ESHRE survey results and good practice recommendations on managing chromosomal mosaicism.

STUDY QUESTION: How should ART/preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) centres manage the detection of chromosomal mosaicism following PGT? SUMMARY ANSWER: Thirty good practice recommendations were formulated that can be used by ART/PGT centres as a basis for their own policy with regards to the management of 'mosaic' embryos. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The use of comprehensive chromosome screening technologies has provided a variety of data on the incidence of chromosomal mosaicism at the preimplantation stage of development and evidence is accumulating that clarifies the clinical outcomes after transfer of embryos with putative mosaic results, with regards to implantation, miscarriage and live birth rates, and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This document was developed according to a predefined methodology for ESHRE good practice recommendations. Recommendations are supported by data from the literature, a large survey evaluating current practice and published guidance documents. The literature search was performed using PubMed and focused on studies published between 2010 and 2022. The survey was performed through a web-based questionnaire distributed to members of the ESHRE special interest groups (SIG) Reproductive Genetics and Embryology, and the ESHRE PGT Consortium members. It included questions on ART and PGT, reporting, embryo transfer policy and follow-up of transfers. The final dataset represents 239 centres. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: The working group (WG) included 16 members with expertise on the ART/PGT process and chromosomal mosaicism. The recommendations for clinical practice were formulated based on the expert opinion of the WG, while taking into consideration the published data and results of the survey. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Eighty percent of centres that biopsy three or more cells report mosaicism, even though only 66.9% of all centres have validated their technology and only 61.8% of these have validated specifically for the calling of chromosomal mosaicism. The criteria for designating mosaicism, reporting and transfer policies vary significantly across the centres replying to the survey. The WG formulated recommendations on how to manage the detection of chromosomal mosaicism in clinical practice, considering validation, risk assessment, designating and reporting mosaicism, embryo transfer policies, prenatal testing and follow-up. Guidance is also provided on the essential elements that should constitute the consent forms and the genetic report, and that should be covered in genetic counselling. As there are several unknowns in chromosomal mosaicism, it is recommended that PGT centres monitor emerging data on the topic and adapt or refine their policy whenever new insights are available from evidence. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Rather than providing instant standardized advice, the recommendations should help ART/PGT centres in developing their own policy towards the management of putative mosaic embryos in clinical practice. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This document will help facilitate a more knowledge-based approach for dealing with chromosomal mosaicism in different centres. In addition to recommendations for clinical practice, recommendations for future research were formulated. Following up on these will direct research towards existing research gaps with direct translation to clinical practice. Emerging data will help in improving guidance, and a more evidence-based approach of managing chromosomal mosaicism. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The WG received technical support from ESHRE. M.D.R. participated in the EQA special advisory group, outside the submitted work, and is the chair of the PGT WG of the Belgian society for human genetics. D.W. declared receiving salary from Juno Genetics, UK. A.C. is an employee of Igenomix, Italy and C.R. is an employee of Igenomix, Spain. C.S. received a research grant from FWO, Belgium, not related to the submitted work. I.S. declared being a Co-founder of IVFvision Ltd, UK. J.R.V. declared patents related to 'Methods for haplotyping single-cells' and 'Haplotyping and copy number typing using polymorphic variant allelic frequencies', and being a board member of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS) and International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis (ISPD). K.S. reported being Chair-elect of ESHRE. The other authors had nothing to disclose. DISCLAIMER: This Good Practice Recommendations (GPR) document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and are based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation.  ESHRE GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care, or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type.  Furthermore, ESHRE GPRs do not constitute or imply the endorsement, or favouring, of any of the included technologies by ESHRE.

Hemoglobinopathies and preimplantation diagnostics.

Hemoglobinopathies constitute some of the most common inherited disorders worldwide. Manifestations are very severe, patient management is difficult and treatment is not easily accessible. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) is a valuable reproductive option for hemoglobinopathy carrier-couples as it precludes the initiation of an affected pregnancy. PGT-M is performed on embryos generated by assisted reproductive technologies and only those found to be free of the monogenic disorder are transferred to the uterus. PGT-M has been applied for 30 years now and ß-thalassemia is one of the most common indications. PGT may also be applied for human leukocyte antigen typing to identify embryos that are unaffected and also compatible with an affected sibling in need of hemopoietic stem cell transplantation. PGT-M protocols have evolved from PCR amplification-based, where a small number of loci were analysed, to whole genome amplification-based, the latter increasing diagnostic accuracy, enabling the development of more generic strategies and facilitating multiple diagnoses in one embryo. Currently, numerous PGT-M cycles are performed for the simultaneous diagnosis of hemoglobinopathies and screening for chromosomal abnormalities in the embryo in an attempt to further improve success rates and increase deliveries of unaffected babies.

An Update on Non-invasive Approaches for Genetic Testing of the Preimplantation Embryo.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) aims to reduce the chance of an affected pregnancy or improve success in an assisted reproduction cycle. Since the first established pregnancies in 1990, methodological approaches have greatly evolved, combined with significant advances in the embryological laboratory. The application of preimplantation testing has expanded, while the accuracy and reliability of monogenic and chromosomal analysis have improved. The procedure traditionally employs an invasive approach to assess the nucleic acid content of embryos. All biopsy procedures require high technical skill, and costly equipment, and may impact both the accuracy of genetic testing and embryo viability. To overcome these limitations, many researchers have focused on the analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) at the preimplantation stage, sampled either from the blastocoel or embryo culture media, to determine the genetic status of the embryo non-invasively. Studies have assessed the origin of cfDNA and its application in non-invasive testing for monogenic disease and chromosomal aneuploidies. Herein, we discuss the state-of-the-art for modern non-invasive embryonic genetic material assessment in the context of PGT. The results are difficult to integrate due to numerous methodological differences between the studies, while further work is required to assess the suitability of cfDNA analysis for clinical application.

ESHRE PGT Consortium good practice recommendations for the detection of monogenic disorders.

The field of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is evolving fast and best practice advice is essential for regulation and standardisation of diagnostic testing. The previous ESHRE guidelines on best practice for PGD, published in 2005 and 2011, are considered outdated, and the development of new papers outlining recommendations for good practice in PGT was necessary. The current paper provides recommendations on the technical aspects of PGT for monogenic/single-gene defects (PGT-M) and covers recommendations on basic methods for PGT-M and testing strategies. Furthermore, some specific recommendations are formulated for special cases, including de novo pathogenic variants, consanguineous couples, HLA typing, exclusion testing and disorders caused by pathogenic variants in the mitochondrial DNA. This paper is one of a series of four papers on good practice recommendations on PGT. The other papers cover the organisation of a PGT centre, embryo biopsy and tubing and the technical aspects of PGT for chromosomal structural rearrangements/aneuploidies. Together, these papers should assist scientists interested in PGT in developing the best laboratory and clinical practice possible.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy by microarray analysis of polar bodies in advanced maternal age: a randomized clinical trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) by comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) of the first and second polar body to select embryos for transfer increase the likelihood of a live birth within 1 year in advanced maternal age women aged 36-40 years planning an ICSI cycle, compared to ICSI without chromosome analysis? SUMMARY ANSWER: PGT-A by CCS in the first and second polar body to select euploid embryos for transfer does not substantially increase the live birth rate in women aged 36-40 years. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: PGT-A has been used widely to select embryos for transfer in ICSI treatment, with the aim of improving treatment effectiveness. Whether PGT-A improves ICSI outcomes and is beneficial to the patients has remained controversial. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a multinational, multicentre, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial with intention-to-treat analysis. Of 396 women enroled between June 2012 and December 2016, 205 were allocated to CCS of the first and second polar body (study group) as part of their ICSI treatment cycle and 191 were allocated to ICSI treatment without chromosome screening (control group). Block randomization was performed stratified for centre and age group. Participants and clinicians were blinded at the time of enrolment until the day after intervention. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Infertile couples in which the female partner was 36-40 years old and who were scheduled to undergo ICSI treatment were eligible. In those assigned to PGT-A, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis of the first and second polar bodies of the fertilized oocytes was performed using the 24sure array of Illumina. If in the first treatment cycle all oocytes were aneuploid, a second treatment with PB array CGH was offered. Participants in the control arm were planned for ICSI without PGT-A. Main exclusion criteria were three or more previous unsuccessful IVF or ICSI cycles, three or more clinical miscarriages, poor response or low ovarian reserve. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate after fresh or frozen embryo transfer recorded over 1 year after the start of the intervention. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Of the 205 participants in the chromosome screening group, 50 (24%) had a live birth with intervention within 1 year, compared to 45 of the 191 in the group without intervention (24%), a difference of 0.83% (95% CI: -7.60 to 9.18%). There were significantly fewer participants in the chromosome screening group with a transfer (relative risk (RR) = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.74-0.89) and fewer with a miscarriage (RR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.26-0.90). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The targeted sample size was not reached because of suboptimal recruitment; however, the included sample allowed a 90% power to detect the targeted increase. Cumulative outcome data were limited to 1 year. Only 11 patients out of 32 with exclusively aneuploid results underwent a second treatment cycle in the chromosome screening group. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The observation that the similarity in birth rates was achieved with fewer transfers, less cryopreservation and fewer miscarriages points to a clinical benefit of PGT-A, and this form of embryo selection may, therefore, be considered to minimize the number of interventions while producing comparable outcomes. Whether these benefits outweigh drawbacks such as the cost for the patient, the higher workload for the IVF lab and the potential effect on the children born after prolonged culture and/or cryopreservation remains to be shown. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Illumina provided microarrays and other consumables necessary for aCGH testing of polar bodies. M.B.'s institution (UZBrussel) has received educational grants from IBSA, Ferring, Organon, Schering-Plough, Merck and Merck Belgium. M.B. has received consultancy and speakers' fees from Organon, Serono Symposia and Merck. G.G. has received personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, Ferring, Merck-Serono, Finox, TEVA, IBSA, Glycotope, Abbott and Gedeon-Richter as well as personal fees from VitroLife, NMC Healthcare, ReprodWissen, BioSilu and ZIVA. W.V., C.S., P.M.B., V.G., G.A., M.D., T.E.G., L.G., G.Ka., G.Ko., J.L., M.C.M., M.P., A.S., M.T., K.V., J.G. and K.S. declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01532284. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 7 February 2012. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 25 June 2012.

Pre-implantation HLA matching: The production of a Saviour Child.

Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) requires the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) to create several pre-implantation-stage embryos, followed by biopsy of embryonic cells for genetic testing and transfer of selected embryos to the womb to establish a pregnancy. HLA typing of ART-created embryos was first reported in 2001. The aim is to establish a pregnancy that is HLA-compatible with an affected sibling who requires haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. HLA-typing can be performed with or without PGD for the exclusion of a single-gene disorder. Haematopoietic stem cells collected from the umbilical cord blood or the bone marrow of the HLA-matched donor sibling born, or a combination of both sources, are used for transplantation and cure of the affected sibling. The procedure is multistep and technically challenging. All specialists involved must aim to adequately support and counsel prospective parents. Results have so far been encouraging, with many documented positive outcomes of affected children being cured.

Complex preimplantation genetic diagnosis for beta-thalassaemia, sideroblastic anaemia, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-typing.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to select histocompatible siblings to facilitate curative haematopoeitic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is now an acceptable option in the absence of an available human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatible donor. We describe a case where the couple who requested HLA-PGD, were both carriers of two serious haematological diseases, beta-thalassaemia and sideroblastic anaemia. Their daughter, affected with sideroblastic anaemia, was programmed to have HSCT. A multiplex-fluorescent-touchdown-PCR protocol was optimized for the simultaneous amplification of: the two HBB-gene mutated regions (c.118C> T, c.25-26delAA), four short tandem repeats (STRs) in chr11p15.5 linked to the HBB gene, the SLC25A38 gene mutation (c.726C > T), two STRs in chr3p22.1 linked to the SLC25A38 gene, plus eleven informative STRs for HLA-haplotyping (chr6p22.1-21.3). This was followed by real-time nested PCR and high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) for the detection of HBB and SLC25A38 gene mutations, as well as the analysis of all STRs on an automatic genetic analyzer (sequencer). The couple completed four clinical in vitro fertilization (IVF)/PGD cycles. At least one matched unaffected embryo was identified and transferred in each cycle. A twin pregnancy was established in the fourth PGD cycle and genotyping results at all loci were confirmed by prenatal diagnosis. Two healthy baby girls were delivered at week 38 of pregnancy. The need to exclude two familial disorders for HLA-PGD is rarely encountered. The methodological approach described here is fast, accurate, clinically-validated, and of relatively low cost.

Prenatal diagnosis for CF using High Resolution Melting Analysis and simultaneous haplotype analysis through QF-PCR.

BACKGROUND: High Resolution Melting (HRM) Analysis is a validated, robust, low-cost, high throughput CF screening method. Here, we report the development and retrospective evaluation of the diagnostic value of a novel multiplex HRM, genotyping and haplotyping method for CF prenatal diagnosis (generic HRM/haplotyping). METHODS: 80 study samples from 20 carrier couples referred for PND (whole blood in EDTA and CVS or amniotic fluid) were genotyped retrospectively using the suggested protocol. RESULTS: All DNA samples (variable sources, extraction methods and unknown concentrations) were successfully amplified by the 1st and 2nd round PCR. The Se, Sp, NPV and PPV for the generic HRM/haplotyping method are calculated at 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This generic protocol for PND using HRM, facilitates the simultaneous analysis of DNA samples from various sources in a fast, robust and efficient way. It can be easily adapted and applied for any genetic condition.

A generic, flexible protocol for preimplantation human leukocyte antigen typing alone or in combination with a monogenic disease, for rapid case work-up and application.

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing of in vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos, aims to establish a pregnancy that is HLA compatible with an affected sibling who requires hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It can be performed with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for exclusion of a single-gene disorder (SGD) and it is a multistep, technically challenging procedure at every stage. Our purpose was to address the difficulties of genetic analysis by developing a fast, reliable and accurate PGD-HLA protocol, to simplify patient work-up and PGD application, while providing high flexibility for combination with any SGD. Requests included PGD-HLA for ß-thalassemia (ß-thal)/sickle cell disease (most common request), Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA), chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) and preimplantation-HLA typing only. For HLA haplotyping, we selected a panel of 26 short tandem repeats (STRs) distributed across the entire HLA locus, following PGD guidelines. When required, mutation detection was performed by both a direct and indirect approach. To support concurrent SGD exclusion and HLA typing, a one-step, single-tube, multiplex fluorescent touchdown-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was optimized. The described touchdown-PCR was successfully applied for all PGD-HLA protocols. Eight clinical cycles were performed with a diagnosis achieved for 94.7% of amplified biopsied blastomeres. Embryo transfer took place in six cycles, with two pregnancies achieved and two healthy female infants (from a twin pregnancy) born so far. Our protocol enables HLA typing in a single PCR, reducing the risk of contamination and the cost, and providing faster results. It requires minimum optimization before clinical application, irrespective of the SGD involved, decreasing the waiting time from referral to treatment for all PGD-HLA cases.

Investigation of gene expression profiles before and after embryonic genome activation and assessment of functional pathways at the human metaphase II oocyte and blastocyst stage.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the oocyte versus the blastocyst transcriptome and provide data on molecular pathways before and after embryonic genome activation. DESIGN: Prospective laboratory research study. SETTING: An IVF clinic and a specialist preimplantation genetics laboratory. PATIENT(S): Couples undergoing or having completed IVF treatment donating surplus oocytes or cryopreserved blastocysts after patient consent. INTERVENTION(S): Sets of pooled metaphase II (MII) oocytes or blastocysts were processed for RNA extraction, RNA amplification, and analysis with the use of the Human Genome Survey Microarrays v2.0 (Applied Biosystems). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Association of cell type and gene expression profile. RESULT(S): Totals of 1,909 and 3,122 genes were uniquely expressed in human MII oocytes and human blastocysts respectively, and 4,910 genes were differentially expressed between the two sample types. Expression levels of 560 housekeeping genes, genes involved in the microRNA processing pathway, as well as hormones and hormone receptors were also investigated. CONCLUSION(S): The lists of genes identified may be of use for understanding the processes involved in early embryo development and blastocyst implantation, and for identifying any dysregulation leading to infertility.

Microsatellite markers within the α-globin gene cluster for robust preimplantation genetic diagnosis of severe α-thalassemia syndromes in Mediterranean populations.

In this study we report the development of a generic protocol for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of severe α-thalassemia (α-thal) syndromes in α-thal carrier couples of Mediterranean origin. The in silico identification and design of primers for multiplex analysis of short tandem repeats (STRs), was followed by the optimization of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions for multiplexed STR analysis within the α-globin gene cluster (16p3.3) and subsequent optimization and validation of a single-cell multiplex reaction including the selected STRs. Three simple dinucleotide repeats were selected based on their rate of heterozygosity, multiplex PCR efficiency and product size, and location within the α-globin gene cluster. The multiplex PCR was optimized in single lymphocytes with PCR efficiency ranging from 92.5 to 98% and an allele drop-out (ADO) rate of 0 to 9.0% for the three loci. The optimized method was applied in two clinical PGD cycles and genotypes were achieved in 17 out of 18 blastomeres (94%). Transfer of unaffected embryos led to a singleton pregnancy in one of the two couples. The triplex PCR validated for Greek and Cypriot populations is a robust generic method for α-thal PGD.

Microdeletion and microduplication 17q21.31 plus an additional CNV, in patients with intellectual disability, identified by array-CGH.

The recognition of the 17q21.31 microdeletion and microduplication syndrome has been facilitated by high resolution oligonucleotide array comparative genome hybridization technology (aCGH). Molecular analysis of the 17q21.31 microdeletion/duplication syndrome demonstrated a critical region involving at least six genes, including STH and MAPT. The 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome has an incidence of 1 in 16,000 births, while the microduplication 17q21.31 has been reported so far in only five patients. In general, phenotypes associated with 17q21.31 microduplication seem to be milder than those associated with the microdeletion. Here, we present four patients who have been referred for genetic evaluation by clinical geneticists due to developmental delay and minor congenital abnormalities. Previous standard karyotypes were negative, while aCGH analysis revealed three patients with 17q21.31 microdeletion and one with the respective microduplication, being the sixth reported case so far. Most importantly one of the microdeletion cases involves only partial MAPT gene deletion while leaving the STH gene intact. Two of our patients, one with the 17q21.31 microdeletion and another with the respective microduplication, carried additional clinically relevant microdeletions (del Xq21.31 and del 15q11.2, respectively), possibly modifying their phenotype.

Modification of the triplet repeat primed polymerase chain reaction method for detection of the CTG repeat expansion in myotonic dystrophy type 1: application in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: To overcome problems associated with the use of triplet repeat primed polymerase chain reaction (TP-PCR) in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). DESIGN: Clinical research study. SETTING: UCL Centre for PGD and Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health. PATIENT(S): Seven couples undergoing PGD for DM1. INTERVENTION(S): A modified TP-PCR protocol (mTP-PCR) for the reliable detection of both expanded and nonexpanded alleles in DMPK was optimized using single lymphocytes. Four cycles of PGD were performed with TP-PCR for diagnosis and a further 10 cycles with mTP-PCR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Amplification efficiency, allele dropout, diagnosis rate, and delivery rate. RESULT(S): Preliminary testing showed that the TP-PCR amplification efficiency was higher using lymphocytes versus buccal cells. Single lymphocytes gave very high amplification efficiencies for both protocols (99% to 100%). There were no false-positive or false-negative results for 148 single lymphocytes tested with mTP-PCR compared with 9% (5 out of 54) false-positive results with TP-PCR, indicating the improved accuracy of the modified protocol. In embryos, the diagnosis rate was 95.6% with mTP-PCR and 75% with TP-PCR. CONCLUSION(S): For PGD of DM1, mTP-PCR is recommended. It may also be applied as a rapid screen for DMPK expansions in individuals with symptoms of DM1, relatives of known mutation carriers, or in prenatal diagnosis.

Expression profiling of DNA repair genes in human oocytes and blastocysts using microarrays.

BACKGROUND: The early preimplantation embryo relies on mRNA and protein from the oocyte to detect DNA damage and activate DNA repair, cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. Expression of some repair genes has been detected in mammalian oocytes and embryos; however, little is known about DNA repair gene expression in human blastocysts. In this study, DNA repair gene expression was investigated in human oocytes and blastocysts to identify the pathways involved at these stages and detect potential differences in repair mechanisms pre- and post-embryonic genome activation. METHODS: Triplicate sets of pooled metaphase II oocytes or blastocysts were processed for analysis using the Human Genome Survey Microarrays V2.0 (Applied Biosystems). RESULTS: Of 154 DNA repair genes investigated, 109 were detected in blastocysts and 107 in oocytes. Among differentially expressed DNA repair genes, 40/55 (73%) had lower expression levels in blastocysts compared with oocytes (P < 0.05, fold change >3). CONCLUSION: Despite experimental limitations due to culture or freezing and thawing of samples, large numbers of repair genes were detected indicating that all DNA repair pathways are potentially functional in human oocytes and blastocysts. The higher mRNA level for most repair genes in oocytes compared with blastocysts ensures sufficient availability of template until embryonic genome activation.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for myotonic dystrophy type 1 in the UK.

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a dominant multisystemic disorder caused by expansion of a trinucleotide repeat in a non-coding region of DMPK. Prenatal diagnosis (PND) is available; however, the decision to terminate affected pregnancies is difficult as the extent of disability is hard to predict from the size of the expansion. In preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) genetic analysis is carried out before the establishment of pregnancy. This paper reviews the largest number of cycles of PGD for DM1 in the UK indicating that PGD is a practical option for affected couples.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for myotonic dystrophy type 1: detection of crossover between the gene and the linked marker APOC2.

OBJECTIVE: To report two cases of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for myotonic dystrophy type I (DM1) where cross-over between the DMPK locus and a linked polymorphic marker APOC2 was detected. METHODS: Embryos from in vitro fertilisation (IVF) were biopsied at day 3 of development and single blastomeres collected. Diagnosis was performed by duplex or triplex fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction (F-PCR) to amplify DMPK and APOC2 loci, or DMPK with APOC2 and D19S112 polymorphic markers. RESULTS: A total of 22 oocytes were retrieved from the two patients, 20 were inseminated of which 15 fertilized (75%) and were suitable for biopsy on day 3. A diagnosis was obtained for 12 embryos (80%) and was confirmed in all un-transferred embryos. Crossover between DM1 and APOC2 was detected in two embryos from the two different couples. Transfer of two embryos took place in both cases resulting in two pregnancies. Each couple have had a healthy baby. CONCLUSION: The above cases highlight the importance of using more than one linked polymorphic marker in PGD-PCR protocols and emphasize the danger of using APOC2 as the sole marker to identify the DM1 mutation.