U.S. States' COVID-19 physical distancing policies and working-age adult mental health outcomes.

In the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, states enacted multiple policies to reduce in-person interactions. Scholars have speculated that these policies may have contributed to adverse mental health outcomes. This study examines potential associations between states' COVID-19 physical distancing policies and working-age (18-64) adults' self-reported mental health. Mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, worsened mental health, and sought treatment for anxiety or depression) are from the National Wellbeing Survey collected from working-age adults in the United States (U.S.) February 1 to March 18, 2021 (N = 3,804). Data on 12 state policies are from the COVID-19 U.S. State Policy Database. Analyses included logistic regression and Bayesian group index modeling, which identified sets, or "bundles," of policies that were associated with each mental health outcome. Multiple policies (both separately and in bundles) were associated with adverse mental health outcomes, with certain policies (closures and curfews on retail and other businesses) being particularly important. A one-month increase in exposure to respective model-derived physical distancing policy bundles was associated with a 36% increase in the odds of reporting that COVID-19 worsened one's mental health (odds ratio [OR] = 1·36; 95% credible interval [CRI] = 1·01 to 1·80), a 6% increase in the odds of meeting the clinical threshold for anxiety (OR = 1·06; CRI = 0·99 to 1·16), and a 15% increase in the odds of seeking treatment for anxiety or depression (OR = 1·15; CRI = 1·02 to 1·49). To accurately understand the role of states' COVID-19 policies on mental health during the pandemic, researchers must consider how collections of policies might influence outcomes.

Why does the importance of education for health differ across the United States?

The positive association between educational attainment and adult health ("the gradient") is stronger in some areas of the United States than in others. Explanations for the geographic pattern have not been rigorously investigated. Grounded in a contextual and life course perspective, this study assesses childhood circumstances (e.g., childhood health, compulsory schooling laws) and adult circumstances (e.g., wealth, lifestyles, economic policies) as potential explanations. Using data on US-born adults aged 50-59 at baseline (N=13,095) and followed for up to 16 years across the 1998-2014 waves of the Health and Retirement Study, this study examined how and why educational gradients in morbidity, functioning, and mortality vary across nine U.S. regions. The findings indicate that the gradient is stronger in some areas than others partly because of geographic differences in childhood socioeconomic conditions and health, but mostly because of geographic differences in adult circumstances such as wealth, lifestyles, and economic and tobacco policies.

Educational Disparities in Adult Health: U.S. States as Institutional Actors on the Association.

Despite numerous studies on educational disparities in U.S. adult health, explanations for the disparities and their growth over time remain incomplete. We argue that this knowledge gap partly reflects an individualist paradigm in U.S. studies of educational disparities in health. These studies have largely focused on proximal explanations (e.g., individual behaviors) to the neglect of contextual explanations (e.g., economic policies). We draw on contextual theories of health disparities to illustrate how U.S. states, as institutional actors, shape the importance of education for health. Using two nationally-representative datasets and seven health measures for adults aged 45-89, we show that the size of the educational gradient in health varies markedly across states. The size varies because of variation in the health of lower-educated adults. We use state excise taxes on cigarettes to illustrate one way that states shape educational disparities in health. Our findings underscore the necessity of contextualizing these disparities.