α1 Proline 277 Residues Regulate GABAAR Gating through M2-M3 Loop Interaction in the Interface Region.

Cys-loop receptors are a superfamily of transmembrane, pentameric receptors that play a crucial role in mammalian CNS signaling. Physiological activation of these receptors is typically initiated by neurotransmitter binding to the orthosteric binding site, located at the extracellular domain (ECD), which leads to the opening of the channel pore (gate) at the transmembrane domain (TMD). Whereas considerable knowledge on molecular mechanisms of Cys-loop receptor activation was gathered for the acetylcholine receptor, little is known with this respect about the GABAA receptor (GABAAR), which mediates cellular inhibition. Importantly, several static structures of GABAAR were recently described, paving the way to more in-depth molecular functional studies. Moreover, it has been pointed out that the TMD-ECD interface region plays a crucial role in transduction of conformational changes from the ligand binding site to the channel gate. One of the interface structures implicated in this transduction process is the M2-M3 loop with a highly conserved proline (P277) residue. To address this issue specifically for α1ß2γ2L GABAAR, we choose to substitute proline α1P277 with amino acids with different physicochemical features such as electrostatic charge or their ability to change the loop flexibility. To address the functional impact of these mutations, we performed macroscopic and single-channel patch-clamp analyses together with modeling. Our findings revealed that mutation of α1P277 weakly affected agonist binding but was critical for all transitions of GABAAR gating: opening/closing, preactivation, and desensitization. In conclusion, we provide evidence that conservative α1P277 at the interface is strongly involved in regulating the receptor gating.

α1 Subunit Histidine 55 at the Interface between Extracellular and Transmembrane Domains Affects Preactivation and Desensitization of the GABAA Receptor.

The GABAA receptor is a member of the Cys-loop family and plays a crucial role in the adult mammalian brain inhibition. Although the static structure of this receptor is emerging, the molecular mechanisms underlying its conformational transitions remain elusive. It is known that in the Cys-loop receptors, the interface between extracellular and transmembrane domains plays a key role in transmitting the "activation wave" down to the channel gate in the pore. It has been previously reported that histidine 55 (H55), located centrally at the interfacial ß1-ß2 loop of the α1 subunit, is important in the receptor activation, but it is unknown which specific gating steps it is affecting. In the present study, we addressed this issue by taking advantage of the state-of-the-art macroscopic and single-channel recordings together with extensive modeling. Considering that H55 is known to affect the local electrostatic landscape and because it is neighbored by two negatively charged aspartates, a well conserved feature in the α subunits, we considered substitution with negative (E) and positive (K) residues. We found that these mutations markedly affected the receptor gating, altering primarily preactivation and desensitization transitions. Importantly, opposite effects were observed for these two mutations strongly suggesting involvement of electrostatic interactions. Single-channel recordings suggested also a minor effect on opening/closing transitions which did not depend on the electric charge of the substituting amino acid. Altogether, we demonstrate that H55 mutations affect primarily preactivation and desensitization most likely by influencing local electrostatic interactions at the receptor interface.

The C loop at the orthosteric binding site is critically involved in GABAA receptor gating.

GABAA receptors (GABAARs) play a crucial role in mammalian adult brain inhibition. The dysfunction of GABAergic drive is related to such disorders as epilepsy, schizophrenia, and depression. Substantial progress has recently been made in describing the static structure of GABAARs, but the molecular mechanisms that underlie the activation process remain elusive. The C loop of the GABAAR structure shows the largest movement upon ligand binding to the orthosteric binding site, a phenomenon that is referred to as "capping." The C loop is known to be involved in agonist binding, but its role in the gating of Cys-loop receptors is still debated. Herein, we investigated this issue by analyzing the impact of a ß2F200 residue mutation of the C loop on gating properties of α1ß2γ2 GABAARs. Extensive analyses and the modeling of current responses to saturating agonist application demonstrated that this mutation strongly affected preactivation, opening, closing and desensitization, i.e. all considered gating steps. Single-channel analysis revealed that the ß2F200 mutation slowed all shut time components, and open times were shortened. Model fitting of these single-channel data further confirmed that the ß2F200 mutation strongly affected all of the gating characteristics. We also found that this mutation altered receptor sensitivity to the benzodiazepine flurazepam, which was attributable to a change in preactivation kinetics. In silico analysis indicated that the ß2F200 mutation resulted in distortion of the C loop structure, causing the movement of its tip from the binding site. Altogether, we provide the first evidence that C loop critically controls GABAAR gating.

Key Metabolic Enzymes Underlying Astrocytic Upregulation of GABAergic Plasticity.

GABAergic plasticity is recognized as a key mechanism of shaping the activity of the neuronal networks. However, its description is challenging because of numerous neuron-specific mechanisms. In particular, while essential role of glial cells in the excitatory plasticity is well established, their involvement in GABAergic plasticity only starts to emerge. To address this problem, we used two models: neuronal cell culture (NC) and astrocyte-neuronal co-culture (ANCC), where we chemically induced long-term potentiation at inhibitory synapses (iLTP). iLTP could be induced both in NC and ANCC but in ANCC its extent was larger. Importantly, this functional iLTP manifestation was accompanied by an increase in gephyrin puncta size. Furthermore, blocking astrocyte Krebs cycle with fluoroacetate (FA) in ANCC prevented enhancement of both mIPSC amplitude and gephyrin puncta size but this effect was not observed in NC, indicating a key role in neuron-astrocyte cross-talk. Blockade of monocarboxylate transport with α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (4CIN) abolished iLTP both in NC and ANCC and in the latter model prevented also enlargement of gephyrin puncta. Similarly, blockade of glycogen phosphorylase with BAYU6751 prevented enlargement of gephyrin puncta upon iLTP induction. Finally, block of glutamine synthetase with methionine sulfoxide (MSO) nearly abolished mIPSC increase in both NMDA stimulated cell groups but did not prevent enlargement of gephyrin puncta. In conclusion, we provide further evidence that GABAergic plasticity is strongly regulated by astrocytes and the underlying mechanisms involve key metabolic enzymes. Considering the strategic role of GABAergic interneurons, the plasticity described here indicates possible mechanism whereby metabolism regulates the network activity.