The Survival Effect of Repeat Surgery at Glioblastoma Recurrence and its Trend: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a dismal disease managed in the first instance by surgical resection, temozolomide, and radiation. The role of repeat surgery at recurrence remains ill defined. This study aims to quantify the effect of repeat surgery in recurrent GBM on overall survival and determine if a trend in reported effect over time exists. METHODS: Searches of 7 electronic databases from inception to January 2018 were conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. There were 2692 articles identified for screening. Prognostic hazard ratios (HRs) derived from multivariate regression analysis were extracted and analyzed using meta-analysis of proportions and linear regression. RESULTS: Eight observational studies reporting prognostic HRs in 10 cohorts were included. They described 1906 recurrent GBM diagnoses, managed by surgery at primary diagnosis, with 709 (37%) undergoing further repeat surgery at recurrence. Repeat surgery was shown to confer a statistically significant survival advantage compared with no surgery at recurrence in the pooled cohort (HR, 0.722; P < 0.001). Newer studies trended toward a more superior prognostic advantage of repeat surgery compared with earlier studies (effect coefficient, 0.856; P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of contemporary literature suggests that repeat surgery at GBM recurrence in select patients confers a significant, prognostic overall survival advantage independent of other prognostic factors. Furthermore, newer studies are significantly more likely to suggest greater benefit than are older studies. The main limitation is the selection bias inherent in the cohorts pooled for analysis. Larger prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to validate the findings of this study and provide stratification for such benefit justified by quality of life metrics.

Quantifying the prognostic significance in glioblastoma of seizure history at initial presentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The role of prognostic factors in the management of glioblastoma (GBM) is very important given the stasis in improving its clinical outcomes. Patients who initially present with a positive seizure history at diagnosis have anecdotally experienced superior survival outcomes. The aim of this review was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the potential prognostic significance of positive seizure history in GBM patients. A search strategy was performed using the PRISMA guidelines for article identification, screening, eligibility and inclusion. Relevant articles were identified from six electronic databases from their inception to August 2017. These articles were screened against established criteria for inclusion into this study. Meta-analysis was conducted by pooling results with multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs). After screening, 6 relevant studies were included for analysis. There was a total cohort of 1836 GBM patients, of which 488 (27%) had a positive seizure history at initial presentation. There was a significant association found between positive seizure history in GBM patients and less mortality events, with an overall HR of 0.71 (95%CI=0.63-0.81, p<0.00001, I2=4%). Positive seizure history at initial presentation of GBM can be associated with improved prognosis. However, there are a number of variables that need to be considered further, including genetic profiling, lead time bias, and anti-epileptic drug (AED) therapy. This review represents the highest level of evidence to date, and its result will be validated by future, prospective study of larger cohorts.

Overview of the interactive task in BioCreative V.

Fully automated text mining (TM) systems promote efficient literature searching, retrieval, and review but are not sufficient to produce ready-to-consume curated documents. These systems are not meant to replace biocurators, but instead to assist them in one or more literature curation steps. To do so, the user interface is an important aspect that needs to be considered for tool adoption. The BioCreative Interactive task (IAT) is a track designed for exploring user-system interactions, promoting development of useful TM tools, and providing a communication channel between the biocuration and the TM communities. In BioCreative V, the IAT track followed a format similar to previous interactive tracks, where the utility and usability of TM tools, as well as the generation of use cases, have been the focal points. The proposed curation tasks are user-centric and formally evaluated by biocurators. In BioCreative V IAT, seven TM systems and 43 biocurators participated. Two levels of user participation were offered to broaden curator involvement and obtain more feedback on usability aspects. The full level participation involved training on the system, curation of a set of documents with and without TM assistance, tracking of time-on-task, and completion of a user survey. The partial level participation was designed to focus on usability aspects of the interface and not the performance per se In this case, biocurators navigated the system by performing pre-designed tasks and then were asked whether they were able to achieve the task and the level of difficulty in completing the task. In this manuscript, we describe the development of the interactive task, from planning to execution and discuss major findings for the systems tested.Database URL: http://www.biocreative.org.