Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Sport Rehabil ; 29(7): 970-975, 2020 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31775119

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: The importance of rehabilitation and evaluation prior to return to sport (RTS) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has been reported. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to investigate current perspectives of Australian orthopedic surgeons on rehabilitation and RTS evaluation. DESIGN: Survey. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Australian Knee Society. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A 14-question survey was disseminated to Australian Knee Society members (orthopedic surgeons) to investigate (1) preferred graft choice, (2) estimated retear rate, (3) importance of preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, and (4) preferred timing of RTS and evaluation prior to RTS discharge. RESULTS: Of all 85 Australian Knee Society members contacted, 86% (n = 73) responded. Overall, 66 respondents (90.4%) preferentially used hamstring tendon autografts. All surgeons estimated their retear rate to be ≤15%, with 31 (42.5%) <5%. Twenty-eight surgeons (38.4%) reported no benefit in preoperative rehabilitation. The majority of surgeons (82.2%-94.5%) reported that postoperative rehabilitation was important within various periods throughout the postoperative timeline. Most surgeons did not permit RTS until ≥9 months (n = 56, 76.7%), with 17 (23.3%) allowing RTS between 6 and 9 months. The most highly reported considerations for RTS clearance were time (90.4%), functional capacity (90.4%), and strength (78.1%). Most commonly, knee strength and/or function was assessed via referral to a preferred rehabilitation specialist (50.7%) or with the surgeon at their practice (11.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This survey revealed variation in beliefs and practices surrounding rehabilitation and RTS evaluation. This is despite the current evidence demonstrating the benefit of preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, as well as the emerging potential of RTS assessments consisting of strength and functional measures to reduce reinjury rates.


Asunto(s)
Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/rehabilitación , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/estadística & datos numéricos , Autoinjertos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Rehabilitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Volver al Deporte/estadística & datos numéricos , Australia , Humanos , Ejercicio Preoperatorio , Lesiones de Repetición , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Phys Ther Sport ; 35: 139-145, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30557764

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate views and practices of Australian therapists on rehabilitation and return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). DESIGN: Survey-based study. SETTING: Online survey platform. PARTICIPANTS: Australian Physiotherapists and Accredited Exercise Physiologists (n = 223). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 1) perceived benefit, timing and frequency of rehabilitation, 2) timing of RTS and information on RTS evaluation and discharge criteria. RESULTS: Therapists preferred to consult patients for the first time at 1-4 days (27.8%), ≤7 days (25.6%) or 7-14 days (30.5%) post-surgery. Within the first 6 weeks, 82.1% of therapists preferred patient visitation 1-2 times per week. Between 3 and 6 months, therapists mainly recommended less frequent visitation with a focus on home exercises. While 22.0% and 53.8% of therapists were willing to discharge patients for sport at 6-9 and 9-12 months, respectively, 22.9% preferred 12-18 months. Common RTS considerations were functional capacity (98.7%), strength (87.0%), lower limb and trunk mechanics (96.0%) and psychological readiness (87.9%). Knee strength was evaluated via manual muscle testing (33.0%), hand held (26.7%) and isokinetic (11.8%) dynamometry. For functional evaluation, 84.3% of therapists employed a hop battery (≥2 hop tests). CONCLUSIONS: This survey revealed variation in beliefs and practices surrounding rehabilitation and RTS evaluation in Australian therapists.


Asunto(s)
Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/rehabilitación , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Volver al Deporte , Australia , Terapia por Ejercicio , Humanos , Rodilla , Fuerza Muscular , Fisioterapeutas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA