Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Biomed Res Int ; 2020: 8679532, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33354571

RESUMEN

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2020/6206157.].

3.
Biomed Res Int ; 2020: 6206157, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32596342

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The cell cycle pathway genes are comprised of 113 members which are critical to the maintenance of cell cycle and survival of tumor cells. This study was performed to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic values of cell cycle gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. METHODS: Clinical features and cell cycle pathway gene expression data were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus and The Cancer Genome Atlas databases. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were determined by the student t-test between HCC and noncancerous samples. Kaplan-Meier survival, univariate, and multivariate survival analyses and validation analysis were performed to characterize the associations between cell cycle gene expression and patients' overall survival and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: 47 and 5 genes were significantly upregulated and downregulated genes in HCC samples, respectively. The high expression of BUB3, CDK1, and CHEK1 was associated with increased mortality (adjusted P value = 0.04, odds ratio (OR): 1.89 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-3.46); adjusted P value = 0.02, OR: 2.06 (95% CI:1.15-3.75); and adjusted P value = 0.04, OR: 1.84 (%95 CI: 1.03-3.32), respectively). The expression of PTTG2 and RAD21 was significantly associated with cancer recurrence (adjusted P value = 0.01, OR: 2.17 (95% CI: 1.24-3.86); adjusted P value = 0.03, OR: 1.88[95% CI:1.08-3.28], respectively), while the low expression of MAD1L1 was associated with cancer recurrence (adjusted P value = 0.03, OR: 0.53 (%95 CI: 0.3-0.93)). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that BUB3, CDK1, and CHEK1 may serve as a prognostic biomarker for HCC patients. PTTG2, RAD21, and MAD1L1 expression is a major factor affecting the recurrence of HCC patients.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/genética , Genes cdc , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Adulto , Biología Computacional , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Análisis de Supervivencia
4.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res ; 38(1): 344, 2019 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31391063

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Accumulated evidences have demonstrated that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are dysregulated and correlate with the pathophysiological basis of malignant tumors. The objective of this research is to uncover the possible molecular mechanism of MACC1-AS1 regarding the regulation of pancreatic carcinoma (PC) metastasis. METHODS: lncRNA microarray and qRT-PCR were applied to identify differentially expressed lncRNA profile in PC. The function and role of MACC1-AS1 in PC were assessed via in vitro as well as in vivo assays. Luciferase analyses, RNA immunoprecipitation, and RNA pull-down were performed to determined the underlying MACC1-AS1 mechanisms. RESULTS: Numbers of differentially expressed lncRNAs in PC were identified via lncRNA microarrays, among which MACC1-AS1 was revealed as the most abundant lncRNA. The upregulation of MACC1-AS1 in PC was further confirmed in two expanded PC cohorts, which showed that MACC1-AS1 expression was upregulated in those PC patients with poor survival. Functionally, knockdown of MACC1-AS1 inhibited the proliferation as well as metastasis of PC cells. Meanwhile, MACC1-AS1 upregulated the expression of PAX8 protein, which promoted aerobic glycolysis and activated NOTCH1 signaling. Additionally, PAX8 was upregulated in PC tissues, which was correlated with the expression of MACC1-AS1 and the overall survival of PC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Together, our findings indicate a critical role of MACC1-AS1/PAX8/NOTCH1 signaling, which may be an alternative treatment target in PC therapy.


Asunto(s)
Factor de Transcripción PAX8/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , ARN Largo no Codificante/genética , Receptor Notch1/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal , Transactivadores/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Apoptosis/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Ciclo Celular , Línea Celular Tumoral , Proliferación Celular , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Masculino , Ratones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Biológicos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Pronóstico , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
5.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) | ID: wpr-805103

RESUMEN

Objective@#To explore the effect of early enteral nutrition(EEN) and parenteral nutrition(PN) on the postoperative outcomes of patients with gastric cancer and nutritional risk in enhanced recovery after surgery.@*Methods@#A total of 130 patients with gastric cancer hospitalized in department of surgery of Ningbo First Hospitalfrom September 2016 to May 2018 were selected and divided into early enteral nutrition support group (EEN) which was placed with jejunal nutrition tube during the operation, and enteral nutrition started within 12-24 hours after the operation, and parenteral nutrition support group (PN) which was given parenteral nutrition support one day after surgery. Patients in both groups were given nutrients of equal heat and nitrogen.The incidence of nutrition-related complications, the incidence of infection-related complications, the length of postoperative hospital stay and the time of anal exhaust were compared between the two groups.@*Results@#The incidence of nutrition-related complications was 10 cases (15.38%) and 4 cases (6.15%)in EEN group and PN group, that was not statistically different (P=0.157). The incidence of infection-related complications was 3 cases (4.61%) and 5 cases (7.69%) in EEN group and PN group, that was not statistically different (P=0.715). The postoperative hospital stay was 11 days (range, 10-15) and 12 days (range, 11-13)in EEN group and PN group, that was not statistically different (P=0.233). The first anal exhaust time and defecation timewere 64 hours (range, 52-77) and 87 hours (range, 76-100) in EEN group and 72 hours(range, 60-86) and 96 hours(range, 86-120) in PN group, that was statistically different(P=0.001, P=0.034).@*Conclusion@#Enhanced recovery after surgery, early enteral nutrition after gastric cancer surgery may promote the recovery of intestinal function, but the complications and hospital stay after operation are not improved.

6.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) | ID: wpr-824177

RESUMEN

Objective To explore the effect of early enteral nutrition (EEN) and parenteral nutrition (PN) on the postoperative outcomes of patients with gastric cancer and nutritional risk in enhanced recovery after surgery. Methods A total of 130 patients with gastric cancer hospitalized in department of surgery of Ningbo First Hospitalfrom September 2016 to May 2018 were selected and divided into early enteral nutrition support group (EEN) which was placed with jejunal nutrition tube during the operation, and enteral nutrition started within 12-24 hours after the operation, and parenteral nutrition support group (PN) which was given parenteral nutrition support one day after surgery. Patients in both groups were given nutrients of equal heat and nitrogen. The incidence of nutrition-related complications, the incidence of infection-related complications, the length of postoperative hospital stay and the time of anal exhaust were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of nutrition-related complications was 10 cases (15. 38%) and 4 cases (6. 15%) in EEN group and PN group, that was not statistically different (P = 0. 157). The incidence of infection-related complications was 3 cases (4. 61%) and 5 cases (7. 69%) in EEN group and PN group, that was not statistically different (P = 0. 715). The postoperative hospital stay was 11 days (range, 10-15) and 12 days (range, 11-13) in EEN group and PN group, that was not statistically different (P = 0. 233). The first anal exhaust time and defecation timewere 64 hours (range, 52-77) and 87 hours (range, 76-100) in EEN group and 72 hours (range, 60-86) and 96 hours (range, 86-120) in PN group, that was statistically different (P=0. 001, P=0. 034). Conclusion Enhanced recovery after surgery, early enteral nutrition after gastric cancer surgery may promote the recovery of intestinal function, but the complications and hospital stay after operation are not improved.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA