RESUMEN
A subcommittee of the Netherlands Commission on Radiation Dosimetry (NCS) was initiated in 2018 with the task to update and extend a previous publication (NCS-15) on the quality assurance of treatment planning systems (TPS) (Bruinviset al2005). The field of treatment planning has changed considerably since 2005. Whereas the focus of the previous report was more on the technical aspects of the TPS, the scope of this report is broader with a focus on a department wide implementation of the TPS. New sections about education, automated planning, information technology (IT) and updates are therefore added. Although the scope is photon therapy, large parts of this report will also apply to all other treatment modalities. This paper is a condensed version of these guidelines; the full version of the report in English is freely available from the NCS website (http://radiationdosimetry.org/ncs/publications). The paper starts with the scope of this report in relation to earlier reports on this subject. Next, general aspects of the commissioning process are addressed, like e.g. project management, education, and safety. It then focusses more on technical aspects such as beam commissioning and patient modeling, dose representation, dose calculation and (automated) plan optimisation. The final chapters deal with IT-related subjects and scripting, and the process of updating or upgrading the TPS.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Shielding disks play an important role in intraoperative electron radiation therapy, and different designs are currently used in clinical practice. This paper investigates the dosimetric impact of the shielding disk used during intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This paper focuses on the study of four shielding disks types that have been used in our clinic: Aluminum (Al)/Lead (Pb), PMMA/Copper(Cu)/PMMA, Aluminum (Al)/Copper (Cu) and Aluminum (Al)/Steel with their specific thicknesses. The theoretical study was conducted with the EGSnrc Monte Carlo (MC) code. On the other hand, the measurements were carried out with gafchromic films for the four shielding disks for the same setup inside the water phantom. Finally, a comparison of the simulated and measured PDD curves was performed for the four material combinations. RESULTS: MC simulation and gafchromic measurements illustrated that dose values under the four shielding disks types were close to 0, whereas the backscattering enhancement of the disks were 103% with Al/Pb shielding disk, 102% with Al/Steel shielding disk, 102% with Al/Cu shielding disk, 95% with PMMA/Cu/PMMA shielding disk. The PDDs values of the gafchromic films in front of the disks were: 107%, 105%, 104%, and 94% for the Al/Pb, Al/Steel, Al/Cu, and PMMA/Cu/PMMA disks respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The dose values above and under the shielding disks were acceptable for the four studied shielding types. Demonstrated it is possible to use any of them clinically, while the best shielding disk was the Al/Pb since it has minimum thickness and a small backscatter enhancement.
