Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Epilepsy Behav ; 24(4): 449-56, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22749607

RESUMEN

Offspring of women with epilepsy (WWE) on AEDs are at increased risks for major congenital malformations and reduced cognition. They may be at risk for other adverse neonatal outcomes. Women with epilepsy on carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), phenytoin (PHT), or valproate (VPA) monotherapy were enrolled in a prospective, observational, multicenter study of the neurodevelopmental effects of AEDs. The odds ratio for small for gestational age (SGA) was higher for VPA vs. PHT, VPA vs. LTG, and CBZ vs. PHT. Microcephaly rates were elevated to 12% for all newborns and at 12 months old, but normalized by age 24 months. Reduced Apgar scores occurred more frequently in the VPA and PHT groups at 1 min, but scores were near normal in all groups at 5 min. This study demonstrates increased risks for being born SGA in the VPA and CBZ groups, and transiently reduced Apgar scores in the VPA and PHT groups. Differential risks among the AEDs can help inform decisions about AED selection for women during childbearing years.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/inducido químicamente , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/fisiopatología , Adulto , Puntaje de Apgar , Peso al Nacer/efectos de los fármacos , Preescolar , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Cabeza/patología , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Microcefalia/inducido químicamente , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/inducido químicamente , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Neurology ; 78(24): 1959-66, 2012 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22649214

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess progesterone treatment of intractable seizures in women with partial epilepsy. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III, multicenter, clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of adjunctive cyclic natural progesterone therapy vs placebo treatment of intractable seizures in 294 subjects randomized 2:1 to progesterone or placebo, stratified by catamenial and noncatamenial status. It compared treatments on proportions of ≥50% responders and changes in seizure frequency from 3 baseline to 3 treated menstrual cycles. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in proportions of responders between progesterone and placebo in the catamenial and noncatamenial strata. Prespecified secondary analysis showed that the level of perimenstrual seizure exacerbation (C1 level) was a significant predictor of responders for progesterone but not placebo. With increasing C1 levels, responders increased from 21% to 57% with progesterone vs 19% to 20% with placebo. Reductions in seizure frequency correlated with increasing C1 levels for progesterone but not placebo, progressing from 26% to 71% for progesterone vs 25% to 26% for placebo. A prespecified clinically important separation between progesterone and placebo responders (37.8% vs 11.1%; p = 0.037) was realized among 21.4% of women who had C1 level ≥3. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the primary outcome of ≥50% responder rates between progesterone vs placebo for catamenial or noncatamenial groups. Post hoc findings suggest that the level of perimenstrual seizure exacerbation is a significant predictor of responder rate with progesterone and that progesterone may provide clinically important benefit for a subset of women with perimenstrually exacerbated seizures. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that cyclic progesterone is ineffective in women with intractable partial epilepsy. Post hoc analysis identified a subset of women with higher levels of perimenstrual seizure exacerbation that were responsive to treatment.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Ciclo Menstrual , Progesterona/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Neurology ; 78(16): 1207-14, 2012 Apr 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22491865

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes at age 4.5 years and compare to earlier ages in children with fetal antiepileptic drug (AED) exposure. METHODS: The NEAD Study is an ongoing prospective observational multicenter study, which enrolled pregnant women with epilepsy on AED monotherapy (1999-2004) to determine if differential long-term neurodevelopmental effects exist across 4 commonly used AEDs (carbamazepine, lamotrigine, phenytoin, or valproate). The primary outcome is IQ at 6 years of age. Planned analyses were conducted using Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID at age 2) and Differential Ability Scale (IQ at ages 3 and 4.5). RESULTS: Multivariate intent-to-treat (n = 310) and completer (n = 209) analyses of age 4.5 IQ revealed significant effects for AED group. IQ for children exposed to valproate was lower than each other AED. Adjusted means (95% confidence intervals) were carbamazepine 106 (102-109), lamotrigine 106 (102-109), phenytoin 105 (102-109), valproate 96 (91-100). IQ was negatively associated with valproate dose, but not other AEDs. Maternal IQ correlated with child IQ for children exposed to the other AEDs, but not valproate. Age 4.5 IQ correlated with age 2 BSID and age 3 IQ. Frequency of marked intellectual impairment diminished with age except for valproate (10% with IQ <70 at 4.5 years). Verbal abilities were impaired for all 4 AED groups compared to nonverbal skills. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse cognitive effects of fetal valproate exposure persist to 4.5 years and are related to performances at earlier ages. Verbal abilities may be impaired by commonly used AEDs. Additional research is needed.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Inteligencia/efectos de los fármacos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/psicología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Pruebas de Inteligencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Conducta Verbal/efectos de los fármacos
4.
Neurology ; 75(22): 1954-60, 2010 Nov 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21106960

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is known to have beneficial effects, but there is concern that breastfeeding during antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy may be harmful to cognitive development. Animal and human studies have demonstrated that some AEDs can adversely affect the immature brain. However, no investigation has examined effects of breastfeeding during AED therapy on subsequent cognitive abilities in children. METHODS: The Neurodevelopmental Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs Study is an ongoing prospective multicenter observational investigation of long-term effects of in utero AED exposure on cognition. Between 1999 and 2004, we enrolled pregnant women with epilepsy who were taking a single AED (carbamazepine, lamotrigine, phenytoin, or valproate). We recently reported on differential AED effects on age 3 year cognitive outcomes. In this report, we focus on the effects of breastfeeding during AED therapy on age 3 cognitive outcomes in 199 children. RESULTS: A total of 42% of children were breastfed. IQs for breastfed children did not differ from nonbreastfed children for all AEDs combined and for each of the 4 individual AED groups. Mean adjusted IQ scores (95% confidence intervals) across all AEDs were breastfed = 99 (96-103) and nonbreastfed = 98 (95-101). Power was 95% to detect a half SD IQ effect in the combined AED analysis, but was inadequate within groups. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary analysis fails to demonstrate deleterious effects of breastfeeding during AED therapy on cognitive outcomes in children previously exposed in utero. However, caution is advised due to study limitations. Additional research is needed to confirm this observation and extend investigations to other AEDs and polytherapy.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Lactancia Materna , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Carbamazepina/efectos adversos , Carbamazepina/uso terapéutico , Preescolar , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Inteligencia , Pruebas de Inteligencia , Lamotrigina , Modelos Lineales , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Tiempo , Triazinas/efectos adversos , Triazinas/uso terapéutico , Ácido Valproico/efectos adversos , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico
5.
Neurology ; 67(3): 407-12, 2006 Aug 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16894099

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy outcomes following in utero exposure to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are uncertain, limiting an evidenced-based approach. OBJECTIVE: To determine if fetal outcomes vary as a function of different in utero AED exposures. METHODS: This ongoing prospective observational study across 25 epilepsy centers in the USA and UK enrolled pregnant women with epilepsy from October 1999 to February 2004 to determine if differential long-term cognitive and behavioral neurodevelopmental effects exist across the four most commonly used AEDs. This initial report focuses on the incidence of serious adverse outcomes including major congenital malformations (which could be attributable to AEDs) or fetal death. A total of 333 mother/child pairs were analyzed for monotherapy exposures: carbamazepine (n = 110), lamotrigine (n = 98), phenytoin (n = 56), and valproate (n = 69). RESULTS: Response frequencies of pregnancies resulting in serious adverse outcomes for each AED were as follows: carbamazepine 8.2%, lamotrigine 1.0%, phenytoin 10.7%, and valproate 20.3%. Distribution of serious adverse outcomes differed significantly across AEDs and was not explained by factors other than in utero AED exposure. Valproate exhibited a dose-dependent effect. CONCLUSIONS: More adverse outcomes were observed in pregnancies with in utero valproate exposure vs the other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). These results combined with several recent studies provide strong evidence that valproate poses the highest risk to the fetus. For women who fail other AEDs and require valproate, the dose should be limited if possible.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Inducidas por Medicamentos/etiología , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Muerte Fetal/inducido químicamente , Complicaciones del Embarazo/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Carbamazepina/efectos adversos , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Lamotrigina , Fenitoína/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Triazinas/efectos adversos , Útero/efectos de los fármacos , Ácido Valproico/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...