The Diagnostic Yield of Site and Symptom-Based Biopsies for Acute Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A 5-Year Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) complicates half of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HCT), and the gastrointestinal tract is commonly affected. Endoscopic biopsies have a key role in the diagnosis. The optimal procedure(s) to perform and site(s) to biopsy remain unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the charts of all adult patients who underwent allogeneic HCT at Duke University Medical Center between 1/1/05 and 1/1/11 and extracted data from those who underwent endoscopic biopsy for suspected GVHD. All histology was re-evaluated by blinded pathologists using 2006 NIH diagnostic criteria and then compared to the original clinical diagnosis of GVHD. RESULTS: A total of 169 adult patients underwent 250 endoscopic procedures to evaluate GVHD. The sensitivity of biopsies for clinical GVHD was 76 and 72% for upper and lower tract sites, respectively. In the presence of nausea, upper tract biopsies were positive for GVHD in 65%, 70% while lower tract biopsies were positive in 61-70%. In the presence of diarrhea, lower tract biopsies were positive in 65%, while upper tract sites were positive in 64-69%. Twenty six (40%) of the sixty-five endoscopies that simultaneously sampled upper and lower tract sites had discordant results. All were histologically positive for GVHD, yet 15% of upper tract biopsies and 25% of lower tract biopsies were negative. CONCLUSIONS: In this large review, the overall sensitivity of biopsies taken during EGD and Flex-Sig was 76 and 72%, respectively. A symptom-driven biopsy approach was not clearly supported as upper tract and lower tract biopsies were similarly diagnostic for GVHD regardless of symptoms.

Lack of beneficial effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with subacute myocardial infarction undergoing late revascularization: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Early clinical studies have suggested that administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) may improve the clinical condition of patients suffering from myocardial infarction (MI).This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single-centre trial aims to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of G-CSF administration in patients with subacute MI and impaired LV function undergoing delayed primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: A total of 16 patients (13 men, mean age 51 years) with subacute ST-segment elevation MI and a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) of less than 45% at baseline who underwent late revascularization, were included in the study. Patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either G-CSF (at a dose of 10 microg/kg body weight) or placebo for five consecutive days. End points consisted of assessment of safety parameters as well as changes of global and regional myocardial function from baseline until six months following PCI. RESULTS: G-CSF administration resulted in a significant mobilization of different cell populations (four-fold increase in WBC count and a six-fold increase in CD34+ cells). G-CSF treatment was well tolerated in most patients and no major adverse cardiac events or severe G-CSF-related side effects were identified during hospitalization and at follow-up. No significant differences were observed between the G-CSF and placebo groups regarding global and regional myocardial function parameters. CONCLUSION: G-CSF administration is safe, but not effective, in improving impaired LV functional parameters in patients with subacute MI who had an impaired baseline EF of less than 45%.