RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are commonly associated with osteoporosis and pose a risk for secondary fractures. Although the administration of anti-osteoporotic drugs is recommended after fractures to mitigate this risk, the potential effect of strong anti-resorptive drugs (e.g., denosumab) on fracture healing processes have not been extensively studied. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of early denosumab administration after femoral intertrochanteric fracture surgery and to compare its effect on fracture healing to that of bisphosphonate-treated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for intertrochanteric femoral fragility fractures between November 2018 and November 2020 were prospectively examined. Patients were randomized into two groups (denosumab [DSM] and ibandronate [IBN] groups) using a simple randomization procedure. Physical findings, plain radiographs, and computed tomography (CT) were used to evaluate fracture healing at 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Physical findings showed no significant differences between the two groups in pain on loading, tenderness at fracture site, or walking ability. There were inter-rater differences in radiological fracture healing rate: plain radiographs, 57.5%-81.8% in the DSM group and 51.5%-90.9% in the IBN group; CT, 51.5%-72.7% in the DSM group and 45.4%-81.8% in the IBN group. Although there were variations, there were no significant differences in the fracture healing rate between groups on plain radiographs or CT among all three raters. CONCLUSIONS: Early administration of denosumab after intertrochanteric femoral fracture surgery did not delay radiological or clinical fracture healing times when compared with ibandronate administration.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cognitive function is an important factor that affects functional recovery after hip fracture (HipFx) surgery. The literature on the pathophysiology of dementia in HipFx patients is scarce. We performed a differential diagnosis of dementia in HipFx patients using clinical and brain MRI findings. METHODS: This is a prospective study in which brain MRI was evaluated for patients with HipFx for research purposes. One-hundred-and-five HipFx patients (85 females and 20 males) who underwent surgery and were subsequently able to undergo brain MRI at our hospital were evaluated. The mean age was 84 years. The presence of dementia was determined based on clinical findings and whether the patient meets its diagnostic criteria according to the International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition (ICD-10). The differential diagnosis of dementia was made based on brain MRI findings and the dementia diagnostic flow chart published in the Clinical Practice Guideline for Dementia 2017 (Japanese Society of Neurology). The Voxel-based Specific Regional Analysis System for Alzheimer's Disease (VSRAD) advance 2 diagnostic software was used to evaluate atrophy of the para-hippocampal gyrus. RESULTS: Fifty-six (53%) patients were clinically diagnosed with dementia according to the ICD-10 criteria. The MRI findings were diverse: Alzheimer's disease (AD)-type, asymptomatic multiple ischemic cerebral lesions, past symptomatic cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage, Binswanger's disease (BW)-type, chronic subdural hematoma, disproportionately enlarged subarachnoidal hydrocephalus (DESH), and their combinations thereof. A combination of MRI and clinical findings of dementia patients demonstrated the following distribution of dementia subtypes: AD (n = 20), vascular dementia (n = 33), AD and BW vascular dementia (n = 3). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the brain MRI findings of HipFx patients were diverse. Although vascular dementia is found to be common in this particular population, this could be an incidental finding. Further study is warranted to clarify the specificity of our findings by increasing the number of patients, setting the control, and investigating whether dementia subtypes affect postoperative gait acquisition and fall risk.