difference for the displacements of all three fixations. p = 0.007 < 0.01667 suggests the significant difference between the two fixations, for example, PML90° and ML180°, indicating that the peak displacement of ML180° is less than that of PML90°. CONCLUSION: After generally analysed in musculoskeletal dynamics, the biomechanical property of the fixtures was presented as follows: the displacement of the parallel plate was less than that of the vertical, and the parallel plate may optimise the clinical reduction anatomically.

Comparative analysis for five fixations of Pauwels-I by the biomechanical finite-element method.

Background: Little is known about how biomechanics govern the five fixtures such as DHS, MLS, DHS + LS, LP, and HA are accepted as common therapeutic techniques. Aims and objectives: A series of numerical models for a femoral neck fracture of Pauwels-I will be constructed by innovative approach of finite element in order to determine the most optimized option in comparison with biomechanical performance. Method: Twenty sets of computer tomography scanned femora were imported onto Mimics to extract 3 D models; these specimens were transferred to Geomagic-Studio for a simulative osteotomy and kyrtograph; then, they underwent UG to fit simulative solid models; 5 sorts of fixture were then expressed by Pro-Engineer virtually. After processing with HyperMesh, all compartments (fracture model + internal implant) were assembled onto 5 systems: "Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS), Multiple Lag screw (MLS), DHS + LS, femoral Locking Plate (LP) and HemiArthroplasty (HA)." Eventually, numerical models of the finite-elemental analysis were exported to AnSys to determine the solution. Result: Four models of fixation and a simulation of HA for Pauwels-I were established, validated, and analyzed with the following findings: In term of displacement, these 5 fixtures ranged between 0.3801 and 0.7536 mm have no significant difference; in term of stress, the averages of peaks for integral assemblage are b(MLS) = 43.5766 ≈< d(LP) = 43.6657 ≈< e(Ha) = 43.6657 < c(DHS + LS) = 66.5494 < a(DHS) = 105.617 in MPa indicate that MLS, LP and HA are not significantly different, but less than DHS + LS or DHS in each. Conclusion: A fixture of MLS or LP with optional HA should be recommended to clinically optimize a Pauwels-I facture.