Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Chirurg ; 93(4): 373-380, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34812906

RESUMEN

Lateral abdominal wall hernias are rare and inconsistently defined, which is why the use of the European Hernia Society classification makes sense, not least for the purpose of comparing the quality of surgical results. A distinction must be made between true fascial defects and denervation atrophy. Based on the available literature, there is generally a low level of evidence with no consensus on the best operative strategy. The proximity to bony structures and the complex anatomy of the three-layer abdominal wall make the technical treatment of lateral hernias difficult. The surgical variations include laparoendoscopic, robotic, minimally invasive, open or hybrid approaches with different mesh positions in relation to the layers of the abdominal wall. The extensive preperitoneal mesh reinforcement open, transabdominal peritoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic repair or total extraperitoneal (TEP) endoscopic repair has met with the greatest approval. The extent of the required medial mesh overlap is determined by the distance between the medial defect boundary and the lateral edge of the straight rectus abdominus muscles. The medially directed preperitoneal and retroperitoneal dissection can be extended into the homolateral retrorectus compartment by laterally incising the posterior rectus sheath or by crossing the midline behind the intact linea alba into the contralateral retrorectus compartment. The intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) technique is a suitable procedure only for smaller defects with possible defect closure but it is also important as an exit strategy in the case of a defective peritoneum. Individualized prehabilitative and preconditioning measures are just as important as the assessment of preoperative anamnestic and clinical findings and risks with radiographic cross-sectional imaging diagnostics.


Asunto(s)
Pared Abdominal , Hernia Ventral , Laparoscopía , Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Mallas Quirúrgicas
2.
Zentralbl Chir ; 145(1): 64-71, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31394581

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The principle of the preperitoneal umbilical mesh plasty (PUMP) technique is placement of the prosthesis in the extraperitoneal space, posterior to the rectus muscles, followed by ventral fascia closure. Difficulties can arise from preperitoneal dissection, mesh insertion, deployment, and positioning. METHODS: 81 elective patients underwent preperitoneal repair of primary umbilical or epigastric hernias sized from 2 - 4 cm between January 2015 and March 2018 and were prospectively collected in the Herniamed database and retrospectively analysed. The same general technique was applied, but over time three different types of mesh devices were used. The experience from these cases and the gradual change between the implants during the observation period is described in this study. RESULTS: No intraoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative complications occurred in 6 of 81 patients (7.4%) with the need for unplanned re-operation in 3 cases. Seventy-six of 81 patients (93.8%) attended the one year follow-up evaluation. Three of 76 patients (3.9%) suffered recurrence and five patients (6.6%) requires treatment for chronic pain. CONCLUSION: Surgeons must work with the implant that best suits their patients' needs and that also provides good results and adequate working comfort. The PUMP technique performs well for ventral hernias sized between 2 and 4 cm without the need of midline reconstruction due to diastasis of the rectus muscles. It enables a local extraperitoneal mesh augmentation without the risk of intraperitoneal complications. PUMP repair lowers the risk of recurrence in comparison with suture repair without increasing the risk of complications.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Umbilical , Hernia Abdominal , Hernia Ventral , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Prótesis e Implantes , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mallas Quirúrgicas
3.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 28(10): 1223-1228, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29620963

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Patients with umbilical or epigastric hernias benefit from mesh- based repairs, and even more so if a concomitant rectus diastasis (RD) is present. The ideal technique is, however, still under debate. In this study we introduce the minimal invasive linea alba reconstruction (MILAR) with the supraaponeurotic placement of a fully absorbable synthetic mesh. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Midline reconstruction with anterior rectus sheath repair and mesh augmentation by an open approach is a well-known surgical technique for ventral hernia repair. Between December 1, 2016, and November 30, 2017, 20 patients with symptomatic umbilical and/or epigastric hernias, and coexisting RD underwent a minimally invasive complete reconstruction of the midline through a small access route. The inner part of both incised and medialized anterior rectus sheaths was replaced by a fully absorbable synthetic mesh placed in a supraaponeurotic position. RESULTS: Patients were hospitalized for an average of 4 days and the mean operating time was 79 minutes. The mean hernia defect size was 1.5 cm in diameter and the mean mesh size was recorded as 15.8 cm in length and 5.2 cm in width. Two patients sustained surgical postoperative complications in terms of symptomatic seroma occurrences with successful interventional treatment.The early results (mean follow-up period of 5 months) showed no recurrences and only 1 patient reported occasional pain following exertion without rest. DISCUSSION: MILAR is a modification of the recently published endoscopic linea alba reconstruction restoring the normal anatomy of the abdominal wall. A new linea alba is formed with augmentation of autologous tissue consisting of the plicated anterior rectus sheaths. Supraaponeurotic placement of a fully absorbable synthetic mesh eliminates potential long-term mesh-associated complications. Regarding MILAR, there is no need for endoscopic equipment due to the uniquely designed flexible lighted retractors, meaning one assistant less is required.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Síndrome del Abdomen en Ciruela Pasa/cirugía , Recto del Abdomen/cirugía , Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Hernia Ventral/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Síndrome del Abdomen en Ciruela Pasa/complicaciones , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Ombligo/cirugía
4.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 28(6): 730-735, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29053405

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic anterior component separation (ECS) techniques facilitate tension-free midline closure of wide ventral hernia defects. We describe a novel approach with a precostal incision and a new cylindrical ballon trocar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center analysis of 19 patients undergoing ECS between January 1, 2014 and August 2, 2017 was performed with regard to improvement of technique. We currently start with a lateral precostal incision. This access in a low-fat and stable area allows for easy identification of the external oblique muscle with the ribs functioning as dorsal abutment for entering the correct plane between external and internal oblique muscles. Then a trocar is inserted with a cylindrical ballon, thus providing sufficient pneumatic widening of the dissection plane. A second 5-mm port is inserted under direct vision below the 12th rib. From there a unidirectional incision of the external oblique aponeurosis is performed from subcostal to the inguinal ligament. If necessary, the cephalad muscular parts of the external oblique can be transected over several centimeters in both directions starting from the precostal incision. RESULTS: We documented no procedure-related complications apart from two hematomas that required no interventions. Four procedures were carried out on one side and the remaining ones bilaterally. In one case, a conversion to conventional open component separation was required due to extensive scarring after open cholecystectomy. There were no notable abdominal bulgings or lateral hernias during a structured postoperative follow-up period of 1 year postoperatively. DISCUSSION: The technique described offers advantages in terms of determination of the correct entry point for ECS, regardless of abdominal wall conditions and the precostal access allows for unidirectional dissection toward the inguinal ligament with only two trocars in total. The cylindrical shape of the ballon trocar provides adequate widening of the working space and ensures good overview for safe dissection.


Asunto(s)
Disección/instrumentación , Endoscopía/métodos , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Disección/efectos adversos , Disección/métodos , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Endoscopía/instrumentación , Femenino , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA