How to hit the allergy target: A critical appraisal of intralymphatic immunotherapy with practical recommendations on ultrasound-guided injections.

BACKGROUND: Intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) represents a promising novel approach treating allergic diseases. However, no standardized procedures or recommendations have been established or reported, despite the recognized fact that treatment efficacy relies on the ability to inject the allergen intranodally. OBJECTIVE: We aim to provide a critical appraisal of ILIT as a method of allergen immunotherapy and to deliver practical recommendations for accurate ILIT. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-three ILIT injections were performed in 28 (47%) women and 32 (53%) men with median age of 29 years (21-59). The injections were ultrasound-guided and recorded for retrospective analysis with respect to injection location, needle visibility, medication release, and patient characteristics. RESULTS: The results show that the correct positioning of the needle within the lymph node (LN) was most critical. If the whole length of the needle bevel was not inserted into the LN, substance backflush into the interstitium was observed. Selecting a more superficial LN and inserting the needle at a smaller angle towards the LN significantly improved needle visibility in the ultrasound. Longitudinal results showed that continuous practice significantly correlated with improved needle visibility and more accurate ILIT injections. CONCLUSION: Based on our results and practical experience, we propose several recommendations for LN selection and the correct handling of ultrasound probe and needle. We are confident that ILIT standardization and training will be important as to meet the goals of good safety and efficacy of ILIT.

A murine model of peanut-allergic asthma.

Objectives: Peanut allergy is an IgE-mediated food allergy that is associated with asthma in certain patients. With increasing prevalence, its great impact on the quality of life, and a lack of treatment options, the need for new therapy options is a given. Hence, models for research and development are required. This study aimed to establish a murine model of allergic airway inflammation induced by peanut allergens. Methods: C3H mice were sensitised by intraperitoneal injections of peanut allergen extract and challenged by an intranasal application of the same extract. The assessment of airway inflammation involved the analysis of immune cells in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid as measured by flow cytometry. Inflammatory reactions in the lung tissue were also studied by histology and quantitative PCR. Moreover, peanut-specific immune responses were studied after re-stimulation of spleen cells in vitro. Results: Sensitisation led to allergen-specific IgE, IgA, and IgG1 seroconversion. Subsequent nasal exposure led to allergic airway inflammation as manifested by structural changes such as bronchial smooth muscle hypertrophy, mucus cell hyperplasia, infiltration of eosinophil cells and T cells, as well as an upregulation of genes expressing IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IFN-γ. Upon re-stimulation of splenocytes with peanut allergen, increased secretion of both T-helper type 2 (Th2) and Th1 cytokines was observed. Conclusion: We successfully established a peanut-associated asthma model that exhibited many features characteristic of airway inflammation in human patients with allergic asthma. The model holds potential as a tool for investigating novel therapeutic approaches aimed at preventing the development of allergic asthma.

Inflammation in acute myocardial infarction: the good, the bad and the ugly.

Convergent experimental and clinical evidence have established the pathophysiological importance of pro-inflammatory pathways in coronary artery disease. Notably, the interest in treating inflammation in patients suffering acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is now expanding from its chronic aspects to the acute setting. Few large outcome trials have proven the benefits of anti-inflammatory therapies on cardiovascular outcomes by targeting the residual inflammatory risk (RIR), i.e. the smouldering ember of low-grade inflammation persisting in the late phase after AMI. However, these studies have also taught us about potential risks of anti-inflammatory therapy after AMI, particularly related to impaired host defence. Recently, numerous smaller-scale trials have addressed the concept of targeting a deleterious flare of excessive inflammation in the early phase after AMI. Targeting different pathways and implementing various treatment regimens, those trials have met with varied degrees of success. Promising results have come from those studies intervening early on the interleukin-1 and -6 pathways. Taking lessons from such past research may inform an optimized approach to target post-AMI inflammation, tailored to spare 'The Good' (repair and defence) while treating 'The Bad' (smouldering RIR) and capturing 'The Ugly' (flaming early burst of excess inflammation in the acute phase). Key constituents of such a strategy may read as follows: select patients with large pro-inflammatory burden (i.e. large AMI); initiate treatment early (e.g. ≤12 h post-AMI); implement a precisely targeted anti-inflammatory agent; follow through with a tapering treatment regimen. This approach warrants testing in rigorous clinical trials.

Quality of life in allergic rhinitis patients treated with intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT): A 19-year follow-up.

Background: In 2002-2005, we conducted a phase I/II clinical trial where a new allergy immunotherapy (AIT) route was introduced: intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT). Ultrasound guidance allowed injection of allergen directly into inguinal lymph nodes. Grass pollen-allergic patients received 3 injections with 1-month intervals. The short ILIT was more patient-friendly, required lower dosing, and was comparable with SCIT regarding short-term efficacy, which was used as a reference. Objective: Nineteen years after ILIT, the same patients were followed up to assess the long-term effect on quality of life and efficacy of the treatment. Methods: Patients who received ILIT and SCIT in 2002-2005 and an additional group of patients, who completed SCIT in 2015-2018, were recruited. All participants received a trial-specific in-house questionnaire and a standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire. Data were recorded off- (February 2021) and on- (May-June 2021) season. Descriptive statistics were applied. Results: Of 58 and 54 patients who originally received ILIT or SCIT, 25 (43%) and 29 (54%) patients, respectively, returned the questionnaires for analysis. Four (16%) and 3 (11%) of the ILIT and SCIT patients, respectively, developed complete protection against grass pollen-mediated rhinitis, whereas another 15 (60%) and 20 (69%) expressed satisfaction with the received AIT. In both groups, any persistent symptoms were reported as mild. Medication usage in the ILIT and SCIT groups was comparable. Nineteen (76%) and 23 (79%) patients, respectively, expressed satisfaction with their AIT. Conclusions: Grass pollen ILIT leads to long-term significant improvement in rhinitis-associated quality of life 19 years after treatment, and the ILIT quality-of-life effect was not inferior to that of SCIT.

Potential Cost Savings by Switching from Subcutaneous to Intralymphatic Insect Venom Immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: IgE-mediated bee venom allergy can be treated with allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT). Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is time and cost intensive due to the repeated consultations, but the costs are justified by the high risk of potentially life-threatening allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. However, intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) offers potential to reduce treatment costs due to a significant reduction in injections and a shorter duration of therapy. Therefore, we calculated the cost savings that arise when switching from SCIT to ILIT. METHODS: Treatment protocols for ILIT were based on previous ILIT studies. Treatment protocols for SCIT were based on routine treatment at the University Hospital Zurich (USZ). The treatment costs were calculated based on the internal hospital information system (KISIM). RESULTS: The calculations revealed a potential two-fold reduction in treatment costs if ILIT is used instead of SCIT in patients with bee venom allergy. The costs could be reduced from EUR 11,612.59 with SCIT to EUR 5,942.15 with ILIT over 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that bee venom ILIT has a cost-benefit potential for health insurances and patients, which should encourage further ILIT studies and which should be taken into account when considering future implementation of ILIT in the standard care of venom allergy.

Allergen immunotherapy: progress and future outlook.

INTRODUCTION: Allergy, the immunological hypersensitivity to innocuous environmental compounds, is a global health problem. The disease triggers, allergens, are mostly proteins contained in various natural sources such as plant pollen, animal dander, dust mites, foods, fungi, and insect venoms. Allergies can manifest with a wide range of symptoms in various organs and be anything from just tedious to life-threatening. A majority of all allergy patients are self-treated with symptom-relieving medicines, while allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causative treatment option. AREAS COVERED: This review will aim to give an overview of the state-of-the-art allergy management, including the use of new biologics and the application of biomarkers, and a special emphasis and discussion on current research trends in the field of AIT. EXPERT OPINION: Conventional AIT has proven effective, but the years-long treatment compromises patient compliance. Moreover, AIT is typically not offered for food allergies. Hence, there is a need for new, effective, and safe AIT methods. Novel routes of administration (e.g. oral and intralymphatic), hypoallergenic AIT products, and more effective adjuvants hold great promise. Most recently, the development of allergen-specific monoclonal antibodies for passive immunotherapy may also allow the treatment of patients currently not treated or treatable.

The next generation virus-like particle platform for the treatment of peanut allergy.

BACKGROUND: Allergy to peanut is one of the leading causes of anaphylactic reactions among food allergic patients. Immunization against peanut allergy with a safe and protective vaccine holds a promise to induce durable protection against anaphylaxis caused by exposure to peanut. A novel vaccine candidate (VLP Peanut), based on virus-like particles (VLPs), is described here for the treatment of peanut allergy. METHODS AND RESULTS: VLP Peanut consists of two proteins: a capsid subunit derived from Cucumber mosaic virus engineered with a universal T-cell epitope (CuMVTT ) and a CuMVTT subunit fused with peanut allergen Ara h 2 (CuMVTT -Ara h 2), forming mosaic VLPs. Immunizations with VLP Peanut in both naïve and peanut-sensitized mice resulted in a significant anti-Ara h 2 IgG response. Local and systemic protection induced by VLP Peanut were established in mouse models for peanut allergy following prophylactic, therapeutic, and passive immunizations. Inhibition of FcγRIIb function resulted in a loss of protection, confirming the crucial role of the receptor in conferring cross protection against peanut allergens other than Ara h 2. CONCLUSION: VLP Peanut can be delivered to peanut-sensitized mice without triggering allergic reactions, while remaining highly immunogenic and offering protection against all peanut allergens. In addition, vaccination ablates allergic symptoms upon allergen challenge. Moreover, the prophylactic immunization setting conferred the protection against subsequent peanut-induced anaphylaxis, showing the potential for preventive vaccination. This highlights the effectiveness of VLP Peanut as a prospective break-through immunotherapy vaccine candidate toward peanut allergy. VLP Peanut has now entered clinical development with the study PROTECT.

Strain matters in mouse models of peanut-allergic anaphylaxis: Systemic IgE-dependent and Ara h 2-dominant sensitization in C3H mice.

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy accounts for the majority of food-induced hypersensitivity reactions and can lead to lethal anaphylaxis. Animal models can provide an insight into the immune mechanisms responsible for sensitization and allergic anaphylaxis. However, different mouse strains and sensitization protocols can influence the successful development of a peanut allergic mouse model. OBJECTIVE: We aimed at developing a systemic anaphylaxis model of peanut allergy that resembles human anaphylaxis. We compared the immunological and clinical responses in genetically different mouse strains. METHODS: Female BALB/c, C57BL/6, and C3H mice were intraperitoneally sensitized and later challenged with peanut proteins. Allergen-specific serology was done by ELISA, and anaphylaxis was evaluated by monitoring changes in body temperature upon systemic challenge. RESULTS: Sensitization to peanut was successful in C3H mice and triggered production of allergen-specific antibodies, cytokines and anaphylaxis. Allergic reactions were characterized by the release of allergic mediators and by changes in leukocyte populations in blood and in the peritoneal cavity. Among the identified major peanut allergens, Ara h 2 showed the strongest anaphylactic potential. Much lower or no trigger of peanut-specific antibodies was observed in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, which experienced no hypersensitivity reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Mouse strain matters for testing of peanut protein allergens. We identified C3H mice as a suitable strain for the development of a mouse model of peanut-allergic anaphylaxis. Pre-clinical, humoural and cellular responses resembled the responses observed in human patients. The described model can be useful for further studies on peanut allergy and for the development of new therapeutic strategies.

Targeting Ara h 2 with human-derived monoclonal antibodies prevents peanut-induced anaphylaxis in mice.

