Effects of Cardioprotective Drugs on 90-Day Mortality or Heart Transplantation in Patients With Fulminant Myocarditis.

Background: Cardioprotective drugs have not been previously shown to improve the prognosis in patients with fulminant myocarditis presentation (FMP). We aimed to investigate whether cardioprotective drugs, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and ß-blocker, administered during hospitalization improved the prognosis in patients with FMP. Methods and Results: This multicenter cohort study conducted in Japan included 755 patients with clinically diagnosed FMP. Those who died within 14 days of admission were excluded, and 588 patients (median age 53 [37-65] years and 40% female) were evaluated. The primary outcome was the composite of 90-day mortality or heart transplantation. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to whether they were administered ACEI/ARB or ß-blocker during hospitalization. Administration of ACEI/ARB without ß-blocker improved the overall patient outcomes (log-rank test [vs. ACEI/ARB - and ß-blocker -]: ACEI/ARB + and ß-blocker -, P<0.001; ACEI/ARB - and ß-blocker +, P=0.256). Subsequently, a matched cohort of 146 patient pairs was generated for patients with or without ACEI/ARB administration during hospitalization. The outcome-free survival at 90 days was significantly higher in the ACEI/ARB administration group than in the non-administration group (hazard ratio 0.37; 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.71). Conclusions: Administration of ACEI or ARB during hospitalization was associated with favorable outcomes in terms of 90-day mortality and heart transplantation events in patients with clinically diagnosed FMP.

Current status of wearable cardioverter-defibrillator use in Japan.

Background: The current status of wearable cardiovascular defibrillators (WCD) use in Japan is unclear. Methods: Using a nationwide claims database of Japan, we assessed characteristics of patients using WCD and factors influencing subsequent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Results: In 1049 cases, those with prior cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) or ventricular arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, or device-related issues were more likely to require permanent ICDs, whereas females were less likely. Conclusions: Prior CPA or fatal arrhythmia, underlying cardiomyopathy, or device-related issues were associated with future permanent ICD implantation. These findings offer insights into the current status of WCD use in Japan.

New device for assessment of endothelial function: plethysmographic flow-mediated vasodilation (pFMD).

Measurement of flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in the brachial artery by using ultrasound is a well-established technique for evaluating endothelial function. To make the measurement quicker and simpler than the measurements of conventional ultrasound FMD (uFMD), we have developed a new noninvasive method, plethysmographic FMD (pFMD), to assess vascular response to reactive hyperemia in the brachial artery. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of measurement of pFMD in comparison to that of measurement of conventional uFMD. This study was a multi-center, cross-sectional study. We compared pFMD by a new device using cuff pressure and volume with conventional uFMD using ultrasound in 50 men (mean age, 41 ± 9 years). pFMD significantly correlated with conventional uFMD (ß = 0.59, P < 0.001). In Bland-Altman plot analysis of pFMD and conventional uFMD, the mean difference of pFMD and conventional uFMD was 0.78%, and limits of agreement (mean difference ±2 standard deviations of the difference) ranged from -4.53% to 6.11%. We demonstrated validity of the new method for measurement of pFMD, which can automate the evaluation of endothelial function in a short time. Measurement of pFMD is simpler than measurement of conventional uFMD and may have reduced artificial bias compared to that of conventional uFMD measurement (URL for Clinical Trial: https://ethics.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/site/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/eki_giji20221213.pdf . Registration Number for Clinical Trial: E2022-0131).

Comparison of embolic risk in left ventricular thrombus between nonischemic and ischemic cardiomyopathy: A nationwide database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) thrombus is not common but poses significant risks of embolic stroke or systemic embolism. However, the distinction in embolic risk between nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 2738 LV thrombus patients from the JROAD-DPC (Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases Diagnosis Procedure Combination) database were included. Among these patients, 1037 patients were analyzed, with 826 (79.7%) having ICM and 211 with NICM (20.3%). Within the NICM group, the distribution was as follows: dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM; 41.2%), takotsubo cardiomyopathy (27.0%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (18.0%), and other causes (13.8%). The primary outcome was a composite of embolic stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) during hospitalization. The ICM and NICM groups showed no significant difference in the primary outcome (5.8% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.34). Among NICM, SSE occurred in 12.6% of patients with DCM, 7.0% with takotsubo cardiomyopathy, and 2.6% with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for SSE revealed an odds ratio of 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-2.7, p = 0.37) for NICM compared to ICM. However, DCM exhibited a higher adjusted odds ratio for SSE compared to ICM (2.6, 95% CI 1.2-6.0, p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide shows comparable rates of embolic events between ICM and NICM in LV thrombus patients, with DCM posing a greater risk of SSE than ICM. The findings emphasize the importance of assessing the specific cause of heart disease in NICM, within LV thrombus management strategies.

Changes in Cardiac Function Following Fulminant Myocarditis.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of myocardial dysfunction in patients with fulminant myocarditis is poorly understood. This study aims to evaluate changes in cardiac function in patients with fulminant myocarditis using a nationwide registry in Japan. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with biopsy-proven fulminant myocarditis and available for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We described the LVEF on admission, at discharge, and 1 year after discharge. We divided patients into 2 groups based on LVEF at discharge (reduced ejection fraction of <50% or preserved ejection fraction of ≥50%) and analyzed changes in LVEF and prognosis according to groups. RESULTS: We included 214 patients (the median [first-third quartiles] age of the cohort was 48 [35-62] years, and 63 [38%] were female). Of 153 patients available for LVEF at 1 year, the median (first-third quartiles) LVEF increased from 33% (21-45%) on admission to 59% (49-64%) at discharge and further to 61% (55-66%) at 1 year. Of 153 patients, 45 (29%) and 22 (14%) had LVEF <50% at discharge and at 1 year, respectively. Comparisons between patients with LVEF <50% and those with LVEF ≥50% demonstrated that the former group had a higher adjusted probability of death or heart transplantation (hazard ratio, 8.19 [95% CI, 2.13-31.5]; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Some patients with fulminant myocarditis had left ventricular dysfunction in the chronic phase. Patients with reduced left ventricular function at discharge had a worse prognosis than those with preserved left ventricular function. REGISTRATION: URL: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000045352; Unique identifier: UMIN000039763.

Multisystemic Inflammation Influences Prognosis in Fulminant Lymphocytic Myocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS) is a hyperinflammatory shock associated with cardiac dysfunction and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, there are no reports on using MIS criteria, such as multisystemic inflammation (MSI) in fulminant myocarditis, without SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study investigated the differences in clinical characteristics and course between patients with fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis (FLM) plus MSI and those without MSI. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 273 patients with FLM registered in the JROAD-DPC database between April 2014 and March 2017. We evaluated the presence of MSI using criteria modified from previously reported MIS criteria and compared the characteristics and risk of mortality or heart transplantation between FLM patients with MSI and without MSI. Of the 273 patients with FLM, 107 (39%) were diagnosed with MSI. The MSI group was younger (44 vs. 57 years; P<0.0001) and had more females (50% vs. 36%; P=0.0236), a higher incidence of pericardial effusion (58% vs. 40%; P=0.0073), and a lower 90-day mortality rate (19% vs. 33%; P=0.0185) than the non-MSI group. The risk of mortality at 90 days was lower in FLM patients aged <50 years with MSI aged <50 years than in those without MSI (P=0.0463). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that MSI may influence the prognosis of FLM, especially in patients aged <50 years.

Oral anticoagulation after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: benefits and risks.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Few recent large-scale studies have evaluated the risks and benefits of continuing oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated the status of continuation of OAC therapy and the association between continuation of OAC therapy and thromboembolic and bleeding events according to the CHADS2 score. METHODS: This retrospective study included data from the Japanese nationwide administrative claims database of patients who underwent CA for AF between April 2014 and March 2021. Patients without AF recurrence assessed by administrative data of the treatment modalities were divided into two groups according to continuation of OAC therapy 6 months after the index CA. The primary outcomes were thromboembolism and major bleeding after a landmark period of 6 months. After inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, the association between OAC continuation and outcomes was determined according to the CHADS2 score. RESULTS: Among 231 374 patients included, 69.7%, 21.6%, and 8.7% had CHADS2 scores of ≤1, 2, and ≥3, respectively. Of these, 71% continued OAC therapy at 6 months. The OAC continuation rate was higher in the high CHADS2 score group than that in the low CHADS2 score group. Among all patients, 2451 patients (0.55 per 100 person-years) had thromboembolism and 2367 (0.53 per 100 person-years) had major bleeding. In the CHADS2 score ≤1 group, the hazard ratio of the continued OAC group was 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-1.01, P = .06] for thromboembolism and was 1.51 (95% CI: 1.27-1.80, P < .001) for major bleeding. In the CHADS2 score ≥3 group, the hazard ratio of the continued OAC group was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.46-0.82, P = .001) for thromboembolism and was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.71-1.56, P = 0.81) for major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study suggests that the benefits and risks of continuing OAC therapy after CA for AF differ based on the patient's CHADS2 score. The risk of major bleeding due to OAC continuation seems to outweigh the risk reduction of thromboembolism in patients with lower thromboembolic risk.

Overview of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccine associated myocarditis compared to non-COVID-19-associated myocarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous literature suggests that both SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 mRNA vaccine are associated with myocarditis, in which the incidence is higher in the infection group. COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis is noted to have a more benign course. Despite these findings, there is a need for a larger population systematic review that compares the outcomes to pre-pandemic acute myocarditis to better understand the extent of the current post-COVID state. METHODS: We performed a literature search with PubMed and EMBASE and identified studies investigating COVID-19 and its vaccinated population, and the population prior to the pandemic (control group) who had myocarditis. We performed a one-group meta-analysis of the incidence, baseline demographics, and outcomes of myocarditis for each group. RESULTS: The incidence in the SARS-CoV-2 infection group was 2.76 per thousand (95% CI, 0.85-8.92), 19.7 per million (95% CI, 12.3-31.6) in the vaccine group, and 0.861 per million (95% CI, 0.04-16.7) in the control group. The majority of patients were male, with the highest proportion in the vaccine group. The mean age was the youngest in the vaccine group (24.8, 95% CI, 19.1-30.6). The vaccine group had the lowest mortality (2.0%, 95% CI, 1.3-2.7) followed by the control and the SARS-CoV-2 infection group. The vaccine group had the lowest proportion of immunoglobulin and glucocorticoid use, mechanical circulatory support, and cardiogenic shock. CONCLUSION: Our study showed favorable outcomes of myocarditis in patients with COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, despite a higher incidence than pre-COVID controls. Further studies with standardized myocarditis diagnostic criteria assessing long-term outcomes are necessary.