Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 185(5)2023 01 30.
Artículo en Danés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36760189

RESUMEN

A 36-year-old woman received isotretinoin treatment for acne and shortly after developed a silent thyroiditis. A 26-year-old woman likewise was treated with isotretinoin for acne and developed Graves' disease two and a half months after treatment. Both patients were without personal or familiar history of thyroid disease. These case reports describe two young women who in proximity to treatment with isotretinoin developed thyroid disease. We propose screening for development of thyroid disease as a part of the already established control regime for isotretinoin patients.


Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Enfermedad de Graves , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Isotretinoína/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Graves/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Graves/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Graves/inducido químicamente , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol ; 20(2): 285-302, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16850778

RESUMEN

Cardiac events in patients undergoing surgery may have serious consequences for both short- and long-term postoperative prognosis. Recently conducted trials have not demonstrated beneficial effects of perioperative beta-blockade, although originally small trials with methodological flaws did suggest this. We evaluate the evidence for using perioperative beta-blockade in both cardiac and non-cardiac surgery, and conclude that there is no statistically significant effect on mortality and insufficient evidence for a reduction of the incidence of mycocardial infarction in meta-analyses of all randomized trials. However, confidence intervals of the intervention effects in the meta-analyses are wide, leaving room for both benefits and harms. The largest observational study performed suggests that perioperative beta-blockade is associated with higher mortality in patients with low cardiac risk or diabetes, and with lower mortality in patients with high cardiac risk undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Larger randomized trials are needed to determine dosage, optimal duration, and safety of therapy, and to identify populations in whom-and how-perioperative beta-blockade may be beneficial.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efectos adversos , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Atención Perioperativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus/cirugía , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Proyectos de Investigación
3.
BMJ ; 332(7556): 1482, 2006 Jun 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16793810

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long term effects of perioperative beta blockade on mortality and cardiac morbidity in patients with diabetes undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Randomised placebo controlled and blinded multicentre trial. Analyses were by intention to treat. SETTING: University anaesthesia and surgical centres and one coordinating centre. PARTICIPANTS: 921 patients aged > 39 scheduled for major non-cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: 100 mg metoprolol controlled and extended release or placebo administered from the day before surgery to a maximum of eight perioperative days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The composite primary outcome measure was time to all cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or congestive heart failure. Secondary outcome measures were time to all cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and non-fatal cardiac morbidity. RESULTS: Mean duration of intervention was 4.6 days in the metoprolol group and 4.9 days in the placebo group. Metoprolol significantly reduced the mean heart rate by 11% (95% confidence interval 9% to 13%) and mean blood pressure by 3% (1% to 5%). The primary outcome occurred in 99 of 462 patients in the metoprolol group (21%) and 93 of 459 patients in the placebo group (20%) (hazard ratio 1.06, 0.80 to 1.41) during a median follow-up of 18 months (range 6-30). All cause mortality was 16% (74/462) in the metoprolol group and 16% (72/459) in the placebo group (1.03, 0.74 to 1.42). The difference in risk for the proportion of patients with serious adverse events was 2.4% (- 0.8% to 5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative metoprolol did not significantly affect mortality and cardiac morbidity in these patients with diabetes. Confidence intervals, however, were wide, and the issue needs reassessment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN58485613.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones de la Diabetes , Metoprolol/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Masculino , Metoprolol/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16167646

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To examine the availability and quality of clinical guidelines on perioperative diabetes care in hospital units before and after a randomised clinical trial (RCT) and international accreditation. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Interventional "before-after" study in 51 units (38 surgical and 13 anaesthetic) in nine hospitals participating in a RCT in the greater Copenhagen area; 27 of the units also underwent international accreditation. FINDINGS: The proportion of units with guidelines increased from 24/51 (47 percent) units before to 38/51 (75 percent) units after the trial. Among the 27 units without guidelines before the trial, significantly more accredited units compared to non-accredited units had a guideline after the trial (9/10 (90 percent) compared to 5/17 (29 percent). The quality of the systematic development scale and the clinical scales improved significantly after the trial in both accredited units (both p < 0.001) and in non-accredited units (both p < 0.02). The improvement of the systematic development scale was significantly higher in accredited than in non-accredited units (p < 0.01). ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The combination of conducting both the DIPOM Trial and international accreditation led to a significant improvement of both dissemination and quality of guidelines on perioperative diabetic care.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/normas , Guías como Asunto , Internacionalidad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Dinamarca , Diabetes Mellitus , Humanos , Atención Perioperativa , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud
6.
Am Heart J ; 147(4): 677-83, 2004 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15077084

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent trials suggest that perioperative beta-blockade reduces the risk of cardiac events in patients with a risk of myocardial ischemia who are undergoing noncardiac surgery. Patients with diabetes mellitus are at a high-risk for postoperative cardiac morbidity and mortality. They may, therefore, benefit from perioperative beta-blockade. METHODS: The Diabetic Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity (DIPOM) trial is an investigator-initiated and -controlled, centrally randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. We compared the effect of metoprolol with placebo on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity rates in patients with diabetes mellitus who were beta-blocker naive, >or=40 years old, and undergoing noncardiac surgery. The study drug was given during hospitalization for a maximum of 7 days beginning the evening before surgery. The primary outcome measure is the composite of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or congestive heart failure leading to hospitalization or discovered or aggravated during hospitalization. Follow-up involves re-examination of patients at 6 months and collection of mortality and morbidity data via linkage to public databases. The study was powered on the basis of an estimated 30% 1-year event rate in the placebo arm and a 33% relative risk reduction in the metoprolol arm. The median follow-up period was 18 months. RESULTS: Enrollment started in July 2000 and ended in June 2002. A total of 921 patients were randomized, and 54% of these patients had known cardiac disease, hypertension, or both. CONCLUSION: The results of this study may have implications for reduction of perioperative and postoperative risk in patients with diabetes mellitus who are undergoing major noncardiac surgery.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones de la Diabetes , Metoprolol/uso terapéutico , Isquemia Miocárdica/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Isquemia Miocárdica/etiología , Isquemia Miocárdica/mortalidad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Atención Perioperativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...