Comparison of computed tomography findings with clinical risks factors for endoscopic therapy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding cases.

Several risk scoring systems exist for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). The clinical Rockall score (clinical RS) and the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) are major risk scores that consider only clinical data. Computed tomography (CT) findings are equivocal in non-variceal UGIB. We compared CT findings with clinical data to predict mortality, rebleeding and need for endoscopic therapy in non-variceal UGIB patients. This retrospective, single-center study included 386 patients admitted to our emergency department with diagnosis of non-variceal UGIB by urgent endoscopy between January 2009 and March 2015. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to investigate CT findings and risk factors derived from clinical data. CT findings could not significantly predict mortality and rebleeding in non-variceal UGIB patients. However, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in CT findings better predicted the need for endoscopic therapy than clinical data. The adjusted odds ratios were 10.10 (95% CI 5.01-20.40) for clinical RS and 10.70 (95% CI 5.08-22.70) for the GBS. UGI hemorrhage in CT findings could predict the need for endoscopic therapy in non-variceal UGIB patients in our emergency department. CT findings as well as risk score systems may be useful for predicting the need for endoscopic therapy.

Metabolic factors accelerate colorectal adenoma recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic factors have been reported to increase the prevalence of colorectal adenomas, however, whether metabolic factors might also accelerate the recurrence after removal of adenomas has not yet been discussed. In this retrospective multicenter study, we clarified the risk factors for adenoma recurrence focusing on metabolic factors. METHODS: We analyzed the medical records of 43,195 patients who had undergone colonoscopy between January 2005 and December 2011 at 5 hospitals in Japan. Of these, the data of 1111 patients who had undergone removal of adenomas at the first screening colonoscopy, and then been followed up by colonoscopy 1 year and 2 years later were analyzed. RESULTS: The following 8 factors were demonstrated with a multivariate analysis as being associated with colorectal adenomas recurrence: for adenoma-related factors, 5 factors (villous features, grade of dysplasia, location and size of the largest removed adenoma, and number of the removed adenomas) were identified; for metabolic factors and other factors, 3 factors (age, body mass index (BMI), and fasting blood glucose (FBG)) were identified. A risk score (0-10 points) was developed based on these 8 factors. The risk of adenoma recurrence increased as the risk score increased. When the risk score was ≥3 (3-10) points, the odds ratio relative to <3 (0-2) points was 7.07 (95% CIs 5.30-9.43). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to adenoma-related factors (villous features, grade of dysplasia, location, size and number), 3 factors (age, BMI and FBG) were demonstrated to influence the recurrence rate of colorectal adenoma. When the risk score was ≥3, the risk of recurrence was significantly elevated.

Single-agent gemcitabine in elderly patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study examined the effect of systemic chemotherapy with gemcitabine (GEM) on survival in elderly patients (aged > or = 70 years) with unresectable biliary tract cancer as compared with best supportive care (BSC). METHODOLOGY: We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer administered GEM (800-1,000 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks as a first-line treatment. Eligibility included age 70 years and over, and bile duct carcinoma or gallbladder cancer. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled: 13 (46.4%) received chemotherapy with GEM and 15 (53.6%) received BSC. No cases of complete or partial response were observed. Stable and progressive disease was observed in 9 (69.2%) and 2 patients (15.4%), respectively. Disease control rate was 69.2%. The median overall survival time of patients treated with GEM and BSC was 9.1 and 2.9 months, and the 1-year survival rates were 15.4% and 6.7%, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in three (23.1%), leukopenia in two (15.4%) and anemia in one patient (7.7%). Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities were constipation (7.7%) and fatigue (7.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy with single-agent GEM is a safe and well tolerated regimen for elderly patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer.

Single-agent gemcitabine in elderly patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study examines the effect of systemic chemotherapy with gemcitabine (GEM) on survival in elderly patients (aged > or =70 years) with unresectable biliary tract cancer and compares it with best supportive care (BSC). METHODOLOGY: We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive patients aged > or =70 years, with unresectable biliary tract cancer who were administered GEM (800-1000 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks as a first-line treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled: 13 (46.4%) received chemotherapy with GEM and 15 (53.6%) received BSC. No cases of complete or partial response were observed. Stable disease was observed in 9 patients (69.2%) and progressive disease in 2 patients (15.4%). Disease control rate was 69.2%. The median overall survival time of patients treated with GEM and BSC was 9.1 and 2.9 months, and the 1-year survival rates were 15.4% and 6.7% respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in three patients (23.1%), leukopenia in two patients (15.4%) and anemia in one patient (7.7%). Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities were constipation (7.7%) and fatigue (7.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy with single-agent GEM is a safe and well tolerated regimen for elderly patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer.