Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 74(1): e17-e23, 2017 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28007717

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The effect of perioperative supplementation of polyunsaturated omega-3 fatty acid (PUFA) on the frequency of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients without a history of AF was evaluated. METHODS: A total of 561 patients were randomized to receive either 1 g of PUFA or placebo twice daily. Treatment was started up to five days before surgery or within 24 hours after surgery, depending on when consent was received. Treatment was continued until the patient's follow-up visit with the cardiologist up to four weeks after surgery. The primary endpoint of the study was AF before hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints included AF within one week after surgery, AF within one month after surgery, length of hospital stay, postoperative bleeding complications, and readmission within one month after surgery. RESULTS: No significant reduction in the risk of AF was observed at hospital discharge (relative risk [RR], 0.98; p = 0.922) or at three weeks after surgery (RR, 0.98; p = 0.844). After restricting the analysis to treatment-adherent patients, the association remained nonsignificant at hospital discharge (RR, 0.90; p = 0.374) and at three weeks after surgery (RR, 0.90; p = 0.330). No significant differences were observed between treatments for rates of readmission, death, and bleeding complications or the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Perioperative supplementation with PUFA did not decrease the risk of AF in the immediate postoperative period. PUFA also had no effect on the length of hospital stay, postoperative bleeding complications, and readmissions within one month after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Suplementos Dietéticos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 64(21): 2257-66, 2007 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17959578

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The effects of vitamin E supplementation on the cholesterol levels of hypercholesterolemic patients receiving statin therapy were studied. METHODS: In this prospective, single-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, patients who were currently taking either lovastatin or simvastatin for a primary diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia were given placebo for two weeks and then randomized to receive a supplement of either 400 IU of vitamin E or matching placebo after dinner for eight weeks, followed by a two-week washout period. RESULTS: Vitamin E supplementation increased plasma alpha-tocopherol concentrations approximately 1.6-fold and increased excretion of its urinary metabolite 4-fold significantly from week 2 to week 6 (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). During the eight-week supplementation period, no statistically significant differences in any lipoprotein cholesterol fraction were detected between groups; however, a 6% decrease in high-density-lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was detected within the vitamin E group from week 2 to week 6 (p < 0.05), but the decrease was not sufficient to change the cardiac risk ratio. Neither cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme (CYP) 3A (as measured by hydroxylation of urinary cortisol) nor cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity was significantly altered during the study. CONCLUSION: Vitamin E supplementation did not affect total or low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolemic patients receiving lovastatin or simvastatin. A small but significant decrease in HDL cholesterol levels was observed in the group that received vitamin E supplementation during the supplementation period, but this decrease was no longer significantly different from the placebo group's levels two weeks postsupplementation. The decrease in HDL cholesterol levels did not appear to be related to either CYP3A or CETP.


Asunto(s)
Colesterol/sangre , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitamina E/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/sangre , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple Ciego
3.
Ann Pharmacother ; 37(12): 1800-3, 2003 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14632599

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of severe memory loss in an elderly patient after initiation of fluoxetine. CASE SUMMARY: An 87-year-old white woman was started on fluoxetine for depression, and the dose was titrated to 20 mg/d. She developed progressive memory loss over the next 6 weeks for which she ultimately was hospitalized. Other potential causes for her memory loss were ruled out. After fluoxetine was discontinued, the patient's memory improved significantly over the next 2 months. An objective causality assessment indicated a possible relationship between the memory loss and fluoxetine in this patient. DISCUSSION: Our report documents a case of severe reversible memory deterioration after initiating fluoxetine. Fluoxetine has a favorable adverse effect profile when compared with older classes of antidepressants. Postmarketing studies and isolated case reports, however, suggest that fluoxetine may harm memory in some patients. Some selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) appear to cause memory loss more frequently than others. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of the possible effects of fluoxetine (and possibly other SSRIs) on memory.


Asunto(s)
Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Trastornos de la Memoria/inducido químicamente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Trastornos de la Memoria/psicología
4.
Ann Pharmacother ; 36(4): 624-7, 2002 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11918510

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of increased blood pressure associated with the use of salsalate in an elderly patient with no prior history of hypertension. CASE SUMMARY: A 78-year-old white man with no prior history of hypertension initiated salsalate therapy for low-back pain. Over the 15 months prior to the initiation of salsalate, his blood pressure averaged 127 +/- 7 mm Hg systolic and 84 +/- 6 mm Hg diastolic (mean +/- SD). After initiation of salsalate, he experienced significant elevations in blood pressure, which led to a preliminary diagnosis of hypertension. Blood pressure after initiation of salsalate averaged 150 +/- 13 mm Hg systolic and 95 +/- 5 mm Hg diastolic. No changes in medications or medication doses (with the exception of warfarin) occurred in the 18 months prior to or during salsalate therapy. His weight remained stable. A detailed review of his medical records and history revealed no other causes for these elevations in blood pressure. Salsalate therapy was discontinued and his blood pressure returned to normotensive levels (119 +/- 2 mm Hg systolic and 81 +/- 2 mm Hg diastolic). DISCUSSION: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced elevations in blood pressure have been well documented in patients receiving antihypertensive medications. Due to its relative weak inhibition of cyclooxygenase and lack of published literature in hypertensive patients, salsalate is considered to have little or no effect on blood pressure. Our report documents a possible case of salsalate-induced hypertension in a previously normotensive elderly man. Observational studies suggest that NSAID use may increase the risk of developing hypertension in older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of the possible effects of NSAIDs on blood pressure. Blood pressure monitoring following the initiation of salsalate may be warranted, particularly in older patients.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Hipertensión/inducido químicamente , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Salicilatos/efectos adversos , Anciano , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Salicilatos/uso terapéutico
5.
J Am Osteopath Assoc ; 99(10_suppl): S9-S13, 1999 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26983063

RESUMEN

Gastroesophageal reflux and asthma are common diseases in the developed world, and they often coexist in patients. Animal experiments, epidemiologic data, and clinical studies suggest that gastroesophageal reflux may contribute to the pathogenesis of asthma. In addition to classic reflux symptoms, such patients may notice nightly exacerbations of asthma or postprandial worsening of their pulmonary symptoms. Empiric treatment with an acid-suppressive regimen is the most cost-effective approach for asthmatic patients with classic gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, especially if the asthma remains poorly controlled despite conventional treatment. If patients have persistent problems after an adequate duration of acid-suppressive therapy or if they report symptoms indicating complicated reflux disease, such as dysphagia, additional diagnostic studies should be initiated. In most cases, medical therapy should be chosen for the long-term treatment of patients with asthma and gastroesophageal reflux. With the availability of less-invasive laparoscopic surgery, fundoplication may be an alternative in selected, mostly young individuals who have documented reflux and symptoms responsive to appropriate acid-suppressive regimens.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA