Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Psychooncology ; 33(4): e6331, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38546209

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To broaden the currently limited reach of genomic innovations, research is needed to understand how psychosocial and cultural factors influence reactions to genetic testing in diverse subgroups. Cancer fatalism is important in cancer prevention and deserves theoretical and empirical attention in the context of genomics and behavior change. METHODS: The current study employed data from a randomized controlled trial (N = 593) offering skin cancer genetic testing (using the melanocortin-1 receptor [MC1R] gene) in primary care in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. We examined interrelations of cancer fatalism with demographics, general health beliefs, perceived risk, perceived control, sun protection and skin screening behaviors and cancer worry in the skin cancer context stratified across Hispanic versus non-Hispanic ethnicity, and examined cancer fatalism as a moderator of intervention effects on study primary outcomes, including 3-month sun protection, cancer worry and perceived risk. RESULTS: Cancer fatalism was significantly related to the perception of control over skin cancer risk behaviors (ps ≤ 0.01) and demographics (ethnicity, education, health literacy; ps < 0.05), but not consistently related to general health beliefs or risk perception. Cancer fatalism did not moderate intervention effects on primary outcomes, except those with higher cancer fatalism randomized to intervention had higher levels of 3-month cancer worry (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: These findings will guide future work considering the role of cancer fatalism in use of genomic technologies in the general population. This work anticipates strategies required to address cancer fatalism as translational genomics becomes more commonly available to diverse general population subgroups.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Neoplasias Cutáneas/psicología , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Pruebas Genéticas , Atención Primaria de Salud
2.
Public Health Genomics ; 22(1-2): 58-68, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31437847

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Translational research in genomics has limited reach and requires efforts to broaden access and utility in diverse populations. Skin cancer is common and rates are rising, including among Hispanics. Germline variants in the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) gene are common in the population and confer moderate risk for melanoma and basal cell cancers across skin types. Feedback about MC1R risk status may promote skin cancer risk awareness and risk reduction. AIMS: We examined the level of interest in pursuing MC1R testing, and patterns of interest across skin cancer perceived threat and control attitudes, cultural beliefs (family influence on health, health system distrust, cancer fatalism, skin cancer misconceptions), and health literacy. METHODS: We used a study website to inform primary care patients in Albuquerque, NM about the benefits and drawbacks of MC1R testing. Website logon, request of a saliva test kit, and return of the test kit (yes vs. no) were primary assessments of study interest and uptake. RESULTS: Of 499 participants provided with a test offer, 33% requested and returned the test. Lower family influence on participants' health was an important factor both overall and within ethnicity subgroups, and may indicate that primary care patients interested in skin cancer genetic testing see themselves as proactive health seekers, independent from family encouragement. Lower self-efficacy for skin cancer prevention was also an important characteristic of those who tested. CONCLUSION: As evidence for common genetic markers for skin cancer accumulates, these findings suggest characteristics of those most likely to pursue genetic testing for skin cancer risk.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Diversidad Cultural , Alfabetización en Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Melanoma , Psicología , Receptor de Melanocortina Tipo 1 , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Adulto , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/etnología , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , New Mexico/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Receptor de Melanocortina Tipo 1/análisis , Receptor de Melanocortina Tipo 1/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etnología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/psicología
3.
J Health Commun ; 21(sup2): 25-29, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27661793

RESUMEN

Poor understanding of gene-environment contributors to health conditions can lead the public to misinterpretations that overemphasize genetics as determinants of health. The present commentary calls for engaging the national community health worker (CHW) workforce to use community elicitation methods such as mental models approaches as a means to enhance the public's literacy regarding genetic and environmental or genomic contributions to health. We discuss three needs related to genomic literacy and suggest how CHWs are uniquely positioned to address these needs among diverse target audiences. We conclude by offering directions for the future of CHWs working to build genomic literacy.


Asunto(s)
Agentes Comunitarios de Salud , Genómica , Alfabetización en Salud , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Interacción Gen-Ambiente , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Recursos en Salud , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...