Discharge from the emergency department and outpatient clinic in cancer patients with acute symptomatic and incidental pulmonary embolism: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear how often cancer patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are discharged from the emergency department (ED) or outpatient clinic and whether direct discharge is safe. We assessed treatment setting and early safety outcomes in cancer patients with acute symptomatic and incidental PE. METHODS: Cancer patients diagnosed with PE at the ED or outpatient clinic between August 2017 and May 2021 were included in Four Cities VTE Cancer, a Dutch multicenter retrospective cohort study. The main outcome was direct discharge versus hospitalization. Safety outcomes were cumulative 14-day mortality and PE-related readmission incidences. RESULTS: We included 602 patients (median age 71 years; 49.5 % female) of whom 285 (47.3 %) were discharged directly and 317 (52.7 %) were hospitalized. The cumulative 14-day mortality incidence was 0.7 % (95 % CI, 0.1-2.4 %) in patients discharged directly and 9.0 % (95 % CI, 6.2-12.5 %) in those hospitalized. The cumulative 14-day PE-related readmission incidence was 1.8 % (95 % CI, 0.7-3.9 %) and 1.4 % (95 % CI, 0.5-3.3 %) in directly discharged and hospitalized patients, respectively. Of the 220 patients with incidental PE, 180 (81.8 %) were discharged directly compared to 105 of 382 (27.5 %) patients with symptomatic PE (P < 0.001). Mortality and readmission incidences in symptomatic and incidental PE were consistent with the main analysis. CONCLUSIONS: About 28 % and 82 % of cancer patients with symptomatic or incidental PE, respectively, were discharged directly, with low 14-day mortality and PE-related readmission incidences. These data underline the need for PE risk stratification in oncological populations and suggest that clinicians successfully identify a proportion of patients in whom direct discharge is safe.

Thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In patients who undergo curative treatment for oesophageal cancer, risk estimates of venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial thromboembolism and bleeding are needed to guide decisions about thromboprophylaxis. METHODS: This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study of patients with stage I-III oesophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by oesophagectomy. The outcomes VTE, arterial thromboembolism, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding and mortality were analysed for four consecutive cancer treatment stages (from diagnosis to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, during neoadjuvant treatment, 30-day postoperative period, and up to 6 months after postoperative period). RESULTS: Some 511 patients were included. The 2-year survival rate was 67·3 (95 per cent c.i. 63·2 to 71·7) per cent. During the 2-year follow-up, 50 patients (9·8 per cent) developed VTE, 20 (3·9 per cent) arterial thromboembolism, 21 (4·1 per cent) major bleeding and 30 (5·9 per cent) clinically relevant non-major bleeding. The risk of these events was substantial at all treatment stages. Despite 30-day postoperative thromboprophylaxis, 17 patients (3·3 per cent) developed VTE after surgery. Patients with VTE had worse survival (time-varying hazard ratio 1·81, 95 per cent c.i. 1·25 to 2·64). Most bleeding events occurred around the time of medical intervention, and approximately one-half during concomitant use of prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: Patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery are at substantial risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events throughout all stages of treatment. Survival is worse in patients with thromboembolic events during follow-up.

ANTECEDENTES: Para tomar decisiones en cuanto a la profilaxis tromboembólica, es preciso estimar el riesgo de tromboembolismo venoso (venous thromboembolism, VTE), de tromboembolismo arterial y de hemorragia en pacientes a los que se vaya a realizar un tratamiento curativo para el cáncer de esófago. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio de cohortes retrospectivo de un solo centro, de pacientes con cáncer de esófago en estadios I-III que fueron tratados con quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante y esofagectomía. Se analizaron, en cuatro momentos del tratamiento (desde el momento del diagnóstico hasta la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante, durante el tratamiento neoadyuvante, en los 30 días del período postoperatorio y a los 6 meses de la cirugía) las siguientes variables: VTE, tromboembolismo arterial, hemorragia grave, hemorragia no grave clínicamente relevante y mortalidad. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 511 pacientes. La supervivencia a los 2 años fue del 67,3% (ic. del 95%, 63,2-71,7). Durante el seguimiento de 2 años, 50 pacientes desarrollaron un VTE (9,8%), 20 un tromboembolismo arterial (3,9%), 21 hemorragias graves (4,1%) y 30 hemorragias no graves clínicamente relevantes (5,9%). El riesgo de estos accidentes fue notable en todas las etapas del tratamiento. A pesar de la profilaxis tromboembólica posquirúrgica, a los 30 días, 17 pacientes (3,3%) desarrollaron un VTE después de la operación. Los pacientes con VTE tuvieron una supervivencia menor (cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio en función del tiempo 1,81; i.c. del 95%, 1,25-2,64). La mayoría de los accidentes hemorrágicos ocurrieron en el contexto de una intervención médica y el 48% durante el uso concomitante de anticoagulación profiláctica o terapéutica. CONCLUSIÓN: Los pacientes con cáncer de esófago tratados con quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante y cirugía tienen un riesgo sustancial de sufrir accidentes tromboembólicos y hemorrágicos en todas las fases del tratamiento. La supervivencia es peor en aquellos pacientes que presentan accidentes tromboembólicos durante el seguimiento.

Short-term prognosis of breakthrough venous thromboembolism in anticoagulated patients.

BACKGROUND: Evidence for guideline recommendations for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during anticoagulant therapy is scarce. We aimed to observe and to describe the management of VTE occurring during anticoagulant therapy. METHODS: This prospective multi-center, observational study included patients with objectively confirmed VTE during anticoagulant therapy (breakthrough event), with a follow-up of 3 months, after the breakthrough event. RESULTS: We registered 121 patients with a breakthrough event, with a mean age of 56 years (range, 19 to 90); 61 were male (50%). Fifty-eight patients (48%) had an active malignancy. At the time of the breakthrough event, 57 patients (47%) were treated with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), 53 patients (44%) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and 11 patients (9%) with direct oral anticoagulants, unfractionated heparin, or VKA plus LMWH. A total of 21 patients (17%) were receiving a subtherapeutic dose of an anticoagulant. The main regimens to treat recurrence in patients on VKA were: switch to LMWH (33%), temporary double treatment with LMWH and VKA (23%), and VKA with a higher target INR (19%). In patients with a breakthrough on LMWH, the most frequently chosen regimen was a permanent dose increase (74%). During 3-month follow-up, 7% of patients had a second breakthrough event and 8% experienced major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in the management of VTE during anticoagulant treatment, reflecting a heterogeneous and complex clinical situation. Despite intensifying anticoagulation, the risk of a second breakthrough event in this population is 7%.

18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography assessed microcalcifications in culprit and non-culprit human carotid plaques.

BACKGROUND: 18F-NaF positron emission tomography (PET) targets microcalcifications. We compared in vitro microPET assessed 18F-NaF uptake between culprit and non-culprit human carotid plaques. Furthermore, we compared 18F-NaF uptake with calcification visualized on microcomputed tomography (microCT). METHODS: Carotid plaques from stroke patients undergoing surgery were incubated in 18F-NaF and scanned using a microPET and a microCT scan. The average PET assessed 18F-NaF uptake was expressed as percentage of the incubation dose per gram (%Inc/g). 18F-NaF PET volume of interest (VOI) was compared with CT calcification VOI. RESULTS: 23 carotid plaques (17 culprit, 6 non-culprit) were included. The average 18F-NaF uptake in culprit carotid plaques was comparable with the uptake in non-culprit carotid plaques (median 2.32 %Inc/g [IQR 1.98 to 2.81] vs. median 2.35 %Inc/g [IQR 1.77 to 3.00], P = 0.916). Only a median of 10% (IQR 4 to 25) of CT calcification VOI showed increased 18F-NaF uptake, while merely a median of 35% (IQR 6 to 42) of 18F-NaF PET VOI showed calcification on CT. CONCLUSIONS: 18F-NaF PET represents a different stage in the calcification process than CT. We observed a similar PET assessed 18F-NaF uptake and pattern in culprit and non-culprit plaques of high-risk patients, indicating that this method may be of more value in early atherosclerotic stenosis development.

Clinically relevant bleeding in cancer patients treated for venous thromboembolism from the CATCH study.

Essentials Cancer patients receiving anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism have an elevated bleeding risk. This secondary analysis of CATCH assessed characteristics of clinically relevant bleeding (CRB). CRB occurs in 15% of cancer patients with thrombosis using therapeutic doses of anticoagulation. After multivariate analysis, risk factors for CRB were age >75 years and intracranial malignancy. SUMMARY: Background Cancer patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) receiving anticoagulant treatment have an increased bleeding risk. Objectives We performed a prespecified secondary analysis of the randomized, open-label, Phase III CATCH trial (NCT01130025) to assess the rate and sites of and the risk factors for clinically relevant bleeding (CRB). Patients/Methods Patients with active cancer and acute, symptomatic VTE received either tinzaparin 175 IU kg-1 once daily or warfarin (target International Normalized Ratio [INR] of 2.0-3.0) for 6 months. Fisher's exact test was used to screen prespecified clinical risk factors; those identified as being significantly associated with an increased risk of CRB then underwent competing risk regression analysis of time to first CRB. Results Among 900 randomized patients, 138 (15.3%) had 180 CRB events. CRB occurred in 60 patients (81 events) in the tinzaparin group and in 78 patients (99 events) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.89). Common bleeding sites were gastrointestinal (36.7%; n = 66), genitourinary (22.8%; n = 41), and nasal (10.0%; n = 18). In multivariate analysis, the risk of CRB increased with age > 75 years (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.14-2.94) and intracranial malignancy (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.07-3.62). In the warfarin group, 40.4% of CRB events occurred in patients with with an INR of < 3.0. A lower time in therapeutic range was associated with a higher risk of CRB. Conclusions CRB is a frequent complication in cancer patients with VTE during anticoagulant treatment, and is associated with age > 75 years and intracranial malignancy.

Age-adjusted D-dimer to rule out deep vein thrombosis: findings from the PALLADIO algorithm.

Essentials The accuracy of the age-adjusted D-dimer in suspected venous thromboembolism is still debated. We assessed the performance of age-adjusted D-dimer combined with the PALLADIO algorithm. The age-adjusted threshold can reduce the need for imaging tests compared to the fixed cut-off. The safety of this approach should be confirmed in large management studies. SUMMARY: Background Age-adjusted D-dimer has been proposed to increase specificity for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the accuracy of this threshold has been recently questioned. Objectives To assess the diagnostic performance of age-adjusted D-dimer combined with clinical pretest probability (PTP) in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Methods PALLADIO (NCT01412242) was a multicenter management study that validated a new diagnostic algorithm, incorporating PTP, D-dimer (using the manufacturer's cut-off) and limited or extended compression ultrasonography (CUS) in outpatients with clinically suspected DVT. Patients with unlikely PTP and negative D-dimer had DVT ruled out without further testing (group 1); patients with likely PTP or positive D-dimer underwent limited CUS (group 2); patients with likely PTP and positive D-dimer underwent extended CUS (group 3). Patients with DVT ruled out at baseline had a 3-month follow-up. In this post-hoc analysis we evaluated age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off (defined as age times 10 µg L-1 , or age times 5 µg L-1 for D-dimers with a lower manufacturer's cut-off, in patients > 50 years). Results In total, 1162 patients were enrolled. At initial visit, DVT was detected in 4.0% of patients in group 2 and 53.0% in group 3. The age-adjusted D-dimer, compared with the fixed cut-off, resulted in 5.1% (95% CI, 4.0-6.5%) reduction of CUS. The incidence of symptomatic VTE during follow-up was: 0.24% (95% CI, 0.04-1.37) in group 1; 1.12% (95% CI, 0.44-2.85) in group 2; and 1.89% (95% CI, 0.64-5.40) in group 3. Conclusions The PALLADIO algorithm using age-adjusted D-dimer slightly decreased the number of required imaging tests, but this approach should be confirmed in large management studies.

Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism: prospective validation of the simplified Geneva score.

Essentials The simplified Geneva score allows easier pretest probability assessment of pulmonary embolism (PE). We prospectively validated this score in the ADJUST-PE management outcome study. The study shows that it is safe to manage patients with suspected PE according to this score. The simplified Geneva score is now ready for use in routine clinical practice. SUMMARY: Background Pretest probability assessment by a clinical prediction rule (CPR) is an important step in the management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). A limitation to the use of CPRs is that their constitutive variables and corresponding number of points are difficult to memorize. A simplified version of the Geneva score (i.e. attributing one point to each variable) has been proposed but never been prospectively validated. Aims Prospective validation of the simplified Geneva score (SGS) and comparison with the previous version of the Geneva score (GS). Methods In the ADJUST-PE study, which had the primary aim of validating the age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off, the SGS was prospectively used to determine the pretest probability in a subsample of 1621 study patients. Results Overall, PE was confirmed in 294 (18.1%) patients. Using the SGS, 608 (37.5%), 980 (60.5%) and 33 (2%) were classified as having a low, intermediate and high clinical probability. Corresponding prevalences of PE were 9.7%, 22.4% and 45.5%; 490 (30.1%) patients with low or intermediate probability had a D-dimer level below 500 µg L-1 and 653 (41.1%) had a negative D-dimer test according to the age-adjusted cut-off. Using the GS, the figures were 491(30.9%) and 650 (40.9%). None of the patients considered as not having PE based on a low or intermediate SGS and negative D-dimer had a recurrent thromboembolic event during the 3-month follow-up. Conclusions The use of SGS has similar efficiency and safety to the GS in excluding PE in association with the D-dimer test.

Association between protein C levels and mortality in patients with advanced prostate, lung and pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Procoagulant factors promote cancer progression and metastasis. Protein C is involved in hemostasis, inflammation and signal transduction, and has a protective effect on the endothelial barrier. In mice, administration of activated protein C reduced experimental metastasis. We assessed the association between protein C and mortality in patients with three types of cancer. METHODS: The study population consisted of patients with advanced prostate, non-small cell lung or pancreatic cancer, who participated in the INPACT trial (NCT00312013). The trial evaluated the addition of nadroparin to chemotherapy in patients with advanced malignancy. Patients were divided into tertiles based on protein C at baseline. The association between protein C levels and mortality was evaluated with Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: We analysed 477 patients (protein C tertiles: <97, 97-121 and ≥121%). Mean age was 65±9years; 390 (82%) were male; 191 patients (40%) had prostate cancer, 161 (34%) had lung cancer, and 125 (26%) pancreatic cancer. During a median follow-up of 10.4months, 291 patients (61%) died. Median protein C level was 107% (IQR 92-129). In the lowest tertile, 75 patients per 100 patient-years died, as compared to 60 and 54 in the middle and high tertile, respectively. Lower levels of protein C were associated with increased mortality (in tertiles: HR for trend 1.18, 95%CI 1.02-1.36, adjusted for age, sex and nadroparin use; as a continuous variable: HR 1.004, 95%CI 1.00-1.008, p=0.07). CONCLUSION: Protein C seems inversely associated with mortality in patients with advanced prostate, lung and pancreatic cancer. Further research should validate protein C as a biomarker for mortality, and explore the effects of protein C on progression of cancer.

Performance of the age-adjusted cut-off for D-dimer in patients with cancer and suspected pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients frequently present with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). The D-dimer (DD) test is less useful in excluding PE in cancer patients due to the lower specificity. In the general population, the age-adjusted cutoff for DD combined with a clinical decision rule (CDR) improved specificity in the diagnosis of PE. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the age-adjusted cutoff (defined as age∗10µg/L in patients >50years) combined with a CDR for the exclusion of PE in cancer patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the age-adjusted cutoff in patients with suspected PE. Here we report a post-hoc analysis on the performance of the age-adjusted cutoff in patients with and without cancer. The primary outcome was the rate of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) during three-month follow-up. RESULTS: Of 3324 patients with suspected PE, 429 (12.9%) patients had cancer. The prevalence of PE was 25.2% in cancer patients and 18% in patients without cancer (p<0.001). Among cancer patients with an unlikely CDR, 9.9% had a DD <500µg/L as compared with 19.7% using the age-adjusted cutoff. In patients without cancer, these rates were 30.1% and 41.9%. The proportion of cancer patients in whom PE could be excluded by CDR and DD doubled from 6.3% to 12.6%. No VTE occurred during three-month follow-up (failure rate 0.0% (95% CI 0.0-6.9%)). CONCLUSION: Compared with the conventional cutoff, the age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff doubles the proportion of patients with cancer in whom PE can be safely excluded by CDR and DD without imaging.

Vascular fingerprint and vascular damage markers associated with vascular events in testicular cancer patients during and after chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic testicular cancer (TC) can be cured with bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy. This comes at the price of an increased cardiovascular disease risk, not only years afterwards, but also during and shortly after chemotherapy. To prevent cardiovascular events, high-risk patients should be identified. The aim of this study was to assess BEP-chemotherapy induced vascular damage and to find risk factors for early vascular events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in (B)EP treated TC patients. Development of venous and arterial vascular events was assessed. Vascular damage markers (von Willebrand factor [vWF], coagulation factor VIII [FVIII], intima media thickness [IMT]) and cardiovascular risk factors were assessed before and until 1 year after chemotherapy. Before start of chemotherapy a vascular fingerprint was estimated. Presence of ≥3 risk factors was defined as high-risk vascular fingerprint: body mass index >25 kg/m(2), current smoking, blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg, total cholesterol >5.1 and/or low-density lipoprotein >2.5 mmol/L or glucose ≥7 mmol/L. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were included. Eight (11%) developed vascular events (four arterial events, four pulmonary embolisms). vWF and FVIII increased during chemotherapy, especially in patients with vascular events. Sixteen patients (22%) had a high-risk vascular fingerprint before start of chemotherapy. These patients had arterial events more often (3/16 [19%] versus 1/57 [2%]; p = 0.031) and higher vWF levels and IMT. CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial activation and upregulation of procoagulant activity seem important mechanisms involved in early (B)EP-chemotherapy-induced vascular events. Before chemotherapy, a quarter already had cardiovascular risk factors. A vascular fingerprint could identify patients at risk for arterial events. This vascular fingerprint, when validated, can be used as a tool to select patients who may benefit from preventive strategies.

PO-07 - Excluding pulmonary embolism in cancer patients using the Wells rule and age-adjusted D-dimer testing: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Among patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), imaging and anticoagulant treatment can be safely withheld in approximately one-third of patients based on the combination of a "PE unlikely" Wells score and a D-dimer below the age-adjusted threshold. The clinical utility of this diagnostic approach in cancer patients is less clear. AIM: To evaluate the efficiency and failure rate of the original and simplified Wells rules in combination with age-adjusted D-dimer testing in patients with active cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Individual patient data were used from 6 large prospective studies in which the diagnostic management of PE was guided by the original Wells rule and D-dimer testing. Study physicians classified patients as having active cancer if they had new, recurrent, or progressive cancer (excluding basal-cell or squamous-cell skin carcinoma), or cancer requiring treatment in the last 6 months. We evaluated the dichotomous Wells rule and its simplified version (Table). The efficiency of the algorithm was defined as the proportion of patients with a "PE unlikely" Wells score and a negative age-adjusted D-dimer, defined by a D-dimer below the threshold of a patient's age times 10 µg/L in patients aged ≥51 years. A diagnostic failure was defined as a patient with a "PE unlikely" Wells score and negative age-adjusted D-dimer who had symptomatic venous thromboembolism during 3 months follow-up. A one-stage random effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the efficiency and failure. RESULTS: The dataset comprised 938 patients with active cancer with a mean age of 63 years. The most frequent cancer types were breast (13%), gastrointestinal tract (11%), and lung (8%). The type of cancer was not specified in 42%. The pooled PE prevalence was 29% (95% CI 25-32). PE could be excluded in 122 patients based on a "PE unlikely" Wells score and a negative age-adjusted D-dimer (efficiency 13%; 95% CI 11-15). Two of 122 patients were diagnosed with non-fatal symptomatic venous thromboembolism during follow-up (failure rate 1.5%; 95% CI 0.13-14.8). The simplified Wells score in combination with a negative age-adjusted D-dimer had an efficiency of 3.9% (95% CI 2.0-7.6) and a failure rate of 2.4% (95% CI 0.3-15). CONCLUSIONS: Among cancer patients with clinically suspected PE, imaging and anticoagulant treatment can be withheld in 1 out of every 8 patients by the original Wells rule and age-adjusted D-dimer testing. The simplified Wells rule was neither efficient nor safe in this population.

PO-28 - Protein C levels are associated with mortality in patients with advanced cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In cancer, tumor progression and metastasis are promoted by prohemostatic activity. Protein C (PC) is involved in hemostasis, inflammation and signal transduction, and has a protective effect on the endothelial barrier. In mice, administration of activated PC reduced experimental metastasis. It is unclear whether PC level is associated with mortality in patients with cancer. AIM: To assess the relation between PC level and survival in patients with advanced cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, open-label study was performed in 11 countries between May 2006 and August 2008 (INPACT study, van Doormaal et al, JCO 2011). Patients (n=503) with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, non-small cell lung cancer stage IIIB and locally advanced pancreatic cancer were randomized to receive nadroparin or placebo for 6 to 46 weeks following a specific schedule. Patients were followed till death or the end of the study in May 2009. PC activity levels were measured at baseline and categorized in tertiles. The association between PC level and mortality was evaluated with Cox proportional hazard models, adjustments were made by multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: PC activity could be measured in 479 (95%) patients (tertiles: <97, 97-120 and >120%). Two patients with missing information on type of cancer were excluded. Mean age was 65±10 years; 87 (18%) were female; and 161 patients had lung cancer, 125 pancreatic cancer and 191 prostate cancer. During median follow-up of 10.5 months, 291 (61%) patients died. Median PC activity was 107% (IQR 92-129). There was a clear inverse relation between PC activity and mortality (p for trend=0.036). In the lowest tertile, mortality was 66%, in the middle and high tertile 61% and 56%, respectively. Compared to the highest tertile, the lowest tertile was associated with a HR on mortality of 1.36 (95% CI 1.02-1.80). Adjustment for age, gender and nadroparin use did not affect this association. The association appeared to be strongest in the patients with lung cancer, HR 0.818 (p=0.11) as compared to the patients with prostate cancer, HR 0.972 (p=0.83) and pancreatic cancer, HR 0.950 (p=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Lower PC activity is associated with increased mortality in patients with advanced cancer. However, validation of our findings in a larger cohort is necessary. When the association of PC and mortality has been proven to be consistent, we would suggest a trial on suppletion of PC in cancer patients.

PO-29 - Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff level increases the number of cancer patients in who pulmonary embolism can be safely excluded without CT-PA imaging: The ADJUST-PE cancer substudy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with cancer frequently present with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). The D-dimer test is less useful to rule out PE in cancer patients due to a lower specificity, whereas the safety of the combination of a clinical decision rule (CDR) and D-dimer test to rule out PE in these patients is unclear. In the general population, use of an age-adjusted cutoff for D-dimer in combination with a CDR has been shown to improve specificity in the diagnosis of PE. AIM: We prospectively analysed the safety and efficacy of the age-adjusted D-dimer (defined as age×10 in patients >50 years) combined with CDR for the exclusion of PE in patients with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter multinational prospective management outcome study in 19 centers in Belgium, France, The Netherlands and Switzerland, the ADJUST-PE study, to validate an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off in patients with suspected PE. The performance of the age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off and CDR was compared between patients with and without cancer. The primary outcome was the rate of adjudicated thromboembolic events during three-month follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 3,324 patients with suspected PE, 429 (12.9%) patients had cancer. Cancer patients were older and more often had surgery or immobilisation. The prevalence of PE was 108/429 (25.2%) in cancer patients and 522/2894 (18%) in patients without cancer, p<0.001. Among cancer patients with an unlikely CDR, 27/274 (9.9%) had a D-Dimer <500 µg/L as compared with 19.7% using the age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off; in patients without cancer, these rates were 30.1% and 41.9%, respectively. The percentage of cancer patients in whom PE could be excluded based on CDR and age-adjusted D-dimer doubled from 6.3% to 12.6%. None of these cancer patients had a venous thromboembolic event during three-month follow-up, thus the failure rate was 0.0% (95% CI 0.0-6.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the usual cut-off, the age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off doubles the proportion of patients with cancer in whom PE can be safely excluded by CDR and D-dimer without need for CTPA imaging.

Current management strategies and long-term clinical outcomes of upper extremity venous thrombosis.

UNLABELLED: Essentials Few data exist on outcome of upper extremity deep and superficial vein thrombosis (UEDVT and UESVT). We followed 102 and 55 patients with UEDVT or UESVT, respectively, for a median of 3.5 years. Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism was low in both diseases, and the mortality high. Postthrombotic symptoms were infrequent and cancer patients had a higher risk of recurrent VTE. SUMMARY: Background There is scant information on the optimal management and clinical outcome of deep and superficial vein thrombosis of the upper extremity (UEDVT and UESVT). Objectives To explore treatment strategies and the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), mortality, postthrombotic symptoms, and bleeding in patients with UEDVT and UESVT and to assess the prognosis of cancer patients with UEDVT. Patients/methods Follow-up of patients with UEDVT or UESVT, who were enrolled previously in a diagnostic management study. Results We followed 102 and 55 patients with UEDVT and UESVT, respectively, both for a median of 3.5 years. Anticoagulant treatment was started in 100 patients with UEDVT (98%) and in 40 (73%) with UESVT. Nine patients with UEDVT (9%) developed recurrent VTE, 26 (26%) died, 6 (8%) of 72 patients had moderate postthrombotic symptoms, and 5 (5%) experienced major bleeding. One patient with UESVT had a recurrent VTE, 18 (33%) died, none had moderate postthrombotic symptoms, and none had major bleeding. Of the cancer patients with UEDVT, 18% had recurrent VTE vs. 7.5% in non-cancer patients (adjusted hazard ratio 2.2, 95%CI 0.6-8.2). The survival rate was 50% in cancer patients with UEDVT vs. 60% in those without (adjusted HR 0.8, 95%CI 0.4-1.4). Conclusions The risk of recurrent VTE was low in patients with UEDVT, and negligible for UESVT. Mortality was high for both diseases. Postthrombotic symptoms were infrequent and mild. Anticoagulant therapy of UEDVT carried a substantial risk of major bleeding. Cancer patients had a significant risk of recurrent VTE.

The influence of corticosteroids on hemostasis in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids have been associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in patients treated for inflammatory diseases. It is unclear whether the thrombotic risk is induced by the inflammation of the underlying inflammatory diseases or whether corticosteroids are prothrombotic as well. Considering the widespread use of corticosteroids in clinical practise, it is critical to know whether corticosteroids enhance coagulation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a 10-day prednisolone burst therapy activates hemostasis in healthy individuals. METHODS: Healthy subjects received either 0.5 mg kg(-1) day(-1) of oral prednisolone or placebo. Venous blood was collected at baseline, day 1 and day 10 and tested for thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TATc), D-dimer, plasmin-alpha2-antiplasmin complexes (PAPc), plasminogen-activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1), von Willebrand factor (VWF) and thrombin generation (peak thrombin, velocity index and endogenous thrombin potential [ETP]). RESULTS: Fifteen subjects received prednisolone and 16 placebo (median age 29 vs. 22 years, female subjects 33% vs. 56%, respectively). Peak thrombin and velocity index were higher in the placebo group at baseline. After 10 days of treatment, peak thrombin, velocity index, PAI-1 and VWF increased in the oral prednisolone group as compared with the placebo group (15.8 [SD 16.3] vs. -0.1 [SD 16.1], 41.2 [SD 41.3] vs. -2.3 [SD 42.7], 18.0 [IQR 8.0-37.0] vs. 0.5 [IQR -18.5-13.0], 4.0 [IQR -1.0-12.0] vs. 0.0 [IQR -2.5-1.5], respectively). No changes were observed for TATc, ETP, PAPc and D-dimer. CONCLUSIONS: Oral prednisolone induces a procoagulant state in healthy subjects, suggesting that corticosteroid treatment may increase the thromboembolic risk in patients with inflammatory diseases.

ADAMTS-13 and von Willebrand factor predict venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

UNLABELLED: ESSENTIALS: Cancer patients are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In this study, cases and controls were cancer patients who did or did not develop VTE. von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels were higher if compared with controls and correlated with cancer stage. VWF and ADAMTS-13 are associated with the occurrence of VTE in cancer. BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). ADAMTS-13 regulates von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity, which plays a role in the development of cancer and in VTE. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to search for an association between the levels of VWF and ADAMTS-13 and VTE in patients with cancer and to compare current scoring systems for prediction of VTE before and after addition of these parameters. PATIENTS/METHODS: In a case-control study, in which patients with recently diagnosed cancer were followed-up for 6 months, we compared 20 patients who developed VTE (cases) and 140 patients with cancer without VTE (controls), matched for sex, age, and type and stage of cancer. We measured VWF, ADAMTS-13 (activity and antigen), P-selectin, D-dimer and F1 + 2 levels at baseline, and calculated both the Khorana score and the Khorana score expanded after addition of P-selectin and D-dimer levels. RESULTS: VWF levels were significantly higher in cases when compared with controls (326 ± 185% vs. 242 ± 158%) and correlated with advanced stage of cancer: localized, 185 [142; 222]; locally advanced, 240 [146; 257]; metastatic, 267 [153; 324] (mean [interquartile range]). The addition of two biomarkers, ADAMTS-13 activity and F1 + 2 levels, to the Khorana score improved receiver operating curves. CONCLUSIONS: von Willebrand factor and ADAMTS-13 are associated with the occurrence of VTE in patients with cancer. Moreover, addition of ADAMTS-13 and F1 + 2 levels to the Khorana score considerably increases the predictive value for VTE.

Loss of asthma control and activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have shown that patients with severe asthma have increased risk of pulmonary embolism, in particular patients with frequent asthma exacerbations. Therefore, we hypothesized that asthma exacerbations are associated with increased haemostatic activity. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether induced loss of asthma control is associated with changes in coagulation and fibrinolytic parameters in peripheral blood. METHODS: We performed a prospective, inhaled steroid withdrawal study in 23 patients with moderate to moderately severe asthma, consisting of a baseline visit and a visit after loss of asthma control. During the visits, we measured asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), atopy, lung function, inflammatory markers (eosinophils and neutrophils), and haemostatic parameters in plasma. RESULTS: Complete cessation of inhaled corticosteroids led to a loss of asthma control in 22 of 23 patients. We found increased asthma symptoms (ACQ 0.9 vs. 2.9, P < 0.01), significantly reduced lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 3.51L vs. 3.13L, P < 0.01) and increased levels of eosinophils in plasma (0.26 × 10(E9)/L vs. 0.16 × 10(E9)/L, P = 0.03) in patients after loss of asthma control. However, we observed no significant changes in the coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters. CONCLUSION: Loss of asthma control after cessation of inhaled corticosteroids does not lead to increased haemostatic activation in patients with moderate to moderately severe asthma. This suggests that more severe inflammation or additional risk factors are required for activation of coagulation or reduction of fibrinolysis in asthma.

Adherence to guidelines to prevent cardiovascular diseases: The LifeLines cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. While there is indisputable evidence that statin treatment reduces the burden of CVD, undertreatment remains a concern for primary and secondary prevention. The aim of this study was to assess the use of lipid-lowering drugs (LLD) among 70,292 individuals in the Netherlands as a proxy of adherence to the national guideline for prevention and treatment of CVD. METHODS: LifeLines is a population-based prospective cohort study in the three Northern provinces of the Netherlands. At baseline, all participants completed questionnaires, and underwent a physical examination and lab testing. The national guidelines were used to assess how many participants were eligible for LLD prescription and we analysed how many indeed reported LLD use. RESULTS: For primary prevention, 77% (2515 of 3268) of those eligible for LLD treatment did not report using these drugs, while for secondary prevention this was 31% (403 of 1302). Patients with diabetes mellitus were treated best (67%) for primary prevention. Notably, of the patients with stroke, only 47% (182 of 386) reported LLD treatment. CONCLUSION: Despite clear guidelines and multiple national initiatives to improve CVD risk management, adherence to guidelines for the treatment of CVD in the Netherlands remains a major challenge. This study calls out for improving public awareness of CVD and to improve primary and secondary prevention to prevent unnecessary CVD-related morbidity and mortality.

Accuracy of X-ray with perfusion scan in young patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) has become the standard test in the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). However, young patients may have an increased risk of cancer with CTPA. Perfusion scanning combined with chest X-ray (X/Q) may offer an adequate alternative, but has never been prospectively validated. We directly compared this strategy with CTPA in patients aged ≤50years with suspected PE. METHODS: Consecutive patients with a likely clinical probability or an abnormal D-dimer level underwent both CTPA and X/Q. Two trained and experienced nuclear physicians independently analyzed the X/Q-scans. The accuracy of X/Q according to the PISAPED criteria was calculated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were included, with a PE rate of 33%. The inter-observer agreement for X/Q-scan reading was high (κ=0.89). After consensus reading, 21 patients (28%) were categorized as 'PE present', 53 (70%) as 'PE absent', and two (2.6%) as 'non-diagnostic'. In 22%, there was a discrepancy between the X/Q-scan and CPTA for the diagnosis or exclusion of PE. The PPV and NPV were 71% and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with a high risk of PE, a diagnostic strategy of chest X-ray and perfusion scanning using the PISAPED criteria seems less safe than CTPA. Additional studies should further investigate this diagnostic algorithm.

A simple decision rule including D-dimer to reduce the need for computed tomography scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: An 'unlikely' clinical decision rule with a negative D-dimer result safely excludes pulmonary embolism (PE) in 30% of presenting patients. We aimed to simplify this diagnostic approach and to increase its efficiency. METHODS: Data for 723 consecutive patients with suspected PE were analyzed (prevalence of PE, 22%). After constructing a logistic regression model with the D-dimer test result and items from the Wells' score, we identified the most prevalent combinations of influential items and selected new D-dimer positivity thresholds. The performance was separately validated with data from 2785 consecutive patients with suspected PE. RESULTS: Three Wells items significantly added incremental value to the D-dimer test: hemoptysis, signs of deep vein thrombosis and 'PE most likely'. Based on the most frequent combinations of these three items, we identified two groups: (i) none of these three items positive (41%); (ii) one or more of these items positive (59%). When applying a 1000 µg/L D-dimer threshold in group 1 and 500 µg/L in group 2, PE could be excluded without CT scanning in 36%, at a false-negative rate of 1.2% (95%, 0.04-3.3%). In the validation set, these proportions were 46% and 1.9% (95% CI, 1.2-2.7%), respectively. Using the conventional Wells score with a normal D-dimer result, these rates were, respectively, 22% and 0.6% (95% CI, 0.10-2.4%). CONCLUSION: Combining Wells items with the D-dimer test resulted in a simplified decision rule, which reduces the need for CT scanning in patients with suspected PE. A prospective validation is required before it can be implemented in clinical practice.