Comparison of the effects of methylprednisolone, hyperbaric oxygen and hesperidin + diosmin on the facial nerve injury: an experimental animal model.

BACKGROUND: Necessity of new and alternative treatments in traumatic facial nerve injury. AIMS/OBJECTIVE: In this experimental study, we aimed to evaluate the histopathologic and functional effects of methylprednisolone, hyperbaric oxygen and hesperidin + diosmin treatments on traumatic facial nerve regeneration in rats. METHODS: After facial nerve injury, five groups were formed with eight rats in each group: Group 1 (negative control), 2 (operation), 3 (corticosteroid), 4 (hyperbaric oxygen), 5 (hesperidin + diosmin). Blink reflex of rats evaluated a day after the operation and at the first, second and third weeks. Facial nerve samples from sacrificed animals were examined under a light microscope. RESULTS: According to our results, in group 4; axonal degeneration and vascular congestion were significantly lower than group 2 and 3, and myelin sheath thickness was significantly higher than group 3. In group 5; axonal degeneration was significantly lower than group 2 and vascular congestion was significantly lower than group 2 and 3. In terms of functional recovery; there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: It has been shown that both hyperbaric oxygen and hesperidin + diosmin treatments have positive effects on facial nerve regeneration. Both treatments may be good alternatives for ameliorating traumatic nerve injury, but these treatment modalities need to be further explored.

Comparison of Dorsal Preservation and Dorsal Reduction Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Nasal Patency and Aesthetic Outcomes by Rhinomanometry, NOSE and SCHNOS Scales.

BACKGROUND: Dorsal preservation techniques have been preferred and gained popularity in recent years. The current study compares the effects of dorsal preservation and dorsal reduction rhinoplasty on nasal patency and aesthetic outcomes by using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and rhinomanometry. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare dorsal preservation and dorsal reduction techniques with rhinomanometry. METHODS: This is a prospective study of 34 patients who underwent rhinoplasty between January 2021-June 2022. The patients were randomly selected preoperatively and divided into two groups as structural rhinoplasty (SR) and preservation rhinoplasty (PR). Nasal Obstruction and Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) scales and rhinomanometric evaluation were performed preoperatively, at 3rd month and 12th month postoperatively. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (10 female, 9 male) were in SR group, 15 patients (7 female, 8 male) were in PR group. There was not significant difference in terms of age and gender between groups. In both groups, NOSE, SCHNOS-O and SCHNOS-C results were found to be significantly lower at postoperative 3rd and 12th month compared to preoperatively (p < 0.001 for the entire SR group, p = 0.001 for the entire PR group). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of PROMs. Mean total nasal volume (TNV) at 12th month were statistically higher than preoperative value in PR group (p = 0.031). Also there was no significant difference in SR group and between groups in terms of rhinomanometry results. CONCLUSION: Dorsal preservation with pushdown technique provides good functional and aesthetic results comparable with structural rhinoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . A well-designed prospective clinical trial.

The relationship between Covid-19 and mucociliary clearance.

BACKGROUND: The effect of Covid-19 infection on nasal mucociliary clearance (MCC) is unknown. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between Covid-19 and nasal MCC in terms of smoking, Covid-19 symptoms and treatment. METHODS: Thirty-six patients who were hospitalized in the pandemic ward due to Covid-19 and 36 volunteers (Covid-19 negative test result) who presented to the otolaryngology outpatient clinic with non-nasal symptoms were included in this study. The Saccharin test was performed in both groups to evaluate nasal MCC. RESULTS: The patients and control groups were not significantly different in terms of age and gender. The nasal MCC time was significantly higher in the patient group compared to the control group (19.18 ± 10.84 min and 13.78 ± 8.18 min, p = .003). CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: In this study, we found that Covid-19 prolonged nasal MCC time regardless of age. We suggest that corticosteroids should be included in the treatment of Covid-19, both with its symptom reduction and its positive effect on MCC duration.

Measurement of some serum cytokines in nasal polyp and evaluation of its correlation with disease severity.

PURPOSE: Nasal polyp is originating from the nasal mucosa or paranasal sinus mucosa. In our study, it was aimed to investigate the possible effects of inflammatory cytokines Interleukin-13 (IL-13), IL-25, IL-33 and Syndecan-1 (SDC-1) in the pathogenesis process of nasal polyp and relationship between these parameters and disease severity. METHODS: Our study was designed as a prospective case-control study. Patients diagnosed with nasal polyp were included in the patient group. The control group comprised volunteers with age and gender compatibility who does not have the disease. IL-13, IL-25, IL-33 and SDC-1 levels were detected in serum samples using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. Nasal polyp disease severity was evaluated by means of "Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22", "Lund-Mackay Score" and "Lund-Kennedy Score". RESULTS: In this study, 35 patients, 29 controls, a total of 64 participants were included. Our evaluation revealed that all cytokine levels in the patient group were statistically significantly higher than the control group (p < 0.05). However, there was no correlation found between scoring methods and cytokine levels (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The increase in cytokine levels in the patient group suggested that cytokine-mediated inflammation processes may be effective in nasal polyp pathogenesis.