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy is a type-I hypersensitivity immune reaction mediated by the binding of peanut allergens to IgE-FcεRI complexes on mast cells and basophils and by their subsequent cellular degranulation. Of all major peanut allergens, Ara h 2 is considered the most anaphylactic. With few options but allergen avoidance, effective treatment of allergic patients is needed. Passive immunotherapy (herein called PIT) based on prophylactic administration of peanut-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) may present a promising treatment option for this under-served disease. METHOD: Fully human recombinant anti-peanut IgG mAbs were tested in mice sensitized to peanut allergen extract. Allergic mice received intravenous immunotherapy with anti-peanut Ara h 2-specific IgG1 or IgG4 mAbs cocktails, and were then challenged by a systemic injection of high-dose peanut allergen extract. The protection from allergic anaphylaxis was measured by monitoring the core body temperature. RESULTS: PIT with peanut-specific mAbs was associated with a significant and dose-dependent reduction of anaphylactic reactions in peanut-sensitized mice challenged with peanut allergen extract. Complete protection was observed at doses approximately 0.3-0.6 mg mAbs. Mixtures of mAbs were more effective than single mAbs, and effective treatment could be obtained with mAbs of both IgG1 and IgG4 subclasses. The therapeutic effect of anti-Ara h 2 mAbs was based on allergen neutralization and independent of the Fcγ receptor and mast-cell inhibition. CONCLUSION: This is the first report that shows that human-derived anti-peanut mAbs can prevent allergic anaphylaxis in mice. The study demonstrates that neutralizing allergenic epitopes on Ara h 2 by mAbs may represent a promising treatment option in peanut-allergy.

RNA with chemotherapeutic base analogues as a dual-functional anti-cancer drug.

Nanoparticles of different sizes formulated with unmodified RNA and Protamine differentially engage Toll-like Receptors (TLRs) and activate innate immune responses in vitro. Here, we report that similar differential immunostimulation that depends on the nanoparticle sizes is induced in vivo in wild type as well as in humanized mice. In addition, we found that the schedule of injections strongly affects the magnitude of the immune response. Immunostimulating 130 nm nanoparticles composed of RNA and Protamine can promote lung metastasis clearance but provides no control of subcutaneous tumors in a CT26 tumor model. We further enhanced the therapeutic capacity of Protamine-RNA nanoparticles by incorporating chemotherapeutic base analogues in the RNA; we coined these immunochemotherapeutic RNAs (icRNAs). Protamine-icRNA nanoparticles were successful at controlling established subcutaneous CT26 and B16 tumors as well as orthotopic glioblastoma. These data indicate that icRNAs are promising cancer therapies, which warrants their further validation for use in the clinic.

Correction: Tusup et al. Evaluation of the Interplay between the ADAR Editome and Immunotherapy in Melanoma. Non-Coding RNA 2021, 7, 5.

In the original article [...].

Intralymphatic Immunotherapy (ILIT) With Bee Venom Allergens: A Clinical Proof-of-Concept Study and the Very First ILIT in Humans.

Background: Subcutaneous venom immunotherapy (VIT) represents an effective treatment against bee venom allergy. However, it involves long treatment times, high costs, and the risk of adverse events (AEs). Shorter, safer, and cheaper treatment options are therefore pursued. Objective: To determine the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of bee venom intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT). Methods: In an open pilot study, 12 patients received bee venom ILIT in three sessions with 14-day intervals: 0.1-5 µg/dose. Ultrasound imaging was applied to guide an injection and to document the lymph node structure. In a second study, 67 patients from 15 centers in Europe and Australia were randomized to receive four doses of either 10- or 20-µg bee venom ILIT with 28-day intervals. Clinical endpoints included specific IgE and IgG and protection after a bee sting challenge. These studies were performed in the years 2000-2003. Results: In a proof-of-concept study, no serious AEs were observed. An increase in allergen-specific IgG1 but no IgG4 and IgE was observed. ILIT induced the protection against a bee sting challenge in 7 out of 8 challenged patients. In a multicenter study, an increase in allergen-specific IgG and IgE was observed, with the highest increase in patients receiving a higher ILIT dose. The study was terminated due to several serious AEs upon the sting challenge provocation after the completion of treatment. However, out of 45 patients challenged, 15 (65%) and 18 (82%) patients in the 10- and 20-µg group, respectively, showed an improvement of two grades or more. No correlation was observed between antibody levels and sting protection. Conclusions: While a pilot study suggested the safety and efficacy of bee venom ILIT, a high number of AEs seen after the sting challenge following a randomized study indicate that the immunology protection offered by bee venom ILIT is insufficient. Of note, the bee venom allergen extract used in the two studies were from the two different providers. While the first study used a formulation approved for use in subcutaneous VIT, the second study used a nonapproved formulation never tested in humans. Further studies on approved formulations should be performed to generate conclusive results regarding the safety and efficacy of bee venom ILIT.

Photochemically-Mediated Inflammation and Cross-Presentation of Mycobacterium bovis BCG Proteins Stimulates Strong CD4 and CD8 T-Cell Responses in Mice.

Conventional vaccines are very efficient in the prevention of bacterial infections caused by extracellular pathogens due to effective stimulation of pathogen-specific antibodies. In contrast, considering that intracellular surveillance by antibodies is not possible, they are typically less effective in preventing or treating infections caused by intracellular pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The objective of the current study was to use so-called photochemical internalization (PCI) to deliver a live bacterial vaccine to the cytosol of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) for the purpose of stimulating major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I-restricted CD8 T-cell responses. For this purpose, Mycobacterium bovis BCG (BCG) was combined with the photosensitiser tetraphenyl chlorine disulfonate (TPCS2a) and injected intradermally into mice. TPCS2a was then activated by illumination of the injection site with light of defined energy. Antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses were monitored in blood, spleen, and lymph nodes at different time points thereafter using flow cytometry, ELISA and ELISPOT. Finally, APCs were infected and PCI-treated in vitro for analysis of their activation of T cells in vitro or in vivo after autologous vaccination of mice. Combination of BCG with PCI induced stronger BCG-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses than treatment with BCG only or with BCG and TPCS2a without light. The overall T-cell responses were multifunctional as characterized by the production of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2 and IL-17. Importantly, PCI induced cross-presentation of BCG proteins for stimulation of antigen-specific CD8 T-cells that were particularly producing IFN-γ and TNF-α. PCI further facilitated antigen presentation by causing up-regulation of MHC and co-stimulatory proteins on the surface of APCs as well as their production of TNF-α and IL-1ß in vivo. Furthermore, PCI-based vaccination also caused local inflammation at the site of vaccination, showing strong infiltration of immune cells, which could contribute to the stimulation of antigen-specific immune responses. This study is the first to demonstrate that a live microbial vaccine can be combined with a photochemical compound and light for cross presentation of antigens to CD8 T cells. Moreover, the results revealed that PCI treatment strongly improved the immunogenicity of M. bovis BCG.

Epitranscriptomics modifier pentostatin indirectly triggers Toll-like receptor 3 and can enhance immune infiltration in tumors.

The adenosine deaminase inhibitor 2'-deoxycoformycin (pentostatin, Nipent) has been used since 1982 to treat leukemia and lymphoma, but its mode of action is still unknown. Pentostatin was reported to decrease methylation of cellular RNA. We discovered that RNA extracted from pentostatin-treated cells or mice has enhanced immunostimulating capacities. Accordingly, we demonstrated in mice that the anticancer activity of pentostatin required Toll-like receptor 3, the type I interferon receptor, and T cells. Upon systemic administration of pentostatin, type I interferon is produced locally in tumors, resulting in immune cell infiltration. We combined pentostatin with immune checkpoint inhibitors and observed synergistic anti-cancer activities. Our work identifies pentostatin as a new class of an anticancer immunostimulating drug that activates innate immunity within tumor tissues and synergizes with systemic T cell therapies.

Kinetics and persistence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation and antibodies after BNT162b2 vaccination in a Swiss cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Since the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), substantial effort has been made to gain knowledge about the immunity elicited by infection or vaccination. METHODS: We studied the kinetics of antibodies and virus neutralisation induced by vaccination with BNT162b2 in a Swiss cohort of SARS-CoV-2 naïve (n = 40) and convalescent (n = 9) persons. Blood sera were analysed in a live virus neutralisation assay and specific IgG and IgA levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunoassay and analysed by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Virus neutralisation was detected in all individuals 2-4 weeks after the second vaccine. Both neutralisation and antibodies remained positive for >4 months. Neutralisation and antibodies showed positive correlation, but immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin A (IgA) seroconversion took place 2-4 weeks faster than neutralisation. Spike-protein specific IgG levels rose significantly faster and were more stable over time than virus neutralisation titres or IgA responses. For naïve but not convalescent persons, a clear boosting effect was observed. Convalescent individuals showed faster, more robust and longer-lasting immune responses after vaccination compared to noninfected persons. No threshold could be determined for spike protein-specific IgG or IgA that would confer protection in the neutralisation assay, implicating the need for a better correlate of protection then antibody titres alone. CONCLUSIONS: This study clearly shows the complex translation of antibody data and virus neutralisation, while supporting the evidence of a single dose being sufficient for effective antibody response in convalescent individuals.

