[Efficacy of Disease Management Programs Asthma and COPD? Results of a Cross-Sectional Study]. / Wirksamkeit von Disease-Management-Programmen für Asthma und COPD? Ergebnisse einer Querschnittstudie.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of the German disease management programs (DMP) asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) cannot be shown with the legally bound documentations. Studies with control groups are rare. Aim of this work was to investigate in a cross-sectional study whether the disease control differs in participants (DMP+) and non-participants (DMP - ) of the DMPs asthma and COPD. METHODS: The study was a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study. Primary endpoints were the Asthma Control Test™ (ACT) in the asthma part of the study and the COPD Assessment Test™ (CAT) for the COPD part. RESULTS: A total of 1038 asthma patients and 846 COPD patients were included, of whom about 70 % participated in the corresponding DMP. The ACT total score was higher in asthma DMP+ patients than in DMP- patients (mean difference 0.86; 95 % CI: 0.29 - 1.43;p = 0.003), but not clinically relevant. For COPD there was no clinically relevant difference in COPD disease impact (0.52; 95 % CI: - 0.71 - 1.75; p = 0.405). Although DMP patients had to be enrolled in the respective DMP for at least one year, only 60 % of these patients had participated in a structured education. We did not observe a difference in disease control in DMP patients who respectively participated and did not participate in a structured education. DISCUSSION: There was no clinically relevant difference in disease control between DMP+ and DMP- patients. The efficacy of DMPs has been demonstrated internationally in randomized controlled trials. Randomized controlled trials should be conducted in Germany for demonstrating efficacy of DMPs asthma and COPD. REGISTRATION: drks.de, DRKS00007664, Registration date: Jan 15, 2015.

Real-life effectiveness of asthma treatment with a fixed-dose fluticasone/formoterol pressurised metered-dose inhaler - Results from a non-interventional study.

OBJECTIVE: Prospective, non-interventional study of fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) combination therapy with fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate (FP/FORM) across a spectrum of community-based patients with asthma in a real-life setting. METHODS: In FP/FORM-treated patients aged ≥12 years, asthma control (Asthma Control Test™ [ACT]), incidence of severe exacerbations, lung function, quality of life (asthma quality of life questionnaire [AQLQ]) and adverse events (AEs) were assessed over one year. RESULTS: Almost 40% (n = 555) of the full analysis population (N = 1410) were receiving ICS/LABA therapy prior to enrolment; 69.8% completed the study. Asthma control (mean ACT ± standard deviation) improved from 16.3 ± 5.0 at baseline to 19.8 ± 4.5 at study end. ACT scores were significantly (p < 0.0001) higher than baseline at all observation timepoints, including the first assessment at 4-6 weeks. The percentage of patients with asthma control increased (baseline: 30.9%; study end: 62.4%), and the percentage of patients with ≥1 severe asthma exacerbation decreased (12 months before: 35.8%; during study: 5.9%). Lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second, peak expiratory flow) improved from baseline to each observation timepoint (p < 0.0001 for all). Improvement in asthma status was accompanied by ameliorated quality of life: AQLQ scores improved significantly from baseline to all observation timepoints (p < 0.0001 for all). AEs accorded with the summary of product characteristics. After study completion, 70% of patients continued FP/FORM treatment. CONCLUSION: In this one-year study, FP/FORM treatment was associated with clinically relevant improvements in asthma status in a diverse population of patients under real-life conditions.

Roflumilast for asthma: Efficacy findings in mechanism of action studies.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy profile of roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor used for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), is well known. In asthma treatment, much less is understood about the role of roflumilast, particularly its mechanism of action and potential bronchodilatory effects. AIM: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and mechanism of action of roflumilast in patients with asthma using data from eight placebo-controlled, double-blind phase I-III studies. METHODS: The studies were conducted at 14 sites in Europe, North America and South Africa from 1997 to 2005. The effect of treatment with 250 µg, 500 µg or 1000 µg roflumilast was compared with placebo in seven cross-over studies and one parallel-group study in 197 patients 18-70 years of age. Primary endpoints focused on the extent of the late allergic response after an allergen challenge, change in sputum cell eosinophil counts or exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Secondary endpoints included the extent of the early allergic response and measurements of tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα), sputum cells and inflammatory markers. RESULTS: Roflumilast attenuated allergen-induced bronchoconstriction (FEV1) in patients with asthma. Significant reductions in allergen-induced airway inflammation, including a reduction in both eosinophil and neutrophil counts were also observed and physiologic responses to allergen-induced challenge were confirmed by a significant reduction in TNFα. Side effects were similar to COPD, but did not include weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: The results from these studies indicate that the anti-inflammatory effects of roflumilast observed in COPD are also seen in asthma and advance our understanding of its mechanism of action. All studies were funded by Takeda. Trial registration numbers available on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01365533.

Bronchodilatory effects of aclidinium bromide, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, in COPD patients.

BACKGROUND: Aclidinium bromide is a novel, long-acting, inhaled muscarinic antagonist bronchodilator currently in Phase III clinical development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study evaluated the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of ascending doses of aclidinium bromide in patients with COPD. METHODS: This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted in patients with moderate to severe COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV(1)] <65% predicted). Patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment sequences of aclidinium bromide 100, 300, 900microg and placebo with a washout period between doses. The primary outcome was area under the FEV(1) curve over the 0-24h time interval. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with COPD were studied. Mean FEV(1) over 24h was 1.583L for placebo, and 1.727L, 1.793L and 1.815L for aclidinium bromide 100, 300 and 900microg, respectively (p<0.001 vs. placebo, all doses). Significant changes from baseline in FEV(1) were detected 15min post-dose for aclidinium bromide 300 and 900microg, with a peak effect 2h post-dose (all doses). Aclidinium bromide was undetected in plasma. The majority of adverse events was unrelated to study medication and did not result in discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Aclidinium bromide 100-900microg produced sustained bronchodilation over 24h in patients with COPD.

Similar efficacy of ciclesonide versus prednisolone to treat asthma worsening after steroid tapering.

RATIONALE: Oral corticosteroids effectively treat asthma exacerbations but are associated with well-described side effects. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of a high dose of an inhaled corticosteroid with oral prednisolone in patients with worsening of their asthma after medication withdrawal. METHODS: Patients tapered off their inhaled corticosteroids until they reached predefined criteria of "worsening asthma". Randomized patients (n=130) were treated double blind with either ciclesonide 800mug twice daily (starting with 800mug hourly for 3h after randomization) or prednisolone 40mg once daily for 2 weeks. Spirometry, daily asthma symptoms, morning and evening peak expiratory flow and blood parameters were assessed in all, methacholine challenge and inflammatory measures were determined in induced sputum in a subset of patients. RESULTS: Ciclesonide was as effective as prednisolone in improving forced expiratory flow in 1s, morning peak expiratory flow and symptoms, the latter improving more rapidly with ciclesonide. No differences were found in methacholine responsiveness or inflammatory measures in sputum or blood. Ciclesonide caused significantly less reduction in morning plasma cortisol levels (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study shows that inhaled ciclesonide (800mug twice daily) has comparable efficacy to oral prednisolone (40mg once daily) to regain asthma control in patients with asthma worsening. The more rapid onset and smaller effect on cortisol suppression suggest a better safety profile of ciclesonide.

[New pharmacological options in the therapy of COPD]. / Neue pharmakologische Ansätze in der Therapie der COPD.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible, mostly progressive and associated with an abnormal inflammatory reaction. The course of this pulmonary disease is influenced by systemic inflammation and comorbidities. COPD is caused by inhaled gases and particles and therefore avoidance of inhalative smoking results in symptomatic relief and improvement of the course of the disease. Modulation of the characteristic pulmonary inflammation, which is present in airways, parenchyma and pulmonary vasculature is targeted by a variety of novel pharmacological approaches. Systemic inflammation associating COPD should also be influenced to improve the disease. Assessment of the benefits of these approaches is difficult since FEV (1.0) as the most popular marker to describe the functional severity of COPD does not always reflect the benefits of the novel therapeutic strategies. Therefore new therapeutic modalities must be paralleled by the development of new clinical relevant targets.

Indacaterol, a novel inhaled beta2-agonist, provides sustained 24-h bronchodilation in asthma.

The present study examined the bronchodilator and safety profiles of single-dose indacaterol in intermittent or persistent asthma. In the present double-blind crossover study, 42 patients were randomised to receive single doses of indacaterol (50, 100, 200 and 400 microg) or placebo via a hydrofluoroalkane pressurised metered-dose inhaler. The primary efficacy comparisons were the per cent changes in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1 )) between indacaterol and placebo 30 min and 21 h post-dose. All doses resulted in prolonged bronchodilation, with indacaterol 200 and 400 microg meeting pre-specified efficacy criteria. The mean percentage increases in FEV(1) from placebo with indacaterol 200 and 400 microg were 7.6 and 14.9%, respectively, at 30 min, and 7.5 and 10.4%, respectively, at 21 h post-dose. At these doses, changes in mean FEV(1) relative to placebo were statistically significant from 5 min to 25 h, inclusive. At 5 min, the geometric least squares mean values for FEV(1) were 3.08 and 3.22 L for the 200 and 400 microg doses, respectively, compared with 2.99 L for placebo. At 24 h after dosing, the baseline-adjusted geometric least square mean FEV(1) was 3.13, 3.11, 3.24 and 3.30 L for indacaterol 50, 100, 200 and 400 microg, respectively, and 2.98 L for placebo. All treatments were well tolerated. Once-daily indacaterol at doses of 200 and 400 microg provided sustained 24-h bronchodilation, with a rapid onset and a good tolerability and safety profile.

Direct measurement of BDP and 17-BMP in bronchial and peripheral lung tissue after inhalation of HFA- vs CFC-driven aerosols.

Indirect assessments have shown a superior lung deposition of HFA-BDP (Ventolair/Qvar) compared to CFC-BDP (Aerobec). The aim of this study was to assess the concentrations of BDP and its metabolite 17-BMP in airways and peripheral tissue from resected lung specimens after inhalation of these BDP formulations. Immediately prior to surgery for lung cancer, 10 patients inhaled 1000 microg of either CFC-BDP (n = 5) or HFA-BDP (n = 5) Mouthwash was collected after inhalation, and serum before, during, and after surgery. There was no significant difference between CFC and HFA in the concentration of 17-BMP in bronchi (median, 4365 vs 4121 pg/g tissue). After CFC, concentrations of 17-BMP were lower in peripheral tissue (1424 vs 2089 pg/g; ANCOVA, p = 0.001) and in serum taken immediately after inhalation (688 vs 1219 pg/ml, p < 0.01). Furthermore, the CFC group showed a higher concentration of BDP in the mouthwash (17,660 vs 1320 ng/ml, p < 0.05), but the concentration of 17-BMP was lower (452 vs 1028 ng/ml, n.s.). These findings indicate a predominantly peripheral deposition of HFA-BDP, in line with previous data. They also provide evidence for a faster uptake and metabolism of HFA-BDP, probably because BDP is dissolved in HFA and has a smaller particle size distribution than the CFC suspensions.

Montelukast attenuates the airway response to hypertonic saline in moderate-to-severe COPD.

This study assessed the effect of the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast on hypertonic saline-induced airway obstruction. A total of 29 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), 42+/-4% predicted) received either 10 mg montelukast and 3 h later placebo via metered-dose inhaler (MDI) (M), or placebo and 3 h later 200 microg salbutamol (S), or two doses of placebo (P), in a randomised order. Patients inhaled salbutamol 1 h after MDI and the challenge was performed 15 min later (3% saline, 5 min). Data are given as per cent changes versus baseline. Compared to P, S caused significant bronchodilation in FEV1 (7.3%) and forced inspiratory volume in one second (FIV1) (4.5%), and M in FIV1 (1.5%). The saline-induced fall in FEV1 was lower after M (-5.8%), compared with S (-10.3%) and P (-13.1%). FEV1 (11.3%) and FIV1 (7.6%) was improved over baseline after recovery by M but not P and S. Recovery times regarding FEV1 (8.5 min) and FIV1 (15.2 min) were shortest after M, respective values for S being 16.8 and 20.4 min, and for P 15.9 and 21.2 min. Effects were strongest in patients with low baseline FEV1 and/or inhaled corticosteroids. Data from this study indicate beneficial effects of montelukast on hypertonic saline-induced airway responses in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, particularly those with severe disease. The major effect was an accelerated recovery leading to values above baseline.

Reproducibility of forced inspiratory and expiratory volumes after bronchodilation in patients with COPD or asthma.

The aim of the present study was to assess the reproducibility of changes in forced inspiratory volumes after bronchodilator inhalation. Thirteen patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (FEV1, 32-75%pred) and 10 patients with asthma (FEV1, 43-75%pred) inhaled either 200 microg fenoterol or 200 microg oxitropium bromide or placebo, each of them on three occasions, on nine different days in a randomised, cross-over, double-blind fashion. Forced expiratory (FEV1) and inspiratory (FIV1) volumes were measured before and 30 min after inhalation. In patients with COPD, the increase in FEV1 (coefficient of variation) was 221 ml (43%) after fenoterol and 235 ml (33%) after oxitropium; changes in FIV1 were 301 ml (45%) and 360 ml (29%). In patients with asthma, FEV1 improved by 618 ml (26%) and 482 ml (25%), FIV1 by 553 ml (41%) and 475 ml (23%). In less severe COPD or asthma, the reduction in dyspnoea was associated with the improvements in both FIV1 and FEV1, but in severe COPD with the improvement in FIV1 only. The data demonstrate that, at least in terms of relative changes, the reproducibility of bronchodilator responses in terms of FIV1 is similar to that of FEV1 and they underline the assertion of FIV1 being a sensible parameter particularly in severe COPD.

Montelukast versus fluticasone: effects on lung function, airway responsiveness and inflammation in moderate asthma.

Whether leukotriene receptor antagonists exhibit adequate anti-inflammatory effects in the treatment of asthma is still a controversial issue. The aim of the present study was to perform a direct comparison of the effects of a 4-week treatment with either montelukast (10 mg, once a day) or low-dose inhaled fluticasone (100 microg b.i.d.) on functional and inflammatory parameters in steroid-naïve patients with moderate asthma. Forty patients (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), 60-80% predicted) were studied in a double-blind, randomised, crossover design. Treatment periods were separated by 3-8 weeks of washout. At the beginning and end of each period, FEV1, airway responsiveness to inhaled methacholine (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20)), the level of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and sputum differential cell counts were determined. Only short-acting beta2-agonists were allowed for relief of symptoms. FEV1 increased by 0.50+/-0.07 L (mean+/-SEM) after fluticasone and by 0.37+/-0.07 L after montelukast (p<0.001, each), and PC20 by 1.33+/-0.13 (p<0.001) and 0.15+/-0.17 (NS) doubling doses, respectively. Correspondingly, percentages of sputum eosinophils were reduced by factor 2.7 (p<0.01) and 1.4 (nonsignificant (NS)), and the levels of exhaled NO (at 50 mL x s(-1)) by factor 2.1 (p<0.01) and 1.1 (NS). These data indicate a comparable bronchodilator action of montelukast and fluticasone in patients with moderate asthma, but additional attenuation of airway inflammation by fluticasone as detectable through noninvasive methods.

Dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids under concomitant medication with montelukast in patients with asthma.

The present study aimed at comparing the effects of a dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids on lung function, indirect measures of airway inflammation and clinical scores during treatment with a leucotriene receptor antagonist. In 50 patients (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 94% predicted), steroid doses (800 microg beclomethasone dipropionate) were first reduced to 50% and then to 25%, for 6 weeks each. One group received a placebo and the other group received montelukast (10 mg). The first reduction did not cause significant effects. During the second, FEV1 and peak expiratory flow decreased in both groups (p<0.001). Daytime symptoms were not altered with placebo but were reduced by montelukast (p<0.05). Night-time symptoms were slightly elevated with placebo (p<0.05) but not montelukast, as well as the use of supplemental salbutamol. Changes in provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20), sputum eosinophils and exhaled nitric oxide were mostly nonsignificant for both placebo and montelukast. These data demonstrate that a 75% reduction in the dose of steroid given to patients with asthma led to a deterioration in lung function not prevented by montelukast, whereas changes in clinical state seemed to favour montelukast treatment. It therefore appears that potential effects of montelukast, in the presence of low-dose steroids, could not be attributed to single indices of lung function or airway inflammation.

The relationship between airway hyper-responsiveness, markers of inflammation and lung function depends on the duration of the asthmatic disease.

BACKGROUND: The combination of airway hyper-responsiveness, eosinophilic airway inflammation, and lung function impairment is considered as a hallmark of bronchial asthma. Since airway function might change with time in chronic asthma, the association between parameters which are characteristic of asthma could be different in subjects with different durations of the disease. OBJECTIVE: We assessed whether in patients with asthma the relationship between airway hyperresponsiveness, non-invasive markers of airway inflammation, and baseline lung function depended on the duration of the disease. METHODS: Sixty-six non-smoking patients with mild to moderate allergic asthma without corticosteroids were assigned to two groups, according to a duration of the disease (time interval since doctor's diagnosis) of either < or = 16 years (median 8 years; mean FEV1, 92.6% pred.; n = 34) or > 16 year (median 25 years; mean FEV1, 87.9% pred.; n = 32). RESULTS: Groups did not differ statistically in PC20FEV1 of methacholine, sputum composition, levels of exhaled nitric oxide (NO), lung function parameters, or history of treatment. There were significant correlations between PC20FEV1, eosinophils and NO in patients with a duration of the disease < or = 16 year, but no relation to lung function. In contrast, patients with a duration > 16 year showed a correlation between PC20FEV1 of methacholine and lung function but not eosinophils or NO. In both groups, eosinophils and NO were associated with each other. These results were corroborated by the statistical procedure of factor analysis that revealed 'inflammation' and 'lung function' as major entities and found 'responsiveness' to be associated with only one of them in each group. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that with a shorter duration of the asthmatic disease airway hyper-responsiveness is associated with airway inflammation, whereas with a longer duration it is associated with impaired lung function, suggesting that in chronic asthma ongoing alterations become the primary determinant of functional characteristics.

Effect of inhaled ciclesonide on airway responsiveness to inhaled AMP, the composition of induced sputum and exhaled nitric oxide in patients with mild asthma.

To assess the efficacy of ciclesonide, a novel corticosteroid pro-drug, we compared its effect on lung function, airway responsiveness to inhaled AMP, the composition of induced sputum, and the level of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) with the effect of budesonide in patients with asthma. Fifteen non-smoking steroid-naive patients (mean FEV(1), 94%pred) inhaled either 400 microg ciclesonide or 400 microg budesonide as a single morning dose for two weeks each separated by a > or =3 week wash-out period. The study was performed in a double-observer, randomized, cross-over design. FEV(1)increased significantly during treatment with budesonide (3.38 vs. 3.64 l P=0,003), but not after ciclesonide (3.60 vs. 3.69 l). PC(20)FEV(1)of AMP increased (P<0,001, each) after both budesonide (4.59 vs. 32.48 mg/ml, 2.8 doubling doses) and ciclesonide (3.92 vs. 20.00 mg/ml, 2.4 doubling doses). The percentage of sputum eosinophils was significantly reduced after ciclesonide (7.9 vs. 3.4% P=0.01), but not budesonide (6.0 vs. 4.3%). After both budesonide and ciclesonide, a significant (P<0.001) reduction in the level of exhaled NO occurred. In none of the parameters studied, the changes differed significantly between treatment with budesonide or ciclesonide. These data suggest that ciclesonide is equi-effective to budesonide with regard to its potency to reduce the airway responsiveness to inhaled AMP as well as airway inflammation in patients with mild asthma.

In patients with chronic bronchitis a four week trial with inhaled steroids does not attenuate airway inflammation.

Systemic corticosteroids have been recommended as a therapeutic option in patients with moderate to severe COPD. In an early stage of the disease, i.e. chronic bronchitis with mild or no airflow obstruction, a trial with inhaled steroids could reveal potential benefits, particularly in terms of a modulation of airway inflammation. We therefore investigated the effect of inhaled fluticasone (1000 microg day(-1)) on markers of airway inflammation in 19 patients with chronic bronchitis (mean+/-SEM FEV1, 83.4+/-3.0% predicted; FEV1/VC, 67.5+/-2.4%) in a double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled manner. Visits were performed before and after two 4-week treatment periods. separated by a 4-week washout period. Lung function, the concentration of exhaled nitric oxide, differential cell counts in induced sputum and the number of cells positive for iNOS, as well as the levels of LDH, ECP, neutrophil elastase and IL-8 in sputum supernatants were determined. Although the total cell number decreased significantly after fluticasone (geometric mean 12.3 vs. 7.7 x 10(6)/ml; P<0.05) it was not significantly different from the change observed after placebo (14.2 vs. 10.6 x 10(6)/ml; n.s.). None of the other parameters showed statistically significant changes after fluticasone or placebo and the results did not depend on the presence of airway hyperresponsiveness. We conclude that in patients with chronic bronchitis short-term treatment with inhaled corticosterids did not improve lung function or inflammatory parameters to an extent which was statistically significant as compared to spontaneous variability.

Combined inhalation of nitric oxide and oxygen in patients with moderate to severe COPD: effect on blood gases.

Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) has been reported to improve oxygenation in patients with COPD if administered in combination with oxygen (O2). Little, however, is known about the variability of these effects and the potential influence of body position. Twenty-six spontaneously breathing patients with moderate to severe COPD inhaled clean air, O2(FiO2, 0.29), 5 ppm NO, 5 ppm NO+O2, 10 ppm NO+O2, 10 ppm NO, and again clean air in an upright position. Blood gas analysis from arterialized capillary blood was performed after each inhalation. Tests were repeated on different days to assess the variability of the response. Furthermore, eight patients were studied in both upright and supine position while inhaling 5 ppm NO in the presence or absence supplemental O2. As compared to clean air, NO led to a mean decrease in PaO2 of -0.9 mmHg at 5 ppm and of -2.8 mmHg at 10 ppm NO. Similarly, NO+O2 led to a dose-dependent fall in PaO2 of -1.8 and -3.6 mmHg, respectively, as compared to O2. Average within-subject variation (SD) of the effects elicited by 5 and 10 ppm NO was 2.4 and 2.3 mmHg without additional O2, and 4.7and 5.3 mmHg with O2. The effects of 5 ppm NO+O2 differed significantly between upright and supine position; as compared to O2 alone, mean (SD) changes were -3.7 +/- 5-8 vs. +1.1 +/- 4.9 mmHg, respectively. Our findings suggest thatthe addition of NO to inhaled oxygen, when given in an upright position, does not lead to an improvement of PaO2 in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Furthermore, it turned out that it was not possible to define responders and non-responders to inhaled NO on an individual basis, since the variability ofthe responses was similar to the mean

Assessment of accuracy and applicability of a new electronic peak flow meter and asthma monitor.

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and applicability of a portable electronic peak flow meter combined with an asthma monitor (AM1, Jaeger, Germany) which measures peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC). The technical accuracy in PEF, FEV1 and FVC measurement was tested according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria for monitoring devices using a flow generator. In addition, the effect of connecting a heated screen pneumotachograph (PT) to the AM1 was determined and the accuracy in FEV1 determinations was evaluated by simultaneous measurements in 49 normal volunteers. The devices tested fulfilled all ATS criteria for monitoring devices with respect to the accuracy of PEF, FEV1, and FVC measurements. The conditions of intra- and interdevice variability were satisfied in all cases. Compared with the PT, the AM1 showed about 4% lower values in FEV1, as measured in the 49 subjects. In conclusion, the electronic peak flow meter and asthma monitor AM1 yielded valid measurements of peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in one second, which matched the accuracy criteria of the American Thoracic Society standards for monitoring devices.