Cost-utility analysis of an integrated care program for children with asthma in a medium-income country.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-utility of an integrated care program (ASMAIRE Infantil Program [PAI]) for children with asthma compared with standard of care. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was used to compare an integrated care program compared to the standard of care in children with asthma in Bogota, Colombia. Baseline characteristics of the patients were established according to the distribution of patients in the PAI database. Other inputs were obtained from published meta-analysis, local registries, medical bills, general mortality data, and expert opinion. Costs were presented in 2017 Colombian pesos. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs and outcomes were discounted by 5% per year. Incremental cost-utility ratios were presented for PAI compared with standard of care. Univariate and multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess model robustness to parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: The model predicted that patients that are part of the PAI would accrue more QALYs than patients on standard of care. The incremental results suggest that the PAI is a cost-effective treatment (incremental cost-utility ratio of Colombian pesos $33 753 817/QALY) compared with standard of care. Sensitivity analyses suggest that results are most sensitive to cost of care (with and without PAI) and costs of severe exacerbation. However, the PAI is cost-effective irrespective of variation in any of the input parameters. CONCLUSION: Our model predicted that an integrated intervention for the management of asthma in pediatric patients improves QALYs, reduces number of disease related exacerbations compared to standard therapy and is cost-effective for the long-term control of the disease in Colombia.

High prevalence of house dust mite sensitization in children with severe asthma living at high altitude in a tropical country.

BACKGROUND: Some studies, mainly in Europe, have shown a low level of sensitization to house dust mite (HDM) allergens at high altitude (HA). Differently, some others in tropical countries have shown a higher level. The aim of this study was to evaluate allergens sensitization, including HDM, in children with severe asthma (SA), residents at HA in a tropical middle-income developing country. METHODS: Observational, analytical, cross-sectional study in children aged 6-15 years old with SA at HA (2640 m). Skin prick tests (SPT), serum IgE, exhaled fraction of nitric oxide (FENO ), spirometry, and asthma questionnaire (ACT) were performed. Associations were explored by Pearson or Spearman coefficients. RESULTS: We included 61 children. Most patients were male (61.3%), median age: 10 years (Interquartile range [IQR]: 8-12), median BMI: 17 kg/m2 (IQR: 16-20); Median of positive SPT: 2 (IQR: 2-3). At least one SPT was positive in 88.7% of patients and 87.9% were positive for at least one HDM. Serum IgE: 348 UI/mL (IQR: 154-760) and FENO : 22 ppb (IQR: 9-41). Prebronchodilator values were (% predicted): FVC: 109.7% (±15.5%), FEV1 : 98.4% (±16.3); FEV1 /FVC: 82% (±8%). SPT were inversely correlated with the FEV1 /FVC (Rho: -0.34; 95% CI: -0.55 a -0.09; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: These children with SA living at HA in a tropical middle-income developing country have a high prevalence of HDM sensitization. One explanation for this might be that tropical conditions, such as temperature and humidity, could modify the effect of the altitude on asthma.