The characteristics and predictors of mortality in periprosthetic fractures around the knee.

Aims: Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around the knee are challenging injuries. This study aims to describe the characteristics of knee PPFs and the impact of patient demographics, fracture types, and management modalities on in-hospital mortality. Methods: Using a multicentre study design, independent of registry data, we included adult patients sustaining a PPF around a knee arthroplasty between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. Univariate, then multivariable, logistic regression analyses were performed to study the impact of patient, fracture, and treatment on mortality. Results: Out of a total of 1,667 patients in the PPF study database, 420 patients were included. The in-hospital mortality rate was 6.4%. Multivariable analyses suggested that American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, history of peripheral vascular disease (PVD), history of rheumatic disease, fracture around a loose implant, and cerebrovascular accident (CVA) during hospital stay were each independently associated with mortality. Each point increase in ASA grade independently correlated with a four-fold greater mortality risk (odds ratio (OR) 4.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to 14.06); p = 0.026). Patients with PVD have a nine-fold increase in mortality risk (OR 9.1 (95% CI 1.25 to 66.47); p = 0.030) and patients with rheumatic disease have a 6.8-fold increase in mortality risk (OR 6.8 (95% CI 1.32 to 34.68); p = 0.022). Patients with a fracture around a loose implant (Unified Classification System (UCS) B2) have a 20-fold increase in mortality, compared to UCS A1 (OR 20.9 (95% CI 1.61 to 271.38); p = 0.020). Mode of management was not a significant predictor of mortality. Patients managed with revision arthroplasty had a significantly longer length of stay (median 16 days; p = 0.029) and higher rates of return to theatre, compared to patients treated nonoperatively or with fixation. Conclusion: The mortality rate in PPFs around the knee is similar to that for native distal femur and neck of femur fragility fractures. Patients with certain modifiable risk factors should be optimized. A national PPF database and standardized management guidelines are currently required to understand these complex injuries and to improve patient outcomes.

Predictors of mortality in periprosthetic fractures of the hip: Results from the national PPF study.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around the hip joint are increasing in prevalence. In this collaborative study, we aimed to investigate the impact of patient demographics, fracture characteristics, and modes of management on in-hospital mortality of PPFs involving the hip. METHODS: Using a multi-centre cohort study design, we retrospectively identified adults presenting with a PPF around the hip over a 10-year period. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to study the independent correlation between patient, fracture, and treatment factors on mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1,109 patients were included. The in-hospital mortality rate was 5.3%. Multivariable analyses suggested that age, male sex, abbreviated mental test score (AMTS), pneumonia, renal failure, history of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and deep surgical site infection were each independently associated with mortality. Each yearly increase in age independently correlates with a 7% increase in mortality (OR 1.07, p=0.019). The odds of mortality was 2.99 times higher for patients diagnosed with pneumonia during their hospital stay [OR 2.99 (95% CI 1.07-8.37) p=0.037], and 7.25 times higher for patients that developed renal failure during their stay [OR 7.25 (95% CI 1.85-28.47) p=0.005]. Patients with history of PVD have a six-fold greater mortality risk (OR 6.06, p=0.003). Mode of treatment was not a significant predictor of mortality. CONCLUSION: The in-hospital mortality rate of PPFs around the hip exceeds 5%. The fracture subtype and mode of management are not independent predictors of mortality, while patient factors such as age, AMTS, history of PVD, pneumonia, and renal failure can independently predict mortality. Peri-operative optimisation of modifiable risk factors such as lung and kidney function in patients with PPFs around the hip during their hospital stay is of utmost importance.

Standard setting for orthopaedic trauma competencies in postgraduate specialty training- catching those falling behind the curve.

