Endothelial activation and stress index as a prognostic factor of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: the report from the nationwide multi-center Thai Lymphoma Study Group.

Several prognostic models have been introduced to predict outcomes of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) is a surrogate of endothelial dysfunction which has been shown to predict outcomes of patients with various hematologic malignancies. However, the prognostic implication of EASIX for DLBCL is limited and warrants exploration. We conducted a retrospective study enrolling adult DLBCL patients including a discovery cohort from the single-centered university hospital database and a validation cohort from the independent nationwide multi-center registry. EASIX scores were calculated using creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase, and platelet levels. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine optimal cutoff. Statistical analysis explored the impact of EASIX on survival outcomes. A total of 323 patients were included in the discovery cohort. The optimal EASIX cutoff was 1.07 stratifying patients into low (53.9%) and high EASIX (46.1%) groups. Patients with high EASIX had worse 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) (53.4% vs. 81.5%, p<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (64.4% vs. 88.7%, p<0.001) than patients with low EASIX. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age, bulky disease, impaired performance status, and high EASIX were associated with an unfavorable OS. In the validation cohort of 499 patients, the optimal EASIX cutoff was 1.04. Similar to the discovery cohort, high EASIX score was associated with high-risk diseases, worse PFS, and inferior OS. In conclusion, EASIX score was significantly associated with survival outcomes and may be used as a simple prognostic tool to better risk-classify DLBCL.

Outcomes of polatuzumab vedotin-containing regimens in real-world setting of relapsed and or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: a matched-control analysis from the Thai Lymphoma Study Group (TLSG).

Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) is a challenging condition to treat, and there is an unmet clinical need for effective therapies. Recently, polatuzumab vedotin (Pola), an anti-CD79b antibody-drug-conjugate (ADC), combined with bendamustine-rituximab (BR), has been approved for R/R DLBCL patients. However, real-world data on Pola-based regimens in R/R DLBCL patients, especially in Thailand, are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Pola-based salvage treatment in R/R DLBCL patients in Thailand. Thirty-five patients who received Pola-based treatment were included in the study, and their data were compared to 180 matched patients who received non-Pola-based therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) in the Pola group was 62.8%, with complete remission and partial remission rates of 17.1% and 45.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10.6 months and 12.8 months, respectively. The study found a significantly higher ORR in Pola-based salvage treatments compared to non-Pola-based therapy (62.8% vs. 33.3%). The survival outcomes were also significantly superior in the Pola group, with longer median PFS and OS than the control group. Grades 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were mainly hematological, and they were tolerable. In conclusion, this study provides real-world evidence of the efficacy and safety of Pola-based salvage treatment in R/R DLBCL patients in Thailand. The results of this study are promising and suggest that Pola-based salvage treatment could be a viable option for R/R DLBCL patients who have limited treatment options.