Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Neurol India ; 68(2): 290-298, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32415008

RESUMEN

Gamma knife for gliomas is a relatively obscure treatment modality with few reports and small series available on the same. An extensive search of English Language literature yields no comprehensive reviews of the same. We here, attempt to review the available literature on gamma knife for all types of gliomas: Low grade, High grade, recurrent, and also for pediatric populations. We used keywords such as "Gamma Knife Glioma," "Stereotactic Radiosurgery Glioma," "Gamma Knife," "Adjuvant therapy Glioma" "Recurrent Glioma" on PubMed search engine, and articles were selected with respect to their use of gamma Knife for Gliomas and outcome for the same. These were then analyzed and salient findings were elucidated. This was combined with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for the same and also included our own initial experience with these tumors. Gamma-knife improved long term survival and quality of life in patients with low grade gliomas. In pediatric low grade gliomas, it may be considered as a treatment modality with a marginal dose of 12-14 Gy, especially in eloquent structures such as brain stem glioma, anterior optic pathway hypothalamic glioma. However, in newly diagnosed high-grade glioma gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is not recommended because of a lack of definitive evidence in tumor control and quality of life. GKRS may find its role in palliative care of recurrent gliomas irrespective of type and grade. Inspite of growing experience with GKRS for gliomas, there is no Level I evidence in support of GKRS, hence better designed randomized controlled trials with long term outcomes are warranted. Although this modality is not a "one size fits all' therapy, it has its moments when chosen correctly and applied wisely. Gliomas being the most common tumors operated in any neurosurgical setting, knowledge about this modality and its application is essential and useful.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Glioma/radioterapia , Radiocirugia/métodos , Adulto , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Niño , Glioma/patología , Humanos , Clasificación del Tumor , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia
2.
Neurol India ; 67(5): 1292-1302, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31744962

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Radiation-induced brain edema (RIBE) is a serious complication of radiation therapy. It may result in dramatic clinico-radiological deterioration. At present, there are no definite guidelines for management of the complication. Corticosteroids are the usual first line of treatment, which frequently fails to provide long-term efficacy in view of its adverse complication profile. Bevacizumab has been reported to show improvement in cases of steroid-resistant radiation injury. The objective of this study is to evaluate the role of Bevacizumab in post-radiosurgery RIBE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 2012, 189 out of 1241 patients who underwent radiosurgery at our institution developed post-radiosurgery RIBE, 17 of which did not respond to high-dose corticosteroids. We systematically reviewed these 17 patients of various intracranial pathologies with clinic-radiological evidence of RIBE following gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). All patients received protocol-based Bevacizumab therapy. The peer-reviewed literature was evaluated. RESULTS: 82 percent of the patients showed improvement after starting Bevacizumab. The majority began to improve after the third cycle started improvement after the third cycle of Bevacizumab. Clinical improvement preceded radiological improvement by an average of eight weeks. The first dose was 5 mg/kg followed by 7.5-10 mg/kg at with two-week intervals. Bevacizumab needs to be administered for an average of seven cycles (range 5-27, median 7) for best response. Steroid therapy could be tapered in most patients by the first follow-up. One patient did not respond to Bevacizumab and needed surgical decompression for palliative care. One noncompliant patient died due to radiation injury. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab is a effective and safe for treatment of RIBE after GKRS. A protocol-based dose schedule in addition to frequent clinical and radiological evaluations are required. Bevacizumab should be considered as an early treatment option for RIBE.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Edema Encefálico/tratamiento farmacológico , Traumatismos por Radiación/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Edema Encefálico/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
3.
Neurol India ; 66(5): 1469-1474, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30233022

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to report the pattern, timing, responsible radiation parameters, and dosimetric results on the outcome of alopecia following gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for various intracranial pathologies. A literature review of radiation-induced alopecia and observation of this complication with GKRS are also included. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors report 6 cases of GKRS-induced focal temporary alopecia without dermal fibrosis or clinical scarring and with no long-term squeal. RESULTS: In all the cases, the scalp received ≥3 Gy radiation exposure. Post GKRS alopecia is a temporary, noncicatricial, focal, reversible phenomenon observed within 2 weeks of the treatment. This acute complication is dose-dependent and reflects damage to the hair follicle. It is only seen with treated volumes in the superficial location. Hair regrowth occurs within two months with no long-term complications and change in hair quality being noted. CONCLUSION: Compared to whole brain radiotherapy, chances of alopecia are significantly less after GKRS. Despite a sharp dose fallout, a single fraction high-dose radiosurgery with GKRS may expose the skin appendages to more than 3 Gy radiation exposures, which may injure the hair follicles irrespective of the growth phase (anagen, telogen, or catagen) they are in. A careful planning that includes sparing of the dermal appendages and hair roots up to 4-6 mm depth in the skin may prevent this complication. Patients with superficial lesions should be well informed about the reversible nature of this possible complication, with near-normal hair growth being established within 2 months of treatment.


Asunto(s)
Alopecia/etiología , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Adulto , Fístula Arteriovenosa/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Femenino , Tumor del Glomo Yugular/radioterapia , Humanos , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/radioterapia , Masculino , Neoplasias Meníngeas/radioterapia , Meningioma/radioterapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dosis de Radiación , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA