Effect of the maternal childbirth experience on a subsequent birth: a retrospective 7-year cohort study of primiparas in Finland.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of the childbirth experience on the likelihood and interval to a subsequent live birth. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a 7-year cohort. SETTING: Childbirths in Helsinki University Hospital delivery units. PARTICIPANTS: All parturients giving birth to a term and living baby from a single pregnancy in Helsinki University Hospital delivery units from January 2012 to December 2018 (n=120 437). Parturients delivering their first child (n=45 947) were followed until the birth of a subsequent child or the end of 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The interval to a subsequent childbirth connected to the experience of the first childbirth was the primary outcome of the study. RESULTS: A negative first childbirth experience decreases the likelihood of delivering a subsequent child during the follow-up (adjusted HR=0.81, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.86) compared with those experiencing the first childbirth as positive. For parturients with a positive childbirth experience, the median interval to a subsequent delivery was 3.90 years (3.84-3.97) compared with 5.29 years (4.86-5.97) after a negative childbirth experience. CONCLUSION: The negative childbirth experience influences reproductive decisions. Consequently, more focus should be placed on understanding and managing the antecedents of positive/negative childbirth experiences.

Pre-eclampsia and cardiovascular risk: a long-term nationwide cohort study on over 120 000 Finnish women.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of pre-eclampsia on the future cardiovascular risk in Finnish women DESIGN: A registry-based nationwide controlled cohort study. SETTING: Women hospitalised for pre-eclampsia in 1969-1993 and control women with a history of normotensive pregnancies followed from the pre-eclampsia diagnosis until 2019 for cardiovascular outcomes. PARTICIPANTS: 31 688 women with and 91 726 control women without a history of pre-eclampsia. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidences of and deaths from ischaemic heart disease (IHD), myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. RESULTS: In total, 25 813 (81.5%) women had pre-eclampsia without severe features, 4867 (15.4%) had pre-eclampsia with severe features and 1006 (3.2%) women developed eclampsia. Women with a history of pre-eclampsia showed elevated risks for IHD (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.44 to 1.59), MI (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.52 to 1.81) and stroke (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.48). The risks for death from IHD (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.75), MI (1.63, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.05) and stroke (1.44, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.01) were also elevated. Pre-eclampsia with severe features or eclampsia was accompanied with 15% higher IHD risk, 19% higher MI risk and 26% higher stroke risk than pre-eclampsia without severe features. The highest risk elevations of 30% for IHD, 32% for MI and 30% for stroke were observed in women with recurrent pre-eclampsia (n=4180). CONCLUSION: Pre-eclampsia-related significant elevations in CVD risks of Finnish women with inherently high risk for these diseases were of the same magnitude as reported previously from other countries. Thus, women with a history of pre-eclampsia should be screened and treated early for modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.

Maternal childbirth experience and induction of labour in each mode of delivery: a retrospective seven-year cohort study of 95,051 parturients in Finland.

BACKGROUND: Childbirth experience has been shown to depend on the mode of delivery. However, it is unclear how labour induction influences the childbirth experience in different modes of delivery. Thus, we assessed the childbirth experience among mothers with spontaneous and induced labours. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Childbirths in four delivery hospitals in Helsinki and Uusimaa District, Finland, in 2012-2018. SAMPLE: 95051 childbirths excluding elective caesarean sections. METHODS: Obstetric data combined to maternal childbirth experience measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was analysed with univariate linear modelling and group comparisons. The primiparas and multiparas were analysed separately throughout the study due to the different levels of VAS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal childbirth experience measured by VAS. RESULTS: The negative effect of labour induction on the childbirth experience was discovered in each mode of delivery. Operative deliveries were perceived more negatively when they were preceded by labour induction. The rate of poor childbirth experience (VAS≤5) was higher for mothers with labour induction (ORs varying from 1.43 to 1.77) except in emergency caesarean sections. The negative effect of labour induction was smaller than the effect of mode of delivery, while successful vaginal delivery with induction (meanPRIMI=8.00 [95% CI 7.96-8.04], meanMULTI=8.50 [8.47-8.53]) was perceived more positive than operational deliveries with spontaneous labour (meansPRIMI≤7.66 [7.61-7.70], meansMULTI≤7.96 [7.89-8.03]). However, labour induction more than doubled the risk of caesarean section for both primiparas and multiparas. CONCLUSIONS: Labour induction generates more negative experiences for both primiparas and multiparas. The negative effect of labour induction is detected for all modes of delivery, being worst among labour induction resulting in operative delivery. The parturients facing cumulative obstetric interventions require special support and counselling during and after delivery.

Maternal childbirth experience and pain relief methods: a retrospective 7-year cohort study of 85 488 parturients in Finland.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse the relation between the used labour pain relief and childbirth experience measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Childbirth in five Helsinki University Hospital delivery units from 2012 to 2018. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Childbirth experience measured by VAS and classified in three groups (negative VAS=1-5, positive VAS=6-8 and highly positive=9-10). RESULTS: The use of epidural or non-epidural compared with non-medical pain relief methods decreased the likelihood to experience highly positive childbirth for primiparous (adjusted OR (aOR)EPIDURAL=0.64, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.73; and aORNON-EPIDURAL=0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.87) and multiparous (aOREPIDURAL=0.90, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.97 and aORNON-EPIDURAL=0.80, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.86) parturients. The effects of epidural differed between primiparas and multiparas. In multiparas epidural was associated with decreased odds for experiencing negative childbirth compared with the non-medical group (aOR=0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.87), while the effect of epidural was considered insignificant in primiparas (aOR=1.28, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.77). CONCLUSION: While the use of medical-epidural and non-epidural-pain relief methods were not associated with odds for experiencing negative childbirth in primiparas, using epidural helps to avoid negative experience in multiparas. However, the odds for experiencing highly positive childbirth were decreased if the parturients used any medical pain relief for both primiparas and multiparas. Consequently, the effect of pain relief on the childbirth experience is strongly confounded by indication. Thus, the use of pain relief per se plays a limited role in the complex formation of the overall childbirth experience.

Maternal childbirth experience and time of delivery: a retrospective 7-year cohort study of 105 847 parturients in Finland.

OBJECTIVES: To explore how the time of delivery influences childbirth experience. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Childbirth in the four Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District hospitals, Finland, from 2012 to 2018. PARTICIPANTS: 105 847 childbirths with a singleton live fetus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Childbirth experience measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). RESULTS: The major difference in average childbirth experience measured by VAS was between primiparas (8.03; 95% CI 8.01 to 8.04) and multiparas (8.47; 95% CI 8.45 to 8.48). Risk ratio (RR) of the low VAS (≤5) was 2.3 when primiparas were compared with multiparas. Differences in VAS between distinct periods were found in two stages: annual and time of day. The decrease in VAS from 2012-2016 to 2017-2018 in primiparas was from 7.97 (95% CI 7.95 to 7.99) to 7.80 (95% CI 7.77 to 7.83) and from 2014-2016 to 2017-2018 in multiparas from 8.60 (95% CI 8.58 to 8.61) to 8.49 (95% CI 8.47 to 8.52). Corresponding RRs of low VAS were 1.3 for primiparas and 1.2 for multiparas. Hourly differences in VAS were detected in primiparas between office hours 08:00-15:59 (7.97; 95% CI 7.94 to 7.99) and other times (night 00:00-07:59; 7.91; 95% CI 7.88 to 7.94; and evening 16:00-23:59; 7.90; 95% CI 7.87 to 7.92). In multiparas differences in VAS were detected between evening (8.52; 95% CI 8.50 to 8.54) and other periods (night; 8.56; 95% CI 8.54 to 9.58; and office hours; 8.57; 95% CI 8.55 to 8.59). CONCLUSION: The maternal childbirth experience depended on the time of delivery. Giving birth during the evening led to impaired childbirth experience in both primiparas and multiparas, compared with delivery at other times. The impact of labour induction on childbirth experience should be further examined. The reorganisation of delivery services and the reduction of birth preparations might affect annual VAS. VAS is a simple method of measuring the complex entity of childbirth experience, and our results indicate its ability to capture temporal variation.

Examining retail purchases of cigarettes and nicotine replacement therapy in Finland.

INTRODUCTION: Finland's success in achieving the goal of its tobacco endgame largely depends on rectifying deficiencies in the delivery of smoking cessation services. One such weakness, which has not been documented with empirical data, is misuse of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). This study's objective was to examine purchase patterns of NRT for estimating improper use of the medication. The study was based on the assumption that duration of a purchase episode is indicative of either proper use or misuse of NRT. METHODS: The participants (n=728), who purchased at least one NRT product in 2016 (mostly gum/lozenge), were selected through enrollment in a large customer loyalty program in Finland (LoCard). Participants were categorized into one of five groups according to their longest purchase episode of NRT, defined by purchases made in consecutive, 4-week intervals. RESULTS: Most participants, who did not adhere to NRT guidelines, either purchased the medication for too short (≤4 weeks, 63.5%) or too long (>24 weeks, 13.2%) of a purchase episode. Median purchases of NRT in the first month of use were one and four in the former and latter, respectively. In contrast to other groups, persistent users (>24 weeks) did not curtail purchases of NRT across several 4-week intervals, suggesting potential for dependence on NRT. CONCLUSIONS: The observation that most purchase episodes were terminated prematurely is consistent with surveys reporting widespread NRT misuse. Given uncertainty of greater regulation of NRT sales through legislation, it would be prudent for Finnish retailers to promote proper use of the therapy.