PKA and PDE4D3 anchoring to AKAP9 provides distinct regulation of cAMP signals at the centrosome.

Previous work has shown that the protein kinase A (PKA)-regulated phosphodiesterase (PDE) 4D3 binds to A kinase-anchoring proteins (AKAPs). One such protein, AKAP9, localizes to the centrosome. In this paper, we investigate whether a PKA-PDE4D3-AKAP9 complex can generate spatial compartmentalization of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling at the centrosome. Real-time imaging of fluorescence resonance energy transfer reporters shows that centrosomal PDE4D3 modulated a dynamic microdomain within which cAMP concentration selectively changed over the cell cycle. AKAP9-anchored, centrosomal PKA showed a reduced activation threshold as a consequence of increased autophosphorylation of its regulatory subunit at S114. Finally, disruption of the centrosomal cAMP microdomain by local displacement of PDE4D3 impaired cell cycle progression as a result of accumulation of cells in prophase. Our findings describe a novel mechanism of PKA activity regulation that relies on binding to AKAPs and consequent modulation of the enzyme activation threshold rather than on overall changes in cAMP levels. Further, we provide for the first time direct evidence that control of cell cycle progression relies on unique regulation of centrosomal cAMP/PKA signals.

Red blood cells from pluripotent stem cells for use in transfusion.

The use of donated red blood cells in transfusion is a well-established cellular therapy. However, problems including insufficient supply, transfusion-transmitted infections and the need for immunological matching hamper even in the best services. These issues may be eliminated by using pluripotent stem cells to generate universal donor group O, Rhesus D-negative red blood cells. Human embryonic stem cells can be maintained and expanded indefinitely and can, therefore, produce the very large cell numbers required for this application. Red blood cell production is also an attractive goal for pluripotent stem cell-derived therapeutics because it is a well-characterized single cell suspension, lacking nucleated cells and with a low expression of HLA molecules. Much progress has been made; however, a number of challenges remain including scale-up, clinical effectiveness and product safety.

Inhibition of MDR1 does not sensitize primitive chronic myeloid leukemia CD34+ cells to imatinib.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the interaction of imatinib mesylate (IM) with the clinically relevant adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette efflux transporter MDR1 (ABCB1) in cells from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and to explore whether inhibition of this transporter would improve IM's efficacy in the elimination of CML CD34(+) cells by increasing cell-associated drug accumulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cells from newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML patients were harvested by leukapheresis and enriched to >95% CD34(+). Expression of the transporter gene MDR1 was performed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Interaction of IM with MDR1 was analyzed by substrate (rhodamine 123) displacement assay. Cell-associated levels of IM in CML CD34(+) cells were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Intracellular phospho-CrkL levels, apoptosis in total CML CD34(+) cells and high-resolution tracking of cell division were assayed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Measurements of cell-associated IM uptake showed significantly lower drug levels in CD34(+) cells, particularly the CD38(-) subpopulation, as compared to IM-sensitive K562 cells. MDR1 was expressed at low level and dye efflux studies demonstrated very little MDR1 activity in CML CD34(+) cells. Furthermore, combination treatment of primitive CML cells with IM and the MDR1 inhibitor PSC833 did not result in elevated cell-associated IM levels. Although we observed slightly enhanced cytostasis with IM when combined with PSC833, this was independent of BCR-ABL inhibition because no associated decrease in phospho-CrkL was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that inhibition of MDR1 neither enhances the effect of IM against BCR-ABL activity, nor significantly potentiates IM's efficiency in eliminating primitive CML cells.

Nilotinib exerts equipotent antiproliferative effects to imatinib and does not induce apoptosis in CD34+ CML cells.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) stem and progenitor cells overexpress BcrAbl and are insensitive to imatinib mesylate (IM). We therefore investigated whether these cells were efficiently targeted by nilotinib. In K562, the inhibitory concentration (IC50) of nilotinib was 30 nM versus 600 nM for IM, consistent with its reported 20-fold-higher potency. However, in primary CD34(+) CML cells, nilotinib and IM were equipotent for inhibition of BcrAbl activity, producing equivalent but incomplete reduction in CrkL phosphorylation at 5 microM. CML CD34(+) cells were still able to expand over 72 hours with 5 microM of either drug, although there was a concentration-dependent restriction of amplification. As for IM, the most primitive cells (CFSE(max)) persisted and accumulated over 72 hours with nilotinib and remained caspase-3 negative. Furthermore, nilotinib with IM led to further accumulation of this population, suggesting at least additive antiproliferative effects. These results confirmed that, like IM, the predominant effect of nilotinib is antiproliferative rather than proapoptotic.

Functional ABCG2 is overexpressed on primary CML CD34+ cells and is inhibited by imatinib mesylate.

Imatinib mesylate (IM) therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has transformed the treatment of this disease. However, the vast majority of patients, despite major responses, still harbor Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph(+)) cells. We have described a population of primitive Ph(+) cells that are insensitive to IM and may be a source of IM resistance. Cell line studies have suggested that the drug transporter ABCG2 may be a mediator of IM resistance, however there is considerable debate about whether IM is an ABCG2 substrate or inhibitor. We demonstrate here that primitive CML CD34(+) cells aberrantly overexpress functional ABCG2 but that cotreatment with IM and an ABCG2 inhibitor does not potentiate the effect of IM. We definitively show that IM is an inhibitor of, but not a substrate for, ABCG2 and that, therefore, ABCG2 does not modulate intracellular concentrations of IM in this clinically relevant cell population.