Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 27
Filtrar
2.
Orthopadie (Heidelb) ; 2024 Apr 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38568216

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hip and knee implants can either be fixed without cement, press-fit, or with bone cement. Real-world data from arthroplasty registers, as well as studies provide a broad database for the discussion of cemented versus uncemented arthroplasty procedures. OBJECTIVE: What does current evidence from international arthroplasty registries and meta-analyses recommend regarding cemented or cementless fixation of hip and knee implants? METHODS: A recommendation is generated by means of direct data comparison from the arthroplasty registries of eight countries (USA, Germany, Australia, UK, Sweden, Norway, New Zealand, Netherlands), the comparison of 22 review studies and meta-analyses based on registry data, as well as an evaluation of recommendations of healthcare systems from different nations. For this purpose, reviews and meta-analyses were selected where the results were statistically significant, as were the annual reports of the arthroplasty registries that were current at the time of writing. RESULTS: For knee arthroplasties, long survival time as well as lower risk of revision can be achieved with the support of cemented fixation with antibiotic-loaded bone cement. In patients aged 70 years and older, cemented fixation of hip stem implants significantly reduces risk of intraoperative or postoperative periprosthetic fracture (quadruple). This applies both to elective total hip arthroplasties and to hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fractures. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement significantly (p = 0.041) reduces the risk of periprosthetic infection, especially in patients with femoral neck fractures. CONCLUSION: Total knee replacement with antibiotic-loaded bone cement is well established internationally and is evidence-based. Registry data and meta-analyses recommend cemented fixation of the hip stem in older patients. In Germany, USA and Australia these evidence-based recommendations still must be transferred to daily practice.

4.
Orthopadie (Heidelb) ; 53(3): 163-175, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37889315

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hip and knee implants can be either fixated without cement, press-fit, or with bone cement. Real-world data from arthroplasty registers, as well as studies, provide a broad database for the discussion of cemented versus uncemented arthroplasty procedures. OBJECTIVES: What is the recommendation for cemented or cementless anchorage of hip and knee implants based on the current evidence from international arthroplasty registries and meta-analyses? METHODS: A recommendation is generated by means of a direct comparison of data from the arthroplasty registries of eight different countries (USA, Germany, Australia, UK, Sweden, Norway, New Zealand, and The Netherlands), the comparison of 22 review studies and meta-analyses based on registry data, as well as the evaluation of the recommendation of healthcare systems of different nations. For this purpose, reviews and meta-analyses whose results were statistically significant were selected, as were the annual reports of the arthroplasty registries that were current at the time of writing. RESULTS: For knee endoprostheses, a long survival time, as well as a lower risk of revision can be achieved with the help of cemented anchorage with antibiotic-laden bone cement. In patients aged 70 years and older, cemented anchorage of the hip stem implant significantly reduces the risk of intraoperative or postoperative periprosthetic fracture (times four), this applies both to elective total hip arthroplasties (TEPs) and to hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fractures. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement significantly (p = 0.041) reduces the risk of periprosthetic infection, especially in patients with femoral neck fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Total knee replacement with antibiotic-loaded bone cement is well established in Germany and evidence based. Registry data and meta-analyses recommend cemented fixation of the hip stem in older patients-in Germany the evidence-based recommendations must still be transferred to daily practice.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral , Prótesis de Cadera , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Falla de Prótesis , Reoperación , Diseño de Prótesis , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía
5.
Orthopadie (Heidelb) ; 53(3): 185-194, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37861705

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The number of operations concerning revision arthroplasty has been increasing continuously in recent years, and it can be assumed that they will continue to increase in the future. If an arthroplasty implant becomes loose, it must be changed. The question often arises as to how the new implant should be fixed in the bone. ADVANTAGES: Revision implants can be inserted into the bone without cement. In the subsequent period, a secondary osseointegration of the implant takes place. Another possibility is to anchor the implant by using bone cement. The advantage of cemented anchorage is that the implant is firmly fixed in the bone, in principle, immediately, and it is possible to fully load the implant directly. Direct postoperative full weight bearing is helpful, especially for older and multimorbid patients, in order to achieve rapid mobilization. PREREQUISITES AND CHALLENGES: When using cement in revision cases, however, there are a few prerequisites and challenges that the surgeon should definitely take into account. In the case of revision, the bone in the former implant bed is often deficient and appears thinned and sclerosed. It is, therefore, important to analyze the bone quality preoperatively on radiographic images and to include it in the planning of the anchoring strategy. In addition, the individual bone quality of the patient must also be taken into account intraoperatively. In any case, it must be clarified whether the basic prerequisites for the sufficient bond strength of the cement with the bone to be formed can still be met. Furthermore, the principles of cementing technique must be strictly observed, and the goal of a perfect cement mantle must be aimed for. If the indication for this is overstated, early loosening of the cemented revision arthroplasty is very likely.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Cubierta de Hielo , Falla de Prótesis , Cementación/métodos
7.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 12(11)2023 Oct 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37998769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The number of periprosthetic joint infections caused by vancomycin-resistant pathogens is increasing. Currently, no PMMA cement is commercially available to cover VRE. Daptomycin shows promising results in treating infection, offering a good safety profile and a reduced risk of developing resistance. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the mechanical stability, handling properties, elution behavior, and antimicrobial effectiveness of PMMA cement loaded with three different daptomycin concentrations in comparison to commercially available antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC). METHODS: Mechanical properties and handling characteristics (ISO 5833, DIN 53435), HPLC elution, antimicrobial effectiveness with proliferation assay (DIN 17025), and inhibition zone testing were investigated. RESULTS: All tested daptomycin concentrations met the ISO and DIN standards for mechanical strength. Loading of 40 g of PMMA cement with 0.5 g of daptomycin did not show any antimicrobial effectiveness, in contrast to 1.0 g and 1.5 g. PMMA cement with 1.5 g of daptomycin was the best in terms of elution and effectiveness, and it showed good ISO mechanical strength; ISO doughing was sticky for a little longer and setting was faster compared to the vancomycin-containing reference cement. CONCLUSION: PMMA cement containing 0.5 g of gentamicin and 1.5 g of daptomycin could be a good alternative to the already established COPAL® (Wehrheim, Germany) G+V for the treatment of PJIs caused by VRE.

8.
Orthopadie (Heidelb) ; 52(12): 968-980, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37828239

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Implant loosening is the most common reason for revision surgery. OBJECTIVES: Contribution of modern cementing technique to the long-term stability of an implant. METHODS: Evaluation of the available evidence on modern cementing technique. RESULTS: Modern cementing technique in hip arthroplasty is considered established and leads to better cementing results. In knee arthroplasty, there are also specific recommendations, including intensive cleaning of the bone bed, mixing of bone cement under vacuum and application of bone cement to the implant and the bone. CONCLUSIONS: The use of modern cementing technique in hip and knee arthroplasty facilitates cementing, increases safety, and minimizes the risk of mechanical loosening.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Artroplastia de Reemplazo , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Cementación/métodos , Reoperación
9.
Orthopadie (Heidelb) ; 52(12): 943-956, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37831091

RESUMEN

PMMA-based bone cements are used for anchoring artificial joints. The cements are offered as two-component systems. During mixing, a liquid paste is formed by free-radical polymerization, which completely hardens into a solid cement matrix as polymerization progresses with an increase in viscosity. Polymerization from MMA to PMMA is an exothermic process, energy is released in the form of heat. After fixation of the prosthesis and curing of the cement, the cement fills the space between the prosthesis and the bone. With the filler PMMA, a strong force-locking and interlocking mechanical bond is created. The essential properties of PMMA cements are dictated by the powder component. In vivo, the hard and brittle bone cements absorb body fluids and become more elastic and softer. The properties of various PMMA bone cements differ significantly, although the chemical acrylate base is identical.


Asunto(s)
Cementos para Huesos , Polimetil Metacrilato , Cementos para Huesos/química , Polimetil Metacrilato/química , Ensayo de Materiales , Calor , Implantación de Prótesis
10.
Orthopadie (Heidelb) ; 52(12): 981-991, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37831092

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is widespread consensus that adjuvant local use of antimicrobial agents in combination with their systemic administration can better prevent and treat implant-associated musculoskeletal infections. The advantage of local antibiotics lies in their particular pharmacokinetics with initially high antibiotic concentrations at the implant site with only low systemic uptake. AIM OF TREATMENT: The aim of local application is to protect the foreign bodies directly at the implantation site from bacterial colonization and biofilm formation (prophylaxis) and to support the eradication of an already established infection after surgical debridement (treatment). Since the observations of Prof. Buchholz, bone cement has been the most frequently used local carrier system. APPLICATION: In cases of infection, surgeons should ideally work together with microbiologists, infectiologists or clinical pharmacists to determine which anti-infective agents are indicated systemically for the patient and which ones are indicated locally with PMMA cement, based on the pathogen(s) and antibiograms. However, for the anti-infective agents administered with bone cement, there is still uncertainty about which agents can be added to this carrier material and at what concentrations. Accordingly, the authors of this review article not only summarize the rationale and evidence for local antibiotic use but also elaborate on the points that must be considered for admixing these agents to the cement.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico
11.
Orthopadie (Heidelb) ; 52(12): 957-967, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37902859

RESUMEN

Processing properties of PMMA bone cements can be divided into four phases: 1. mixing, 2. waiting, 3. processing and 4. curing. Each of these phases is subject to several external influencing factors, such as temperature and humidity, which must be considered during application. Instructions for use provided by the manufacturers of PMMA bone cements and mixing and application systems contain important information on correct application. The processing properties of PMMA bone cements and possible factors influencing the curing process are of great importance for safe procedures in the operating room. Knowledge of the viscosity and consistency of the PMMA bone cement from the dough phase to complete curing facilitates preparation and application, which in the long term significantly improves the requirements placed on PMMA cements regarding the function and service life of the implant.


Asunto(s)
Cementos para Huesos , Polimetil Metacrilato , Viscosidad , Temperatura
12.
Med Eng Phys ; 119: 104027, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37634907

RESUMEN

Early aseptic loosening following primary total knee arthroplasty related to several factors might appear at the interface implant-cement or cement-bone. A standardized in vitro model might provide information on the relevance of single variable parameter of cementation including technique and cement respectively bone structure on fixation strength. Micromotion measurement using different directions of load should detect the primary stability of the interfaces. An open-cell rigid foam model was used for cementation of PFC-Sigma tibial trays with Palacos®. Pins were applied to the model for continuous non-destructive measurement. Relative micromotions for rotation, valgus-varus and extension flexion stress were detected at the interfaces as well as cement penetration was measured. The reproducibility of the measurement could be shown for all interfaces in extension-flexion movements. For rotation a negative trend was shown for the interface cement-prosthesis and cement-bone concerning varus-valgus stress reflecting varying surgical cementation technique. More micromotion related to extension-flexion force might reflect the design of the implant. Measurement of relative micromotion and cement distribution appear accurate to detect small differences of movement at different interfaces of cemented tibial implants and the results are reproducible for most parameter. An increased number of specimens should achieve statistical relevance for all measurements.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Miembros Artificiales , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Cementos para Huesos , Clavos Ortopédicos
13.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 12(5)2023 May 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37237751

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are currently no recommendations to direct the optimal diagnosis and treatment of fungal osteoarticular infections, including prosthetic joint infections and osteomyelitis. Active agents (fluconazole; amphotericin B) are regularly applied per os or intravenously. Other drugs such as voriconazole are used less frequently, especially locally. Voriconazole is less toxic and has promising results. Local antifungal medication during primary surgical treatment has been investigated by implanting an impregnated PMMA cement spacer using intra-articular powder or by daily intra-articular lavage. The admixed dosages are rarely based on characteristic values and microbiological and mechanical data. The purpose of this in vitro study is to investigate the mechanical stability and efficacy of antifungal-admixed PMMA with admixed voriconazole at low and high concentrations. METHODS: Mechanical properties (ISO 5833 and DIN 53435) as well as efficacy with inhibition zone tests with two Candida spp. were investigated. We tested three separate cement bodies at each measuring time (n = 3) Results: Mixing high dosages of voriconazole causes white specks on inhomogeneous cement surfaces. ISO compression, ISO bending, and DIN impact were significantly reduced, and ISO bending modulus increased. There was a high efficacy against C. albicans with low and high voriconazole concentrations. Against C. glabrata, a high concentration of voriconazole was significantly more efficient than a dose at a low concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Mixing voriconazole powder with PMMA (Polymethylmethacrylate) powder homogeneously is not easy because of the high amount of dry voriconazole in the powder formulation. Adding voriconazole (a powder for infusion solutions) has a high impact on its mechanical properties. Efficacy is already good at low concentrations.

14.
Orthopade ; 51(1): 44-51, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34032883

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic infection (PPI) is a rare but serious complication. An elementary component of the therapy of PPI is the use of bone cement with the addition of antibiotics. For targeted therapy, manual mixing of antibiotics with industrially produced bone cement mixtures is often necessary. Possible problems resulting from manual mixing have not been described sufficiently so far. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, the aim of the present study was to describe the influence of the additional homogenisation by dry mixing of a polymer-active substance mixture on the quality of manually added cement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the laboratory-based study, four cement samples were prepared using different methods for manual addition and homogenisation of antibiotics (vancomycin). The reference control was Copal® G + V (Heraeus Medical GmbH, Wehrheim, Germany), to which the vancomycin (V) had already been industrially added. The samples were then examined for mechanical, microbiological and microscopic parameters. RESULTS: In the mechanical and microbiological results, no statistically significant differences were found between the manually added mixtures and the reference. After dry mixing of the polymer powder, the inner surface of the mixing cartridges used showed signs of scratching in the microscopic examination and showed indications of abrasion during mixing. CONCLUSION: The manual addition of antibiotics to industrially produced bone cement should be reserved for selected indications if the bone cement mixtures produced by industry are not sufficient.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Cementos para Huesos , Alemania , Humanos , Polimetil Metacrilato/efectos adversos , Vancomicina
15.
Orthopedics ; 44(1): e55-e60, 2021 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33089336

RESUMEN

Removal of a stable cement mantle may be invasive and time consuming and may result in unnecessary damage to bone and surrounding soft tissue. The goal of this study was to investigate the feasibility of the use of polymethylmethacrylate cement on preexisting cement as well as to explore the prerequisites for practical clinical use under standardized laboratory conditions. The strength of the cement-cement interface was evaluated with a 4-point bending to failure test, according to International Organization for Standardization 5833, as well as standardized shear strength, according to American Society for Testing and Materials D732. Various intraoperative cleaning agents were tested to remove simulated contamination with bone marrow. Contamination of the cement-cement interface with bone marrow decreases bending strength, modulus, and shear strength. Removal of the bone marrow with a degreasing agent significantly increases bending strength as well as bending modulus and can increase shear strength up to 9% compared with use of a nondegreasing agent. The cement-cement interface may reach up to 85% of bending strength, 92% of bending modulus, and comparable shear strength compared with a uniform cement block. Meticulous removal of fatty contaminant is important. Use of a degreasing agent further increases the stability of the cement-cement interface. With these precautions, it is safe to assume that the combined molecular and mechanical interlock is sufficient for most clinical applications and will not represent the weakest link in prosthetic revision. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(1):e55-e60.].


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia/métodos , Cementos para Huesos , Polimetil Metacrilato , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales , Reoperación
16.
Eur J Med Res ; 25(1): 34, 2020 Aug 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32811560

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication of orthopedic implant surgery. Treatment often includes the use of an antibiotic-loaded Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement spacer. Several antibiotics are commonly used for the preparation of these spacers, but due to the increasing number of infections with resistant Gram-negative bacteria, there is a need for the use of carbapenem antibiotics such as meropenem and imipenem as drugs of last resort. Unfortunately, the reaction heat generated during the preparation of the bone cement can be a major problem for the stability of these antibiotics. In the present study, the stability of meropenem and imipenem was tested before and after the admixture to PMMA bone cements. METHODS: High-performance liquid chromatography with ion-pairing reversed-phase separation and spectrophotometric detection was used for analysis. Stability tests with meropenem and imipenem were performed with antibiotics in solution and solid form at different temperatures (37 °C, 45 °C, 60 °C, 90 °C) and times (30 min, 60 min, 120 min). To test the stability of both antibiotics in PMMA after exposure to the reaction heat during polymerization, three different bone cements were used to generate specimens that contained defined amounts of antibiotics. Reaction heat was measured. The form bodies were mechanically crushed and aliquots were dissolved in ethyl acetate. Samples were prepared for HPLC DAD analysis. RESULTS: Meropenem and imipenem showed the highest degradation levels after heat stressed in solution, with maximum levels of 75% and 95%, respectively. In solid form, degradation levels decreased dramatically for meropenem (5%) and imipenem (13%). Stability tests of both carbapenems in bone cement showed that they remained largely stable during PMMA polymerization, with retrieved amounts of about 70% in Palacos® R and Copal® G+V, and between 80 and 90% in Copal® spacem. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the results of meropenem and imipenem in solution, both antibiotics remain stable in solid form and mostly stable in the cement after PMMA polymerization. The low degradation levels of both antibiotics after exposure to temperatures > 100 °C allow the conclusion that they can potentially be used for an application in PMMA cements.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/química , Cementos para Huesos/química , Carbapenémicos/química , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Polimetil Metacrilato/química , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/normas , Austria/epidemiología , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/metabolismo
17.
J Orthop Trauma ; 34(4): 210-215, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32195889

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the biofilm formation on a biodegradable material, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), with that on conventional titanium (Ti) and steel (St) implant material. METHODS: Pins made of the different materials were incubated in Müller-Hinton broth inoculated with 2 × 10 colony-forming units (CFU)·mL of Staphylococcus aureus for 2 and 7 days and then sonicated for the disruption of the biofilms. CFU were counted to quantify the number of bacteria in the biofilm, and the cell proliferation assay 2,3-Bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H- tetrazolium-5-carboxanilid salt was used to evaluate their metabolic activity. Scanning electron microscopy visualized the structure of the biofilm. RESULTS: We found a significantly higher metabolic activity and CFU count in the biofilm of PHB pins compared with St and Ti pins (analysis of variance, P < 0.0001). Scanning electron microscopy revealed structured biofilms on PHB pins already after 2 days of incubation, which was not observed on the other tested implants. CONCLUSION: PHB implants seem to provide an environment that advantages the formation of biofilms of S. aureus, a common pathogen in implant-related infections. The amount of biofilm is higher on PHB implant compared with conventionally used orthopedic titanium and steel implants. To overcome the potential risk of surgical site infections linked to the clinical use of PHB implants, possible modifications of the material, increasing its antibacterial properties, need to be further investigated.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Staphylococcus aureus , Ácido 3-Hidroxibutírico , Biopelículas , Humanos , Hidroxibutiratos , Poliésteres , Prohibitinas , Titanio
18.
J Med Microbiol ; 68(3): 475-479, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30702418

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Due to numerous advantages of the combination of clindamycin and gentamicin in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement, promising preliminary results have been reported. However, there are no data that analyse mid-term outcomes. METHODOLOGY: This pilot study included patients who experienced 5 years of follow-up and who were treated with gentamicin- and clindamycin-loaded (G+C) PMMA cement. They were divided into two groups: (1) the periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) comprising patients who underwent a one-stage exchange, and (2) aseptic group comprising patients who underwent aseptic revision or primary arthroplasty procedures, but were considered to be high-risk patients for infection. We evaluated the rate of septic and aseptic revision arthroplasty with a minimum of 5-year follow-up.Results/Key findings. A total of 32 patients in both groups were included. Eighteen patients belonged to the PJI-group and 14 belonged to the aseptic group. There was no reinfection among the patients of the PJI group. Infection was prevented in the aseptic group, including patients with a history of PJI or at higher risk of infection. No patient underwent an exchange of the cemented prosthesis at the 5-year follow-up [72-82 months, standard deviation (sd)=3.3]. CONCLUSIONS: The local use of G+C bone cement during septic and aseptic revision arthroplasty, was associated with a high success rate for the eradication of infection following one-stage septic exchange, and with prevention of infection in high-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Cementos para Huesos/química , Clindamicina/uso terapéutico , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Clindamicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gentamicinas/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Polimetil Metacrilato , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Factores de Tiempo
19.
J Bone Jt Infect ; 2(4): 213-217, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29188173

RESUMEN

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most challenging complications after joint replacement. However, when treated correctly, chances of recovery are good. The most important step in correct diagnosis and management of PJI is the detection of the causative germ. In the last years, the use of sonication in the diagnostic process has become more important. However, this diagnostic methodology has been controversially discussed when used in combination with antibiotic loaded bone cement (PMMA), which is frequently used in joint replacement surgeries. The aim of this study was thus to analyse in vitro bacterial growth in sonication fluid cultures obtained from antibiotic loaded PMMA which were contaminated with various bacterial biofilms. Sonication fluid obtained from antibiotic loaded PMMA (Copal G+V and Copal G+C) and plain Palacos R (control) contaminated either with S. aureus, E. faecalis, S. sanguinis or P.acnes, were analysed for bacterial re-growth in a standardised in-vitro setting. In vitro bacterial growth was not interfered by released antibiotics from sonication of antibiotic loaded PMMA for S. aureus, E. faecalis and S. sanguinis. However, for P. acnes bacterial counts were affected by the released antibiotics as well as by the time delay between sonication and analysis. The in-vitro data suggest sonication to be an easy and sensitive diagnostic modality to detect easy-to-detect bacteria, however, results are alarming for the difficult-to-detect bacteria P. acnes, indicating that further attention and research is necessary to improve the detection of difficult-to-detect bacteria.

20.
Unfallchirurg ; 120(7): 561-572, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28643095

RESUMEN

The treatment of superficial wound infections with local antibiotics is considered to be problematic as it is accompanied by an increased risk of resistance development and ineffectiveness in deeper regions. On the contrary, the local application of antibiotics is useful in arthroplasty and necessary if implants are utilized. The reason for this is the prevention of a rapid biofilm formation on foreign implants and a resulting infection may remain undiscovered until it becomes chronic. Apart from exogenous material, necrotic tissue (e. g. bone sequestra) provides suitable retreat areas for pathogens in the body. Because of the characteristics of bone and joint infections and an exceptional infection recurrence rate, a combined approach is required. Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis is able to reduce the number of pathogens acquired by perioperative contamination or hematogenic spread from another focus of infection; however, systemically applied antibiotics often fail to form an effective colonization barrier around the implant because their ability to penetrate the bone is relatively low. On the other hand, the high concentration of locally released antibiotics leads to an effective protection of the implant from bacteria in situ. Thus, for the treatment of implant-associated infections, systemic and local application of anti-infective agents is a reliable adjuvant measure that improves the therapeutic success. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement is the most commonly used local drug carrier. Based on clinical and microbiological results, microbiologists and infectious disease experts together with the surgeon and pharmacist determine which anti-infective agents are indicated for systemic and local, PMMA cement-related application. Because there is no evident concept for the local application, unlike the recommendation for systemic use of anti-infective agents, this review article describes which aspects should be taken into account.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infección de Heridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Tópica , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Artroplastia , Artroplastia de Reemplazo , Biopelículas/efectos de los fármacos , Portadores de Fármacos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Polimetil Metacrilato , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...