Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Vasa ; 43(1): 55-61, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24429331

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is frequently present in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, there are limited data regarding the association between ankle brachial index (ABI) ≤ 0.90 (which is diagnostic of PAD) or > 1.40 (suggesting calcified arteries) and the severity of stroke and in-hospital outcome in this population. We aimed to evaluate these associations in patients with acute ischemic stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 342 consecutive patients admitted for acute ischemic stroke (37.4 % males, mean age 78.8 ± 6.4 years). The severity of stroke was assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)and the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at admission. The outcome was assessed with the mRS and dependency (mRS 2 - 5) at discharge and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: An ABI ≤ 0.90 was present in 24.6 % of the patients whereas 68.1 % had ABI 0.91 - 1.40 and 7.3 % had ABI > 1.40. At admission, the NIHSS score did not differ between the 3 groups (10.4 ± 10.6, 8.3 ± 9.3 and 9.3 ± 9.4, respectively). The mRS score was also comparable in the 3 groups (3.6 ± 1.7, 3.1 ± 1.8 and 3.5 ± 2.3, respectively). At discharge, the mRS score did not differ between the 3 groups (2.9 ± 2.2, 2.3 ± 2.1 and 2.7 ± 2.5, respectively) and dependency rates were also comparable (59.5, 47.6 and 53.3 %, respectively). In-hospital mortality was almost two-times higher in patients with ABI ≤ 0.90 than in patients with ABI 0.91 - 1.40 or > 1.40 but this difference was not significant (10.9, 6.6 and 6.3 %, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: An ABI ≤ 0.90 or > 1.40 does not appear to be associated with more severe stroke or worse in-hospital outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke.


Asunto(s)
Índice Tobillo Braquial , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Isquemia Encefálica/mortalidad , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Grecia/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología
2.
Blood Press ; 22(5): 307-11, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24059788

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: We aimed to assess the prevalence of resistant hypertension (RH) in patients attending hypertension outpatient clinics and to identify risk factors for RH. We studied the medical records of the last visit of all patients (n = 1810; 40.4% males, age 56.5 ± 13.5 years) who attended at least once our hypertension outpatient clinic during the last decade. RH was defined as blood pressure (BP) > 140/90 mmHg in patients without diabetes or chronic kidney disease (or BP > 130/80 mmHg in patients with the latter diseases) despite treatment with full doses of three antihypertensive agents from different classes or controlled BP on four or more different antihypertensive agents. The prevalence of RH was 12.3%, whereas 22.2% of the patients had well-controlled hypertension and 65.5% had uncontrolled hypertension but were on less than three antihypertensive agents. Independent predictors of RH were age (risk ratio, RR = 1.08, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.05-1.12, p < 0.001), body mass index (RR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.13, p < 0.05) and the presence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) (RR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.03-3.91, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RH is frequent in patients followed up in hypertension outpatient clinics. In addition to age and obesity, MetS appears to be associated with increased risk for RH. Clarification of the mechanisms underpinning the association between MetS and hypertension might reduce the prevalence of RH.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión/epidemiología , Síndrome Metabólico/epidemiología , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Grecia/epidemiología , Humanos , Hipertensión/metabolismo , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólico/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...