Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
1.
J Gerontol Nurs ; 48(4): 33-40, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35343843

RESUMEN

Older adults face several challenges when accessing specialist care. Advanced practice nurses (APNs) can perform an important role in primary care for older adults, particularly when bolstered with digital tools. In the current study, we conducted a multiple case study of electronic consultations (eConsults) involving APNs to assess how these practitioners use the service to improve access to care. All eConsults submitted by or to an APN in 2019 on behalf of patients aged ≥65 years were reviewed to identify examples from six settings representative of the range of advanced nursing practices. For each setting, a final case was chosen using an iterative process and stratified by specialty and type of advice. Included cases were assessed using a conceptual framework for health care access. Selected cases illustrate how APNs can be effective users of eConsults in a diversity of health care settings. The framework allowed for an in-depth study of access over the range of interactions that take place among patients, caregivers, providers, and the health care system. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(4), 33-40.].


Asunto(s)
Enfermería Geriátrica , Consulta Remota , Anciano , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos
2.
Front Public Health ; 7: 279, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31637228

RESUMEN

Background: Patients with complex circumstances pertaining to geography, socioeconomic status, or functional health often face inequities in accessing care. Electronic consultation (eConsult) is a secure online application that allows primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists to communicate regarding a patient's care. eConsult has demonstrated an ability to improve access to specialist care, and may be of particular use in cases of inequitable access. Methods: We examined how eConsult is used to improve equity of access for patients in complex circumstances by conducting a multiple case study of eConsults from seven patient groups: addiction, frail elderly, homeless, long-term care, rural, special needs, and transgender. Cases from these groups were selected from all eConsult cases completed between January 1 and December 31, 2017 using a data collection strategy tailored to each group. An access framework by Levesque et al. was applied to the data to examine five dimensions of access, arranged in chronological order, that reflect the process of a patient seeking care: approachability, acceptability; availability, affordability, and appropriateness. Two reviewers analyzed the cases using an iterative approach, regularly presenting findings to the research team for discussion and interpretation. Results: Eight hundred and twenty-five cases emerged across the seven target groups. The selected cases highlighted a number of key factors, including the value of the patient-PCP relationship, the importance of considering patient perspectives when providing care, and efforts to accommodate patients facing particular challenges to accessing care. Examples emerged among all five dimensions of the Levesque et al. access framework, with the final dimension, appropriateness, emerging across all cases. Conclusions: By leveraging the eConsult platform, PCPs can help improve equitable access to specialist care. More research is needed to understand why patients with complex circumstances face a longer wait time compared to the general population, and the impact that eConsults can have in improving health outcomes and wait times for this population.

3.
Fam Med ; 51(7): 567-573, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31287902

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients in many countries face poor access to specialist care. Electronic consultation (eConsult) improves access by allowing primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists to communicate electronically. As more countries adopt eConsult services, there has been growing interest in leveraging them as educational tools. Our study aimed to assess PCPs' perspectives on eConsult's ability to improve collegiality between providers and serve as an educational tool. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative content analysis of free-text comments left by PCPs using the Champlain BASE eConsult service based in Eastern Ontario, Canada. All responses provided between January 1, 2015 and January 31, 2017 that mentioned education or collegiality were included. RESULTS: PCPs completed 16,712 closeout surveys during the study period, of which 3,601 (22%) included free-text comments. Of these, 223 (6%) included references to education or collegiality. Three prominent themes emerged from the data: building provider relationships, teaching incorporated into answer, and prompting further learning. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs described eConsult's ability to foster stronger relationships with specialists, deliver responses that provided teaching in multiple areas of their practice, and support further learning that extended beyond the case at hand and into their overall practice. The Champlain BASE eConsult service has educational value for providers. Further study is underway to explore how questions and replies submitted through eConsult can be used to facilitate reflective learning and promote feedback to providers.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Cooperativa , Aprendizaje , Médicos de Atención Primaria/educación , Consulta Remota , Especialización , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Humanos , Ontario , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
J Med Internet Res ; 20(12): e11112, 2018 12 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30578187

