RESUMEN
Children provided with general anaesthesia for dental extractions at East Surrey Hospital were audited to determine the percentage of children who were prescribed adequate pain management in accordance with guidance published by the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Three audit cycles were completed. Data were collected retrospectively through case note review. The results from the first cycle showed that only 47% of children were prescribed with a recommended analgesic regimen. Implementation of change included the development of a protocol for analgesic delivery, which was disseminated to the anaesthetic and dental teams. Full compliance with the audit standards was then demonstrated in the second and third cycles. This audit demonstrates the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in order to provide high standards of care for children undergoing dental extractions under general anaesthesia. The protocol developed could be applied to other surgical day case procedures for children to improve the patient experience.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Dental/métodos , Anestesia General/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Extracción Dental/métodos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Anestesia Dental/normas , Anestesia General/normas , Niño , Protocolos Clínicos , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Extracción Dental/efectos adversos , Extracción Dental/normasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Child protection has become a very poignant subject in the UK. The Laming report into the death of Victoria Climbié led to the implementation of multidisciplinary safeguarding policies and training for healthcare professionals, social services staff and police. However, many dental practitioners, as well as other healthcare professionals, have little confidence when reporting their concerns and reducing the 'gap' between suspicion and reporting (Laming in The victoria climbie inquiry: report of an inquiry by Lord Laming, 2003. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-victoria-climbie-inquiry-report-of-an-inquiry-by-lord-laming ). Our audit aimed to identify and address the barriers of reporting safeguarding concerns amongst the hospital team. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to staff at Surrey and Sussex Healthcare National Health Service Trust with a valid Safeguarding Children Level 3 certificate in order to assess their knowledge of safeguarding children. Changes to traditional safeguarding training (Group 1) were implemented to include a broader range of speakers, each speaking for shorter times with more personal and focused presentations (Groups 2 and 3). Three cohorts of participants were assessed including healthcare assistants, nurses, dentists, and doctors. RESULTS: Group 1 (n = 100) reported 64% experience of reporting compared with group 2 (n = 100) 43% and group 3 (n = 76) 51%. Confidence was higher in those with more experience in child protection. The most common barrier was the uncertainty of diagnosis. More barriers to reporting existed in the new style of training in groups 2 and 3. The scenarios were answered with appropriate concern and reporting by groups 1 and 2, however, less for group 3. DISCUSSION: Experienced and trained practitioners are more likely to refer children to child protection teams when they have concerns of abuse or neglect. Personalising training was shown to be less effective and the focus should be more on diagnosis and local protocols. Early training from undergraduate level was a unanimous request. CONCLUSION: Focused training on diagnosis and local protocols, accompanied by bespoke teaching for specific specialties would be the most constructive tool for safeguarding children. Exploring modern methods such as simulation-based training could be effective. Structured forms and local policies that are familiar to clinicians prevent omissions and encourage professional awareness.
Asunto(s)
Maltrato a los Niños , Odontólogos , Niño , Maltrato a los Niños/diagnóstico , Maltrato a los Niños/prevención & control , Humanos , Rol Profesional , Medicina Estatal , Encuestas y CuestionariosAsunto(s)
Caries Dental/terapia , Preescolar , Humanos , Política Organizacional , Sociedades Odontológicas , Diente Primario , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
Idiopathic faecal incontinence in middle-aged people has been found to be commonly associated with neurogenic damage to the anal sphincter musculature. Because neurogenic atrophy of skeletal muscle is a common feature of ageing, we have investigated the possibility that faecal incontinence in elderly people might be due to age-related denervation of the anal sphincter musculature. The technique of single fibre electromyography was used to measure the motor unit fibre density in the external and sphincter muscle in ten patients aged 78 to 99 years. Those patients whose continence was impaired had a markedly increased fibre density. Our findings suggest that neurogenic damage to the anal sphincter musculature may so reduce its functional reserve in elderly people that incontinence occurs when other factors, such as looseness of stool or depression of cerebral function, co-exist.