Overall reaction mechanism of photocatalytic CO2 reduction on a Re(i)-complex catalyst unit of a Ru(ii)-Re(i) supramolecular photocatalyst.

Rhenium(i) complexes fac-[ReI(diimine)(CO)3(L)]n+ are mostly used and evaluated as photocatalysts and catalysts in both photochemical and electrochemical systems for CO2 reduction. However, the selective reduction mechanism of CO2 to CO is unclear, although numerous mechanistic studies have been reported. A Ru(ii)-Re(i) supramolecular photocatalyst with fac-[ReI(diimine)(CO)3{OC(O)OCH2CH2NR2}] (R = C2H4OH) as a catalyst unit (RuC2Re) exhibits very high efficiency, selectivity, and durability of CO formation in photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions. In this work, the reaction mechanism of photocatalytic CO2 reduction using RuC2Re is fully clarified. Time-resolved IR (TR-IR) measurements using rapid-scan FT-IR spectroscopy with laser flash photolysis verify the formation of RuC2Re(COOH) with a carboxylic acid unit, i.e., fac-[ReI(diimine)(CO)3(COOH)], in the photocatalytic reaction solution. Additionally, this important intermediate is detected in an actual photocatalytic reaction using steady state irradiation. Kinetics analysis of the TR-IR spectra and DFT calculations demonstrated the reaction mechanism of the conversion of the one-electron reduced species of RuC2Re with a fac-[ReI(diimine˙-)(CO)3{OC(O)OCH2CH2NR2}]- unit, which was produced via the photochemical reduction of RuC2Re by 1,3-dimethyl-2-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (BIH), to RuC2Re(COOH). The kinetics of the recovery processes of the starting complex RuC2Re from RuC2Re(COOH) accompanying the release of CO and OH- was also clarified. As a side reaction of RuC2Re(COOH), a long-lived carboxylate-ester complex with a fac-[ReI(diimine)(CO)3(COOC2H4NR2)] unit, which was produced by the nucleophilic attack of TEOA to one of the carbonyl ligands of RuC2Re(CO) with a fac-[ReI(diimine)(CO)4]+ unit, was formed during the photocatalytic reaction. This complex works not only as a precursor in another minor CO formation process but also as an external photosensitiser that photochemically reduces the other complexes i.e., RuC2Re, RuC2Re(COOH), and the intermediate that is reductively converted to RuC2Re(COOH).

Correction to "Highly Efficient Supramolecular Photocatalyst for CO2 Reduction with Eight Carbon-Carbon Bonds between Ru(II) Photosensitizer and Re(I) Catalyst Unit".

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.3c01407.].

Photocatalyzed CO2 reduction to CO by supramolecular photocatalysts made of Ru(II) photosensitizers and Re(I) catalytic subunits containing preformed CO2TEOA adducts.

Two new supramolecular photocatalysts containing Ru(II) polypyridine units as light-harvesting photosensitizers and Re(I) polypyridine subunits as catalytic centers have been prepared. The new species, RuRe2A and Ru2ReA, contain catalytic Re(I) subunits coordinated by the preformed CO2TEOA adduct (known to be the effective catalytic subunits; TEOA is triethanolamine) and exhibit quite efficient and selective photoreduction of CO2 to CO, with outstanding TONs of 2368 and 2695 and a selectivity of 99.9% and 98.9%, respectively. Such photocatalytic properties are significantly improved with respect to those of previously studied RuRe2 and Ru2Re parent compounds, containing chloride ligands instead of the CO2TEOA adduct. Comparison between photocatalytic performance of the new species and their parent compounds allows to investigate the effect of the CO2TEOA insertion process as well as the eventual effect of the presence of chloride ions in solution on the photocatalytic processes. The improved photocatalytic properties of RuRe2A and Ru2ReA compared with their parent species are attributed to a combined effect of different distribution of the one-electron reduced form of the supramolecular photocatalysts on the Ru-subunit(s) (leading to decreased CO formation due to a poisoning ligand loss process) and on the Re-subunit(s) and to the presence of chloride ions in solution for RuRe2 and Ru2Re, which could interfere with the CO2TEOA adduct formation, a needed requisite for CO forming catalysis. These results strongly indicate the utility of preparing supramolecular photocatalysts containing preformed adducts.

