RESUMEN
The present in vitro study focuses on the filling ability of three different bioceramic cements with or without the addition of a bioceramic sealer in an open apex model on the marginal apical adaptation, tubule infiltrations, and void distributions as well as the interface between the cement and the sealer materials. To this end, sixty mandibular premolars were used. MTA-Biorep (BR), Biodentine (BD), and Well-Root Putty (WR) were used to obturate the open apex model with or without the addition of a bioceramic sealer, namely TotalFill® BC sealer™ (TF). A digital optical microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were used to investigate the cement-dentin interface, marginal apical adaptation, and the material infiltration into the dentinal tubules. Micro-computed X-ray tomography and digital optical microscopy were used to investigate the cement-sealer interface. The results were analyzed by using the Kruskal-Wallis test. No significant difference was found between the groups for the marginal apical adaptation quality (p > 0.05). Good adaptation of the dentin-cement interface was found for all tested groups and the sealer was placed between the cement material and dentinal walls. All the groups demonstrated some infiltrations into the dentinal tubules at the coronal part except for the BR group. A good internal interface was found between the cement and the sealer with the presence of voids at the external interface. A larger number of voids were found in the case of the BD-TF group compared to each of the other two groups (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of the present in vitro study, all the groups demonstrated good marginal apical adaptation. The use of a sealer in an open apex does not guarantee good filling and, in addition, creates voids at the external interfaces with the dental walls when the premixed sealer is used with powder-liquid cement systems. The use of a premixed bioceramic cement could offer fewer complications than when a powder-liquid cement system is used.
RESUMEN
Background and aims A root perforation is a connection between the root canal system and the external supportive tissues. Strip perforation (SP), occurring within root canals in a strip, can worsen the prognosis of a treated tooth, reduce its mechanical resistance, and impair the tooth structure. One of the suggested methods to treat SP is to seal it with a bio-material such as calcium silicate cement. Therefore, this in vitro study aimed to assess the molar structure impairment due to SP, which requires studying the fracture resistance, and the ability of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), bioceramic, and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) to repair this perforation. Materials and methods Seventy-five molars were instrumented to size #25 and taper 4%, irrigated with sodium hypochlorite and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), dried, and then divided randomly into five groups (G1-G5): in G1, root canals were filled with gutta-percha and sealer (negative control sample), whereas the rest of the groups (G2-G5) had a manual simulated SP made with Gates Glidden drill at the mesial root of the extracted molar, and filled with gutta-percha and sealer up to their perforation area; in G2, SP was filled with gutta-percha and sealer (positive control sample); G3 used MTA to repair the SP; G4 used bioceramic putty; and G5 used CEM. Fracture resistance tests of the molars were conducted in the crown-apical direction using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA test and Bonferroni test were used to study the significance of the differences in the mean values of the tooth fracture resistance, where statistical significance was set at 0.05. Results The ANOVA test showed that there were statistically significant differences between the fracture resistance (in newtons) values among groups (p = 0.000). The Bonferroni test showed that G2 had a smaller fracture resistance mean than the other four study groups (656.53 N; p = 0.000), and that of G5 was smaller than G1, G3, and G4 (794.40 N, 1083.73 N, 1025.20 N, and 1034.20 N, respectively; p = 0.000 in each pairwise comparison). Conclusion SP reduced the fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars. SP restored using MTA and bioceramic putty was better than that treated with CEM and similar to molars without SP. Moreover, MTA and bioceramic putty enhanced the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth to levels similar to molars without SP.