Effects of renal denervation on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: a latest systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials.

The efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) has been controversial, but recent randomized sham-controlled trials demonstrated significant blood pressure reductions after RDN in patients with hypertension. We conducted a systematic review and updated meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of RDN on ambulatory and office blood pressures in patients with hypertension. Databases were searched up to 15 November 2023 to identify randomized, sham-controlled trials of RDN. The primary endpoint was change in 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) with RDN versus sham control. The secondary endpoints were changes in 24 h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure, daytime and nighttime blood pressure (BP), office BP, and home BP. A sub-analysis determined outcomes by medication, procedure, and device. From twelve trials, 2222 patients with hypertension were randomized to undergo RDN (n = 1295) or a sham procedure (n = 927). At 2-6 months after treatment, RDN significantly reduced 24 h ambulatory SBP by 2.81 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -4.09, -1.53; p < 0.001) compared with the sham procedure. RDN also reduced daytime SBP by 3.17 mmHg (- 4.75, - 1.58; p < 0.001), nighttime SBP by 3.41 mmHg (- 4.69, - 2.13; p < 0.001), office SBP by 4.95 mmHg (- 6.37, - 3.54; p < 0.001), and home SBP by 4.64 mmHg (- 7.44, - 1.84; p = 0.001) versus the sham control group. There were no significant differences in the magnitude of BP reduction between first- and second-generation trials, between devices, or between with or without medication. These data from randomized sham-controlled trials showed that RDN significantly reduced all blood pressure metrics in medicated or unmedicated patients with hypertension, including resistant/uncontrolled hypertension.

Low serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor may predict poor response to cardiac rehabilitation in patients with cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is associated with skeletal muscle energy metabolism and that BDNF is a predictor of mortality in heart failure patients. However, little is known about the relationship between BDNF and cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Therefore, this study retrospectively investigated the effects of baseline serum BDNF levels on the CR-induced exercise capacity improvement in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS: We assigned 99 CVD patients (mean age 71±12 years, male = 60) to Low, Middle, and High groups based on the tertiles of baseline BDNF levels. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing was done using supervised bicycle ergometer twice before and after 3 weeks of CR. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) followed by post-hoc analysis using Tukey's HSD test was conducted to assess the multivariate associations between baseline BDNF levels categorized by BDNF tertiles (as independent variable) and %increases in AT and peak VO2 after 3-week CR (as dependent variables) after adjustment for age and gender (as covariates), as a main statistical analysis of the present study. RESULTS: The higher the baseline BDNF levels, the better nutritional status evaluated by the CONUT score (p<0.0001). Baseline anaerobic threshold (AT) and peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) were similar among the three groups. ANCOVA followed by post-hoc analysis revealed that age- and gender-adjusted %increases in peak VO2 after 3-week CR were positively associated with baseline BDNF levels (p = 0.0239) and Low BDNF group showed significantly lower %increase in peak VO2 than High BDNF group (p = 0.0197). Significant association was not found between baseline BDNF and %increase in AT (p = 0.1379). CONCLUSIONS: Low baseline BDNF levels were associated with malnutrition in CVD patients. A positive association between baseline BDNF levels and CR-induced increases in peak VO2 was found. It was suggested that CVD patients with low baseline BDNF levels may be poor responders to CR.

Anti-hypertensive medication adherence in the REQUIRE trial: post-hoc exploratory evaluation.

Maintaining medication adherence is important in treating hypertension, especially resistant hypertension (RH), and variable medication adherence can confound results in blood pressure trials. This post-hoc analysis evaluated adherence at baseline and 3 months using available urine samples from the REQUIRE trial, comparing 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (ASBP) lowering effects of ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) versus sham in RH. At baseline, 45% (26/58) patients showed poor adherence. Among patients with good baseline adherence, adherence was unchanged at 3 months, and uRDN patients had a decreased ASBP whereas sham patients did not. In poorly adherent patients, sham patients showed a trend towards increased adherence and a significant ASBP reduction, whereas uRDN patients did not change. Accordingly, adherence changes and the resultant ASBP reduction in poorly adherent sham patients may explain the lack of between-group difference seen in REQUIRE. Monitoring and maintaining medication adherence is important for future interventional studies in RH.

Angiotensin II receptor blocker and statin combination therapy associated with higher skeletal muscle index in patients with cardiovascular disease: A retrospective study.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Reduction in skeletal muscle mass is the most important component in diagnosing sarcopenia. Ageing and chronic heart failure due to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) accelerate the reduction of skeletal muscles. However, there are no currently available drugs that are effective for sarcopenia. The purpose of this study was to explore the association between prescribed medications and skeletal muscle mass in patients with CVD. METHODS: This was a single-centre, retrospective, cross-sectional study. The subjects were 636 inpatients with CVD who took prescribed medicines for at least 4 weeks at the time of admission. Skeletal muscle volume was assessed using a bioelectrical impedance assay. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Single regression analysis showed that 10 and 3 medications were positively and negatively associated with skeletal muscle index (SMI), respectively. Stepwise multivariate regression analysis revealed that angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)/statin combination, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, and antihyperuricemic agents were positively associated with SMI while diuretics and antiarrhythmic agents were negatively associated with SMI. After adjustment using propensity score matching, the SMI was found to be significantly higher in ARB/statin combination users than in non-users. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Combination use of ARB/statin was associated with a higher SMI in patients with CVD. A future randomised, controlled trial is warranted to determine whether the ARB/statin combination will increase the SMI and prevent sarcopenia in patients with CVD.

Catheter-based ultrasound renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension: the randomized, controlled REQUIRE trial.

Renal denervation is a promising new non-pharmacological treatment for resistant hypertension. However, there is a lack of data from Asian patients. The REQUIRE trial investigated the blood pressure-lowering efficacy of renal denervation in treated patients with resistant hypertension from Japan and South Korea. Adults with resistant hypertension (seated office blood pressure ≥150/90 mmHg and 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg) with suitable renal artery anatomy were randomized to ultrasound renal denervation or a sham procedure. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 3 months. A total of 143 patients were included (72 renal denervation, 71 sham control). Reduction from baseline in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 3 months was not significantly different between the renal denervation (-6.6 mmHg) and sham control (-6.5 mmHg) groups (difference: -0.1, 95% confidence interval -5.5, 5.3; p = 0.971). Reductions from baseline in home and office systolic blood pressure (differences: -1.8 mmHg [p = 0.488] and -2.0 mmHg [p = 0.511], respectively), and medication load, did not differ significantly between the two groups. The procedure-/device-related major adverse events was not seen. This study did not show a significant difference in ambulatory blood pressure reductions between renal denervation and a sham procedure in treated patients with resistant hypertension. Although blood pressure reduction after renal denervation was similar to other sham-controlled studies, the sham group in this study showed much greater reduction. This unexpected blood pressure reduction in the sham control group highlights study design issues that will be addressed in a new trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02918305 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

Effects of renal denervation on blood pressures in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials.

The efficacy of renal denervation has been controversial, but recent randomized sham-controlled trials demonstrated significant blood pressure reductions after renal denervation in patients with hypertension. We conducted a systematic review and updated meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of renal denervation on ambulatory and office blood pressures in patients with hypertension. Databases were searched up to 25 May 2021 to identify randomized, sham-controlled trials of renal denervation. The primary endpoint was change in 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure with renal denervation versus sham control. The secondary endpoints were daytime and nighttime systolic blood pressure, and office systolic blood pressure. A sub-analysis determined outcomes by medication, procedure, and device. From nine trials, 1555 patients with hypertension were randomized to undergo renal denervation (n = 885) or a sham procedure (n = 670). At 2-6 months after treatment, renal denervation significantly reduced 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure by 3.31 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -4.69, -1.94) compared with the sham procedure (p < 0.001). Renal denervation also reduced daytime SBP by 3.53 mmHg (-5.28, -1.78; p < 0.001), nighttime SBP by 3.20 mmHg (-5.46, -0.94; p = 0.006), and office SBP by 5.25 mmHg (-7.09, -3.40; p < 0.001) versus the sham control group. There were no significant differences in the magnitude of blood pressure reduction between first- and second-generation trials, between devices, or with or without medication. These data from randomized sham-controlled trials showed that renal denervation significantly reduced all blood pressure metrics in medicated or unmedicated patients with hypertension, including resistant/uncontrolled hypertension. Future trials should investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of renal denervation.

Day-by-Day Blood Pressure Variability in the Subacute Stage of Ischemic Stroke and Long-Term Recurrence.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine whether variability of day-by-day blood pressure (BP) during the subacute stage of acute ischemic stroke is predictive of long-term stroke recurrence. METHODS: We analyzed 7665 patients (mean±SD age: 72.9±13.1 years; women: 42.4%) hospitalized for first-ever ischemic stroke in 7 stroke centers in Fukuoka, Japan, from June 2007 to November 2018. BP was measured daily during the subacute stage (4-10 days after onset). Its mean and coefficient of variation (CV) values were calculated and divided into 4 groups according to the quartiles of these BP parameters. Patients were prospectively followed up for recurrent stroke or all-cause death. The cumulative event rate was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. We estimated the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of the events of interest after adjusting for potential confounders and mean BP values using Cox proportional hazards models. The Fine-Gray model was also used to account for the competing risk of death. RESULTS: With a mean (±SD) follow-up duration of 3.9±3.2 years, the rates of recurrent stroke and all-cause death were 3.9 and 9.9 per 100 patient-years, respectively. The cumulative event rates of recurrent stroke and all-cause death increased with increasing CVs of systolic BP and diastolic BP. The systolic BP CV was significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke after adjusting for multiple confounders and mean BP (hazard ratio [95% CI] for fourth quartile versus first quartile, 1.26 [1.05-1.50]); the risk of recurrent stroke also increased with an increasing systolic BP CV for nonfatal strokes (1.26 [1.05-1.51]) and when death was regarded as a competing risk (1.21 [1.02-1.45]). Similar associations were observed for the diastolic BP CV. CONCLUSIONS: Day-by-day variability of BP during the subacute stage of acute ischemic stroke was associated with an increased long-term risk of recurrent stroke.

Overexpression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 by renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. Truth or myth? A systematic review of animal studies.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) protects against organ damage in hypertension and cardiovascular diseases by counter regulating the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). ACE2 is also the receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Based on the claim that RAS inhibitors (RASIs) cause ACE2 overexpression in some animal experiments, concerns have arisen that RASIs may aggravate SARS-CoV-2 infection and coronavirus disease-2019 severity in RASI-treated patients. To achieve a comprehensive review, a systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed was conducted regarding the effects of RASIs on tissue ACE2 mRNA/protein expression in healthy animals and animal models of human diseases. We identified 88 eligible articles involving 168 experiments in the heart, kidneys, lungs, and other organs. Three of 38 experiments involving healthy animals showed ACE2 expression greater than twice that of the control (overexpression). Among 102 disease models (130 experiments), baseline ACE2 was overexpressed in 16 models (18 experiments) and less than half the control level (repression) in 28 models (40 experiments). In 72 experiments, RASIs did not change ACE2 levels from the baseline levels of disease models. RASIs caused ACE2 overexpression compared to control levels in seven experiments, some of which were unsupported by other experiments under similar conditions. In 36 experiments, RASIs reversed or prevented disease-induced ACE2 repression, yielding no or marginal changes. Therefore, ACE2 overexpression appears to be a rare rather than common consequence of RASI treatment in healthy animals and disease models. Future studies should clarify the pathophysiological significance of RASI-induced reversal or prevention of ACE2 repression in disease models.

Interactions of coronaviruses with ACE2, angiotensin II, and RAS inhibitors-lessons from available evidence and insights into COVID-19.

The rapid spread of a novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has led to an ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Recently, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) has been shown to be a functional receptor for SARS-CoV-2 to enter host target cells. Given that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and an ACE inhibitor (ACEI) upregulated ACE2 expression in animal studies, the concern might arise regarding whether ARBs and ACEIs would increase the morbidity and mortality of COVID-19. On the other hand, animal data suggested a potential protective effect of ARBs against COVID-19 pneumonia because an ARB prevented the aggravation of acute lung injury in mice infected with SARS-CoV, which is closely related to SARS-CoV-2. Importantly, however, there is no clinical or experimental evidence supporting that ARBs and ACEIs either augment the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 or aggravate the severity and outcomes of COVID-19 at present. Until further data are available, it is recommended that ARB and ACEI medications be continued for the treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease and hypertension, especially those at high risk, according to guideline-directed medical therapy based on the currently available evidence.

Increased arterial velocity pulse index is an independent factor related to skeletal muscle mass reduction and tissue damage in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Reduced skeletal muscle mass is the most important component of sarcopenia. Aging and chronic diseases, including chronic heart failure, are the causes of reduced skeletal muscle mass. However, little is known about the mechanism of skeletal muscle mass reduction in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). The purpose of this study was to assess the associations among skeletal muscle mass reduction, endothelial function, and other markers of advanced vascular damage in CVD patients. This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis that included 310 inpatients with CVD in our hospital. Flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) was performed to assess early vascular damage, i.e., endothelial dysfunction. The arterial velocity pulse index (AVI) and arterial pressure volume index (API) were assessed to reveal signs of advanced vascular damage, such as arterial stiffening and increased peripheral resistance. The bioelectrical phase angle (PA), as a marker of tissue damage, and the skeletal muscle index (SMI) were measured. Correlation analyses were performed among these parameters. Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 25.5% of patients according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria. Greater progression of arterial stiffness, shown by a higher AVI, and more severe tissue damage, shown by a narrower PA, were found in individuals with sarcopenia. Stepwise multivariate regression analysis showed that sex, age, PA, hypertension, and AVI were factors independently correlated with SMI. In conclusion, advanced vascular damage, such as increased arterial stiffness and peripheral resistance, might play an important role in the reduction in skeletal muscle mass, possibly through damage to skeletal muscle tissue in CVD patients.

Low blood pressure and cardiovascular events in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease after revascularization: the CREDO-Kyoto registry cohort-1.

The current American, European, and Japanese guidelines for hypertension treatment have lowered blood pressure (BP) targets to <130/80 mmHg in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there is concern that low BP may increase cardiovascular events in diabetic CAD patients. Currently, coronary revascularization has become widespread in diabetic CAD patients. Thus, whether low BP is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events in diabetic CAD patients after revascularization was investigated. We examined 2718 stable CAD patients with DM in the CREDO-Kyoto cohort-1 registry enrolling 9877 patients who underwent their first percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass grafting. There were no cutoff points for systolic BP (SBP) below which the age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios for cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and nonfatal stroke increased. The cutoff diastolic BP (DBP) for increasing cardiovascular death was 70 mmHg (P = 0.014), whereas there was no cutoff DBP for increasing nonfatal MI and nonfatal stroke. However, on stepwise Cox hazard proportional regression analysis, the independent factors increasing cardiovascular death were hypertension, low creatinine clearance, wide pulse pressure, prior MI, and nonuse of statins, but DBP < 70 mmHg was not a significant factor. In conclusion, in diabetic CAD patients after coronary revascularization, low SBP and DBP were not significant factors that increased cardiovascular events. Careful attention should be paid to vascular lesions and organ damage that have already progressed.

Effects of blood pressure lowering in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The efficacy and safety of blood pressure lowering in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remain unknown. We systematically searched PubMed/Medline, ICHUSHI, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Library database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of blood pressure lowering in patients with HFpEF that were published from January 1996 to July 2017. Our study included a total of 10 RCTs involving 13,091 patients with HFpEF that compared all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalization, renal dysfunction, and/or hypotension between drug intervention and control groups. Then, we analyzed systolic blood pressure (SBP) before and during trials using the SBP from the RCTs data. SBP decreased in the intervention group (134.7-130.2 mmHg) more than that in the control group (134.4-133.3 mmHg), and heart failure hospitalization was reduced in the intervention group compared to that in the control group [RR 0.89 (0.82-0.97), P = 0.006]. There was no effect of treatment on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and hypotension. However, in the studies that compared renal function, SBP decreased in the intervention group (134.3-129.6 mmHg) more than that in the control group (134.0-132.8 mmHg), and the occurrence of renal dysfunction increased in the intervention group compared to that in the control group [RR 1.52 (1.31-1.76), P < 0.00001)]. Blood pressure lowering that achieves SBP levels of ~130 mmHg may be related to the reduction in heart failure hospitalization in patients with HFpEF, but it also possibly leads to an increased risk of renal dysfunction.

Effects of lowering diastolic blood pressure to <80 mmHg on cardiovascular mortality and events in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The target of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) remains controversial in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We systematically searched PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Central database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of reducing DBP in CAD patients from January 1965 to July 2017. Seven placebo-controlled RCTs enrolling 34,814 CAD patients who achieved DBP <80 mmHg were included in the drug-intervention group. The average achieved blood pressures (BPs) were 126.3/75.1 and 131.5/77.8 mmHg in the drug-intervention and placebo-control groups, respectively. Drug intervention was associated with an 11% reduction in coronary revascularization and a 31% reduction in heart failure. In the drug-intervention group, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, and stroke were reduced with marginal significance, whereas hypotension was increased by 123%. A meta-analysis of four RCTs, in which the achieved DBP was <75 mmHg, showed that the drug intervention was associated with a 22% reduction in heart failure. These results suggest that reducing DBP to 80 mmHg or less would significantly reduce coronary revascularization and heart failure but at the expense of causing hypotension in CAD patients. Further trials are warranted to prove this issue.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertensive patients with myocardial infarction or heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are considered primary drugs for the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI), and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are used when ACEIs cannot be tolerated. However, it is unclear whether ACEIs or ARBs are more appropriate first-line drugs in hypertensive patients with MI or heart failure (HF). The present study aimed to compare the effects of ACEIs and those of ARBs in these patients. Sixty randomized controlled trails (RCTs) that compared the effects of ACEIs and ARBs in patients with MI or HF were extracted by searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and the Medical Central Journal database according to the PRISMA guidelines. We finally selected six eligible RCTs and identified three systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The proportion of hypertensive patients ranged from 36 to 69%. Meta-analyses were performed for recurrence or new onset of MI (risk ratio 0.97 [95% confidence interval: 0.88, 1.06]), hospitalization for HF (0.98 [0.84, 1.14]), cardiovascular or total mortality (0.98 [0.91, 1.05]), cardiovascular events or stroke (1.02 [0.94, 1.11]), and adverse events (1.40 [1.11, 1.77]). There were no significant differences between ACEIs and ARBs for all outcomes, except adverse events. Study discontinuation owing to adverse events was significantly more common with ACEIs than with ARBs. Among hypertensive patients with MI or HF, it appears desirable to select the most appropriate drugs, ACEIs or ARBs, in each case by considering the function level, patient background, comorbidity presence, blood pressure target, drug price and other such factors comprehensively in addition to considering tolerability.