Survival Predictors Before Preoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Radical resection after preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAESCC), but its outcome remains unsatisfactory. In order to develop a personalized treatment program for LAES, we herein compared the survival prediction utility of five pre-NAC nutritional, inflammatory, and immune indexes in patients with LAESCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the survival of 203 patients with LAESCC who underwent radical resection after NAC from January 2011 to September 2019 for the following representative pre-NAC nutritional, inflammatory, and immune indices: modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, Prognostic Nutritional Index, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, serum neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI) were evaluated for their impact on survival. RESULTS: Of the five indices, GNRI was the best predictor of survival as determined by the area under the curve (p<0.05). When patients were divided into three groups according to the nutritional risk assessment of Bouillanne et al. using the pre-NAC GNRI, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were significantly stratified (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, the GNRI independently identified a poor OS group [group 1: hazard ratio (HR)=2.598, p=0.002; group 2: HR=6.257, p<0.001] and a high recurrence risk group (group 1: HR=1.967, p=0.016; group 2: HR=4.467, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with LAESCC, GNRI may be the most accurate, reliable, and useful prognostic factor among the five major systemic inflammatory and nutritional indices.

The clinical impacts of the prognostic nutritional index for the esophageal cancer patients who received curative treatment.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) on esophageal cancer survival and recurrence after curative treatment. METHODS: This study included 120 patients who underwent curative surgery followed by the adjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer between 2008 and 2018. The risk factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified. RESULTS: The PNI of 49 was regarded to be the optimal critical point of classification considering the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rate. The OS rates at three and five years after surgery were 47.4% and 36.0% in the PNI low group, respectively, and 62.5% and 56.5% in the PNI high group, which amounted to a statistically significant difference (P = 0.020). The RFS rates at three and five years after surgery were 31.0% and 24.8% in the PNI low group, respectively, and 50.9% and 42.8% in the PNI high group, which amounted to a statistically significant difference (P = 0.020). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the PNI was a significant independent risk factor for the OS and a marginally significant independent risk factor forRFS. CONCLUSION: The PNI was a risk factor for survival in patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer. It is necessary to develop the effective plan of the perioperative care and the surgical strategy according to the PNI.

Intraoperative Blood Loss Impacts Recurrence and Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Intraoperative blood loss (IBL) has been reported to decrease survival after surgical resection of some malignancies; however, there are few reports on the effects of IBL on recurrence and survival in locally advanced esophageal cancer. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between IBL and postoperative recurrence and overall survival in patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and ninety-eight patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who underwent preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and curative resection as standard treatment were included in this study. Based on a defined cut-off value for IBL, 27 and 171 patients were classified into the high and low IBL groups, respectively. The relationship between each group and clinicopathological factors, postoperative recurrence, and overall survival were investigated. RESULTS: In terms of the relationship between IBL and clinicopathological factors, the high IBL group had significantly more patients with pathological T4, longer operative time, and higher incidence of postoperative complications than the low IBL group. Both recurrence-free and overall survival were significantly worse in the high IBL group than in the low IBL group. Furthermore, multivariate analysis identified high IBL as an independent factor for predicting poor reference free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Heavy IBL in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer may be a useful predictor of postoperative recurrence and overall survival.

Adverse Events in Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated With Nivolumab in Combination With Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: When nivolumab is administered as second-line therapy for esophageal cancer, radiotherapy may also be provided in cases either concurrently or sequentially. The aim of this study was to retrospectively examine whether the incidence of adverse events increases in such cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two esophageal cancer patients [17 males and 5 females; mean age 71 years (range=58-87 years)] treated with nivolumab were included. Patients were divided into two treatment groups: nivolumab alone (N group) (12 patients) and nivolumab combined with radiotherapy (R group) (10 patients). All patients had squamous cell carcinoma. The primary outcomes measured were the severity and frequency of adverse events. RESULTS: Adverse events were seen in 6 of the 12 patients in the N group and 8 of the 10 in the R group. There were significantly more adverse events in the R group (p=0.035), but no difference in Grade 3 or higher adverse events (p=0.781), indicating that the adverse events were controllable. There was no significant difference in treatment effect between the N and R groups. CONCLUSION: In this report, 50% of adverse events in the N group were grade 3-4, 25% of which were grade 4, as seen in previous reports. In the present study, the side effects were not enhanced by treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus radiotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus radiation therapy would be a relatively safe treatment and may become an option for esophageal cancer treatment in the future.

Can Clinical Stage in the 8th Edition of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM Classification Stratify the Prognosis of Patients Undergoing Curative Surgery for Siewert Type II/III Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction?

BACKGROUND/AIM: Clinical staging in the eighth edition of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification (TNM8) is reported to predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. However, there have been no reports on using the TNM8 for prognostic stratification of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). This study aimed to investigate whether it was possible to stratify the prognosis of patients who underwent curative surgery for Siewert type II/III AEG according to the TNM8 clinical stage (cStage). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included patients with Siewert type II/III AEG who underwent curative surgery between 2000 and 2019 at Kanagawa Cancer Center. Those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We investigated the survival of patients with AEG of each TNM8 cStage. RESULTS: This study included 138 patients, among whom 102 (74%) had Siewert type II and 36 (26%) had Siewert type III AEG. A total of 50, 38, 43, and seven patients were classified with cStage I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The median duration of follow-up of the survivors was 54.7 months. The 5-year overall survival rate of the entire cohort was 65.8%, whereas for patients with cStage I, II, III and IV was 81.6%, 69.0%, 54.3% and 14.3%, respectively. The hazard ratio with reference to cStage I was 1.83, 3.07, and 8.13 for cStage I, III, and IV, respectively, increasing in a stepwise manner. CONCLUSION: TNM8 Clinical staging is able to stratify the prognosis of patients with Siewert type II/III AEG.

Clinical Effect of the C-Reactive Protein to Serum Albumin Ratio in Patients with Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Treated with Trifluridine/Tipiracil.

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an oral anticancer agent used as a third- or later-line treatment for patients with metastatic gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/GEJC). The C-reactive protein-to-serum albumin ratio (CAR) is an inflammation-based prognostic marker in gastric cancer. This retrospective study evaluated CAR's clinical significance as a prognostic factor in 64 patients with mGC/GEJC administered FTD/TPI as a third- or later-line therapy. Patients were categorized into high- and low-CAR groups based on pre-treatment blood data. This study evaluated associations between CAR and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), clinicopathological features, treatment efficacy, and adverse events. The high-CAR group had significantly worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, a higher prevalence of patients administered with a single course of FTD/TPI, and a higher rate of patients not administered chemotherapy after FTD/TPI therapy than the low-CAR group. Median OS and PFS were significantly poorer in the high-CAR group than in the low-CAR group (113 vs. 399 days; p < 0.001 and 39 vs. 112 days; p < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, high CAR was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. The overall response rate was not significantly different between the high- and low-CAR groups. Regarding adverse events, the high-CAR group had a significantly lower incidence of neutropenia and a higher incidence of fatigue than the low-CAR group. Therefore, CAR may be a potentially useful prognostic factor for patients with mGC/GEJC treated with FTD/TPI as third- or later-line chemotherapy.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Mucinous Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Mucinous gastric carcinoma (MGC) has a poor prognosis. Due to the differences in clinicopathology factors between MGC and non-MGC (NMGC), it is difficult to compare them. In this study, we compared the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of MGC and NMGC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For gastric carcinoma (GC), 3,042 gastrectomy patients were included in the study and divided into the MGC (n=86) and NMGC (n=2,956) groups. The characteristics and prognoses of patients in both groups were compared before and after (both groups, n=86) propensity score matching. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in the tumor location (upper) (MGC group: 28.0% vs. NMGC group: 24.7%, p=0.003), tumor diameter (median) [65 mm (8-200 mm) vs. 40 mm (2-75 mm), p<0.001], lymph node metastasis (70.9% vs. 37.3%, p<0.001), venous invasion (57.0% vs. 40.4%, p<0.001), and lymphatic invasion (62.8% vs. 34.9%, p<0.001) before propensity score matching. The 5-year overall survival (OS) (70.9% vs. 76.2%, p=0.006) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (75.5% vs. 82.4%, p=0.014) rates were significantly lower in the MGC group. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in either the 5-year OS (70.9% vs. 73.7%, p=0.230) or CSS (75.5% vs. 75.7%, p=0.587) rates. In addition, no substantial difference was observed in either of the recurrence forms. CONCLUSION: MGC is rare and usually diagnosed at a more advanced stage. However, MGC and NMGC have similar prognoses.

Clinical Significance of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio/Serum Albumin Ratio in Patients With Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Administered Trifluridine/Tipiracil.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an anticancer-agent that is administered as third-line or later chemotherapy for metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/GEJC). Although inflammatory and nutritional statuses have attracted attention as prognostic factors for patients with mGC/GEJC in this therapy, their usefulness has not been fully clarified. Thus, this study investigated the clinical significance of prognostic nutritional index (PNI), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and NLR/serum albumin (Alb) ratio in patients administered FTD/TPI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 64 patients who underwent FTD/TPI treatment for mGC/GEJC at Kanagawa Cancer Center, Kanagawa, Japan, between October 2019 and June 2022. Patients were divided into high and low PNI, NLR, and NLR/Alb groups according to their pretreatment blood data. This study evaluated the associations between the inflammatory and nutritional indexes and survivals. RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with low PNI were significantly poorer than those with high PNI. However, low PNI was not an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. There was no significant association between NLR and OS or PFS. In contrast, the OS of patients with high NLR/Alb was significantly poorer than those with high PNI and low NLR/Alb. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that high NLR/Alb was an independent prognostic factor for OS. CONCLUSION: The NLR/Alb may be a useful prognostic factor in patients with mGC/GEJC being administered FTD/TPI as third-line or later chemotherapy.

Clinical Course of Vitamin B12 Deficiency and Associated Risk Factors in Patients After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Patients are at-risk for vitamin B12 deficiency after total gastrectomy due to a lack of intrinsic factors. The aim of the study was to clarify the clinical course and risk factors for vitamin B12 deficiency after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer were selected from the medical records of the Yokohama City University from 2000 to 2020. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for vitamin B12 deficiency. RESULTS: We evaluated 47 patients. The median serum vitamin B12 levels before surgery were 359 pg/ml, while those at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery these were 255 pg/ml, 197.5 pg/ml, 195 pg/ml, and 206 pg/ml, respectively. Univariate analyses to identify factors associated with vitamin B12 deficiency at 6 months after surgery showed that the occurrence of postoperative complications was a significant risk factor (OR=6.347, 95%CI=1.607-25.774, p=0.009), while adjuvant chemotherapy was a marginally significantly risk factor (OR=3.562, 95%CI=0.877-14.477, p=0.076). CONCLUSION: Almost half of the patients were diagnosed with vitamin B12 deficiency at 6 months after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. In addition, the occurrence of postoperative complications and adjuvant chemotherapy were risk factors for vitamin B12 deficiency at 6 months after surgery.

Clinical Significance of the Prealbumin Level in Gastric Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the clinical influence of the prealbumin level on the gastric cancer survival and recurrence after curative treatment. METHODS: This study included 447 patients who underwent curative treatment for gastric cancer between 2013 and 2017. The risk factors for the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified. RESULTS: A prealbumin level of 20 mg/dl was regarded as the optimal point of classification, considering the 3- and 5-year survival rates. The OS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were 80.7% and 65.0% in the low-prealbumin group, respectively, and 93.1% and 87.9% in the high-prealbumin group, respectively, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). The RFS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were 71.7% and 68.0% in the low-prealbumin group, respectively, and 90.1% and 84.7% in the high-prealbumin group, respectively, a statistically significant difference (p = 0.031). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the prealbumin level was a significant independent risk factor for the OS and RFS. In addition, the rate of introduction of adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly lower and the frequency of peritoneal recurrence and lymph node recurrence significantly higher in the low-prealbumin group than in the high-prealbumin group. CONCLUSION: Prealbumin is a risk factor for the survival in patients who undergo curative treatment for gastric cancer. It is necessary to develop an effective plan of perioperative care and surgical strategy according to the prealbumin level.

The Comparison of the Dietary Intake Loss Between Elderly and Non-Elderly Patients After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The present study quantified the changes in the dietary and nutritional intake after gastrectomy between elderly and non-elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients ≥ 75 years old were classified into the elderly group, and 127 patients < 75 years old were classified into the non-elderly group. The respective median % dietary intake losses at 1 and 3 months postoperatively were -12.4% and -5.3% in the elderly group and -8.3% and -2.8% in the non-elderly group (p = 0.075 and 0.080). On comparing the intake loss of three major nutrients, the respective median % lipid intake losses at 1 and 3 months postoperatively were -13.5% and -5.8% in the elderly group and -7.3% and 0% in the non-elderly group (p = 0.029 and 0.045). CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that elderly patients experienced more serious lipid intake loss after gastrectomy than non-elderly patients.

Prognostic Value of the Perioperative Systemic Inflammation Score for Patients With Curatively Resected Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The systemic inflammation score (SIS) is a promising tool for the evaluation of prognosis. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of the preoperative SIS status in gastric cancer (GC) patients who underwent curative resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 258 patients with primary gastric cancer who received curative treatment at Yokohama City University. The SIS was evaluated before surgery as determined by the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (cut-off value=4.44) and serum albumin level (cut-off value=4.0 g/dl). RESULTS: A high SIS was identified as an independent predictor of overall survival [hazard ratio (HR)=1.784, p<0.05] and multivariate analysis showed marginal significance for recurrence-free survival (HR=1.710, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The preoperative SIS score was correlated with both the OS and RFS of GC patients, as well as the clinical course of adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, the SIS score is a promising prognostic factor for GC.

The Clinical Impact of Other Primary Cancer in Patients Who Received Curative Treatment for Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The present study evaluated the clinical impact of other metachronous or synchronous primary cancer (OPC) in patients who received curative treatment for esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study included 168 patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2018. Prognosis and differences between the OPC status (metachronous/synchronous) and clinic pathological parameters was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients were included in this study. Forty patients were diagnosed with metachronous/synchronous OPC. When comparing the clinicopathological factors between the patients with and without OPC, the patients' background and postoperative clinical courses were very similar between the two groups. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates in patients with esophageal cancer with OPC were 66.0% and 54.5%, respectively, while those in patients without OPC were 50.1% and 41.4%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in these rates (p=0.156). The OPC status was not included in the final multivariate analysis model. CONCLUSION: The OPC status was not found to be a prognostic factor for patients who received curative treatment for esophageal cancer. Therefore, it is not necessary to avoid performing curative treatment for esophageal cancer because of a patient's OPC status.

[A Case of Curative Surgery for Locally Advanced Small Bowel GIST after Imatinib Therapy].

According to the risk classification of recurrence, the standard treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST)is complete surgical resection and postoperative adjuvant therapy with imatinib; however, the usefulness of neoadjuvant therapy is unclear. We report a case of giant GIST in the pelvis suspectedly having bladder infiltration that was radically resected and underwent preoperative imatinib therapy. A 52-year-old man visited a clinic because of abdominal pain, fever, and frequent urination. An abdominal mass was determined, and the patient was referred to our hospital for detailed examination and treatment. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed a 17 cm diameter irregular mass from the lower navel to the pelvis, and the bladder boundary was partially unclear. Transrectal biopsy was performed using endoscopic ultrasonography, and according to the Fletcher classification, a high-risk GIST was diagnosed. After preoperative imatinib therapy of 400 mg/day was administered for 3 months, surgery was performed. The tumor was strongly adhered to the bladder, but no invasion was observed, and partial small intestine resection was performed. The surgical margin was negative without capsule damage. On day 34 postoperatively, imatinib therapy was resumed, and as of 1 year postoperatively, the course is well without recurrence.

Laparoscopic-assisted surgery versus open surgery for transverse colon cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

Introduction: Previous randomized controlled trials demonstrated similar oncological outcomes between laparoscopic-assisted (LA) and open (OP) colectomy; however, patients with transverse colon cancer were not analyzed. The aim of this study was to confirm the oncological safety and the advantages of the short- and long-term results of LA surgery for transverse colon cancer in comparison to OP surgery. Materials and Methods: The study data were retrospectively collected from the databases of four hospitals. Patients with transverse colon cancer who underwent LA or OP R0 or R1 resection were registered. Results: Among the 204 patients, 149 underwent OP colectomy and 55 underwent LA colectomy. The median follow-up period was 43 months. The rate of conversion to OP resection was 7.3%. The 5-year overall survival rate of the LA group was higher than that of the OP surgery group for all-stage patients (97.5% vs. 91.1%, P = 0.108), and it was similar in Stage II and Stage III patients (94.1% vs. 94.2%, P = 0.510). The LA group had significantly lower blood loss and a significantly longer operative time in comparison to the OP surgery group. Furthermore, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (9 vs. 13 days, P = 0.001) and the incidence of Grade ≥III complications was lower in the LA group (3.7% vs. 14.8%, P = 0.031). Conclusion: We concluded that LA surgery for transverse colon cancer is oncologically safe and yields better short-term results in comparison to OP surgery.

Clinical Significance of Mean Corpuscular Volume in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To clarify the clinical significance of measuring the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) of red blood cells before applying neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who will receive NAC followed by curative resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 169 eligible patients at the Kanagawa Cancer Center between 2011-2018. The patients were divided into high and low-MCV groups. The cutoff value of the MCV was determined by the maximum χ2 statistic value on the log-rank test and was set at 92.8 fl. Clinicopathological features and outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant association between the MCV and clinicopathological features. Both five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the high-MCV group were significantly poorer than those in the low-MCV group (RFS, p=0.026; OS, p=0.006). On multivariate analysis, a high-MCV was an independent predictive survival factor for RFS [hazard ratio (HR)=1.728; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.033-2.891; p=0.037] and OS (HR=1.836; 95%CI=1.002-3.365; p=0.049). CONCLUSION: Measurement of the MCV before NAC may be a useful prognostic biomarker in patients with locally advanced ESCC who will receive NAC followed by curative resection.

The Clinical Impact of Synchronous and Metachronous Other Primary Cancer in Gastric Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The present study evaluated the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of gastric cancer (GC) patients with synchronous and metachronous other primary cancer who received curative treatment for GC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 244 patients who underwent curative treatment for GC between 2005 and 2018. The risk factors for the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients were included in this study. Among them, 58 patients were diagnosed with synchronous and metachronous other primary cancer. When comparing the patient background characteristics and clinical course between GC patients without and with synchronous and metachronous other primary cancer, the background, postoperative surgical complications, and details of adjuvant treatment were similar between the two groups. The 3- and 5-year OS rates in GC patients with synchronous and metachronous other primary cancer were 69.7% and 48.0%, respectively, while those in patients without synchronous and metachronous other primary cancer were 80.6% and 74.3%, respectively, showing a statistically significant difference (p<0.001) The synchronous and metachronous other primary cancer status was included in the final multivariate analysis model (hazard ratio=2.201; 95% confidence interval=1.229-3.942; p=0.008). CONCLUSION: Synchronous and metachronous other primary cancer status is a prognostic factor in GC patients. Therefore, synchronous and metachronous other primary cancer patients need both other primary cancer and GC follow-up to improve their survival.

