Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Malawi Med J ; 35(4): 214-219, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38362572

RESUMEN

Aim: The study aimed to determine the epidemiology and evaluate the trends in the uptake of refractive error services in Harare. Methods: A clinic-based retrospective study at the Greenwood Park Eye Centre and its three subsidiaries was conducted from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. Results: 12,216 patients' records were retrieved, out of which 1074 (8.79%) had refractive error cases. The prevalence of visual impairment at presentation was 5.80% [95% CI: 5.39 - 6.23]. Among those with refractive error, the sample prevalence of visual impairment before correction was 41.30% [CI: 38.3 - 44.3, 95%], and 2.20% [95% CI: 1.4 - 3.3] after correction. There was inconsistency in the percentage utilization of refractive error services, with the highest being 42.60% in 2015. Refractive error types were related to age, employment position, and type of visual impairment prior to refractive error treatment. Conclusion: There was a low percentage of refractive error services uptake in urban Zimbabwe.


Asunto(s)
Anteojos , Errores de Refracción , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Agudeza Visual , Zimbabwe/epidemiología , Errores de Refracción/epidemiología , Errores de Refracción/terapia , Hospitales , Prevalencia , Trastornos de la Visión/epidemiología
2.
Malawi med. j. (Online) ; 35(4): 214-219, 2023. figures, tables
Artículo en Inglés | AIM (África) | ID: biblio-1532158

RESUMEN

Aim The study aimed to determine the epidemiology and evaluate the trends in the uptake of refractive error services in Harare. Methods A clinic-based retrospective study at the Greenwood Park Eye Centre and its three subsidiaries was conducted from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. Results 12,216 patients' records were retrieved, out of which 1074 (8.79%) had refractive error cases. The prevalence of visual impairment at presentation was 5.80% [95% CI: 5.39 ­ 6.23]. Among those with refractive error, the sample prevalence of visual impairment before correction was 41.30% [CI: 38.3 ­ 44.3, 95%], and 2.20% [95% CI: 1.4 ­ 3.3] after correction. There was inconsistency in the percentage utilization of refractive error services, with the highest being 42.60% in 2015. Refractive error types were related to age, employment position, and type of visual impairment prior to refractive error treatment. Conclusion There was a low percentage of refractive error services uptake in urban Zimbabwe.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Errores de Refracción , Terapéutica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA