Oncological outcome after MRI-based selection for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the OCUM Rectal Cancer Trial.

BACKGROUND: It is not clear whether all patients with rectal cancer need chemoradiotherapy. A restrictive use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) based on MRI findings for rectal cancer was investigated in this study. METHODS: This prospective multicentre observational study included patients with stage cT2-4 rectal cancer, with any cN and cM0 status. Carcinomas in the middle and lower third that were 1 mm or less from the mesorectal fascia, all cT4 tumours, and all cT3 tumours of the lower third were classified as high risk, and these patients received nCRT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). All other carcinomas with a minimum distance of more than 1 mm from the mesorectal fascia and those in the upper third were classified as low risk; these patients underwent TME alone (no nCRT). Patients were followed for at least 3 years. Outcomes were the rates of local recurrence, distant metastasis and survival. RESULTS: Among 545 patients included, 428 were treated according to the study protocol: 254 (59·3 per cent) had TME alone and 174 (40·7 per cent) received nCRT and TME. Median follow-up was 60 months. The 3- and 5-year local recurrence rates were 1·3 and 2·7 per cent respectively, with no differences between the two treatment protocols. Patients with disease requiring nCRT had higher 3- and 5-year rates of distant metastasis (17·3 and 24·9 per cent respectively versus 8·9 and 14·4 per cent in patients who had TME alone; P = 0·005) and worse disease-free survival compared with that in patients who did not need nCRT (3- and 5-year rates 76·7 and 66·7 per cent, versus 84·9 and 76·0 per cent in the TME-alone group; P = 0·016). CONCLUSION: Restriction of nCRT to high-risk patients achieved good results.

Long-term results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery after endoscopic polypectomy of malignant rectal adenoma.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the treatment and prognosis of malignant rectal polyps. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) after endoscopic complete polypectomy of malignant rectal adenomas with long-term follow-up. METHODS: Of 105 patients with pT1 rectal carcinoma in 32 patients TEM followed complete endoscopic polypectomy while 73 had primary TEM. Local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis, overall and cancer-specific survival were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 9.1 years. In 32 patients with TEM following complete polypectomy no residual cancer was found. LR occurred in 3/28 (11%) patients with low-risk carcinoma (pT1 G1/2/X, L0/X, R0) and in 1/4 (25%) with high-risk carcinoma (pT1 G3/4 or L1). After primary TEM with complete resection (minimal distance >1 mm) LR occurred in 6/60 (10%) with low-risk carcinoma. After incomplete TEM resection (minimal distance ≤1 mm) LR occurred in 3/8 (38%) patients with low-risk and in 1/5 (20%) patients with high-risk carcinoma. Grading was the only significant risk factor for LR after endoscopic polypectomy followed by TEM (p = 0.002). At all outcomes did not differ between postpolypectomy TEM and primary TEM. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with malignant rectal polyps removed by endoscopic polypectomy have a substantial risk of LR even if TEM of polyp site is cancer free. Risk of LR depends on tumor characteristics. In low-risk carcinoma long-term follow-up is necessary. The high LR rate in patients with high-risk rectal carcinoma restricts the use of TEM alone.

Use of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Select Patients with Rectal Cancer for Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation--Interim Analysis of the German OCUM Trial (NCT01325649).

INTRODUCTION: Introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery for rectal cancer decreased local recurrence dramatically. Additional neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCR) is frequently given in UICC II and III tumors based on TNM staging which is of limited accuracy. We aimed to evaluate determination of circumferential margin by magnetic resonance imaging (mrCRM) as an alternative criterium for nCR. METHODS: Multicenter prospective cohort study which enrolled 642 patients in 13 centers with non-metastasized rectal adenocarcinoma. Patients with T4 tumors or patients with a mrCRM of 1 mm or less were treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation. All others proceeded directly to surgery when inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria were met. Quality of TME and accuracy of mrCRM determination were assessed during pathology workup. RESULTS: TME was complete in 381 of 389 patients after surgery without nCR (97.9%) and in 245 of 253 patients (96.8%) after nCR. Negative pathology circumferential margins (pCRM) were seen in 97.4% without nCR and in 89% of patients after nCR. Negative pCRM was predicted by negative mrCRM in 98.3% of rectal cancers. NCR was given to 253 of 642 patients (39.5%). Lymph node count was 23 (range 7-79; median/range) for surgery without nCR and 19 (range 2-56) for surgery after nCR. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical quality determined by pathology workup of specimen was very good in this study. Magnetic resonance imaging guided indication for nCR allows to achieve superb results concerning surrogate parameters for good oncological outcome. Thus, use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation with its potential detrimental side effects may be substantially reduced in selected patients.

[Spincter preservation after selective chemoradiotherapy of rectal cancer. Interim results of the OCUM study]. / Spinktererhalt nach selektiver Radiochemotherapie des Rektumkarzinoms. Zwischenergebnisse der OCUM-Studie.

BACKGROUND: In a prospective multicenter observational study (OCUM) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nRCT) was selectively administered depending on the risk of local recurrence and based on the distance between tumor and mesorectal fascia in pretherapeutic high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). OBJECTIVE: Frequency and quality of abdominoperineal excision (APE) and sphincter preserving operations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 642 patients treated in 13 hospitals 389 received surgery alone and 253 nRCT followed by surgery. By univariate and multivariate analysis risk factors for APE were determined. Quality parameters were the quality grade of mesorectal excision, the pathohistological involvement of the circumferential resection margin and intraoperative local dissemination of tumor cells. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In 12.8 % of the patients APE was performed. Independent risk factors for APE were tumor location in the lower third of the rectum and the individual hospitals, where APE varied between 0 and 32 %. This variation was chiefly caused by the different case mix. Hospitals with a high APE rate (> 30 %) treated significantly more patients with very low lying carcinomas (< 3 cm above the anal verge) and more advanced tumors. The median height of the tumor in cases of APE was nearly equal in all participating hospitals. Independent on the number of cases the quality of rectal surgery was high. Within the patient groups of primary surgery and nRCT the oncological quality parameter did not significantly differ between sphincter preservation and APE. As far as sphincter preservation is concerned the results justify a selective application of nRCT in patients with rectal carcinoma. The long-term results still have to be awaited.

[Lymph node dissection after primary surgery and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of rectal cancer. Interim analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study (OCUM)]. / Lymphknotendissektion nach primärer Chirurgie und neoadjuvanter Radiochemotherapie des Rektumkarzinoms. Interimsanalyse einer multizentrischen prospektiven Beobachtungsstudie (OCUM).

INTRODUCTION: The OCUM trial (NCT01325649) aims to clarify whether low rates of local recurrence are also achieved when the indications for neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy are not based on the clinical TNM staging but on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging with measurement of the tumor distance to the circumferential resection margin. In this interim analysis the lymph node status in OCUM patients was investigated as a surrogate parameter for quality of surgery and histopathological work-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Until now a total of 560 patients have been included in this study. Total mesorectal excision (TME) without pretreatment was undertaken in 338 patients (60.4 %) and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was administered in 222 (39.6 %) patients. The histological work-up was performed according to the guidelines of the German Association of Pathologists. Data are given as median values and ranges in brackets. RESULTS: The lymph node yield was 24 (7-79) in 338 patients undergoing primary TME surgery without pretreatment, while 20 (3-56) lymph nodes were identified in patients after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (p = 0.001). A minimum of 12 lymph nodes were analyzed in 335 out of 338 patients (99.1 %) and in 209 out of 222 patients (94.1 %) following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (p = 0.001). Lymph node metastasis was identified (p = 0.362) in 116 out of 338 patients without pretreatment (34.3 %) and in 71 out of 222 patients after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (32.0 %). Patient age did not influence the number of identified lymph nodes or rate of lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSION: In this trial the number of identified lymph nodes suggests that the quality of surgery and histopathological work-up were adequate compared to the standards defined by national guidelines. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy led to a reduced lymph node yield compared to surgery without pretreatment; however, this did not influence the rate of lymph node metastasis.

