Papilla of Vater morphology as an influencing factor in successful cannulation during resident training in advanced endoscopy. A prospective clinical study.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a complex procedure. Clinical guidelines assess competence in ERCP through a defined number of procedures, but multiple factors are involved. Our aim was to analyze the morphology of the papilla of Vater as an independent factor in selective common bile duct cannulation during resident training. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients that underwent ERCP were studied consecutively. All ERCPs were begun by a resident in training. The type of papilla was classified according to Haraldsson, including those with previous sphincterotomy. Cannulation difficulty and success and their relation to the type of papilla were documented. The analysis was divided into three 4-month periods. RESULTS: Of the 429 patients, cannulation was difficult in 101 (23.5%). The residents achieved selective cannulation of the common bile duct in 276 (64.3%) and the cannulation success rate at the end of their training was 81.7%. Cannulation was performed with the least difficulty in papillae with previous sphincterotomy (2.8%), unlike the type 4 papilla, which was difficult to cannulate in 50% of the cases. The lowest overall cannulation success was in the type 2 papilla (81.8%). CONCLUSION: Papilla type can influence cannulation success, but it is not the only related factor. Patients that underwent previous sphincterotomy appear to be the cases in whom ERCP training can be started.

Use of audiovisual devices in transnasal endoscopy without sedation to improve tolerance. A prospective clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Transnasal endoscopy (TNE) has proven its diagnostic utility, but it has not been widely accepted given that it is performed without sedation. There are no previous studies on the use of methods to improve its tolerability. Our aim was to evaluate the tolerability of TNE, when simultaneously performed with an audiovisual device as a distractor. METHODS: We evaluated 50 patients, 10 of whom did not agree to participate. The performance of the procedure was explained, using an audiovisual device. Before randomization, we applied anxiety and depression scores. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group I (using an audiovisual device during the procedure) and Group II (without a device). Anxiety and numeric pain rating scales were used, and vital signs were monitored and recorded before, during, and after the endoscopy. An overall procedure satisfaction score was applied at the end of the study and 24 h later. RESULTS: Mean age was 41.6 years and 35 of the patients were women (87.5%). The most frequent indication for TNE was refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. There were no severe comorbidities, and none of the patients had a significant anxiety or depression score. One patient in Group II did not tolerate TNE due to nasal pain. There was no statistically significant difference between groups, regarding anxiety, pain, vital signs, and satisfaction scale. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that TNE was well tolerated and had a high acceptance rate in our patients. The use of distracting audiovisual devices did not increase tolerance to the endoscopic procedure.

Comparison of conventional cytomorphology, flow cytometry immunophenotyping, and automated cell counting of CSF for detection of CNS involvement in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cytospin conventional cytomorphology (CCC) is the standard method for detecting lymphoblasts in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and for guiding treatment decisions. We evaluated flow cytometry immunophenotyping (FCI) performance for improving detection of central nervous system (CNS) involvement in ALL. METHODS: This prospective study included analysis of consecutive CSF samples of patients of all ages with ALL at 3 clinical stages: new diagnosis, relapse suspicion, and after relapse treatment. Manual, cytospin, automated, and FCI methods were compared and their performance statistically assessed. Using FCI as the reference method, optimal CSF cutoff cell count that better correlated with presence of lymphoblasts was established by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-seven CSF samples were investigated, 35 (45.4%) from newly diagnosed cases, 30 (39%) suspicion of relapse, and 12 (15.6%) after treatment for relapse. Median manual WBC count in patients with CNS involvement detected by FCI was 3.75 cells/µL (0.0-1280), and this was also the count that best correlated with CNS infiltration (sensitivity, 50.0%; specificity, 82.2%). Compared with FCI, CCC sensitivity and specificity were 28.6% and 100%. Automated CSF WBC count in patients with CNS involvement detected by FCI was 5 (0.0-1578). For automated count, optimal WBC cutoff was 4.5 cells/µL (sensitivity, 62.5%; specificity, 70.5%). CONCLUSION: Flow cytometry immunophenotyping complements conventional cytospin analysis for detection of lymphoblasts in the CSF of ALL patients at any clinical stage.