Vision 2020: How Caregiving and Work Productivity Outlook Shifted for Academic Pediatric Faculty.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected both home and work routines and may have exacerbated existing inequities. The objectives of this study were to describe pediatric faculty work productivity and caregiving responsibilities during the pandemic, identify groups at risk, and better understand mitigation strategy preferences. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey of Department of Pediatric faculty. Responses were analyzed by demographic data as well as academic context. Results: Women (p = 0.003) and junior faculty (p = 0.02) reported greater increases in caregiving responsibilities than men and senior faculty during the pandemic compared with the previous year. Faculty perceived a worse one-year outlook for their research than for their teaching or clinical responsibilities (p < 0.01). More than a third (37%) of faculty reported wellness concerns affecting job performance, which was more common among those with increased caregiving responsibility (p = 0.01). Junior faculty (p = 0.01) and those whose increased caregiving (p = 0.01) were two and threefold more likely to report that their caregiving responsibilities would affect promotion, for those likely to go up for promotion within 10 years. Preferred mitigation strategies included clear communication of expectations by leadership, acknowledging the need for adjustments in expectations, flexible work hours, and allowances for an off-line day. Conclusion: Pediatric faculty with increased caregiving responsibilities and junior faculty are at highest risk for the pandemic, affecting their readiness for promotion. Wellness concerns by faculty could affect work performance. Researchers report a worse 1-year outlook than the other groups. Faculty identified preferred strategies to potentially assist in maintaining their productivity.

Can pediatric sleep questions be incorporated into a risk model to predict respiratory complications following adenotonsillectomy?

BACKGROUND: Adenotonsillectomy, one of the most frequent surgical procedures in children, is usually performed for sleep-disordered breathing, a disease spectrum from primary snoring to obstructive sleep apnea. Children undergoing an adenotonsillectomy may be at risk for perioperative respiratory complications, necessitating intervention or escalation of care. However, there is no effective preoperative screening or risk-stratification model for perioperative respiratory complications that incorporates not only clinical history and physical examination but also sleep question responses for children as there is for adults. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective observational study was to develop a risk-stratification model for perioperative respiratory complications in children undergoing an adenotonsillectomy incorporating not only clinical history and physical examination but also sleep question responses. METHODS: A 25-question sleep questionnaire was prospectively administered preoperatively for 1895 children undergoing an adenotonsillectomy from November 2015 to December 2017. The primary outcome measure was overall perioperative respiratory complications, collected prospectively and defined as having at least one major or minor complication intraoperatively or postoperatively. RESULTS: The incidence of overall perioperative respiratory complications was 20.4%. Preoperative factors associated with perioperative respiratory complications in the multiple regression model were age, race, preoperative tonsil size, the presence of a syndrome, and the presence of a pulmonary disease. None of the sleep questionnaire responses remained in the multivariable analysis. The area under the ROC curve for the risk stratification model incorporating sleep question responses was only 0.6114% (95% CI: 0.60, 0.67). CONCLUSION: Preoperative sleep question responses may be unable to predict overall perioperative respiratory complications in children undergoing an adenotonsillectomy. A robust risk stratification model incorporating sleep question responses with clinical history and physical examination was unable to discriminate or predict perioperative respiratory complications in our population undergoing an adenotonsillectomy.

What is the role of sleep in physician burnout?

None: The occurrence of physician burnout is widespread among clinicians and academic faculty, who report indicators such as low quality of life and poor work-life balance. Chronic insufficient sleep, whether due to extended work hours, circadian misalignment, or unrecognized sleep disorders, is a critically important risk factor for burnout that is overlooked and under-studied, and interventions to promote healthy sleep may reduce burnout susceptibility among attending physicians. While strategies to reduce burnout among resident and attending physicians have been under-evaluated, evidence suggests a need to address burnout at both individual and organizational levels. Solutions have been offered that are applicable to many stakeholders, including employers; payers; licensing and certification boards; state and federal regulatory agencies; and physicians and researchers. As more studies are undertaken to evaluate how these approaches impact burnout, two questions need to be addressed: (1) What is the role of sleep in the crisis of burnout, specifically among attendings, who are particularly under-studied? (2) Is restoration of healthy sleep the fundamental mechanism by which burnout interventions work? It is essential for key stakeholders to consider the role of sleep, sleepiness, and sleep disorders in order to optimize any efforts to mitigate the present crisis in physician burnout, particularly among attending physicians, an understudied group.

Sleep, fatigue and burnout among physicians: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine position statement.

None: Physician burnout is a serious and growing threat to the medical profession and may undermine efforts to maintain a sufficient physician workforce to care for the growing and aging patient population in the United States. Burnout involves a host of complex underlying associations and potential for risk. While prevalence is unknown, recent estimates of physician burnout are quite high, approaching 50% or more, with midcareer physicians at highest risk. Sleep deprivation due to shift-work schedules, high workload, long hours, sleep interruptions, and insufficient recovery sleep have been implicated in the genesis and perpetuation of burnout. Maladaptive attitudes regarding sleep and endurance also may increase the risk for sleep deprivation among attending physicians. While duty-hour restrictions have been instituted to protect sleep opportunity among trainees, virtually no such effort has been made for attending physicians who have completed their training or practicing physicians in nonacademic settings. It is the position of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine that a critical need exists to evaluate the roles of sleep disruption, sleep deprivation, and circadian misalignment in physician well-being and burnout. Such evaluation may pave the way for the development of effective countermeasures that promote healthy sleep, with the goal of reducing burnout and its negative impacts such as a shrinking physician workforce, poor physician health and functional outcomes, lower quality of care, and compromised patient safety.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in pediatric lung transplant recipients: recent advances in monitoring.

To investigate the clinical validity of newer diagnostic tests such as monitoring of EBVqPCR and lymphocyte function assay ImmuKnow in helping to diagnose PTLD in pediatric lung transplant recipients. Single-center, retrospective case-control study. CsA trough levels, EBVqPCR and ImmuKnow (Cyclex Inc., Columbia, MD, USA) levels were measured serially as part of routine care. Re-transplant patients and patients who did not reach 12 months post-transplant at the time of analysis were excluded. Twenty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. The study group consisted of seven patients who developed PTLD, five of which were EBV- recipients who received EBV+ lungs. The rest of the eligible patients served as controls. Median time to develop PTLD was 273 days (range: 166-343). One, two, three, six, and nine months after transplant, mean (+/-s.d.) CsA trough whole blood levels (ng/mL) were not different between the two groups: 378 +/- 38, 390 +/- 52, 402 +/- 89, 359 +/- 42, and 342 +/- 115, vs. 416 +/- 105, 347 +/- 64, 337 +/- 78, 333 +/- 86, and 281 +/- 54 [PTLD vs. no-PTLD, respectively (p > 0.05 for all time points)]. Mean (+/-s.d.) EBVqPCR levels (copies/mL) measured at three, six, and nine months post-transplant were significantly elevated in PTLD group compared to no-PTLD group: 84 +/- 99, 3384 +/- 7428 and 839 +/- 1444 vs. 9 +/- 26, 8 +/- 36 and 32 +/- 136, respectively (p < 0.05 for all time points). Mean (+/-s.d.) ImmuKnow levels (ATP ng/mL) at three, six, and nine months post-transplant were significantly lower in the PTLD group when compared with no-PTLD group: 144 +/- 67, 137 +/- 110, and 120 +/- 153 vs. 290 +/- 161, 300 +/- 162, and 293 +/- 190, respectively (p < 0.05 for all time points). Close monitoring of EBV viral load by qPCR and the degree of immunosuppression via ImmuKnow may guide physicians to reach the diagnosis of PTLD early.