BACKGROUND: The Curriculum for Trauma and Orthopaedics focuses on producing competent Day-One Consultants. However, the expected development trajectory is not clear. It is important, yet difficult to objectively identify trainees who are "falling behind". This project proposes practical, consensus-based thresholds of Operative Trauma Competence at each Waypoint stage of training. METHODS: 32 trainers and 73 trainees in one Deanery were identified. The trainers and trainees were asked their PBA level expectation of a trainee at ST4, ST6 and ST8 for nine trauma competencies. Lower quartile values were calculated providing thresholds. RESULTS: 53 (72%) trainees and 22 (69%) trainers responded. At ST8, the lower quartile threshold was level 4 for all procedures. At ST6, three operation groups became apparent: Group 1 (hip hemiarthroplasty, Dynamic hip screw; k-wire distal radius fracture and Weber C Ankle open reduction, internal fixation (ORIF)) Group 2 (Tibial Nail; Olecranon Tension band wire, ORIF radial shaft; distal radius plate fixation)- Group 3 (supracondylar fracture fixation)Threshold levels for procedures were: Group 1- 4a; Group 2-3b and Group 3- 3a.At ST4, there was more variation and spread in responses, however, expectations could still be similarly grouped: Group 1- 3a; Group 2- 2b and Group 3- 2a. CONCLUSION: In an increasingly competency-based training environment we provide tangible thresholds for expectations of orthopaedic trainees' progression and development. We identified two groups: basic trauma (Group 1 where level 4 competencies should be attained by ST6) and intermediate trauma (Groups 2 and 3 where level 4 competencies should be attained by ST8.).

The incidence of medial end clavicle fractures is higher than had previously been considered.

BACKGROUND: Previous X-ray epidemiological studies have estimated the incidence of medial end clavicle fractures to account for 2-3% of all clavicle fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At our institution X-rays of every patient attending the Emergency Department are reviewed at a Virtual Fracture Clinic by a Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon. Patients with a fracture are referred to the Shoulder and Elbow Fracture Clinic. Patients without a fracture are contacted and, if there are on-going concerns, are referred to the Shoulder and Elbow Fracture Clinic. Over an 18-month period we identified every patient that attended our Emergency Department that had sustained a clavicle fracture. RESULTS: In total 558 clavicle fractures were identified (139 (24.9%) - lateral, 360 (64.5%) - middle, 59 (10.6%) - medial). Of the 59 medial end fractures, 31 (52.5%) were identified on presentation at the Emergency Department, 13 (22%) at the Virtual Fracture Clinic, 6 (10.2%) on computed tomography scan at the Shoulder and Elbow Fracture Clinic and 9 (15.3%) were admitted directly to the trauma unit. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the incidence of medial end clavicle fractures in the general population is higher than had previously been considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Insights into patient preferences for elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

AIMS: To investigate factors that contribute to patient decisions regarding attendance for arthroplasty during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was distributed to patients on the waiting list for hip or knee arthroplasty in a single tertiary centre within the UK. Patient factors that may have influenced the decision to attend for arthroplasty, global quality of life (QoL) (EuroQol five-dimension three-level (EQ-5D-3L)), and joint-specific QoL (Oxford Hip or Knee Score) were assessed. Patients were asked at which 'COVID-alert' level they would be willing to attend an NHS and a "COVID-light" hospital for arthroplasty. Independent predictors were assessed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 540 distributed questionnaires, 400 (74.1%; 236 awaiting hip arthroplasty, 164 awaiting knee arthroplasty) complete responses were received and included. Less than half (48.2%) were willing to attend for hip or knee arthroplasty while a UK COVID-19 epidemic was in circulation (COVID-alert levels 3 to 5). Patients with worse joint-specific QoL had a preference to proceed with surgery at COVID-alert levels 3 to 5 compared to levels 1 and 2 (hip arthroplasty odds ratio (OR) 1.54 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45 to 1.63); knee arthroplasty OR 1.16 (1.07 to 1.26)). The odds of patients with worse joint-specific QoL being willing to attend for surgery at COVID-alert levels 3 to 5 increased further if surgery in a private, "COVID-light" hospital was available (hip arthroplasty OR 3.50 (95% CI 3.26 to 3.71); knee arthroplasty OR 1.41 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.53). CONCLUSION: Patient decisions surrounding elective surgery have been influenced by the global COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the importance of patient involvement in ensuring optimized provision of elective surgery during these challenging times. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(4):261-270.

Cerebrovascular assessment of patients undergoing shoulder surgery in beach chair position using a multiparameter transcranial Doppler approach.

Although the beach-chair position (BCP) is widely used during shoulder surgery, it has been reported to associate with a reduction in cerebral blood flow, oxygenation, and risk of brain ischaemia. We assessed cerebral haemodynamics using a multiparameter transcranial Doppler-derived approach in patients undergoing shoulder surgery. 23 anaesthetised patients (propofol (2 mg/kg)) without history of neurologic pathology undergoing elective shoulder surgery were included. Arterial blood pressure (ABP, monitored with a finger-cuff plethysmograph calibrated at the auditory meatus level) and cerebral blood flow velocity (FV, monitored in the middle cerebral artery) were recorded in supine and in BCP. All subjects underwent interscalene block ipsilateral to the side of FV measurement. We evaluated non-invasive intracranial pressure (nICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (nCPP) calculated with a black-box mathematical model; critical closing pressure (CrCP); diastolic closing margin (DCM-pressure reserve available to avoid diastolic flow cessation); cerebral autoregulation index (Mxa); pulsatility index (PI). Significant changes occured for DCM [mean decrease of 6.43 mm Hg (p = 0.01)] and PI [mean increase of 0.11 (p = 0.05)]. ABP, FV, nICP, nCPP and CrCP showed a decreasing trend. Cerebral autoregulation was dysfunctional (Mxa > 0.3) and PI deviated from normal ranges (PI > 0.8) in both phases. ABP and nCPP values were low (< 60 mm Hg) in both phases. Changes between phases did not result in CrCP reaching diastolic ABP, therefore DCM did not reach critical values (≤ 0 mm Hg). BCP resulted in significant cerebral haemodynamic changes. If left untreated, reduction in cerebral blood flow may result in brain ischaemia and post-operative neurologic deficit.

Centromedullary pinning of radial neck fractures: length matters!

Centromedullary pinning provides an excellent alternative to open reduction in severely displaced radial neck fractures. It has a low complication rate because it is an extra-articular and minimally invasive technique. The functional results have been shown to be good or excellent in most cases. The technique is described clearly in the literature but has posed us with certain difficulties. We present a useful technical tip on performing centromedullary pinning based on our experience of treating radial neck fractures by this method.

Establishing a generic training programme for future junior doctors: a role for neurosurgery within the framework of clinical neurosciences.

INTRODUCTION: To describe the opinion of junior doctors in neurosurgery in the UK and Eire about future reforms to training, and to relate this to the establishment of a generic neurosciences training programme. METHODS: A postal questionnaire survey of neurosurgery units in UK and Eire (36 units). All senior house officers (SHOs) taking part in a neurosurgery on-call rota during the 6 months between February and August 2003 (n=236); 190 respondents (response rate 81% overall, 90% neurosurgery SHOs and 55% neurology SHOs. The questionnaire covered most aspects of provision of training, working pattern and job satisfaction gained from the post. Also included were questions on future reforms for training. RESULTS: There is an overwhelming acceptance amongst SHOs for training to be centred on generic programmes. The audit also identified that there are many aspects of neurosurgical training which will be very suitable for trainees from other fields, thus supporting the establishment of a generic neurosciences training programme. CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of a generic training programme would encourage an improvement in training standards for the whole SHO grade. To ensure the success of this proposed generic training programme, support from junior doctors and all those involved in postgraduate education is required. Neurosciences teaching has the excellent potential to move towards the planning and formation of a generic neurosciences training programme in-line with the proposed reforms.