Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Orthopedics ; 39(1): e108-16, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26726984

RESUMEN

Pertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients represent a major health issue. The available surgical options are fixation with extramedullary devices, intramedullary nailing, and arthroplasty. Intramedullary nailing for hip fractures has become more popular in recent years. Advantages of intramedullary nailing for hip fracture fixation include a more efficient load transfer due to the proximity of the implant to the medial calcar, less implant strain and shorter lever arm because of its closer positioning to the mechanical axis of the femur, significantly less soft tissue disruption and periosteal stripping of the femoral cortex, shorter operative time and hospital stay, fewer blood transfusions, better postoperative walking ability, and lower rates of leg-length discrepancy. Compromise of the posteromedial cortex and/or the lateral cortex, a subtrochanteric extension of the fracture, and a reversed obliquity fracture pattern represent signs of fracture instability, warranting the use of intramedullary nailing. However, the use of intramedullary nailing, with its unique set of clinical implications, has introduced a new set of complications. The reported complications include malalignment, cutout, infection, false drilling, wrong lag screw length and drill bit breakage during the interlocking procedure, external or internal malrotation (≥20°) of the femoral diaphysis, elongation of the femur (2 cm), impaired bone healing, periprosthetic fracture distal to the tip of the nail, fracture collapse, implant failure, lag screw intrapelvic migration, neurovascular injury, secondary varus deviation, complications after implant removal, trochanteric pain, and refracture. Many of these complications are related to technical mistakes. This article reviews intramedullary nailing for the treatment of pertrochanteric femoral fractures, with an emphasis on complications.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/etiología , Fracturas no Consolidadas/etiología , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Fracturas Periprotésicas/etiología , Falla de Prótesis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología
2.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 24(6): 1013-7, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23864358

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Ilizarov pioneered bone transport using a circular external fixator. Papineau described a staged technique for the treatment for infected pseudarthrosis of the long bones. This article presents a single-stage Papineau technique and Ilizarov bone transport, and postoperative negative-pressure wound dressing changes for septic bone defects of the tibia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the files of seven patients (mean age, 32 years) with septic bone defects of the tibia treated with a Papineau technique and Ilizarov bone transport in a single stage, followed by postoperative negative-pressure wound dressing changes. All patients had septic pseudarthrosis and skin necrosis of the tibia. The technique included a single-stage extensive surgical debridement of necrotic bone, open bone grafting with cancellous bone autograft and bone transport, and postoperative negative-pressure wound dressing changes for wound closure. The mean time from the initial injury was 6 months (range, 4-8 months). The mean follow-up was 14 months (range, 10-17 months). RESULTS: All patients experienced successful wound healing at a mean of 29 days. Six patients experienced successful bone regeneration and union at the docking side at a mean of 6 months. One patient experienced delayed union at the docking site, which was treated with autologous cancellous bone grafting. Two patients experienced pin track infection, which was successfully treated with antibiotics and pin site dressing changes. All patients were able to return to their work and previous levels of activity, except one patient who had a stiff ankle joint and had to change his job. No patient experienced recurrence of infection, or fracture of the regenerated or transported bone segment until the period of this study. CONCLUSION: The combined Papineau and Ilizarov bone transport technique with negative-pressure wound closure provides for successful eradication of the infection, reconstruction of the bone defect, and soft-tissue closure. A single-stage surgical treatment is feasible, without any complications.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Cerradas/terapia , Fracturas Abiertas/terapia , Seudoartrosis/terapia , Piel/patología , Tibia/patología , Fracturas de la Tibia/terapia , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Regeneración Ósea , Trasplante Óseo , Desbridamiento , Femenino , Curación de Fractura , Fracturas Cerradas/microbiología , Fracturas Abiertas/microbiología , Humanos , Técnica de Ilizarov , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Necrosis/cirugía , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Seudoartrosis/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Tibia/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...