Why Is Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Insensitive to Liquid Water?

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) is widely recognized as a remarkably powerful analytical technique that enables trace-level detection of organic molecules on a metal surface in aqueous systems with negligible spectral interference of water. This insensitivity of SERS to liquid water is violated in a restrictive manner under specific electrochemical conditions. However, the origin of such different SERS sensitivities to liquid water remains unclear. Here, we show that hydrogen-bond networks of water play a pivotal role in losing SERS enhancement for liquid water, and SERS detection of water requires local defects in the hydrogen-bond networks, which are formed around hydration shells of solute ions or on a polarized electrode surface. This work gives a new perspective on in situ SERS investigations in aqueous systems, including electrochemical and biological reactions.

Quantitative Analyses of Biofilm by Using Crystal Violet Staining and Optical Reflection.

Biofilms have caused many problems, not only in the industrial fields, but also in our daily lives. Therefore, it is important for us to control them by evaluating them properly. There are many instrumental analytical methods available for evaluating formed biofilm qualitatively. These methods include the use of Raman spectroscopy and various microscopes (optical microscopes, confocal laser microscopes, scanning electron microscopes, transmission electron microscopes, atomic force microscopes, etc.). On the other hand, there are some biological methods, such as staining, gene analyses, etc. From the practical viewpoint, staining methods seem to be the best due to various reasons. Therefore, we focused on the staining method that used a crystal violet solution. In the previous study, we devised an evaluation process for biofilms using a color meter to analyze the various staining situations. However, this method was complicated and expensive for practical engineers. For this experiment, we investigated the process of using regular photos that were quantified without any instruments except for digitized cameras. Digitized cameras were used to compare the results. As a result, we confirmed that the absolute values were different for both cases, respectively. However, the tendency of changes was the same. Therefore, we plan to utilize the changes before and after biofilm formation as indicators for the future.