Effectiveness of motor and prefrontal cortical areas for brain-controlled functional electrical stimulation neuromodulation.

Objective. Brain-computer interface (BCI)-controlled functional electrical stimulation (FES) could excite the central nervous system to enhance upper limb motor recovery. Our current study assessed the effectiveness of motor and prefrontal cortical activity-based BCI-FES to help elucidate the underlying neuromodulation mechanisms of this neurorehabilitation approach.Approach. The primary motor cortex (M1) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) BCI-FES interventions were performed for 25 min on separate days with twelve non-disabled participants. During the interventions, a single electrode from the contralateral M1 or PFC was used to detect event-related desynchronization (ERD) in the calibrated frequency range. If the BCI system detected ERD within 15 s of motor imagery, FES activated wrist extensor muscles. Otherwise, if the BCI system did not detect ERD within 15 s, a subsequent trial was initiated without FES. To evaluate neuromodulation effects, corticospinal excitability was assessed using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation, and cortical excitability was assessed by motor imagery ERD and resting-state functional connectivity before, immediately, 30 min, and 60 min after each intervention.Main results. M1 and PFC BCI-FES interventions had similar success rates of approximately 80%, while the M1 intervention was faster in detecting ERD activity. Consequently, only the M1 intervention effectively elicited corticospinal excitability changes for at least 60 min around the targeted cortical area in the M1, suggesting a degree of spatial localization. However, cortical excitability measures did not indicate changes after either M1 or PFC BCI-FES.Significance. Neural mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of BCI-FES neuromodulation may be attributed to the M1 direct corticospinal projections and/or the closer timing between ERD detection and FES, which likely enhanced Hebbian-like plasticity by synchronizing cortical activation detected by the BCI system with the sensory nerve activation and movement related reafference elicited by FES.

Scoping Review on Brain-Computer Interface-Controlled Electrical Stimulation Interventions for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Adults: A Look at Participants, Interventions, and Technology.

Purpose: While current rehabilitation practice for improving arm and hand function relies on physical/occupational therapy, a growing body of research evaluates the effects of technology-enhanced rehabilitation. We review interventions that combine a brain-computer interface (BCI) with electrical stimulation (ES) for upper limb movement rehabilitation to summarize the evidence on (1) populations of study participants, (2) BCI-ES interventions, and (3) the BCI-ES systems. Method: After searching seven databases, two reviewers identified 23 eligible studies. We consolidated information on the study participants, interventions, and approaches used to develop integrated BCI-ES systems. The included studies investigated the use of BCI-ES interventions with stroke and spinal cord injury (SCI) populations. All studies used electroencephalography to collect brain signals for the BCI, and functional electrical stimulation was the most common type of ES. The BCI-ES interventions were typically conducted without a therapist, with sessions varying in both frequency and duration. Results: Of the 23 eligible studies, only 3 studies involved the SCI population, compared to 20 involving individuals with stroke. Conclusions: Future BCI-ES interventional studies could address this gap. Additionally, standardization of device and rehabilitation modalities, and study-appropriate involvement with therapists, can be considered to advance this intervention towards clinical implementation.

Objectif: les pratiques de réadaptation actuelles pour améliorer le fonctionnement de la main et du bras reposent sur la physiothérapie et l'ergothérapie, mais de plus en plus de recherches évaluent les effets de la réadaptation améliorée par la technologie. Les chercheurs analysent les interventions qui combinent une interface cerveau-ordinateur (ICO) à la stimulation électrique (SÉ) en réadaptation des mouvements des membres supérieurs pour résumer les données probantes sur 1) les populations de participants aux études, 2) les interventions d'ICO-SÉ et 3) les systèmes d'ICO-SÉ. Méthodologie: après avoir fouillé sept bases de données, deux analystes ont extrait 23 études admissibles. Les chercheurs ont regroupé l'information sur les participants aux études, de même que sur les interventions et les approches utilisées pour mettre au point des systèmes d'ICO-SÉ intégrés. Les études portaient sur l'utilisation des interventions d'ICO-SÉ auprès des populations victimes d'un accident vasculaire cérébral ou d'une lésion médullaire. Toutes faisaient appel à l'électroencéphalographie pour obtenir les signaux cérébraux de l'ICO, et la SÉ fonctionnelle était la SÉ la plus courante. Les interventions d'ICO-SÉ se déroulaient généralement sans thérapeute, et la fréquence et la durée des séances étaient variables. Résultats: sur les 23 études admissibles, seulement trois traitaient de la population victime d'une lésion médullaire, par rapport à 20 de personnes victimes d'un accident vasculaire cérébral. Conclusions: les futures études d'interventions d'ICO-SÉ pourraient corriger cette lacune. De plus, on peut envisager de standardiser les modalités des appareils et de la réadaptation et de prévoir une participation avec les thérapeutes adaptée à l'étude pour faire progresser cette intervention vers la mise en œuvre clinique.

Evidence That Brain-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Could Elicit Targeted Corticospinal Facilitation of Hand Muscles in Healthy Young Adults.

OBJECTIVES: Brain-computer interface (BCI)-controlled functional electrical stimulation (FES) has been used in rehabilitation for improving hand motor function. However, mechanisms of improvements are still not well understood. The objective of this study was to investigate how BCI-controlled FES affects hand muscle corticospinal excitability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 12 healthy young adults were recruited in the study. During BCI calibration, a single electroencephalography channel from the motor cortex and a frequency band were chosen to detect event-related desynchronization (ERD) of cortical oscillatory activity during kinesthetic wrist motor imagery (MI). The MI-based BCI system was used to detect active states on the basis of ERD activity in real time and produce contralateral wrist extension movements through FES of the extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscle. As a control condition, FES was used to generate wrist extension at random intervals. The two interventions were performed on separate days and lasted 25 minutes. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in ECR (intervention target) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscles were elicited through single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex to compare corticospinal excitability before (pre), immediately after (post0), and 30 minutes after (post30) the interventions. RESULTS: After the BCI-FES intervention, ECR muscle MEPs were significantly facilitated at post0 and post30 time points compared with before the intervention (pre), whereas there were no changes in the FCR muscle corticospinal excitability. Conversely, after the random FES intervention, both ECR and FCR muscle MEPs were unaffected compared with before the intervention (pre). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated evidence that BCI-FES intervention could elicit muscle-specific short-term corticospinal excitability facilitation of the intervention targeted (ECR) muscle only, whereas randomly applied FES was ineffective in eliciting any changes. Notably, these findings suggest that associative cortical and peripheral activations during BCI-FES can effectively elicit targeted muscle corticospinal excitability facilitation, implying possible rehabilitation mechanisms.

Characterizing the stimulation interference in electroencephalographic signals during brain-computer interface-controlled functional electrical stimulation therapy.

INTRODUCTION: The integration of brain-computer interface (BCI) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) has brought about a new rehabilitation strategy: BCI-controlled FES therapy or BCI-FEST. During BCI-FEST, the stimulation is triggered by the patient's brain activity, often monitored using electroencephalography (EEG). Several studies have demonstrated that BCI-FEST can improve voluntary arm and hand function after an injury, but few studies have investigated the FES interference in EEG signals during BCI-FEST. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of band-pass filters, used to extract the BCI-relevant EEG components, in simultaneously reducing stimulation interference. METHODS: We used EEG data from eight participants recorded during BCI-FEST. Additionally, we separately recorded the FES signal generated by the stimulator to estimate the spectral components of the FES interference, and extract the noise in time domain. Finally, we calculated signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) values before and after band-pass filtering, for two types of movements practiced during BCI-FEST: reaching and grasping. RESULTS: The SNR values were greater after filtering across all participants for both movement types. For reaching movements, mean SNR values increased between 1.31 dB and 36.3 dB. Similarly, for grasping movements, mean SNR values increased between 2.82 dB and 40.16 dB, after filtering. CONCLUSIONS: Band-pass filters, used to isolate EEG frequency bands for BCI application, were also effective in reducing stimulation interference. In addition, we provide a general algorithm that can be used in future studies to estimate the frequencies of FES interference as a function of the selected stimulation pulse frequency, FSTIM , and the EEG sampling rate, FS .

Comparing preference related to comfort in torque-matched muscle contractions between two different types of functional electrical stimulation pulses in able-bodied participants.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is commonly used in rehabilitation to generate electrically-induced muscle contractions. FES has been shown to assist in the recovery of voluntary motor functions after stroke or spinal cord injury. However, discomfort associated with FES can motivate patients to withdraw their participation from FES therapy despite its benefits. To address this issue, a functional electrical stimulator, called MyndMove™ (MyndTec Inc., Canada), has been developed to generate more comfortable contractions than conventional stimulators. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, interventional, with two treatment arms. SETTING: A laboratory within a rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve able-bodied participants. INTERVENTION: FES delivered with two different stimulators, MyndMove™ and Compex Motion (Compex, Switzerland), during muscle contractions of high, moderate and low stimulation intensity. OUTCOME MEASURES: Comfort-related preference to a given stimulator and the discomfort score rated through a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-101) for both stimulators. RESULTS: Participants perceived a reduction in discomfort during high-intensity stimulation generated using MyndMove™. In addition, MyndMove™ stimulations were preferred in 60% of all contractions. The reduction in discomfort associated with MyndMove™ might be due the fact that MyndMove™ delivers less charge to generate contractions of equivalent intensity, compared to Compex Motion. CONCLUSION: Reducing discomfort during FES may help in generating stronger and more clinically useful contractions, increasing accessibility of FES therapy to include individuals with low tolerance to FES.

KITE-BCI: A brain-computer interface system for functional electrical stimulation therapy.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: Integrating brain-computer interface (BCI) technology with functional electrical stimulation therapy (FEST) is an emerging strategy for upper limb motor rehabilitation after spinal cord injury (SCI). Despite promising results, the combined use of these technologies (BCI-FEST) in clinical practice is minimal. To address this issue, we developed KITE-BCI, a BCI system specifically designed for clinical application and integration with dynamic FEST. In this paper, we report its technical features and performance. In addition, we discuss the differences in distributions of the BCI- and therapist-triggered stimulation latencies. DESIGN: Two single-arm 40-session interventional studies to test the feasibility of BCI-controlled FEST for upper limb motor rehabilitation in individuals with cervical SCI. SETTING: Rehabilitation programs within the University and Lyndhurst Centres of the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Five individuals with sub-acute (< 6 months post-injury) SCI at the C4-C5 level, AIS B-D, and three individuals with chronic (> 24 months post-injury) SCI at C4 level, AIS B-C. OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured BCI setup duration, and to characterize the performance of KITE-BCI, we recorded BCI sensitivity, defined as the percentage of successful BCI activations out of the total number of cued movements. RESULTS: The overall BCI sensitivities were 74.46% and 79.08% for the sub-acute and chronic groups, respectively. The average KITE-BCI setup duration across the two studies was 11 min and 13 s. CONCLUSION: KITE-BCI demonstrates a clinically viable single-channel BCI system for integration with FEST resulting in a versatile technology-enhanced upper limb motor rehabilitation strategy after SCI.

Brain-computer interface-triggered functional electrical stimulation therapy for rehabilitation of reaching and grasping after spinal cord injury: a feasibility study.

STUDY DESIGN: Feasibility and preliminary clinical efficacy analysis in a single-arm interventional study. OBJECTIVES: We developed a brain-computer interface-triggered functional electrical stimulation therapy (BCI-FEST) system for clinical application and conducted an interventional study to (1) assess its feasibility and (2) understand its potential clinical efficacy for the rehabilitation of reaching and grasping in individuals with sub-acute spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Spinal cord injury rehabilitation hospital-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-Lyndhurst Centre. METHODS: Five participants with sub-acute SCI completed between 12 and 40 1-hour sessions using BCI-FEST, with up to 5 sessions a week. We assessed feasibility by measuring participants' compliance with treatment, the occurrence of adverse events, BCI sensitivity, and BCI setup duration. Clinical efficacy was assessed using Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), as primary outcomes. In addition, we used two upper-limb function tests as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: On average, participants completed 29.8 sessions with no adverse events. Only one of the 149 sessions was affected by technical challenges. The BCI sensitivity ranged between 69.5 and 80.2%, and the mean BCI setup duration was ~11 min. In the primary outcomes, three out of five participants showed changes greater than the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). Additionally, the mean change in secondary outcome measures met the threshold for detecting MCID as well; four out of five participants achieved MCID. CONCLUSIONS: The new BCI-FEST intervention is safe, feasible, and promising for the rehabilitation of reaching and grasping after SCI.

Restoration of Upper Limb Function After Chronic Severe Hemiplegia: A Case Report on the Feasibility of a Brain-Computer Interface-Triggered Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy.

Functional electrical stimulation therapy (FEST) is a state-of-the-art treatment for retraining motor function after neurological injuries. Recent literature suggests that FEST can be further improved with brain-computer interface (BCI) technology. In this case study, we assessed the feasibility of using BCI-triggered FEST (BCI-FEST) to restore upper limb function in a 57-yr-old man with severe left hemiplegia resulting from a stroke 6 yrs before enrollment in the study. The intervention consisted of two blocks of forty 1-hr BCI-FEST sessions, with three sessions delivered weekly. During therapy, a single-channel BCI was used to trigger the stimulation programmed to facilitate functional movements. The measure of the feasibility of the BCI-FEST included assessing the implementation and safety of the intervention. Clinical improvements were assessed using (a) Functional Independence Measure, (b) Action Research Arm Test, (c) Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - Hand Function Test, and (d) Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity test. Upon completion of 80 therapy sessions, 14-, 17-, and 18-point changes were recorded on Action Research Arm Test, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity test, and Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - Hand Function Test, respectively. The participant also indicated improvement as demonstrated by his ability to perform various day-to-day tasks. The results suggest that BCI-FEST is safe and viable.