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Excessive wait times for specialist care pose a serious concern for many patients, leading to duplication of tests, patient anxiety, and poorer health outcomes. In response to this issue, many health care systems have begun implementing technological innovations designed to improve the referral-consultation process. Among these services is electronic consultation (eConsult), which connects primary care providers and specialists through a secure platform to facilitate discussion of patients' care. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine different eConsult services available worldwide and compare the strategies, barriers, and successes of their implementation in different health care contexts. METHODS: We conducted an environmental scan comprising 3 stages as follows: literature review; gray literature search; and targeted, semistructured key informant interviews. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (literature review) and Google (gray literature search). Upon completing the search, we generated a list of potential interview candidates from among the stakeholders identified. Potential participants included researchers, physicians, and decision makers. The maximum variation sampling was used to ensure sufficient breadth of participant experience. In addition, we conducted semistructured interviews by telephone using an interview guide based on the RE-AIM framework. Analyses of transcripts were conducted using a thematic synthesis approach. RESULTS: A total of 53 services emerged from the published and gray literature. Respondents from 10 services participated in telephonic interviews. The following 4 major themes emerged from the analysis: service structure; benefits of eConsult; implementation challenges; and implementation enablers. CONCLUSIONS: eConsult services have emerged in a variety of countries and health system contexts worldwide. Despite differences in structure, platform, and delivery of their services, respondents described similar barriers and enablers to the implementation and growth and reported improved access and high levels of satisfaction.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Telemedicina/métodos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto
5.
Healthc Policy ; 14(1): 19-29, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30129432

RESUMEN

This paper explores our efforts to support the expansion of a regional electronic consultation (eConsult) service on a national level by addressing potential policy barriers. We used an integrated knowledge translation (IKT) strategy based on five key activities leading to a National eConsult Policy Think Tank meeting: (1) identifying potential policy enablers and barriers; (2) engaging national and provincial/territorial partners; (3) including patient voices; (4) undertaking co-design and planning; and (5) adopting a solution-based approach. We successfully leveraged a diverse set of stakeholders in strategic discussions, culminating in actionable suggestions for next steps, which will serve to inform a national implementation strategy.


Asunto(s)
Política de Salud , Consulta Remota/organización & administración , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/métodos , Canadá , Humanos
6.
Fam Pract ; 35(1): 93-98, 2018 01 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28968806

RESUMEN

Background: Excessive wait times for specialist care can have a substantial negative impact on health outcomes. The Champlain BASETM (Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation) eConsult service based in Ottawa, Canada has demonstrated the ability to improve patients' access to specialist care. Objective: We interviewed patients who were treated using eConsult in order to explore their attitudes towards the service and their experiences of receiving care via the service. Methods: We conducted a thematic analysis of patient interviews using a constant comparative approach. Patients whose primary care providers used the eConsult service in their care were contacted by telephone between June 2015 and January 2016 and completed 15-min semi-structured interviews. Results: Of 43 contacted participants, 30 completed interviews (70%). Over half of all respondents (n = 16) reported receiving a follow-up call or appointment within 1 week, and 26 stated that eConsult was useful in their case. Participants unanimously agreed that eConsult was an acceptable way to access specialist care, and 29 stated that they would ask their primary care provider to use eConsult on their behalf in the future. Three themes emerged from the thematic analysis of patient comments: access, acceptability of eConsult and strengthened role of the primary care provider. Conclusions: Patients expressed acceptance for eConsult as a model for improving access to specialist care, had largely positive experiences with it as a model of care delivery, and supported its use in their future care.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Consulta Remota/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Canadá , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Investigación Cualitativa , Servicios de Salud Rural , Adulto Joven
7.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 30(6): 766-774, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29180551

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Excessive wait times for chronic pain are associated with significant reductions in quality of life and worse health outcomes. The Champlain BASE™ (Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation) eConsult service can improve access to specialist care for patients with chronic pain by facilitating electronic communication between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists. We explored the content of eConsult cases sent to chronic pain specialists to identify the major themes emerging from exchanges between PCPs and specialists regarding patients with chronic pain. METHODS: We conducted a thematic analysis of eConsult cases submitted to chronic pain specialists between April 1, 2011 and October 31, 2014, using a constant comparison approach. RESULTS: PCPs submitted 128 cases to chronic pain specialists during the study period. The study team coded 48 cases before data saturation was reached. PCPs sought advice for treating patients with chronic pain arising from a range of medical problems, and who frequently struggled with issues of mental health, substance dependence, and social complexity. Specialists responded with advice on pain management and treatment, directed PCPs to published guidelines and community resources, and validated the PCPs' frustration or concerns. Specialists provided instruction on safe opioid prescribing and how to identify and manage potential cases of substance dependence. CONCLUSION: Providing care to patients with chronic pain is a challenge for PCPs, who often experience frustration at their inability to provide a definitive solution for patients. Specialists offered invaluable feedback not only through guidance and advice, but also with sympathy and encouragement.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Consulta Remota/métodos , Especialización , Adulto , Femenino , Intercambio de Información en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermeras Practicantes/organización & administración , Médicos de Atención Primaria/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de Vida , Consulta Remota/organización & administración
8.
Can Fam Physician ; 62(3): e122-8, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27427563

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore perceptions about the factors that influence the ratio of generalists to other specialists. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews. SETTING: Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen individuals who were closely involved in medical education and health human resource planning or had a role in influencing medical education policy. METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted with participants until data saturation was reached. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using constant comparison techniques. For the purpose of simplifying discourse, family medicine and generalism were treated as synonymous throughout the interviews. MAIN FINDINGS: Seven themes emerged from participants' responses: ratio of generalists to specialists, importance of generalism, barriers to generalism, role of the medical education system, role of policy makers, geographic location, and the future of generalism. CONCLUSION: Most respondents perceived the ratio of specialists to generalists as roughly even and believed the reasons for this balance included increased attention from policy makers, a greater presence of family physicians in research and teaching, and a shift toward a more regional and representative distribution of medical education facilities. Respondents also highlighted challenges within family medicine including providers choosing a narrower scope of practice, a shift away from generalism, and ongoing inequities between family physicians and other specialties in terms of remuneration, lifestyle, and prestige.


Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales/provisión & distribución , Médicos de Familia/provisión & distribución , Especialización , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Canadá , Educación Médica , Médicos Generales/educación , Humanos , Rol del Médico , Médicos de Familia/educación
9.
Pain Med ; 17(6): 1049-1057, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27040667

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of the Champlain BASE (Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation) eConsult service on access to specialist care for patients with chronic pain. DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive study SETTING: The Champlain Local Health Integration Network, comprising Ottawa, Canada, and the surrounding region. SUBJECTS: All eConsult cases submitted to chronic pain specialists by primary care providers between April 15, 2011 and June 30, 2015. METHODS: Usage data and provider responses to a mandatory closeout survey were analyzed to determine response times, case outcomes, and provider satisfaction. RESULTS: Ninety-three primary care providers submitted 199 eConsults to four chronic pain specialists during the study period. Submitted cases had median response times of 1.9 days. Thirty-six percent of cases resulted in an unnecessary referral being avoided, and over 90% of cases were rated by primary care providers as being of high or very high value for their patients and themselves. CONCLUSION: The eConsult service improved access to specialist care for patients with chronic diseases. By facilitating prompt communication between primary care providers and specialists, eConsult can help mitigate the negative effects of long wait times experienced by patients with chronic pain.

10.
Gerontol Geriatr Med ; 2: 2333721416677195, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28680942

RESUMEN

Objective: The objective of the study is to examine the Champlain. BASETM (Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation) eConsult service's impact on access to care for older persons. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of all eConsult cases submitted between April 15, 2011, and July 31, 2015, in which the patient was above the age of 65 years. Study data consisted of utilization data collected automatically by the service and responses to surveys completed by primary care providers at the conclusion of all eConsult cases. Results: A total of 1,796 cases were submitted for older persons between April 15, 2011, and July 31, 2015, accounting for 21.3% of all cases submitted during the study period. Specialists responded to cases in a median of 0.8 days. In 94% of cases, providers rated eConsult as having great or excellent value for themselves and their patients. Sixty-eight percent of eConsults did not require a face-to-face visit; only 28% of all cases resulted in a referral. Discussion: As they suffer from higher than average rates of comorbid disease and mobility issues, older persons stand to benefit from shorter wait times and better access to care, which the eConsult service can provide.

11.
Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs ; 38(4): 245-65, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26368512

RESUMEN

Low levels of literacy in early childhood can have lasting effects on children's educational and intellectual development. Many countries have implemented newborn literacy programs designed to teach parents pre-literacy promoting activities to share with their children. We conducted 2 quasi-experimental studies using 1) a pre-test/post-test design and 2) a non-equivalent control group design to examine the effect of newborn literacy programs on parents' self-reported literacy intentions/behaviors, values toward literacy, and parent-child interactions. Parents were recruited from 3 provinces, 2 with newborn literacy programs (intervention) and 1 without (control). Parents in the intervention group completed prenatal and postnatal (after participation in program) questionnaires. Parents in the control group completed 1 questionnaire. Questionnaires were designed to capture parents' literacy intentions (prenatal), behaviors (postnatal), values, and parent-child interactions (postnatal). A total of 98 parents were included in study one and 174 were included in study two. Parents' self-reported prenatal intentions and values were higher than their postnatal behaviors and values. Parents in the intervention group exhibited higher literacy behaviors and values and greater enjoyment reading to their children than parents in the control group, though they also reported reading to their children less frequently. Parents in the intervention group had significantly higher Positive Interactive scores than controls. Overall, we found participation in newborn literacy programs positively impacted parenting behaviors and attitudes. Lower postnatal within-group scores (intentions and values versus behaviors and values) may have been the result of participants' high expectations. Given our findings, we recommend that these programs continue.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Educativa Precoz/métodos , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Responsabilidad Parental/psicología , Padres/educación , Lectura , Adaptación Psicológica , Canadá , Desarrollo Infantil , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Relaciones Madre-Hijo
12.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 28(3): 394-403, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25957372

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We have improved access to specialist care and decreased wait times in our region through the development and implementation of the Champlain BASE (Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation) service. This secure, web-based tool allows primary care providers (PCPs) quick access to specialist advice for their patients and often helps to avoid the need for a face-to-face referral. Our successful implementation of eConsult in our region provides a unique opportunity to examine PCPs' satisfaction and overall perspective on using the service. METHODS: Following the closure of each case, PCPs completed a short survey with multiple-choice and open-ended questions regarding the eConsult. All eConsults submitted between April 15, 2011, and December 31, 2013, were analyzed. We calculated satisfaction scores from the survey and conducted a constant-comparison thematic analysis on those cases where the PCP elected to leave a text response. RESULTS: We analyzed 2,052 eConsults completed during the study period. In 91% and 93% of eConsults, PCPs reported a high value for their patients and themselves, respectively. In 554 eConsults, PCPs elected to leave a written response. Three major themes emerged: PCP appreciation of the eConsult service, perceived benefits for the quality of patient care, and attitudes towards using a new health technology. High satisfaction was expressed with quick response times, helpfulness of responses, and reassurance reported. Most PCPs felt eConsult had a positive impact on patient care by also providing reassurance to patients, reducing burden of time and travel, and offering educational opportunities to PCPs applicable to future cases. CONCLUSION: PCPs showed a high level of satisfaction with eConsult's quick turnaround time and quality of specialist advice. Our results illustrate the advantages of using asynchronous virtual platforms to increase access to specialty care from a PCP perspective.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Aplicaciones de la Informática Médica , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Consulta Remota/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ontario , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Consulta Remota/métodos
13.
Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs ; 38(1): 39-56, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25533602