Mechanistic study of photocatalytic CO2 reduction using a Ru(ii)-Re(i) supramolecular photocatalyst.

Supramolecular photocatalysts comprising [Ru(diimine)3]2+ photosensitiser and fac-[Re(diimine)(CO)3{OC(O)OC2H4NR2}] catalyst units can be used to reduce CO2 to CO with high selectivity, durability and efficiency. In the presence of triethanolamine, the Re catalyst unit efficiently takes up CO2 to form a carbonate ester complex, and then direct photocatalytic reduction of a low concentration of CO2, e.g., 10% CO2, can be achieved using this type of supramolecular photocatalyst. In this work, the mechanism of the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 was investigated applying such a supramolecular photocatalyst, RuC2Re with a carbonate ester ligand, using time-resolved visible and infrared spectroscopies and electrochemical methods. Using time-resolved spectroscopic measurements, the kinetics of the photochemical formation processes of the one-electron-reduced species RuC2(Re)-, which is an essential intermediate in the photocatalytic reaction, were clarified in detail and its electronic structure was elucidated. These studies also showed that RuC2(Re)- is stable for 10 ms in the reaction solution. Cyclic voltammograms measured at various scan rates besides temperature and kinetic analyses of RuC2(Re)- produced by steady-state irradiation indicated that the subsequent reaction of RuC2(Re)- proceeds with an observed first-order rate constant of approximately 1.8 s-1 at 298 K and is a unimolecular reaction, independent of the concentrations of both CO2 and RuC2(Re)-.

Factors determining formation efficiencies of one-electron-reduced species of redox photosensitizers.

Improvement in the photochemical formation efficiency of one-electron-reduced species (OERS) of a photoredox photosensitizer (a redox catalyst) is directly linked to the improvement in efficiencies of the various photocatalytic reactions themselves. We investigated the primary processes of a photochemical reduction of two series [Ru(diimine)3]2+ and [Os(diimine)3]2+ as frequently used redox photosensitizers (PS2+), by 1,3-dimethyl-2-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (BIH) as a typical reductant in detail using steady-irradiation and time-resolved spectroscopies. The rate constants of all elementary processes of the photochemical reduction of PS2+ by BIH to give the free PS•+ were obtained or estimated. The most important process for determining the formation efficiency of the free PS•+ was the escape yield from the solvated ion pair [PS•+-BIH•+], which was strongly dependent on both the central metal ion and the ligands. In cases with the same central metal ion, the system with larger -ΔGbet, which is the free energy change in the back-electron transfer from the OERS of PS•+ to BIH•+, tended to lower the escape yield of the free OERS of PS2+. On the other hand, different central metal ions drastically affected the escape yield even in cases with similar -ΔGbet; the escape yield in the case of RuH2+ (-ΔGbet = 1.68 eV) was 5-11 times higher compared to those of OsH2+ (-ΔGbet = 1.60 eV) and OsMe2+ (-ΔGbet = 1.71 eV). The back-electron transfer process from the free PS•+ to the free BIH•+ could not compete against the further reaction of the free BIH•+, which is the deprotonation process giving BI•, in DMA for all examples. The produced BI• gave one electron to PS2+ in the ground state to give another PS•+, quantitatively. Based on these findings and investigations, it is clarified that the photochemical formation efficiency of the free PS•+ should be affected not only by -ΔGbet but also by the heavy-atom effect of the central metal ion, and/or the oxidation power of the excited PS2+, which should determine the distance between the excited PS and BIH at the moment of the electron transfer.