Dogmas, challenges, and promises in phase III allergen immunotherapy studies.

The concept of treatment of an allergy with the offending allergen was introduced more than a century ago. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease modifying treatment of allergic diseases caused by inhalational allergens and insect venoms. Despite this, only few AIT products have reached licensure in the US or an official marketing authorization status in European countries. Moreover, most of these AIT products are provided on an individual patient basis as named patient products (NPP) in Europe, while individualized preparations of (mixed) allergenic extract vials for subcutaneous administration (compounding) is common practice in the US. AIT products are generally considered safe and well tolerated, but the major practical clinical development challenge is to define the optimal dose and prove the efficacy and safety of these products using state-of-the art Phase II and pivotal Phase III studies. In planning Phase II-III AIT studies, a thorough understanding of the study challenges is essential (e.g. variability and non-validated status of subjective primary endpoints, limitations of pollen season definitions) and dogmas of these products (e.g., for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) trials double-blinding conditions cannot be maintained, resulting in stronger placebo responses in the active treatment group and inflated treatment effects in Phase III). There is future promise for more objective biomarker endpoints (e.g. basophil activation (CD63 and CD203c), subsets of regulatory dendritic, T and B cells, IL-10-producing group 2 innate lymphoid cells; alone or in combination) to overcome several of these dogmas and challenges; innovation in AIT clinical trials can only progress with integral biomarker research to complement the traditional endpoints in Phase II-III clinical development. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of these dogmas, challenges and recommendations based on published data, to facilitate the design of Phase III studies and improve the evidence basis of safe and effective AIT products.

IL-12 regulates type 3 immunity through interfollicular keratinocytes in psoriasiform inflammation.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder underpinned by dysregulated cytokine signaling. Drugs neutralizing the common p40 subunit of interleukin-12 (IL-12) and IL-23 represented a therapeutic breakthrough; however, new drugs that block the IL-23p19 subunit and spare IL-12 are more effective, suggesting a regulatory function of IL-12. To pinpoint the cell type and underlying mechanism of IL-12­mediated immune regulation in psoriasis, we generated a conditional Il12rb2-knockout (KO)/reporter mouse strain. We detected Il12rb2 expression in T cells and a specific subset of interfollicular (IF) keratinocytes. Analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq) data from patients with psoriasis confirmed a similar expression pattern in the human skin. Deletion of Il12rb2 across the hematopoietic compartment did not alter the development of Aldara-induced psoriasiform inflammation. However, depletion of Il12rb2 in keratinocytes exacerbated disease development, phenocopying the Il12rb2 germline knockout. Protective IL-12 signaling blocked the hyperproliferation of keratinocytes, maintained skin barrier integrity, and diminished disease-driving IL-23/type 3 immune circuits. In line, specific IL-23p19 blockade led to a more profound reduction of psoriatic keratinocyte expression signatures in the skin of patients with psoriasis than combined IL-12/IL-23 inhibition. Collectively, we provide a potential explanation for the superior efficacy of IL-23p19 inhibitors in psoriasis and describe an unperceived role of IL-12 in maintaining skin epithelial cell homeostasis.

A tissue culture infectious dose-derived protocol for testing of SARS-CoV-2 neutralization of serum antibodies on adherent cells.

For a cytopathic virus such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the neutralization capacity of serum from convalescent or vaccinated persons or of therapeutic antibodies can be tested on adherent cell cultures. Here, a simple and tissue culture infectious dose-derived protocol for assessment of neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 is described. Compared with the often applied plaque-forming unit assay, the working load is lower, and fewer manipulations of the infected cultures are required. Hence, the method is safer for the personnel.