Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Scand J Surg ; 112(3): 147-156, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37377127

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare malignancy in the Nordic countries and no common Nordic treatment guidelines exist. This study aimed to characterize the current diagnostic and treatment strategies in the Nordic countries and disclose differences in these strategies. METHODS: This was a survey study with a cross-sectional questionnaire of all 19 university hospitals providing curative-intent surgery for GBC in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland. RESULTS: In all Nordic countries except Sweden, neoadjuvant/downstaging chemotherapy was used in GBC patients. In T1b and T2, majority of the centers (15-18/19) performed extended cholecystectomy. In T3, majority of the centers (13/19) performed cholecystectomy with resection of segments 4b and 5. In T4, majority of the centers (12-14/19) chose palliative/oncological care. The centers in Sweden extended lymphadenectomy beyond the hepatoduodenal ligament, whereas all other Nordic centers usually limited lymphadenectomy to the hepatoduodenal ligament. All Nordic centers except those in Norway used adjuvant chemotherapy routinely for GBC. There were no major differences between the Nordic centers in diagnostics and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical and oncological treatment strategies of GBC vary considerably between the Nordic centers and countries.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Colecistectomía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos , Estadificación de Neoplasias
2.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 14(1): 366-378, 2023 Feb 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36915447

RESUMEN

Background: Short-term outcomes of pancreatic surgery have improved globally during the last two decades. Long-term survival of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has also shown slight improvement. We describe a cohort of 566 consecutive pancreatectomies performed at a Northern Finnish tertiary center. We analyze the trends in short-term outcomes of all-cause pancreatic surgery and long-term survival of PDAC patients. Methods: All pancreatic resections performed at the Oulu University Hospital during years 2000-2020 were included. Patient data was analyzed in four time periods (2000-2005, 2006-2010, 2011-2015 and 2016-2020). Clinicopathological parameters of patients and tumors, complication data and short-term mortality were recorded for all patients and compared between time quartiles. Long-term survival and administration rates of neo-, and/or adjuvant therapy of PDAC patients were analyzed. Results: A total of 566 pancreatectomies were performed during the study period: 359 (63%) pancreatoduodenectomies (PDs), 130 (23.0%) open left pancreatectomies (LPs), 45 (8.0%) laparoscopic LPs, 26 (5.1%) total pancreatectomies (TPs), and 6 (1.1%) enucleations. Median age of patients was 63 [57-71] years, and 49% [267] of patients were men. Number of pancreatectomies per time period increased from 67 in 2000-2005 to 266 in 2016-2020. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Classification III patients and T3 tumors were more frequently operated on in later time periods. Complication rates remained at constant low levels throughout the study period, but reoperation rate increased from 9.4% in 2000-2010 to 16.2% in 2011-2020. Short-term (90-day) mortality after pancreatectomy decreased from 3.1% to 0.74%, while 5-year survival improved from 14.3% in 2006-2011 to 21.4% in 2011-2015. Resection rate of diagnosed PDAC cases, as reported by the Finnish Cancer Registry (FCR) for the catchment area, increased from 3.2% to 14.9% over the study period. Conclusions: The hospital volume of pancreatectomies has increased substantially, while complications and postoperative mortality have remained at acceptable levels. Long-term survival and resection rate of PDAC patients showed notable improvement over two decades.

3.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 90(6): 957-963, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31326385

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Certain appearances of the major duodenal papilla have been claimed to make cannulation more difficult during ERCP. This study uses a validated classification of the endoscopic appearance of the major duodenal papilla to determine if certain types of papilla predispose to difficult cannulation. METHODS: Patients with a naïve papilla scheduled for ERCP were included. The papilla was classified into 1 of 4 papilla types before cannulation started. Time to successful bile duct cannulation, attempts, and number of pancreatic duct passages were recorded. Difficult cannulation was defined as after 5 minutes, 5 attempts, or 2 pancreatic guidewire passages. RESULTS: A total of 1401 patients were included from 9 different centers in the Nordic countries. The overall frequency of difficult cannulation was 42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39%-44%). Type 2 small papilla (52%; 95% CI, 45%-59%) and type 3 protruding or pendulous papilla (48%; 95% CI, 42%-53%) were more frequently difficult to cannulate compared with type 1 regular papilla (36%; 95% CI, 33%-40%; both P < .001). If an inexperienced endoscopist started cannulation, the frequency of failed cannulation increased from 1.9% to 6.3% (P < .0001), even though they were replaced by a senior endoscopist after 5 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic appearance of the major duodenal papilla influences bile duct cannulation. Small type 2 and protruding or pendulous type 3 papillae are more frequently difficult to cannulate. In addition, cannulation might even fail more frequently if a beginner starts cannulation. These findings should be taken into consideration when performing studies regarding bile duct cannulation and in training future generations of endoscopists.


Asunto(s)
Ampolla Hepatopancreática/patología , Cateterismo , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Conductos Pancreáticos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
4.
Endoscopy ; 51(11): 1027-1034, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30895583

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic duct disruption is common and is associated with high morbidity in cases of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). In this study, we tested the feasibility and safety of prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting (PPDS) in ANP and compared PPDS with conservative treatment. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients (aged 18 - 75 years) diagnosed with ANP between February 2011 and July 2015. These patients were prospectively randomized to receive PPDS or conservative treatment at two tertiary centers. PPDS was performed as soon as possible after randomization. RESULTS: Concern regarding iatrogenic infections with pancreatic necrosis in the PPDS group prompted interim analysis, which confirmed a highly elevated risk. Thus, the trial was terminated prematurely for ethical reasons. Of the 11 patients in the PPDS group, all patients with successful pancreatic duct placement (5/5, 100 %) presented with infection, compared with only 3 of the 13 patients (23.1 %) in the conservative treatment group (P = 0.01). Analysis revealed success rates of 63.6 % for pancreatic duct cannulation, 45.5 % for pancreatic duct stenting, and 18.2 % for placement of a stent bridging the necrosis. Cannulation and stenting failures were due to duodenal edema and pancreatic duct stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: PPDS in ANP is associated with an unacceptably high risk of pancreatic necrosis infection. In addition, the procedure is technically challenging due to duodenal edema and ductal stenosis.


Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Conductos Pancreáticos/cirugía , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/prevención & control , Stents , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Cateterismo/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
5.
Ann Surg ; 269(5): 932-936, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29206674

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine long-term survival and causes of death among working-age patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) compared with the normal population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have investigated long-term survival after AP and recurrent AP compared with the normal population; moreover, results from those studies are difficult to compare, due to suboptimal control populations and wide variations in follow-up times. METHODS: This retrospective, registry-based study included 1644 patients with AP, aged 18 to 64 years, admitted to Oulu University Hospital in 1995 to 2012. Patient data were compared with data from 8220 age- and sex-matched controls that resided in the hospital district area. RESULTS: Alcohol was the main etiologic factor causing 71.4% of the cases. During the median follow-up time of 9.5 years, mortality was 24.2% in the study group and 6.3% in the control group (P < 0.001). Alcohol-related factors caused 39.4% of deaths and alcohol AP was the main single cause of death (16.3%) in the study group. Of all fatal AP cases, 42.9% were related to recurrence. Survival was similar among patients with nonalcohol AP and controls. CONCLUSION: The long-term mortality among patients admitted to the hospital due to (mainly alcohol induced) AP was 4 times higher than that in the age- and sex-matched control population. The significant difference in the causes of death between patients with alcohol AP and controls could be explained by alcohol-related diseases. Occurrences of AP without an alcohol etiology had a minimal impact on survival.


Asunto(s)
Pancreatitis/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
6.
Surg Endosc ; 29(1): 108-12, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24942784

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Data concerning the incidence and treatment of pancreatic fistula after necrosectomy in severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis (SAP) are scarce. Our aim was to assess the incidence of pancreatic fistula, and the feasibility and results of endoscopic transpapillary stenting (ETS) in patients with SAP after necrosectomy. METHODS: From January 2009 to December 2012 twenty-nine consecutive patients with SAP and necrosectomy in Oulu University Hospital were enrolled into this study. Five patients died before ETS because of the rapid progress of the disease and were, therefore, excluded. RESULTS: ERP was performed for the remaining 24 patients demonstrating fistula in 22/24 patients (92 %). ETS was successful in 23 patients and the fistula closed in all of them after a median of 82 (2-210) days with acceptable morbidity and no procedure-related mortality. CONCLUSION: All patients after necrosectomy for SAP seem to have internal or external pancreatic fistula. EST aimed at internal drainage of the necrosectomy cavity is a feasible and effective therapy in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Páncreas/cirugía , Fístula Pancreática/terapia , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Stents , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fístula Pancreática/epidemiología , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...