RESUMEN

Research demonstrates that literacy and academic achievement are predicated on the emergent literacy knowledge and skills children acquire from birth up to 4 years of age. Parents are children's first and most important language and literacy teachers, yet not all parents have the capacity to establish an adequate early literacy foundation. Efforts to address this situation have resulted in numerous programs aimed at fostering emergent literacy development. This systematic review evaluates evidence on the effectiveness of parent-mediated interventions that increase the time parents spend reading with young children up to 4 years old. Four studies met inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes for 664 children. Three provided data for meta-analysis of effects on reading duration. The standardized mean difference in reading duration was 1.61 (95% CI, 1.03, 2.19 fixed-effect), favoring intervention over control. Results indicate that interventions aimed at increasing the amount of time parents spend reading interactively with their children yield positive results. Findings also demonstrate that pediatric primary care providers are well positioned to deliver reading promotion programs to parents and preschoolers.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Educativa Precoz/métodos , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Lectura , Preescolar , Educación/métodos , Humanos , Lactante
14.
Biol Res Nurs ; 16(1): 83-94, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23099559

RESUMEN

To promote optimal health and behavioral outcomes in children, nurses have long supported parents in providing the best possible care and nurturance to their offspring. A growing body of neuroscience research argues convincingly for the combined influences of genes and early caregiving on producing an individual's unique health and behavioral phenotype. In this article, we systematically review studies that demonstrate the relationship between qualities of early caregiving and genetic propensity to health and behavioral outcomes. From an initial set of 255 articles, 24 articles met our inclusion criteria. The outcomes fall into four distinct groups: hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) response to stress, externalizing behavior, internalizing behavior, and disorganized attachment. In the articles, authors examined genes that code for the 5-hydroxy tryptamine (serotonin) transporter genes linked polymorphic region [5-HTTLPR] serotonin transporter promoter, D4 dopamine receptor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and monoamine oxidase A promoter. The reviewed studies suggest that the effect of the early rearing environment on gene expression relates mainly to HPA response to stress, whereas interactions between genes and caregiving mainly relate to behavior and attachment. Findings have implications for nurses focused on advocacy, prevention, and intervention to support the healthy development of children in families faced with adversity.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Interacción Gen-Ambiente , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Estado de Salud , Humanos
15.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 26(1): 69-80, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22293644

RESUMEN

The effect of postpartum depression (PPD) on mothers has been extensively studied. But even though up to 50% of men whose partners suffer from PPD also have depressive symptoms, little is known about the impact of maternal PPD on fathers. Depressive symptoms are likely to decrease fathers' ability to provide maternal support. Children with 2 depressed parents are at significantly greater risk for poor developmental outcomes than those with 1 affected parent. The objective of this Canada-wide exploratory/descriptive study was to describe the support needs and preferences for support of fathers whose partners have had PPD. Qualitative methods and community-based research approaches were used, and one-to-one telephone interviews were conducted between 2009 and 2011 with a total of 40 fathers. Fathers desired support from both formal (professional) and informal (friends and family) sources and noted that ideal support interventions should cover a number of key topics including information on PPD and practical tips on how to cope with their partner's PPD. Fathers reported that the ideal PPD intervention program does not favor any one setup and, to reach the full spectrum of parents, the program must be multitiered, accessible, and as flexible as funding allows.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/enfermería , Trastorno Depresivo/prevención & control , Relaciones Padre-Hijo , Padre/psicología , Enfermería Neonatal/organización & administración , Conducta Paterna/psicología , Periodo Posparto/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Alberta , Padre/educación , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Rol de la Enfermera , Responsabilidad Parental/psicología , Apoyo Social , Esposos/psicología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...