What Is an Adequate Margin During Sublobar Resection of ≤3 cm N0 Subsolid Lung Adenocarcinomas?

BACKGROUND: Sublobar resection offers noninferior survival vs lobectomy for ≤2 cm non-small cell lung cancer and is commonly used for subsolid tumors. Although data exist for solid tumors, the minimum adequate margin of resection for subsolid adenocarcinomas remains unclear. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 1101 adenocarcinoma resections at our institution from 2006 to 2022. Inclusion criteria were tumors ≤3 cm with ≥10% radiographic ground glass, excised by sublobar resection. Exclusions were positive nodes or positive or unreported margin. The primary outcome was the rate of local recurrence (LR) at multiple thresholds of margin distance. The relationship between margin distance and solid component size was also explored. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 194 patients. Median (interquartile range) tumor diameter and margin distance were 12 mm (9-17 mm) and 10 mm (5-17 mm), respectively. Median follow-up was 42.5 months. There was a progressive increase in LR with diminishing margin (0.1-cm decrements) from 1.5 cm to 0.5 cm. The difference in the rate of LR between "over" (n = 143) and "under" (n = 51) was most significant at 0.5 cm (8 of 51 [15.7%] vs 6 of 143 [4.2%]; P = .01) but did not reach α adjusted for multiple comparisons. On Cox regression for LR-free survival, margin ≤0.5 cm (P = .19) and solid component percentage (P = .14) trended to significance. Combining these using a ratio of margin distance-to-solid component size, a ratio of ≤1 showed a significantly higher rate of LR (7 [14.3%] vs 2 [2.0%], P = .009). Treatment of LRs provided at least intermediate-term survival in 87% of recurrences (median postrecurrence follow-up was 44 months). CONCLUSIONS: During sublobar resection of subsolid lung adenocarcinomas, a margin distance-to-solid component size ratio of >1.0 appears to be a more reliable factor than margin distance alone to minimize local recurrence. Local recurrence, however, may not impact survival in patients with subsolid adenocarcinomas if timely treatment is administered.

First in Human Phase 1 Clinical Trial of Stereotactic Irradiation to Achieve Lung Volume Reduction (SILVR) in Severe Emphysema.

PURPOSE: Only a subset of patients with severe emphysema qualify for lung volume reduction surgery or endobronchial valves. We previously demonstrated that stereotactic ablative radiation therapy of lung tumors reduces lung volume in treated lobes by creating localized lung fibrosis. We aimed to determine the safety and secondarily explore the efficacy of stereotactic irradiation for lung volume reduction (SILVR) over 18 months after intervention in patients with severe emphysema. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a single-arm, prospective clinical trial in eligible patients with severe emphysema treated with unilateral stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (45 Gy in 3 fractions) to a target within the most emphysematous region. The primary outcome was safety in terms of incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events, and the secondary outcome was efficacy. RESULTS: Eight patients received the intervention. Median (range) baseline characteristics were age 73 years (63-78); forced expiratory volume in 1 second percent of predicted value (FEV1%) 28.5% (19.0-42.0); diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide percent of predicted value 40% (24.0-67.0); and body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity (BODE) index 5.5 (5-9). The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was 3 of 8 (37.5%). The relative change in target lobe volume was -23.1% (-1.6 to -41.5) and -26.5% (-20.6 to -40.8) at 6 and 18 months, respectively. The absolute ΔFEV1% was greater in patients with a BODE index ≤5 versus ≥6 (+12.0% vs -2.0%). The mean baseline lung density (in Hounsfield units, reflecting the amount of preserved parenchyma) within the intermediate dose volume (V60BED3) correlated with the absolute change in target lobe volume at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: SILVR appears to be safe, with a signal for efficacy as a novel therapeutic alternative for patients with severe emphysema. SILVR may be most safe and effective in patients with a lower BODE index and/or less parenchymal destruction.

Should Surveillance Endoscopy Be Routine After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to Detect Marginal Ulcers: Initial Outcomes in a Tertiary Referral Centre.

PURPOSE: Encouraged by the excellent outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) reported by many authors, we added this procedure to our bariatric armamentarium in 2015. Here we present our initial experience of 68 cases and findings from routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at 1 year. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of a single surgical unit in a tertiary referral centre. Patients undergoing OAGB from January 2015 to May 2019 were included. A fixed biliopancreatic (BP) limb length of 200 cm was used in all patients. Surveillance endoscopy was done at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients, of whom 67.6% were females, were analysed. Mean age was 40.8 ± 1 years. Mean preoperative weight and body mass index (BMI) were 131 ± 24.7 kg and 51 ± 7 kg/m2, respectively. Median follow-up was 23 months (range 9-55 months), with 88% follow-up at 6 months and 1 year. At 1 year, mean total weight loss (TWL) and excess weight loss (EWL) were 35% and 71%, respectively. Endoscopy at 1 year revealed a 9.5% rate of marginal ulcers, majority of which healed with conservative treatment. Eighty-eight percent patients had complete remission of diabetes, and 94% had complete remission of hypertension. There was no 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: OAGB is a safe and effective bariatric procedure with excellent short-term outcomes in terms of weight loss, resolution of obesity-related co-morbidities and complications. Routine surveillance endoscopy at 1 year may detect asymptomatic marginal ulcers and, thus, prevent ulcer-related complications.