Clinical Impact of Surgical Sarcopenia on Long-term Survival.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Preoperative sarcopenia is associated with various cancers and affects the long-term prognosis of patients. After gastrectomy for gastric cancer, dynamic changes in body composition occur, and sarcopenia becomes more apparent after surgery than before surgery. However, the relationship between sarcopenia in the early postoperative period and long-term survival is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of surgical sarcopenia on long-term outcomes of patents with gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 408 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy (distal or total gastrectomy) for gastric cancer at the Kanagawa Cancer Center from December 2013 to November 2017. Sarcopenia was defined using the skeletal muscle index (SMI), using computed tomography (CT) one month after gastrectomy. We compared the long-term outcomes between patients with and without sarcopenia. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 83.2% and 91.4% in the surgical and non-surgical sarcopenia groups, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) of surgical sarcopenia for OS was 2.410 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.321-4.396). In addition, surgical sarcopenia was associated with non-cancer-related deaths and deaths from other cancers. CONCLUSION: Patients with surgical sarcopenia after gastrectomy should be carefully monitored not only for gastric cancer recurrence but also for the occurrence of other diseases, including other cancers.

Feasibility and Safety of Oral Nutritional Supplementation with High-Density Liquid Diet After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Patients requiring total gastrectomy for gastric cancer experience a decrease in food intake leading to severe body weight loss after surgery. This loss may be prevented using a high-density liquid diet of high caloric content and minimal volume. This phase II study evaluated the feasibility and safety of a high-density liquid diet (UpLead®; Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) after total gastrectomy. METHODS: UpLead® (1 pack, 100 mL, 400 kcal/day) was administered after surgery for 28 days. The primary endpoint was the % relative dose intensity of 28 days of UpLead intake®. The secondary endpoint was % body weight loss at 1 and 3 months after surgery. The sample size was 35 considering expected and threshold values of 80 and 60%, respectively, with a one-sided alpha error of 10% and statistical power of 80%. RESULTS: Among 35 patients enrolled before surgery between April 2018 and December 2019, 29 patients who could initiate UpLead® after surgery were analyzed. Seven patients had interrupted UpLead® intake due to taste intolerance (n = 6) and due to a duodenal stump fistula (n = 1). The remaining 22 patients completed 28 days of UpLead® intake, including temporary interruption, with no associated adverse events. The median relative dose intensity was 25.8% (95% confidence interval: 20.6-42.0%). The median body weight loss at 1 and 3 months after surgery was 7.2% (range: 3.2-13.9%) and 13.1% (range: 2.5-20.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Oral nutritional supplementation with a high-density liquid diet (UpLead®) was safely administered but was not feasible after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Clinical trial registration number UMIN000032291.

Clinical Significance of EREG Gene Expression in Gastric Cancer Tissue After Curative Surgery.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Epiregulin (EREG) is a ligand of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and promotes tumour progression mainly by stimulating the EGF pathway. We investigated the clinical significance of EREG mRNA expression in cancer tissues from patients with gastric cancer (GC) in pathological (p) Stage II/III who have undergone curative surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Expression of EREG mRNA was measured in cancer tissues obtained from 253 patients with pStage II/III GC who underwent curative surgery. Patients were divided into groups based on high or low expression of EREG mRNA. We examined the relationship between EREG mRNA expression levels and clinicopathological features and survival. RESULTS: Clinicopathological features did not vary between the high and low EREG mRNA expression groups. Overall survival was significantly lower in the high-expression group compared to that in the low-expression group (5-year survival probability: 55.0% vs. 73.0%; p=0.005). Multivariate analysis showed EREG mRNA expression to be an independent predictor of poor survival (hazard ratio=1.794; 95% confidence interval=1.186-2.712; p=0.006). CONCLUSION: Expression of EREG mRNA in cancer tissue from patients with pStage II/III GC may be a useful prognostic marker after curative surgery.