RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a clinician-reported scale that measures the degree of disability in patients who suffered a stroke. Patients' perception of a meaningful recovery from severe stroke, expected value of a stroke intervention, and the effect of disparities are largely unknown. METHODS: We conducted a survey of patients, their family members, and accompanying visitors to understand their personal preferences and expectations for acute strokes potentially eligible for acute endovascular intervention using a hypothetical scenario of a severe stroke in a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 164 survey respondents, 65 (39.6%) were the patient involved, 93 (56.7%) were a family member, and six (3.7%) were accompanied visitors (friends, other). Minimally acceptable disability after a stroke intervention was considered as mRS 2 by 42 respondents (25.6%), as mRS 3 by 79 (48.2%), and as mRS 4 by 43 (26.2%) respondents. Race was associated with different views on this question (p < 0.001; Hispanic and Black patients being more likely to accept disability than Caucasian and Asian patients), while sex (p = 0.333) and age (p = 0.560) were not. Sixty-three respondents (38.4%) viewed minimally acceptable probability of improvement with an intervention as over 50%, 57 (34.8%) as 10-50%, and 44 (26.8%) as less than 10%. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of acceptable outcomes were reported regardless of gender or age. However, race was associated with different acceptable outcome. This is an important finding to demonstrate because of the persistent racial and ethnic disparities in the utilization of endovascular therapy for acute stroke in the United States.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) is a non-invasive optical technique that enables continuous blood flow measurements in various organs, including the brain. DCS quantitatively measures blood flow from temporal fluctuations in the intensity of diffusely reflected light caused by the dynamic scattering of light from moving red blood cells within the tissue. METHODS: We performed bilateral cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements using a custom DCS device in patients undergoing neuroendovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke. Experimental, clinical, and imaging data were collected in a prospective manner. RESULTS: The device was successfully applied in nine subjects. There were no safety concerns or interference with the standard angiography suite or intensive care unit workflow. Six cases were selected for final analysis and interpretation. DCS measurements with photon count rates greater than 30 KHz had sufficient signal-to-noise to resolve blood flow pulsatility. We found an association between angiographic changes in cerebral reperfusion (partial or complete reperfusion established in stroke thrombectomy cases; temporary flow arrest during carotid artery stenting) and those observed intraprocedurally with CBF measurements via DCS. Limitations of the current technology included sensitivity to the interrogated tissue volume under the probe and the effect of local changes in tissue optical properties on the accuracy of CBF estimates. CONCLUSION: Our initial experience with DCS in neurointerventional procedures showed the feasibility of this non-invasive approach in providing continuous measurement of regional CBF brain tissue properties.