The prognostic value of lymph node ratio and updated TNM classification in rectal cancer patients with adequate versus inadequate lymph node dissection.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to clarify whether the lymph node ratio (LNR) is superior to the updated TNM classification regarding the prognosis of stage III rectal cancer patients who have not undergone neoadjuvant therapy. The TNM system is based on the absolute number of lymph nodes involved, and the LNR takes into account involved and examined nodes. METHODS: In 237 patients with stage III rectal cancer, we evaluated prognostic factors for 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and risk of distant metastases (DM) using the Kaplan-Meier method, with patients divided based on adequate versus inadequate lymph node dissection (≥12 vs. <12 lymph nodes examined). The updated TNM divides patients into four groups (1, 2-3, 4-6, and ≥7 involved nodes), while LNR divides patients into quartiles. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among patients with adequate lymph node dissection, the distributions within the two systems were in agreement in 141/178 (79.2 %, kappa 0.721), and the predictive values for OS, DFS, and DM were similar. In patients with inadequate lymph node dissection, the classifications of both systems were concordant in only 13/59 (22 %, kappa 0.021). The pN system significantly under-staged patients, while the LNR classification was a better predictor of OS, DFS, and DM. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with adequate lymph node dissection, LNR staging does not add substantial information to the predictions of updated TNM lymph node staging. However, in patients with inadequate lymph node harvesting, the LNR compensates for the under-staging of the TNM classification and provides a better estimation of prognosis than the updated TNM system.

[Quality indicators of diagnosis and therapy in MRI-based neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer - interim analysis of a Prospective Multicentre Observational Study (OCUM)]. / Qualitätsindikaktoren der Diagnose und Therapie bei MRT-basierter neoadjuvanter Radiochemotherapie des Rektumkarzinoms - Interimsanalyse einer prospektiven, multizentrischen Beobachtungsstudie (OCUM).

BACKGROUND: The interim analysis of a prospective multicentre observational study of selective neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (OCUM) in patients with rectal cancer should evaluate the quality of diagnosis and therapy as a prerequisite for continuation of the study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 230 patients with the clinical stage cT2 - 4, each cN, M0 with radical tumour resection were enrolled until now. The values of 13 quality indicators were compared with the target values formulated by the workflow of the Working Group rectal cancer II and the German Cancer Society and were also compared with the results of the certified bowel centres of Germany 2010. RESULTS: The target values were fulfilled to a high degree regardless of caseload. 83 % of parameters have been fully achieved and 14 % nearly achieved. In primary surgery the proportion of patients with 12 or more histologically examined lymph nodes was 99.2 %, after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy 90 %. A R0 resection was performed in 98.3 % and a resection of TME in muscularis propria plane only in 2.2 %. The rate of positive circumferential resection margins (pCRM + ) was 5.7 % only. CONCLUSIONS: The high quality of rectal surgery justifies the concept and the continuation of the study.

Extension of the measurement capabilities of the quadrupole resonator.

The quadrupole resonator, designed to measure the surface resistance of superconducting samples at 400 MHz has been refurbished. The accuracy of its RF-dc compensation measurement technique is tested by an independent method. It is shown that the device enables also measurements at 800 and 1200 MHz and is capable to probe the critical RF magnetic field. The electric and magnetic field configuration of the quadrupole resonator are dependent on the excited mode. It is shown how this can be used to distinguish between electric and magnetic losses.

Oncological short-term effects and adverse events of MRI-guided selective neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer.

AIM: To investigate the oncological short-term effects and acute side-effects of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided selective neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (nRCT) for rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective multicenter cohort study of 230 patients with rectal cancer stage II or III, nRCT was applied in the following situations (n=96) only: cT4 tumors, cT3 tumors of the distal rectum or tumors leaving a circumferential resection margin (CRM) of ≤1 mm between the tumor and the mesorectal fascia (mrCRM+). Pre-therapeutical tumor stage and involvement of mesorectal fascia were assessed by MRI and were compared with the pathological findings of the rectal specimens. Furthermore, tumor regression grades, acute side-effects, and surgical complications were analysed. RESULTS: Using selective nRCT, 62 out of 72 patients (86%) with mrCRM+ had tumor-negative pathological CRM. Reduction of T category was observed in 62% and of N category in 88% of patients. Lymph node metastasis was found by pathology in only 21% of all irradiated patients. Histologically complete tumor regression (ypT0ypN0) was observed in 15% and intermediate regression (more than 25%, but not complete) in 67% of patients. Fifteen percent of patients suffered from grade 3 toxicity, but no grade 4 toxicity occurred. nRCT did not adversely influence surgical morbidity. CONCLUSION: Despite the negative selection of locally advanced rectal cancer cases for nRCT, impressive rates of tumor down-staging and eradication of tumor from the mesorectal fascia were achieved. The rate of complete regression is comparable to that in the literature. Moreover, the selective use of nRCT spared a considerable percentage of patients with stage II/III rectal cancer severe irradiation toxicity.

[Palliative care for patients with oesophageal cancer]. / Palliativtherapie beim Ösophaguskarzinom.

BACKGROUND: Palliative therapy for patients with incurable oesophageal cancer necessitates a broad spectrum of different measures to relieve symptoms. METHODS: Surgical procedures (palliative tumour resections, bypass surgery) are rarely indicated on account of the high morbidity. Preeminent treatment options to eliminate dysphagia and to ensure food passage are endoscopic procedures, in particular, the endoscopically or radiologically guided stent implantation. In case of failure, a percutaneous feeding tube and general palliative measures are required. Furthermore tumour-specific therapies (brachytherapy, radiochemotherapy, chemotherapy) are applied. DISCUSSION: The choice of the procedure is based on the symptoms, the tumour situation, the patients' general status, and their preferences. If possible, an individual, interdisciplinary treatment concept for each patient should be designed and modified according to the course of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: It should be the aim of future studies to elucidate the optimal combination of a merely symptomatic treatment with tumour-specific measures under the aspect of the achievable quality of life.

[The optimult study concept - selective neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy based on preoperative MRI]. / Das Optimult-Studienkonzept - Grundlage für selektiven Einsatz neoadjuvanter Radiochemotherapie auf MRT-Basis?

Optimal surgery for rectal cancer, i. e., total mesorectal excision in the middle and lower rectum reduces local recurrence substantially. Multi-modal therapy further improves the rate of local recurrence in advanced rectal cancer. In Germany neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is most frequently given for these tumours. However, clinical staging by endosonography, CT scan and / or MRI is unreliable, particulary as regards lymph node category, which entails overtreatment of a relevant number of patients secondary to overstaging. Thus, a subgroup of patients has to tolerate side effects and long-term sequelae of neoadjuvant therapy without having oncological benefit from this pretreatment. It is of note that the prognosis of patients with advanced rectal cancer depends not only on the T and N category but also on the free circumferential margin of the tumour as determined by pathological examination. In contrast to the T and N category, the latter may be predicted before treatment by pelvic MRI. While several case series demonstrated that low local recurrence rates are achieved in patients when preoperative MRI showed free circumferential margins, this concept was never tested in a randomised controlled trial. We, therefore, designed a two-armed randomised study with patients who suffer from rectal cancer and who have 2 mm or more free circumferential margins on their preoperative MRI. These patients are either operated without pretreatment (intervention arm) or receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with subsequent surgery (control arm). If local recurrence in the intervention arm is not inferior to the control arm, this study may form the basis for an individualised therapeutic concept for rectal cancer based on preoperative MRI. Potentially, chemoradiation therapy may be avoided in the future for patients who will have no oncological benefit from this treatment modality.

Treatment of metachronous and simultaneous liver metastases of pancreatic cancer.

AIM: Patients were analyzed who underwent treatment of liver metastases from pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Selection criteria were the possibility of R0 resection of the primary and/or the liver metastases, no other sites of metastases, and the presentation of liver metastases. A comparison of treatment by surgery versus chemotherapy regarding overall survival and disease-free interval was performed. RESULTS: Between 1996 and 2008, a total number of 23 patients were retrospectively identified from a prospective database of 193 cases of pancreatic cancer. In 14 cases, liver metastases were found simultaneously, and in 9 cases metachronously, fulfilling the abovementioned selection criteria. Of these, 13 patients underwent surgery and 10 were treated by gemcitabine. There were no differences in survival in patients with synchronous liver metastases of pancreatic cancer treated by resection of the primary combined with partial hepatectomy versus treatment by gemcitabine (8 vs. 11 months). In patients with metachronous liver metastases, the median survival was increased after liver resection compared to patients who were treated with gemcitabine (31 vs. 11 months). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous resection of pancreatic cancer and liver metastases cannot be recommended. Resection of metachronous liver metastases of pancreatic cancer seems to improve survival in highly selected patients.

[Diagnosis of and therapy for gastric cancer--work-flow]. / Diagnostik und Therapie des Magenkarzinoms--Workflow.

AIM: This review comments on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer in the classical meaning--excluding adenocarcinoma of the -oesophagogastric junction. Algorithms of diagnosis and care with respect to tumour stage are presented. PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Besides oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography is necessary for the accurate diagnosis of T categories and as a selection criterion for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Computed tomography is recommended for preoperative evaluation of tumours > T1, laparoscopy has become an effective stag-ing tool in T3 and T4 tumours avoiding unnecessary laparotomies and improving the detection of small -liver and peritoneal metastases. TREATMENT: Endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection are indicated in superficial cancer confined to the mucosa with special characteristics (T1 a / no ulcer / G1, 2 / Laurén intestinal / L0 / V0 / tumour size < 2 cm). In all other cases total gastrectomy or distal subtotal gastric resection are indicated, the latter in cases of tumours located in the distal two-thirds of the stomach. Standard lymphadenectomy (LAD) is the D2 LAD without distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. The Roux-en-Y oesophagojejunostomy is still the preferred type of reconstruction. An additional pouch reconstruction should be considered in -patients with favourable prognosis, this also -applies for the preservation of the duodenal passage by jejunum interposition. Extended organ resections are only indicated in cases where a R0-resection is possible. Hepatic resection for metachronous or synchronous liver metastases is rarely advised since 50 % of patients with liver metastases show concomitant peritoneal dissemination of the disease. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Undergoing gastrectomy at a high-volume centre is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and a better prognosis, however, clear thresholds for case load cannot be given. Perioperative chemotherapy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy are based on the MAGIC and MacDonald trials. Perioperative chemotherapy should be performed in patients with T3 and T4 tumours with the aim to increase the likelihood of curative R0-resection by downsizing the tumour. Adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy cannot be recommended since its benefit has so far not been proven in randomised trials. In selected patients with incomplete lymph-node dissection and questionable R0-resection postoperative chemoradiotherapy may be debated.

[Rectal melanoma: the value of modern treatment]. / Rektummelanome: Stellenwert der modernen Therapie.

Rectal melanoma is a rare disease. There is much controversy concerning cause, incidence and treatment of the disease and the spreading of recurrence. In this article, we discuss actual aspects of diagnostic, therapy and prognosis on the basis of our series of seven patients as well as a literature review. The surgical therapy in the form of local tumour excision with a disease-free margin of up to 1-2 cm is the initial therapeutic modality of choice. Large tumours that obviously could not be removed in sano should be treated with a multimodal concept. Such tumours should be treated by a combination of neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy for down-staging with subsequent local excision (LE) or abdomino-perineal rectum extirpation (APR). An inguinal lymphadenectomy should only be performed if the lymph nodes are enlarged on clinical or radiological examination. The prognosis of rectal melanoma is markedly poor and is primarily related with the stage of disease. The 5-year survival rate is estimated at about 24% for patients with stage I tumours. Patients with stage II and III tumours have appreciably shorter survival times of 12 months on the average.

[New perspectives in laparoscopic simulation: from students' skills lab to stress evaluation]. / Neue Perspektiven der laparoskopischen Simulation: Vom Studententrainingslabor bis zur Stressevaluation.

BACKGROUND: Application of a LapSim-training model in the Students' Skills Lab as well as the objective evaluation of stress in a virtual operating room scenario offer new perspectives in laparoscopic simulation. METHODS: In a Students' Skills Lab , assessment of learning curves of laparoscopic basic skills and complex tasks was carried out with 28 individuals at a LapSim Virtual Reality (VR)-simulator in a training curriculum consisting of 9 units. In addition, in a virtual operating room scenario, stress evaluation was performed with 18 surgeons by means of a sympathicograph and, in that way, the laparoscopic error and complication rate were recorded. Three different stress reactions (SR 1-3) could be identified. RESULTS: In the Students' Skills Lab, at the beginning of the curriculum (unit 1), the best learning effects together with the improvement of the laparoscopic performance could be presented for the two parameters: Extent of movement of the laparoscopic instruments (length of path as well as degree of deviation from the "optimal course") and duration of the procedure. In the virtual stress scenario, the intraoperative error rate of surgeons with a stress reaction without recovery (SR-1) was lower than of those with recovery (SR-2) or without stress reaction (SR-3). CONCLUSION: Application of the LapSim Virtual Reality (VR)-simulator in the Students' Skills Lab and for stress and crisis simulation represents a new perspective in laparoscopic simulation, which will have to be further evaluated in the future. The transfer to the "real" operating room will have to be continued as a training and scientific validation paradigm.

[Indications for conventional adrenalectomy]. / Indikationen zur konventionellen Adrenalektomie.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional adrenalectomy still plays an important role, even in the era of minimally invasive endocrine surgery. It was the aim of our study to analyse the indications for conventional adrenalectomy in our own patients since the introduction of the minimally invasive technique in the year 1994 - laparoscopically and retroperitoneoscopically. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1994 and September 2006, a total of 412 adrenalectomies were performed in 380 patients. Out of these, 106 operations (25.7 %) were carried out conventionally in 98 patients, and 306 operations (74.3 %) endoscopically in 282 patients. RESULTS: Indications for conventional adrenalectomy were - as compared with the minimally invasive procedure - significantly more frequent adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC), especially in the context of multivisceral resections, as well as adrenal metastases (synchronous and metachronous). In contrast, adrenal Cushing's disease (including 19 patients with bilateral tumours), pheochromocytoma, incidentaloma and Conn's syndrome constituted a more frequent indication for minimally invasive adrenalectomy. Conventionally operated adrenal pathologies with on average 6.0 (range: 1.2-19.0) cm diameter were significantly larger than the endoscopically removed tumours with on average 3.3 (range: 0.2-9.2) cm diameter (p < 0.0001). The side localisation and the frequency of bilateral adrenal tumours did not differ significantly in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Since the establishment of the minimally invasive technique in 1994, conventional adrenalectomy has been selected for 26 % of all resected adrenal pathologies at our clinic and, therefore, still plays an important role even in the era of laparoscopic surgery. The benefit of the laparoscopic procedure in the case of malignant pheochromocytoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, and isolated adrenal metastases at a locally confined stage is still unclear and requires prospective, randomised studies.

[Diagnosis and treatment of colorectal liver metastases - workflow]. / Diagnostik und Therapie von Lebermetastasen kolorektaler Karzinome - Workflow.

In this review, standards of diagnosis and treatment of colorectal liver metastases are described on the basis of a workshop discussion. Algorithms of care for patients with synchronous / metachronous colorectal liver metastases or locoregional recurrent tumour are presented. Surgical resection is the procedure of choice in the curative treatment of liver metastases. The decision about the resection of liver metastases should consider the following parameters: 1. General operability of the patient (comorbidity); 2. Achievability of an R 0 situation: i. if necessary, in combination with ablative methods, ii. if necessary, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, iii. the ability to eradicate extrahepatic tumour manifestations; 3. Sufficient volume of the liver remaining after resection ("future liver remnant = FLR): i. if necessary, in combination with portal vein embolisation or two-stage hepatectomy; 4. The feasibility to preserve two contiguous hepatic segments with adequate vascular inflow and outflow as well as biliary drainage; 5. Tumour biological aspects ("prognostic variables"); 6. Experience of the surgeon and centre! Extrahepatic disease does not contraindicate hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases provided a complete resection of both intra- and extrahepatic disease is feasible. Even in bilobar colorectal metastases and 5 or more tumours in the liver, a complete tumour resection has been described. The type of resection (hepatic wedge resection or anatomic resection) does not influence the recurrence rate. Preoperative volumetry is indicated when major hepatic resection is planned. The FLR should be 25 % in patients with normal liver, 40 % in patients who have received intensive chemotherapy or in cases of fatty liver, liver fibrosis or diabetes, and 50-60 % in patients with cirrhosis. In patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases, preoperative chemotherapy enables complete resection in 15-30 % of the cases, whereas the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable liver metastases has not been sufficiently supported. In situ ablative procedures (radiofrequency ablation = RFA and laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy = LITT) are local therapy options in selected patients who are not candidates for resection (central recurrent liver metastases, bilobar multiple metastases and high-risk resection or restricted patient operability). Patients with tumours larger than 3 cm have a high local recurrence rate after percutaneous RFA and are not optimal candidates for this procedure. The physician's experience influences the results significantly, both after hepatectomy and after in situ ablation. Therefore, patients with colorectal liver metastases should be treated in centres with experience in liver surgery.

[Surgical therapy for esophageal carcinoma: a prospective 20-year analysis]. / Chirurgische Therapie des Osophaguskarzinoms: Eine prospektive 20-Jahres-Analyse.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was the analysis of long-term developments in the surgical therapy for esophageal carcinoma at our hospital over a period of 20 years with a differentiated view on the two predominant histological tumour types. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1985 and September 2005, esophageal resections were performed in 470 patients at our clinic on account of a malignant tumour of the esophagus. The abdomino-thoracic resection with abdominal and extended mediastinal lymph node dissection as well as intrathoracic anastomosis was the standard treatment in the case of squamous cell carcinoma, whereas in adenocarcinoma a transhiatal resection with abdominal and dorsal mediastinal lymphadenectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy was carried out. For analysis of the development, the study period of 20 years was divided into two intervals: interval 1 from 9 / 1985 to 9 / 1995, and interval 2 from 10 / 1995 to 9 / 2005. RESULTS: Both tumour entities displayed in the last interval (10 / 1995 to 9 / 2005) significantly earlier tumour stages. A proportionally identical amount of transhiatal resections for squamous cell carcinoma was found in both intervals, whereas the transhiatal procedures for adenocarcinoma increased in the last decade (3.6 % in the period between 9 / 1985 and 9 / 1995, as compared with 23.6 % between 10 / 1995 and 9 / 2005) (p < 0.05). While the overall prognosis for squamous cell carcinoma did not significantly differ in the two decades (p = 0.2040), patients with adenocarcinoma were found to have a significantly improved long-term survival (log-rank test: p = 0.0365) in the second decade. The prognosis for adenocarcinoma, therefore, could be improved in the course of time with a 3-year survival rate of finally 40 % (as compared with 17.5 % in the first decade), and a 5-year survival rate of 25 % (as compared with 15 %). CONCLUSION: Surgical therapy for esophageal carcinoma has undergone distinct changes over the past 20 years. These are mainly due to epidemiological and diagnostic aspects, an improved selection of patients, whereby the operative procedure is adapted to the tumour stage and the operative risk for the patient. Especially with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, these changes have led to a significantly more favourable long-term prognosis.