Hoarding of insulin and oral antidiabetics in the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: Regulatory actions taken to avoid shortage.

OBJECTIVE: To report on hoarding of prescribed medicines, with focus on insulins, in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and on regulatory actions taken to avoid shortage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Prescribed Drug Register which utilizes the Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System and covers the total Swedish population was used. We calculated the number of packages of insulins (ATC code A10A), oral anti-diabetics (A10B), and all medicines across all ATC codes combined (A-S) dispensed per week in 2019 and 2020. Correspondingly, the number of packages of glucose test strips dispensed was calculated using the data source Concise held by the Swedish eHealth Agency. RESULTS: Prompt increases in numbers of dispensed packages were observed in March, peaking at week 11/2020. The absolute numbers of packages dispensed in week 11/2019 and week 11/2020 were: insulin, 49,694 and 95,767, an increase by +92.7%; oral antidiabetics, 55,478 and 82,684, +47.1%; glucose test strips, 18,119 and 23,476, +29:6%; and all medicines across all ATC codes combined, 1,988,456 and 2,659,421, +33.7%. Voluntary restriction of dispensing and a rapid change to applicable regulation were implemented within 2 weeks. A steep decline occurred, which became more pronounced after temporary regulation came in force from April 1, then leveling out during the following months. CONCLUSION: A signal of insulin hoarding was detected early in the COVID-19 pandemic. A temporary regulation, reducing dispensing to a maximum supply of 3 months was rapidly implemented. A shortage of vitally important prescribed medicines was avoided.

A temporary regulation to manage an impending shortage due to extraordinary prescribing patterns of chloroquines observed during early phase of COVID-19 epidemic.

Background: Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine (C/HC) received considerable international media attention due to anticipated treatment effect in COVID-19. This led to increased prescriptions threatening to generate product shortages for patients prescribed within approved indications.We evaluated effects of a temporary regulation mandating pharmacies to only dispense C/HC prescribed by physicians with defined specialties. Methods: Data from Region Stockholm, which include 2.4 out of 10 million Sweden's population, were used. Weekly time trends of prescriptions and requisitions of C/HC by prescriber's workplace during January to April 2020 were followed. Results: Numbers of unique individuals with filled prescriptions of chloroquine increased tenfold and of hydroxychloroquine more than threefold from January to March. In the first week of April, filled prescriptions of C/HC dropped. In the later weeks of April, the number of filled prescriptions was back at similar levels as before the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.During January and February, specialists in rheumatology accounted for 686 out of all 979 prescriptions dispensed (70.1%) of C/HC. In March, a large proportion of prescriptions dispensed were from specialists not usually prescribing C/HC, and rheumatology accounted for 628 out of all 1,639 prescriptions (38.3%). In April, specialists in rheumatology accounted for 386 out of all 641 prescriptions dispensed (60.0%). Conclusion: After an observed increase in prescriptions of C/HC, a temporary regulation was introduced on 2nd April 2020 to reduce prescriptions from specialists not usually prescribing C/HC to avoid shortages for patients within approved indications. Subsequently, dispensed prescriptions decreased from April and remained at pre-COVID-19 levels thereafter.

[Medicinal products in unauthorised indications]. / Rutinmässig off label-utvärdering bör inte göras av Läkemedelsverket.

The Medical Products Agency (MPA) has conducted the assessment presented in this manuscript within the remits of a Government assignment to the MPA. No new safety concern, and consequently no need for regulatory action, has been identified in relation to off-label use of rituximab in patients with active MS. While there is plausible pharmacodynamic, early phase clinical trial, and non-interventional data on effectiveness to support the biological effects of rituximab in MS, the magnitude of efficacy in relation to a well-defined population and posology has not been reliably confirmed from a regulatory perspective. From the MPA regulatory perspective, the benefit-risk balance for rituximab in patients with MS is at this stage considered undetermined. The overall recommendation of the MPA is to not create a specific procedure intended for systematically implemented benefit-risk evaluations of medicinal products in unauthorised indications.

Comorbidity as a predictor of overall survival in prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy combined with HDR brachytherapy boosts.

BACKGROUND: The risk stratification currently applied prior to curative treatment for localized prostate cancer (PC) does not take into account comorbidity or age. Therefore, we investigated the impact of comorbidity on overall survival (OS) in PC patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost. MATERIAL AND METHODS: At a single center, 611 consecutive patients diagnosed with localized PC from 1998 to 2004 underwent definitive EBRT (50 Gy) and HDR brachytherapy boosts (2 × 10 Gy) combined with neoadjuvant total androgen blockade. Comorbidity was assessed with the Charlson comorbidity score. The impact of risk factors on OS and disease-free survival (DFS) was calculated using Cox proportional hazard ratios. Risk groups were defined as follows: low-risk PC: PSA <10, WHO grade 1 and T stage 1; high-risk PC: PSA >20 and/or WHO grade 3 and/or T stage 3a; intermediate-risk PC representing patients who did not fit either the low- or high-risk PC group. RESULTS: Mean age in the study cohort was 66.4 years, and 51% of the patients reported some degree of comorbidity. Divided into risk groups 8.2% were categorized as low-risk, 64% as intermediate-risk and 27.8% as high-risk PC. Overall 10-year survival was 72.2%, and 89% of the patients were relapse-free. In the univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazard ratios, age, comorbidity and T stage were statistically significant predictors of OS: hazard ratios 1.56, 1.44 and 1.2 (p-values .002, .04 and .05), respectively. WHO grade, PSA at diagnosis, T stage and comorbidity were also significant predictors of DFS (p-values .0001, .0001, .009 and .003, respectively). CONCLUSION: Comorbidity assessed with the Charlson score predicts OS in patients with localized PC treated with curative intent using combined EBRT and HDR brachytherapy boost, and should be considered when making decisions before radical treatment.

Early salvage radiation therapy combined with short-term hormonal therapy in recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: single-institution 4-year data on outcome, toxicity, health-related quality of life and co-morbidities from 184 consecutive patients treated with 70 Gy.

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of 70 Gy salvage radiotherapy (SRT) combined with short-term neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) in the treatment of recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy (RP), and to consider quality of life (QoL), survival outcomes and impact of co-morbidities on treatment-related rectal-genitourinary toxicity. Electronic records of 184 SRT patients treated consecutively between October 2001 and February 2007 were analyzed. Median age was 64 years (median follow-up 48 months). NHT was given to 165 patients (median 3 months). Pre-RP and pre-SRT PSA, PSA doubling time, Gleason score (GS), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and detectable post-SRT PSA were recorded. Any detectable PSA or PSA >0.1 ng/ml + nadir was considered biochemical failure (BcF). The Charlson co-morbidity index was used to correlate co-morbidities and rectal-genitourinary toxicity. Scores from the health-related QoL EORTC QLQ-C30 and PR-25 questionnaires were also evaluated. In 116 (63%) patients, a long-lasting curative effect was indicated by undetectable PSA levels. In univariate analysis, using BcF as an outcome variable, p<0.001 was found for GS, pre-SRT PSA, SVI and detectable post-SRT PSA. Multivariate analysis showed p=0.01 for SVI, p=0.09 for GS, and detectable post-SRT PSA (p=0.01); with metastases as an outcome variable, only SVI was significant (p=0.007). Cancer-specific and overall survival were 99 and 95%, respectively. Although microscopy showed SVI or GS 8-10 in the prostatectomy specimens 17/40 (43%) and 13/29 (45%), respectively, of patients still showed undetectable PSA at long-term follow-up (median 55 months) after SRT. Likewise, 11/31 (36%) patients with pre-SRT PSA >1.0 ng/ml and 80/134 (60%) patients with PSA doubling time (PSADT) <10 still showed undetectable PSA after 50 months. Slightly elevated acute and late rectal-genitourinary grade 3-4 toxicity was observed. No association with co-morbidity/toxicity was found. EORTC QLQ-C30 scores were similar to or slightly better than reference values. SRT with 70 Gy combined with 3-month NHT results in long-term undetectable PSA in >50% of patients with recurrence after RP with acceptable rectal-genitourinary toxicity and without negatively affecting long-term QoL. Non-metastatic patients should not be disqualified from receiving SRT although presenting with poor prognostic factors at surgery.

System for interstitial photodynamic therapy with online dosimetry: first clinical experiences of prostate cancer.

The first results from a clinical study for Temoporfin-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) of low-grade (T1c) primary prostate cancer using online dosimetry are presented. Dosimetric feedback in real time was applied, for the first time to our knowledge, in interstitial photodynamic therapy. The dosimetry software IDOSE provided dose plans, including optical fiber positions and light doses based on 3-D tissue models generated from ultrasound images. Tissue optical property measurements were obtained using the same fibers used for light delivery. Measurements were taken before, during, and after the treatment session. On the basis of these real-time measured optical properties, the light-dose plan was recalculated. The aim of the treatment was to ablate the entire prostate while minimizing exposure to surrounding organs. The results indicate that online dosimetry based on real-time tissue optical property measurements enabled the light dose to be adapted and optimized. However, histopathological analysis of tissue biopsies taken six months post-PDT treatment showed there were still residual viable cancer cells present in the prostate tissue sections. The authors propose that the incomplete treatment of the prostate tissue could be due to a too low light threshold dose, which was set to 5 J∕cm2.

Sublingual administration of fentanyl to cancer patients is an effective treatment for breakthrough pain: results from a randomized phase II study.

In this study we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of sublingual fentanyl (SLF) for breakthrough pain (BTP) in adult opioid-tolerant cancer patients. Patients received one dose of placebo, SLF 100, 200 and 400 microg in random order at four pain episodes. The primary efficacy endpoint was pain intensity difference (PID) from baseline. Twenty-seven patients received study medication. Overall PID increased significantly with SLF 400 microg versus placebo (8.57 mm, p <0.0001). Improvements were statistically different from placebo at 15 min (p = 0.005). SLF 100 and 200 microg showed a numerical trend towards improved pain relief. A dose that gave a clinically important reduction in pain (PID > 20 mm) was identified by 95% of patients. Reduced use of rescue medication (p < 0.001, SLF 400 microg) and improved global assessment of treatment (p = 0.0146, SLF 400 microg) confirmed these differences as clinically important. Nausea and dizziness were the most common treatment-related adverse effects. SLF appears to be a fast, effective and well-tolerated treatment for BTP.

Zoledronic acid induces caspase-dependent apoptosis in renal cancer cell lines.

OBJECTIVE: To study and characterize the potential antitumoral effects of zoledronic acid (ZA) on renal cancer cell lines in vitro. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different and well-characterized renal cancer cell lines were studied, namely ACHN, A-498 and CAKI-2. The cytotoxic potential of ZA was evaluated using a fluorometric microculture cytotoxic assay. The degree of M30 induction following ZA treatment was measured using an M30 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the blockage of this effect was studied using a pan-caspase inhibitor. Immunofluorescence of the M30 neoepitope was performed to visualize the M30-inducing properties of ZA. RESULTS: A significant reduction in viable cells was seen for all three cell lines following treatment with ZA, compared with untreated controls. This effect was most pronounced for the ACHN cells, as only 4% were viable following incubation with ZA for 72 h. A concomitant increase in the apoptosis significant caspase-dependent M30 antigen was demonstrated. This effect could be blocked by the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD. CONCLUSIONS: ZA exerts cytotoxic effects on renal cancer cell lines in vitro. These include caspase-dependent induction of apoptosis, which can be quantified and visualized using M30 ELISA and immunofluorescence, respectively. The clinical relevance of this finding needs to be further investigated, but these results indicate that ZA may be a treatment alternative for selected patients with skeletal metastasized renal cell cancer, particularly for those with impaired performance status without other treatment options.

Is the use of a surrogate urethra an option in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy?

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy and the dosimetric consequences of substituting a surrogate urethra assumed to be at the geometric center of the prostate, in place of the true urethra when using high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred prostate cancer patients treated with HDR brachytherapy constituted the study group. A pre-plan was made with the urethra visualized. The true urethra was defined, and a surrogate urethra was placed at the geometric center of the prostate. The distance between the two urethras was measured. The deviation was evaluated at the base, middle, and apex. To evaluate the dosimetric consequences for the true urethra when using a surrogate urethra, two different dose plans were made: one based on the true urethra and one based on the surrogate urethra. The dose-volume histograms for the true urethra were analyzed. RESULTS: The deviation between the true urethra and the surrogate urethra was greatest at the base of the prostate. A statistically significant difference was seen between the dosimetric parameters for the true and the surrogate urethra when the dose plan was made using the surrogate urethra. In this situation the dose to the true urethra was increased above our defined maximum tolerance limit. CONCLUSIONS: When using dose plans made according to a surrogate urethra the dose to the true urethra might be too high to be acceptable. If the true urethra is not visualized, severe damage could easily develop in a significant number of patients.

Clinical outcome in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy and high dose-rate iridium 192 brachytherapy boost: a 6-year follow-up.

To report the long-term results for treatment of localized carcinoma of the prostate using high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, conformal external beam radiotherapy (3D EBRT) and neo-adjuvant hormonal therapy (TAB). From 1998 through 1999, 154 patients with localized prostate cancer were entered in the trial. Biologically no evidence of disease (bNED) was defined at PSA levels < 2 microg/l. In order to compare the results of this treatment with other treatment modalities, the patient's pre-treatment data were used to calculate the estimated 5-year PSA relapse free survival using Kattan's nomograms for radical prostatectomy (RP) and 3D EBRT. After 6 years of follow-up, 129 patients remain alive. The actual 5-year relapse-free survival is 84%. None of the patients demonstrated clinical signs of local recurrence. The median PSA at follow-up among the relapse-free patients was 0.05 microg/l. Among the 80 patients who presented with clinical stage T3 tumours, 55 (68%) were relapse-free. The expected 5-year relapse-free survival using nomograms for RP and 3D EBRT was 54% and 70%, respectively. Late rectal toxicity RTOG grade 3 occurred in 1% of the patients. Late urinary tract toxicity RTOG grade 3 developed in 4% of the patients. Combined treatment, utilizing HDR, 3D EBRT and TAB, produces good clinical results. Rectal toxicity is acceptable. Urinary tract toxicity, most likely can be explained by the fact that during the first years of this treatment, no effort was made to localize the urethra, which was assumed to be in the middle of the prostate.

Dosimetry of anal radiation in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to determine the radiation dose to the anus during brachytherapy using high-dose-rate Ir-192 sources. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thermoluminescence dosimeters were used for measuring the dose to the distal part of the anus in 10 patients, and in a prostate phantom to measure the radiation dose during the transport of the radiation source. RESULTS: The measured dose to the anus in vivo was on average 0.85 Gy (range, 0.48-1.37 Gy) per treatment. The transport dose using 15 and 19 needles in the prostate phantom was 0.07 and 0.08 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The dose delivered to the anus using high-dose-rate brachytherapy with Ir-192 sources is quite low. There is a contribution to the anal radiation dose during the transport of the Ir-192 source into the needles. However, in clinical practice when using 15-20 needles, the dose from transporting the Ir-192 source can be ignored.

Prostate displacement kit: reducing the radiation dose to the rectum.

During high dose-rate brachytherapy boost in 20 patients the use of a prostate-water-rectal-displacement-kit contributed to an increase in the distance between the prostate and the rectum, however, the prostate was not totally immobilized by the needles, implying the necessity for an very careful on-line dose-planning dosimetry.

Prostate volume determination: differential volume measurements comparing CT and TRUS.

PURPOSE: To compare the differences in prostate volume assessed by computerized tomography (CT), step-section transrectal ultrasound (TRUS-step), and TRUS with ellipsoid-formula volume calculation (TRUS-ellipsoid). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-one patients with localized prostate cancer treated with combined external conformal radiotherapy and high dose rate brachytherapy, who had prostate volumes evaluated using CT, TRUS-step and TRUS-ellipsoid according to our clinical routine for dose planning. The measurements were collected retrospectively based on actual dose-plans. RESULTS: The prostate volume was on average 34 cc (range 18-60 cc) according to CT, 28 cc (range 12-57 cc) and 24 cc (range 13-44 cc) according to TRUS-step and TRUS-ellipsoid, respectively. The differences between the lengths measured were most pronounced with a mean length of 4.5 cm (range 3.0-6.0 cm) defined by CT as compared to 3.6 cm (range 3.0-5.0 cm) and 3.6 cm (range 2.8-5.0 cm) when defined by TRUS-step and TRUS-ellipsoid, respectively. CONCLUSION: CT defined volumes are 30% larger than volumes defined with TRUS-step. This is probably due to uncertainty in defining the apex of the prostate and thereby the length of the prostate using CT. When defining target in radiotherapy, it is important to be aware of the differences in volumes depending on the technique used.

A prospective Phase II trial of using extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy in primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

A retrospective study has indicated that stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has a value in treating both primary tumors and singular metastatic lesions that cause local symptoms. Here we present the results of a prospective study evaluating the safety and local efficacy of SRT in metastatic or inoperable primary renal cancer. Thirty patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) or inoperable primary RCC received high-dose fraction SRT. In total, 82 lesions were treated. Dose/fractionation schedules varied depending on target location and size. The most frequently used fractionations were 8 Gy x 4, 10 Gy x 4, 15 Gy x 2 or 15 Gy x 3 prescribed to the periphery of the PTV. Local control, defined as radiologically stable disease (SD) or partial/complete response (PR/CR) was obtained in 98% of treated lesions but 19% of lesions were in patients with a follow time of less than 6 months. CR was observed in 21% of the patients and 58% of the patients had a partial volume reduction or local stable disease after a median follow-up of 52 months (range 11-66) for patients alive and 18 months (range 4-57) for deceased patients. Local progression was seen in two lesions. Side effects were grade I-II in 90% of cases. The overall survival was 32 months. SRT for patients with primary and metastatic RCC resulted in high local control rate with generally low toxicity. The method can thus be considered a therapeutic option to surgery in patients with a limited number of metastases, as local treatment in RCC with an indolent presentation or as a method of reducing tumor burden prior to medical treatment.

Additive/synergistic antitumoral effects on prostate cancer cells in vitro following treatment with a combination of docetaxel and zoledronic acid.

Once bone metastasized and androgen independent, prostate cancer is often associated with skeletal morbidity and disability. New treatment modalities that can palliate symptoms from the skeleton and inhibit further progression are warranted. In this study, the antitumoral effects following treatment with a combination of docetaxel and the new generation bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid, were investigated on two hormone-refractory prostate cancer cell lines: PC3 and DU145. The prostate cancer cells were treated with increasing concentrations of zoledronic acid in the absence or presence of docetaxel. Toxicity was measured using fluorometric microculture cytotoxic assay technique. A concentration of 25 microM, zoledronic acid reduced the viable cell number to 68% and 98% for PC3 and DU145 cells respectively. Docetaxel, on the other hand, at a concentration of 0.1 ng/ml, had no effect on the viability. However, a combination of zoledronic acid and docetaxel reduced the cell number to 60% and 81% respectively. Furthermore, zoledronic acid in the concentration range 12.5 microM-50 microM enhanced the antitumoral effects of docetaxel (0.01-1 ng/ml) in an additive and/or synergistic manner for both cell lines. These data support the hypothesis that zoledronic acid, in addition to having bone resorption inhibiting properties, also exhibits anti-tumoral effects. It also appears that combined treatment with docetaxel causes additive and/or synergistic cytostatic effects on prostate cancer cells.